Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

sop-creator索普创造者

Agent Skill

sop-creator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,360

周安装

55

GitHub Stars

678

下载量

427
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sop-creator(索普创造者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/coleam00/second-brain-skills
仓库路径:skills/sop-creator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/coleam00/second-brain-skills --skill sop-creator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/coleam00/second-brain-skills --skill sop-creator

简介

sop-creator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。

  • 适用于运维、工程、安全等多个领域的标准化操作流程文档编写需求。
  • 采用可扫描、可操作、可测试的结构化格式,强调责任归属和定期审查机制。
  • 安装前需确认是否具备写入项目文档目录的权限,并注意其可能修改文件系统内容。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

SOP & Runbook Creator

Create practical documentation that people actually follow.

Philosophy

Nobody reads 50-page docs. Make it scannable, actionable, and impossible to misunderstand.

Core principles:

  • Scannable - Headers, bullets, tables. No walls of text.
  • Actionable - Every step is something you DO, not something you "consider"
  • Specific - Numbers, names, thresholds. No "as needed" or "when appropriate"
  • Testable - Clear success criteria. How do you know it worked?
  • Maintained - Owner, last updated, review schedule

SOP Categories

Pick the right format for your use case:

Tech/Engineering

TypeWhen to Use
RunbookEmergency response, incidents, on-call
Deployment PlaybookReleases, migrations, maintenance
Troubleshooting GuideDebugging, diagnosis trees
How-To GuideOne-off setup, configuration
ADRArchitecture decisions

Operations/Business

TypeWhen to Use
Process SOPRepeatable business workflows
ChecklistQuality control, verification
Decision TreeComplex if/then scenarios
Handoff DocRole transitions, shift changes

Content/Creative

TypeWhen to Use
Production WorkflowContent creation pipelines
Review ProcessApproval workflows
Publishing ChecklistPre-launch verification

General

TypeWhen to Use
Standard SOPAny repeatable process
Quick ReferenceCondensed version of longer SOP
Onboarding GuideNew person ramping up

Universal Structure

Every SOP needs at minimum:

# [What This Does]

> **TL;DR:** One sentence - what, when, who.

## Definition of Done

This is complete when:
- [ ] [Primary outcome]
- [ ] [Verification step]
- [ ] [Any handoff/notification]

## When to Use This
[Trigger conditions]

## Prerequisites
[What you need before starting]

## The Process
[Numbered steps - the actual work]

## Verify Completion
[Return to Definition of Done, confirm all checked]

## When Things Go Wrong
[Common issues and fixes]

## Questions?
[Who to contact]

Definition of Done is the most important section. Put it near the top. Make it a checklist. Be specific.

Writing Rules

Be Specific

Don't WriteWrite Instead
"Contact the team""Message @sarah in #ops-team"
"Wait until ready""Wait until status shows 'Complete' (~5 min)"
"Review carefully""Check items A, B, C in the dashboard"
"As appropriate""If value > 100"
"Regularly""Every Monday at 9am"
"Soon""Within 2 hours"

Action-First Steps

# Bad
"The report should be reviewed before sending to ensure
accuracy and completeness of all data fields."

# Good
1. Open the report in [System]
2. Verify these fields are populated:
   - [ ] Customer name
   - [ ] Amount
   - [ ] Date
3. Click "Send"

Warnings Come First

# Bad
1. Delete the old records
   Note: This cannot be undone

# Good
> **WARNING:** This permanently deletes records. Export first if needed.

1. Delete the old records

Decision Points are Clear

# Bad
"Handle the request based on priority level"

# Good
**If priority is:**
- **Critical:** Drop everything, handle now, notify manager
- **High:** Handle within 4 hours
- **Normal:** Handle within 24 hours
- **Low:** Add to weekly batch

Format Selection Guide

Ask yourself:

  1. Is this for emergencies? → Runbook
  2. Is this a complex multi-phase project? → Playbook
  3. Is this a simple repeated task? → Standard SOP or Checklist
  4. Does it have lots of if/then branching? → Decision Tree
  5. Is it for debugging? → Troubleshooting Guide
  6. Is it recording a decision? → ADR
  7. Is it for someone new? → Onboarding Guide

Metadata (Keep it Light)

---
title: [Clear name]
owner: [Person or team]
last_updated: [Date]
review_schedule: [quarterly/annually/as-needed]
---

That's it. No document IDs, version matrices, or approval chains unless you actually need them.

Templates

Each template is in references/:

TemplateUse For
runbook.mdIncidents, emergencies, on-call
standard-sop.mdAny repeatable process
how-to-guide.mdOne-off tasks, setup
onboarding-guide.mdNew person ramping up
decision-tree.mdComplex if/then flows
checklist.mdQC, verification

All templates have Definition of Done as the primary success criteria.

Quality Checklist

Before publishing:

  • Can someone unfamiliar follow this?
  • Are all steps actionable (verbs, not descriptions)?
  • Are specifics provided (names, numbers, thresholds)?
  • Is there a clear "done" state?
  • Is the owner/contact info current?
  • Has it been tested recently?

Anti-Patterns

Kill these:

  • "Per company policy..." (just state what to do)
  • "It is recommended that..." (just say "do X")
  • "Please ensure..." (just say "check X")
  • Passive voice ("the form should be submitted" → "submit the form")
  • Describing what to do instead of showing it
  • Walls of text with no structure
  • Screenshots that will be outdated in a month

Do these:

  • Start with the most common path
  • Put edge cases at the bottom
  • Link to related docs instead of duplicating
  • Use tables for reference info
  • Use checklists for verification steps
  • Include "I'm stuck" escape hatches

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.35%
按下载量换算147

Claude

32.25%
按下载量换算138

Cursor

18.27%
按下载量换算78

Gemini CLI

10.26%
按下载量换算44

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills