Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clean-architecture(干净的架构)

clean-architecture 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clean-architecture 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 51,536。

总安装 582周安装 25GitHub Stars 315下载 204核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clean-architecture(干净的架构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit
仓库路径:skills/clean-architecture
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill clean-architecture
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill clean-architecture

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供整洁架构分层指导与依赖倒置原则应用参考。适用于规划领域模型与应用层职责分离的设计决策。可协助划分项目结构并约束各层引用关系。clean-architecture 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。强调领域层无框架依赖,保持业务逻辑纯净。

建议结合 Roslyn MCP 工具进行静态分析与健康检查。

来源仓库内路径:skills/clean-architecture

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill clean…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clean-architecture 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill clean-architect…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clean-architecture 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clean-architecture 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

clean-architecture 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

clean-architecture 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 582 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 204 次,GitHub 315 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clean-architecture 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clean-architecture

干净的架构 · 本页

582315调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Clean Architecture

Core Principles

  1. Dependency inversion is the foundation — All dependencies point inward. Domain has zero project references. Application references only Domain. Infrastructure references Application and Domain. Api references all but depends on abstractions. The compiler enforces this via project references.
  2. Domain owns the rules — Business logic lives in the Domain layer as entity methods, domain services, or specifications. The Domain layer has no knowledge of databases, HTTP, or any framework — only pure C# and.NET primitives.
  3. Use cases are the unit of work — Each use case (command or query) is a single class in the Application layer. It orchestrates domain objects, persists through abstractions, and returns a result. No "service" classes with 20 methods.
  4. Infrastructure is a plugin — EF Core, external APIs, email senders, file storage — all live in Infrastructure and implement interfaces defined in Application or Domain. Swap implementations without touching business logic.
  5. The API layer is thin — Endpoints map HTTP to use cases and use cases to HTTP responses. No business logic in endpoints.

Patterns

Project Layout

src/
  MyApp.Domain/
    Entities/
      Order.cs                    # Entity with behavior
      OrderItem.cs
    Enums/
      OrderStatus.cs
    Exceptions/
      DomainException.cs          # Base domain exception
    Interfaces/
      IOrderRepository.cs         # Only if query needs go beyond DbSet
    Common/
      Entity.cs                   # Base entity with Id
      Result.cs                   # Result pattern type

  MyApp.Application/
    Common/
      Behaviors/
        ValidationBehavior.cs     # Mediator pipeline behavior
      Interfaces/
        IAppDbContext.cs           # DbContext abstraction (preferred over repository)
    Orders/
      Commands/
        CreateOrder/
          CreateOrderCommand.cs
          CreateOrderHandler.cs
          CreateOrderValidator.cs
      Queries/
        GetOrder/
          GetOrderQuery.cs
          GetOrderHandler.cs
          OrderDto.cs

  MyApp.Infrastructure/
    Persistence/
      AppDbContext.cs              # Implements IAppDbContext
      Configurations/
        OrderConfiguration.cs
      Migrations/
    Services/
      EmailSender.cs               # Implements IEmailSender from Application
    DependencyInjection.cs         # AddInfrastructure extension

  MyApp.Api/
    Endpoints/
      OrderEndpoints.cs            # Thin, maps HTTP ↔ use cases
    Program.cs

DbContext Abstraction (Preferred Over Repository)

Define a minimal interface in Application; implement in Infrastructure:

// Application/Common/Interfaces/IAppDbContext.cs
public interface IAppDbContext
{
    DbSet<Order> Orders { get; }
    DbSet<Product> Products { get; }
    Task<int> SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken ct = default);
}

// Infrastructure/Persistence/AppDbContext.cs
public class AppDbContext(DbContextOptions<AppDbContext> options)
    : DbContext(options), IAppDbContext
{
    public DbSet<Order> Orders => Set<Order>();
    public DbSet<Product> Products => Set<Product>();

    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(AppDbContext).Assembly);
    }
}

Why IAppDbContext over IRepository? EF Core's DbSet already IS a repository. Adding another abstraction on top adds indirection without value in most cases.

Use Case Handler (Command)

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderCommand.cs
public record CreateOrderCommand(
    string CustomerId,
    List<OrderItemDto> Items) : IRequest<Result<Guid>>;

public record OrderItemDto(string ProductId, int Quantity, decimal UnitPrice);

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderHandler.cs — uses Mediator (source-generated, MIT)
internal sealed class CreateOrderHandler(
    IAppDbContext db,
    TimeProvider clock) : IRequestHandler<CreateOrderCommand, Result<Guid>>
{
    public async ValueTask<Result<Guid>> Handle(CreateOrderCommand request, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var order = Order.Create(
            request.CustomerId,
            request.Items.Select(i => new OrderItem(i.ProductId, i.Quantity, i.UnitPrice)),
            clock.GetUtcNow());

        db.Orders.Add(order);
        await db.SaveChangesAsync(ct);

        return Result.Success(order.Id);
    }
}

// Application/Orders/Commands/CreateOrder/CreateOrderValidator.cs
public class CreateOrderValidator : AbstractValidator<CreateOrderCommand>
{
    public CreateOrderValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.CustomerId).NotEmpty();
        RuleFor(x => x.Items).NotEmpty();
        RuleForEach(x => x.Items).ChildRules(item =>
        {
            item.RuleFor(x => x.ProductId).NotEmpty();
            item.RuleFor(x => x.Quantity).GreaterThan(0);
            item.RuleFor(x => x.UnitPrice).GreaterThan(0);
        });
    }
}

Use Case Handler (Query)

// Application/Orders/Queries/GetOrder/GetOrderQuery.cs
public record GetOrderQuery(Guid OrderId) : IRequest<Result<OrderDto>>;

public record OrderDto(Guid Id, string CustomerId, decimal Total, string Status, DateTimeOffset CreatedAt);

// Application/Orders/Queries/GetOrder/GetOrderHandler.cs
internal sealed class GetOrderHandler(IAppDbContext db) : IRequestHandler<GetOrderQuery, Result<OrderDto>>
{
    public async ValueTask<Result<OrderDto>> Handle(GetOrderQuery request, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var order = await db.Orders
            .Where(o => o.Id == request.OrderId)
            .Select(o => new OrderDto(o.Id, o.CustomerId, o.Total, o.Status.ToString(), o.CreatedAt))
            .FirstOrDefaultAsync(ct);

        return order is not null
            ? Result.Success(order)
            : Result.Failure<OrderDto>("Order not found");
    }
}

Domain Entity with Behavior

// Domain/Entities/Order.cs
public class Order : Entity
{
    private readonly List<OrderItem> _items = [];

    private Order() { } // EF Core

    public string CustomerId { get; private set; } = null!;
    public OrderStatus Status { get; private set; }
    public decimal Total { get; private set; }
    public DateTimeOffset CreatedAt { get; private set; }
    public IReadOnlyList<OrderItem> Items => _items.AsReadOnly();

    public static Order Create(string customerId, IEnumerable<OrderItem> items, DateTimeOffset now)
    {
        var order = new Order
        {
            Id = Guid.CreateVersion7(),
            CustomerId = customerId,
            Status = OrderStatus.Pending,
            CreatedAt = now
        };

        foreach (var item in items)
            order.AddItem(item);

        return order;
    }

    public void AddItem(OrderItem item)
    {
        _items.Add(item);
        Total = _items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
    }

    public Result Cancel()
    {
        if (Status is not OrderStatus.Pending)
            return Result.Failure("Only pending orders can be cancelled");

        Status = OrderStatus.Cancelled;
        return Result.Success();
    }
}

Thin Endpoint Wiring (IEndpointGroup Auto-Discovery)

Every endpoint group implements IEndpointGroup and is auto-discovered via app.MapEndpoints(). Program.cs never changes when adding new endpoints. See the minimal-api skill for the full IEndpointGroup interface and EndpointExtensions setup.

// Api/Endpoints/OrderEndpoints.cs
public sealed class OrderEndpoints : IEndpointGroup
{
    public void Map(IEndpointRouteBuilder app)
    {
        var group = app.MapGroup("/api/orders").WithTags("Orders");

        group.MapPost("/", CreateOrder)
            .WithName("CreateOrder");

        group.MapGet("/{id:guid}", GetOrder)
            .WithName("GetOrder");

        group.MapGet("/", ListOrders)
            .WithName("ListOrders");
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> CreateOrder(
        CreateOrderCommand command, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(command, ct);
        return result.IsSuccess
            ? TypedResults.Created($"/api/orders/{result.Value}", result.Value)
            : result.ToProblemDetails();
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> GetOrder(
        Guid id, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(new GetOrderQuery(id), ct);
        return result.IsSuccess
            ? TypedResults.Ok(result.Value)
            : TypedResults.NotFound();
    }

    private static async Task<IResult> ListOrders(
        [AsParameters] ListOrdersQuery query, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var result = await sender.Send(query, ct);
        return TypedResults.Ok(result);
    }
}

Infrastructure DI Registration

// Infrastructure/DependencyInjection.cs
public static class DependencyInjection
{
    public static IServiceCollection AddInfrastructure(
        this IServiceCollection services,
        IConfiguration config)
    {
        services.AddDbContext<AppDbContext>(options =>
            options.UseNpgsql(config.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")));

        services.AddScoped<IAppDbContext>(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<AppDbContext>());

        return services;
    }
}

Anti-patterns

Anemic Domain Model

// BAD — entity is just a data bag, all logic in handler
public class Order
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string CustomerId { get; set; } = null!;
    public decimal Total { get; set; }
    public List<OrderItem> Items { get; set; } = [];
}

// Handler sets everything directly
order.Total = order.Items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Pending;

// GOOD — entity encapsulates its own rules (see Domain Entity pattern above)
var order = Order.Create(customerId, items, clock.GetUtcNow());

DbContext in Domain Layer

// BAD — Domain references EF Core
// Domain/Services/OrderService.cs
public class OrderService(AppDbContext db) { } // Domain depends on Infrastructure!

// GOOD — Domain defines interfaces, Infrastructure implements
// Domain/Interfaces/IOrderRepository.cs (only if you need query abstraction beyond DbSet)
// Application/Common/Interfaces/IAppDbContext.cs (preferred)

Fat Endpoints

// BAD — business logic in the endpoint
app.MapPost("/orders", async (CreateOrderRequest req, AppDbContext db) =>
{
    var order = new Order { CustomerId = req.CustomerId };
    foreach (var item in req.Items)
    {
        order.Items.Add(new OrderItem { ProductId = item.ProductId, Quantity = item.Quantity });
    }
    order.Total = order.Items.Sum(i => i.Quantity * i.UnitPrice);
    db.Orders.Add(order);
    await db.SaveChangesAsync();
    return TypedResults.Created($"/orders/{order.Id}", order);
});

// GOOD — endpoint delegates to a use case
app.MapPost("/orders", async (CreateOrderCommand command, ISender sender, CancellationToken ct) =>
{
    var result = await sender.Send(command, ct);
    return result.IsSuccess
        ? TypedResults.Created($"/orders/{result.Value}", result.Value)
        : result.ToProblemDetails();
});

Repository for Every Entity

// BAD — repository per entity duplicates DbSet functionality
public interface IOrderRepository { Task<Order?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }
public interface IProductRepository { Task<Product?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }
public interface ICustomerRepository { Task<Customer?> GetByIdAsync(Guid id); }

// GOOD — use IAppDbContext with DbSet<T> directly
// Only create a repository interface when you have complex query logic
// that you want to test in isolation or reuse across multiple use cases

Decision Guide

ScenarioRecommendation
When to use CA over VSAMedium+ domain complexity, long-lived system, team familiar with layers
When to add a Domain layerBusiness rules involve invariants across entity groups
IAppDbContext vs repositoriesPrefer IAppDbContext; add repository only for complex reusable queries
Mediator vs raw handlers in CAMediator for pipeline behaviors (validation, logging); raw handlers for simplicity
When to add Domain eventsWhen side effects (notifications, audit) should be decoupled from the main flow
Evolving from VSA to CAWhen handlers start needing shared domain logic that does not belong in Common/

平台分布

Codex

36.66%
按下载量换算75

Claude

30.05%
按下载量换算61

Cursor

19.88%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

8.41%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills