Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

testing(测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 52,984。

总安装 541周安装 23GitHub Stars 315下载 190核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing(测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit
仓库路径:skills/testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于测试策略规划与自动化用例生成指导。适用于 WebApplicationFactory 集成测试优先原则。可协助编写 AAA 模式单元测试与 Testcontainers 集成。强调行为测试而非实现细节,提升重构鲁棒性。建议区分模拟与真实服务使用场景。

testing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill testi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill testing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 541 次,近一周安装 23 次,下载 190 次,GitHub 315 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
testing

测试 · 本页

541315需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing (.NET 10)

Core Principles

  1. Integration tests are the highest-value tests — A single WebApplicationFactory test covers routing, binding, validation, business logic, and persistence in one shot. Start here before writing unit tests.
  2. Real databases in tests — Use Testcontainers to spin up real PostgreSQL/SQL Server instances. In-memory providers hide real bugs (transactions, constraints, SQL generation).
  3. AAA pattern is mandatory — Every test has three clearly separated sections: Arrange, Act, Assert. No mixing.
  4. Test behavior, not implementation — Tests should survive refactoring. Test what the system does, not how it does it.

Patterns

xUnit v3 Basics

public class OrderServiceTests
{
    [Fact]
    public async Task CreateOrder_WithValidItems_ReturnsSuccessResult()
    {
        // Arrange
        var db = CreateInMemoryDb();
        var clock = new FakeTimeProvider(new DateTimeOffset(2025, 1, 15, 0, 0, 0, TimeSpan.Zero));
        var service = new OrderService(db, clock);
        var request = new CreateOrderRequest("customer-1", [new("product-1", 2)]);

        // Act
        var result = await service.CreateAsync(request);

        // Assert
        Assert.True(result.IsSuccess);
        Assert.NotEqual(Guid.Empty, result.Value.Id);
        Assert.Equal(clock.GetUtcNow(), result.Value.CreatedAt);
    }

    [Theory]
    [InlineData("")]
    [InlineData(null)]
    public async Task CreateOrder_WithInvalidCustomerId_ReturnsFailure(string? customerId)
    {
        // Arrange
        var service = CreateService();

        // Act
        var result = await service.CreateAsync(new CreateOrderRequest(customerId!, []));

        // Assert
        Assert.False(result.IsSuccess);
    }
}

Integration Tests with WebApplicationFactory

The highest-value test pattern. Tests the full HTTP pipeline.

// Fixtures/ApiFixture.cs
public class ApiFixture : WebApplicationFactory<Program>, IAsyncLifetime
{
    private readonly PostgreSqlContainer _postgres = new PostgreSqlBuilder()
        .WithImage("postgres:17")
        .Build();

    protected override void ConfigureWebHost(IWebHostBuilder builder)
    {
        builder.ConfigureServices(services =>
        {
            // Replace the real DB with Testcontainers
            services.RemoveAll<DbContextOptions<AppDbContext>>();
            services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
                options.UseNpgsql(_postgres.GetConnectionString()));
        });
    }

    public async Task InitializeAsync()
    {
        await _postgres.StartAsync();

        // Apply migrations
        using var scope = Services.CreateScope();
        var db = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<AppDbContext>();
        await db.Database.MigrateAsync();
    }

    public new async Task DisposeAsync()
    {
        await _postgres.DisposeAsync();
        await base.DisposeAsync();
    }
}
// Tests/Orders/CreateOrderTests.cs
public class CreateOrderTests(ApiFixture fixture) : IClassFixture<ApiFixture>
{
    private readonly HttpClient _client = fixture.CreateClient();

    [Fact]
    public async Task CreateOrder_ReturnsCreated_WithValidRequest()
    {
        // Arrange
        var request = new CreateOrderRequest("customer-1", [new("product-1", 2)]);

        // Act
        var response = await _client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", request);

        // Assert
        Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.Created, response.StatusCode);

        var order = await response.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<OrderResponse>();
        Assert.NotNull(order);
        Assert.NotEqual(Guid.Empty, order.Id);
        Assert.Contains("/api/orders/", response.Headers.Location?.ToString());
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task CreateOrder_ReturnsValidationProblem_WithEmptyItems()
    {
        // Arrange
        var request = new CreateOrderRequest("customer-1", []);

        // Act
        var response = await _client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", request);

        // Assert
        Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, response.StatusCode);
    }
}

Testcontainers for Real Database Testing

// For SQL Server
private readonly MsSqlContainer _mssql = new MsSqlBuilder()
    .WithImage("mcr.microsoft.com/mssql/server:2022-latest")
    .Build();

// For PostgreSQL
private readonly PostgreSqlContainer _postgres = new PostgreSqlBuilder()
    .WithImage("postgres:17")
    .Build();

// For Redis
private readonly RedisContainer _redis = new RedisBuilder()
    .WithImage("redis:7")
    .Build();

Verify Snapshot Testing

Use Verify for complex response objects where manual assertions would be fragile.

[Fact]
public async Task GetOrder_MatchesSnapshot()
{
    // Arrange
    await SeedOrder(fixture);

    // Act
    var response = await _client.GetAsync("/api/orders/known-id");
    var content = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();

    // Assert — compares against a stored .verified.txt file
    await Verify(content);
}

On first run, Verify creates a .verified.txt file. On subsequent runs, it compares output. If the output changes, the test fails and shows a diff.

Test Data Builders

public class OrderBuilder
{
    private string _customerId = "default-customer";
    private List<OrderItem> _items = [new("product-1", 1, 9.99m)];
    private OrderStatus _status = OrderStatus.Pending;

    public OrderBuilder WithCustomer(string customerId)
    {
        _customerId = customerId;
        return this;
    }

    public OrderBuilder WithItems(params OrderItem[] items)
    {
        _items = [..items];
        return this;
    }

    public OrderBuilder WithStatus(OrderStatus status)
    {
        _status = status;
        return this;
    }

    public Order Build() => Order.Create(_customerId, _items, _status);
}

// Usage in tests
var order = new OrderBuilder()
    .WithCustomer("vip-customer")
    .WithStatus(OrderStatus.Confirmed)
    .Build();

Testing Time-Dependent Code

Use TimeProvider (built into.NET 8+) and FakeTimeProvider from Microsoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing.

[Fact]
public async Task ExpireOrders_MarksOldPendingOrdersAsExpired()
{
    // Arrange
    var clock = new FakeTimeProvider(new DateTimeOffset(2025, 6, 1, 0, 0, 0, TimeSpan.Zero));
    var db = CreateDb();
    var order = Order.Create("customer-1", items, clock.GetUtcNow());
    db.Orders.Add(order);
    await db.SaveChangesAsync();

    // Advance time past expiry threshold
    clock.Advance(TimeSpan.FromDays(31));

    var handler = new ExpireOrders.Handler(db, clock);

    // Act
    await handler.Handle(new ExpireOrders.Command(), CancellationToken.None);

    // Assert
    var updated = await db.Orders.FindAsync(order.Id);
    Assert.Equal(OrderStatus.Expired, updated!.Status);
}

Test Naming Convention

Use the pattern: MethodName_StateUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior

[Fact] public async Task CreateOrder_WithValidItems_ReturnsSuccessResult() { }
[Fact] public async Task CreateOrder_WithEmptyItems_ReturnsValidationError() { }
[Fact] public async Task GetOrder_WithNonExistentId_ReturnsNotFound() { }
[Fact] public async Task CancelOrder_WhenAlreadyShipped_ReturnsConflict() { }

Anti-patterns

Don't Use In-Memory Database for Integration Tests

// BAD — hides real SQL behavior, transactions, constraints
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
    options.UseInMemoryDatabase("TestDb"));

// GOOD — Testcontainers with real database
services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
    options.UseNpgsql(testContainer.GetConnectionString()));

Don't Test Implementation Details

// BAD — testing that a specific repository method was called
mock.Verify(x => x.AddAsync(It.IsAny<Order>()), Times.Once);
mock.Verify(x => x.SaveChangesAsync(), Times.Once);

// GOOD — test the observable outcome
var order = await db.Orders.FindAsync(orderId);
Assert.NotNull(order);
Assert.Equal(OrderStatus.Created, order.Status);

Don't Share Mutable State Between Tests

// BAD — static shared state
private static readonly AppDbContext SharedDb = CreateDb();

// GOOD — fresh state per test (or use IAsyncLifetime for shared fixtures)
private AppDbContext CreateDb() => new(new DbContextOptionsBuilder<AppDbContext>()...);

Don't Write Assertion-Free Tests

// BAD — no assertion, only checks it doesn't throw
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_Works()
{
    await service.CreateAsync(request);
    // "it didn't throw, so it works!" — NO
}

// GOOD — assert the expected outcome
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_PersistsOrderToDatabase()
{
    var result = await service.CreateAsync(request);

    var persisted = await db.Orders.FindAsync(result.Value.Id);
    Assert.NotNull(persisted);
    Assert.Equal(request.CustomerId, persisted.CustomerId);
}

Decision Guide

ScenarioRecommendation
Testing an API endpointWebApplicationFactory integration test
Testing business logic in isolationUnit test with fakes/stubs
Database-dependent testsTestcontainers (real DB)
Complex response validationVerify snapshot testing
Time-dependent logicFakeTimeProvider
External API dependencyWireMock.Net or HttpMessageHandler stub
Parameterized test cases[Theory] with [InlineData] or [MemberData]
Test data setupBuilder pattern
Shared expensive fixtureIClassFixture<T> with IAsyncLifetime

平台分布

Codex

37.85%
按下载量换算72

Claude

27.53%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

18.7%
按下载量换算36

Gemini CLI

9.93%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills