Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

codebase-audit-pre-push(代码库审计预推送)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

codebase-audit-pre-push 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,859。

总安装 1,656周安装 69GitHub Stars 35,885下载 552核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:codebase-audit-pre-push(代码库审计预推送)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/codebase-audit-pre-push
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill codebase-audit-pre-push
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill codebase-audit-pre-push

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

codebase-audit-pre-push 作为推送前的最终审查工具,全面检查即将上线的代码质量和安全性。适用于首次推送、公开发布或部署前的高标准校验,确保符合工程规范和安全要求。自动清理冗余代码、修复格式问题并标记关键缺陷,实现“发现问题即修正”的工作流。

操作前应评估其对文件系统的写入权限,避免误改重要配置或触发意外构建行为。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/codebase-audit-pre-push

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill cod…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

codebase-audit-pre-push 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill codebase-audi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

codebase-audit-pre-push 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

codebase-audit-pre-push 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

codebase-audit-pre-push 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

codebase-audit-pre-push 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,656 次,近一周安装 69 次,下载 552 次,GitHub 35,885 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

codebase-audit-pre-push 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 35,885 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
codebase-audit-pre-push

代码库审计预推送 · 本页

1,65635,885接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Pre-Push Codebase Audit

As a senior engineer, you're doing the final review before pushing this code to GitHub. Check everything carefully and fix problems as you find them.

When to Use This Skill

  • User requests "audit the codebase" or "review before push"
  • Before making the first push to GitHub
  • Before making a repository public
  • Pre-production deployment review
  • User asks to "clean up the code" or "optimize everything"

Your Job

Review the entire codebase file by file. Read the code carefully. Fix issues right away. Don't just note problems—make the necessary changes.

Audit Process

1. Clean Up Junk Files

Start by looking for files that shouldn't be on GitHub:

Delete these immediately:

  • OS files: .DS_Store, Thumbs.db, desktop.ini
  • Logs: *.log, npm-debug.log*, yarn-error.log*
  • Temp files: *.tmp, *.temp, *.cache, *.swp
  • Build output: dist/, build/, .next/, out/, .cache/
  • Dependencies: node_modules/, vendor/, __pycache__/, *.pyc
  • IDE files: .idea/, .vscode/ (ask user first), *.iml, .project
  • Backup files: *.bak, *_old.*, *_backup.*, *_copy.*
  • Test artifacts: coverage/, .nyc_output/, test-results/
  • Personal junk: TODO.txt, NOTES.txt, scratch.*, test123.*

Critical - Check for secrets:

  • .env files (should never be committed)
  • Files containing: password, api_key, token, secret, private_key
  • *.pem, *.key, *.cert, credentials.json, serviceAccountKey.json

If you find secrets in the code, mark it as a CRITICAL BLOCKER.

2. Fix.gitignore

Check if the .gitignore file exists and is thorough. If it’s missing or not complete, update it to include all junk file patterns above. Ensure that .env.example exists with keys but no values.

3. Audit Every Source File

Look through each code file and check:

Dead Code (remove immediately):

  • Commented-out code blocks
  • Unused imports/requires
  • Unused variables (declared but never used)
  • Unused functions (defined but never called)
  • Unreachable code (after return, inside if (false))
  • Duplicate logic (same code in multiple places—combine)

Code Quality (fix issues as you go):

  • Vague names: data, info, temp, thing → rename to be descriptive
  • Magic numbers: if (status === 3) → extract to named constant
  • Debug statements: remove console.log, print(), debugger
  • TODO/FIXME comments: either resolve them or delete them
  • TypeScript any: add proper types or explain why any is used
  • Use === instead of == in JavaScript
  • Functions longer than 50 lines: consider splitting
  • Nested code greater than 3 levels: refactor with early returns

Logic Issues (critical):

  • Missing null/undefined checks
  • Array operations on potentially empty arrays
  • Async functions that are not awaited
  • Promises without .catch() or try/catch
  • Possibilities for infinite loops
  • Missing default in switch statements

4. Security Check (Zero Tolerance)

Secrets: Search for hardcoded passwords, API keys, and tokens. They must be in environment variables.

Injection vulnerabilities:

  • SQL: No string concatenation in queries—use parameterized queries only
  • Command injection: No exec() with user-provided input
  • Path traversal: No file paths from user input without validation
  • XSS: No innerHTML or dangerouslySetInnerHTML with user data

Auth/Authorization:

  • Passwords hashed with bcrypt/argon2 (never MD5 or plain text)
  • Protected routes check for authentication
  • Authorization checks on the server side, not just in the UI
  • No IDOR: verify users own the resources they are accessing

Data exposure:

  • API responses do not leak unnecessary information
  • Error messages do not expose stack traces or database details
  • Pagination is present on list endpoints

Dependencies:

  • Run npm audit or an equivalent tool
  • Flag critically outdated or vulnerable packages

5. Scalability Check

Database:

  • N+1 queries: loops with database calls inside → use JOINs or batch queries
  • Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
  • Unbounded queries: add LIMIT or pagination
  • Avoid SELECT *: specify columns

API Design:

  • Heavy operations (like email, reports, file processing) → move to a background queue
  • Rate limiting on public endpoints
  • Caching for data that is read frequently
  • Timeouts on external calls

Code:

  • No global mutable state
  • Clean up event listeners (to avoid memory leaks)
  • Stream large files instead of loading them into memory

6. Architecture Check

Organization:

  • Clear folder structure
  • Files are in logical locations
  • No "misc" or "stuff" folders

Separation of concerns:

  • UI layer: only responsible for rendering
  • Business logic: pure functions
  • Data layer: isolated database queries
  • No 500+ line "god files"

Reusability:

  • Duplicate code → extract to shared utilities
  • Constants defined once and imported
  • Types/interfaces reused, not redefined

7. Performance

Backend:

  • Expensive operations do not block requests
  • Batch database calls when possible
  • Set cache headers correctly

Frontend (if applicable):

  • Implement code splitting
  • Optimize images
  • Avoid massive dependencies for small utilities
  • Use lazy loading for heavy components

8. Documentation

README.md must include:

  • Description of what the project does
  • Instructions for installation and execution
  • Required environment variables
  • Guidance on running tests

Code comments:

  • Explain WHY, not WHAT
  • Provide explanations for complex logic
  • Avoid comments that merely repeat the code

9. Testing

  • Critical paths should have tests (auth, payments, core features)
  • No test.only or fdescribe should remain in the code
  • Avoid test.skip without an explanation
  • Tests should verify behavior, not implementation details

10. Final Verification

After making all changes, run the app. Ensure nothing is broken. Check that:

  • The app starts without errors
  • Main features work
  • Tests pass (if they exist)
  • No regressions have been introduced

Output Format

After auditing, provide a report:

CODEBASE AUDIT COMPLETE

FILES REMOVED:
- node_modules/ (build artifact)
- .env (contained secrets)
- old_backup.js (unused duplicate)

CODE CHANGES:
[src/api/users.js]
  ✂ Removed unused import: lodash
  ✂ Removed dead function: formatOldWay()
  🔧 Renamed 'data' → 'userData' for clarity
  🛡 Added try/catch around API call (line 47)

[src/db/queries.js]
  ⚡ Fixed N+1 query: now uses JOIN instead of loop

SECURITY ISSUES:
🚨 CRITICAL: Hardcoded API key in config.js (line 12) → moved to .env
⚠️ HIGH: SQL injection risk in search.js (line 34) → fixed with parameterized query

SCALABILITY:
⚡ Added pagination to /api/users endpoint
⚡ Added index on users.email column

FINAL STATUS:
✅ CLEAN - Ready to push to GitHub

Scores:
Security: 9/10 (one minor header missing)
Code Quality: 10/10
Scalability: 9/10
Overall: 9/10

Key Principles

  • Read the code thoroughly, don't skim
  • Fix issues immediately, don’t just document them
  • If uncertain about removing something, ask the user
  • Test after making changes
  • Be thorough but practical—focus on real problems
  • Security issues are blockers—nothing should ship with critical vulnerabilities

Related Skills

  • @security-auditor - Deeper security review
  • @systematic-debugging - Investigate specific issues
  • @git-pushing - Push code after audit

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

平台分布

Codex

39.27%
按下载量换算217

Claude

28.58%
按下载量换算158

Cursor

17.95%
按下载量换算99

Gemini CLI

9.47%
按下载量换算52

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills