Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

code-to-prd(代码到 prd)

code-to-prd 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

code-to-prd 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,221。

总安装 5,290周安装 214GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,661核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.1.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-to-prd(代码到 prd)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/code-to-prd
安装命令:
openclaw skills install code-to-prd
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install code-to-prd

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

将现有代码逆向工程为产品需求文档 (PRD) 的分析工具。适合在缺乏文档的老项目中快速重建业务逻辑理解。自动解析路由、API 和状态管理机制生成结构化描述。输出内容需经产品经理确认方可作为正式依据。code-to-prd 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

复杂系统建议辅以人工访谈完善细节缺失部分。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install code-to-prd;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

code-to-prd 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install code-to-prd。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-to-prd 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-to-prd 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

code-to-prd 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

code-to-prd 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,290 次,近一周安装 214 次,下载 1,661 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-to-prd 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
code-to-prd

代码到 prd · 本页

5,290—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Name
code-to-prd
Tier
STANDARD
Category
product
Dependencies
none
Author
Alireza Rezvani
Version
2.1.2
name
code-to-prd
description
|
license
MIT
metadata
updated
2026-03-17

Name

Code → PRD

Description

Reverse-engineer any frontend, backend, or fullstack codebase into a complete Product Requirements Document (PRD). Analyzes routes, components, models, APIs, and user interactions to produce business-readable documentation detailed enough for engineers or AI agents to fully reconstruct every page and endpoint.

Code → PRD: Reverse-Engineer Any Codebase into Product Requirements

Features

  • 3-phase workflow: global scan → page-by-page analysis → structured document generation
  • Frontend support: React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Next.js (App + Pages Router), Nuxt, SvelteKit, Remix
  • Backend support: NestJS, Express, Django, Django REST Framework, FastAPI, Flask
  • Fullstack support: Combined frontend + backend analysis with unified PRD output
  • Mock detection: Automatically distinguishes real API integrations from mock/fixture data
  • Enum extraction: Exhaustively lists all status codes, type mappings, and constants
  • Model extraction: Parses Django models, NestJS entities, Pydantic schemas
  • Automation scripts: codebase_analyzer.py for scanning, prd_scaffolder.py for directory generation
  • Quality checklist: Validation checklist for completeness, accuracy, readability

Usage

# Analyze a project and generate PRD skeleton
python3 scripts/codebase_analyzer.py /path/to/project -o analysis.json
python3 scripts/prd_scaffolder.py analysis.json -o prd/ -n "My App"

# Or use the slash command
/code-to-prd /path/to/project

Examples

Frontend (React)

/code-to-prd ./src
# → Scans components, routes, API calls, state management
# → Generates prd/ with per-page docs, enum dictionary, API inventory

Backend (Django)

/code-to-prd ./myproject
# → Detects Django via manage.py, scans urls.py, views.py, models.py
# → Documents endpoints, model schemas, admin config, permissions

Fullstack (Next.js)

/code-to-prd .
# → Analyzes both app/ pages and api/ routes
# → Generates unified PRD covering UI pages and API endpoints

Role

You are a senior product analyst and technical architect. Your job is to read a frontend codebase, understand every page's business purpose, and produce a complete PRD in product-manager-friendly language.

Dual Audience

  1. Product managers / business stakeholders — need to understand *what* the system does, not *how*
  2. Engineers / AI agents — need enough detail to fully reconstruct every page's fields, interactions, and relationships

Your document must describe functionality in non-technical language while omitting zero business details.

Supported Stacks

StackFrameworks
FrontendReact, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Next.js (App/Pages Router), Nuxt, SvelteKit, Remix, Astro
BackendNestJS, Express, Fastify, Django, Django REST Framework, FastAPI, Flask
FullstackNext.js (API routes + pages), Nuxt (server/ + pages/), Django (views + templates)

For backend-only projects, the "page" concept maps to API resource groups or admin views. The same 3-phase workflow applies — routes become endpoints, components become controllers/views, and interactions become request/response flows.


Workflow

Phase 1 — Project Global Scan

Build global context before diving into pages.

1. Identify Project Structure

Scan the root directory and understand organization:

Frontend directories:
- Pages/routes (pages/, views/, routes/, app/, src/pages/)
- Components (components/, modules/)
- Route config (router.ts, routes.ts, App.tsx route definitions)
- API/service layer (services/, api/, requests/)
- State management (store/, models/, context/)
- i18n files (locales/, i18n/) — field display names often live here

Backend directories (NestJS):
- Modules (src/modules/, src/*.module.ts)
- Controllers (*.controller.ts) — route handlers
- Services (*.service.ts) — business logic
- DTOs (dto/, *.dto.ts) — request/response shapes
- Entities (entities/, *.entity.ts) — database models
- Guards/pipes/interceptors — auth, validation, transformation

Backend directories (Django):
- Apps (*/apps.py, */views.py, */models.py, */urls.py)
- URL config (urls.py, */urls.py)
- Views (views.py, viewsets.py) — route handlers
- Models (models.py) — database schema
- Serializers (serializers.py) — request/response shapes
- Forms (forms.py) — validation and field definitions
- Templates (templates/) — server-rendered pages
- Admin (admin.py) — admin panel configuration

Identify framework from package.json (Node.js frameworks) or project files (manage.py for Django, requirements.txt/pyproject.toml for Python). Routing, component patterns, and state management differ significantly across frameworks — identification enables accurate parsing.

2. Build Route & Page Inventory

Extract all pages from route config into a complete page inventory:

FieldDescription
Route pathe.g. /user/list, /order/:id
Page titleFrom route config, breadcrumbs, or page component
Module / menu levelWhere it sits in navigation
Component file pathSource file(s) implementing this page

For file-system routing (Next.js, Nuxt), infer from directory structure.

For backend projects, the page inventory becomes an endpoint/resource inventory:

FieldDescription
Endpoint pathe.g. /api/users, /api/orders/:id
HTTP methodGET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH
Controller/viewSource file handling this route
Module/appWhich NestJS module or Django app owns it
Auth requiredWhether authentication/permissions are needed

For NestJS: extract from @Controller + @Get/@Post/@Put/@Delete decorators. For Django: extract from urls.py → urlpatterns and viewsets.py → router registrations.

3. Map Global Context

Before analyzing individual pages, capture:

  • Global state — user info, permissions, feature flags, config
  • Shared components — layout, nav, auth guards, error boundaries
  • Enums & constants — status codes, type mappings, role definitions
  • API base config — base URL, interceptors, auth headers, error handling
  • Database models (backend) — entity relationships, field types, constraints
  • Middleware (backend) — auth middleware, rate limiting, logging, CORS
  • DTOs/Serializers (backend) — request validation shapes, response formats

These will be referenced throughout page/endpoint analysis.


Phase 2 — Page-by-Page Deep Analysis

Analyze every page in the inventory. Each page produces its own Markdown file.

Analysis Dimensions

For each page, answer:

A. Page Overview
  • What does this page do? (one sentence)
  • Where does it fit in the system?
  • What scenario brings a user here?
B. Layout & Regions
  • Major regions: search area, table, detail panel, action bar, tabs, etc.
  • Spatial arrangement: top/bottom, left/right, nested
C. Field Inventory (core — be exhaustive)

For form pages, list every field:

Field NameTypeRequiredDefaultValidationBusiness Description
UsernameText inputYes—Max 20 charsSystem login account

For table/list pages, list:

  • Search/filter fields (type, required, enum options)
  • Table columns (name, format, sortable, filterable)
  • Row action buttons (what each one does)

Field name extraction priority:

  1. Hardcoded display text in code
  2. i18n translation values
  3. Component placeholder / label / title props
  4. Variable names (last resort — provide reasonable display name)
D. Interaction Logic

Describe as "user action → system response":

[Action]     User clicks "Create"
[Response]   Modal opens with form fields: ...
[Validation] Name required, phone format check
[API]        POST /api/user/create with form data
[Success]    Toast "Created successfully", close modal, refresh list
[Failure]    Show API error message

Cover all interaction types:

  • Page load / initialization (default queries, preloaded data)
  • Search / filter / reset
  • CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete)
  • Table: pagination, sorting, row selection, bulk actions
  • Form submission & validation
  • Status transitions (e.g. approval flows: pending → approved → rejected)
  • Import / export
  • Field interdependencies (selecting value A changes options in field B)
  • Permission controls (buttons/fields visible only to certain roles)
  • Polling / auto-refresh / real-time updates
E. API Dependencies

Case 1: API is integrated (real HTTP calls in code)

API NameMethodPathTriggerKey ParamsNotes
Get usersGET/api/user/listLoad, searchpage, size, keywordPaginated

Case 2: API not integrated (mock/hardcoded data)

When the page uses mock data, hardcoded fixtures, setTimeout simulations, or Promise.resolve() stubs — the API isn't real yet. Reverse-engineer the required API spec from page functionality and data shape.

For each needed API, document:

  • Method, suggested path, trigger
  • Input params (name, type, required, description)
  • Output fields (name, type, description)
  • Core business logic description

Detection signals:

  • setTimeout / Promise.resolve() returning data → mock
  • Data defined in component or *.mock.* files → mock
  • Real HTTP calls (axios, fetch, service layer) with real paths → integrated
  • __mocks__ directory → mock
F. Page Relationships
  • Inbound: Which pages link here? What parameters do they pass?
  • Outbound: Where can users navigate from here? What parameters?
  • Data coupling: Which pages share data or trigger refreshes in each other?

Phase 3 — Generate Documentation

Output Structure

Create prd/ in project root (or user-specified directory):

prd/
├── README.md                     # System overview
├── pages/
│   ├── 01-user-mgmt-list.md      # One file per page
│   ├── 02-user-mgmt-detail.md
│   ├── 03-order-mgmt-list.md
│   └── ...
└── appendix/
    ├── enum-dictionary.md         # All enums, status codes, type mappings
    ├── page-relationships.md      # Navigation map between pages
    └── api-inventory.md           # Complete API reference
README.md Template
# [System Name] — Product Requirements Document

## System Overview
[2-3 paragraphs: what the system does, business context, primary users]

## Module Overview

| Module | Pages | Core Functionality |
|--------|-------|--------------------|
| User Management | User list, User detail, Role mgmt | CRUD users, assign roles and permissions |

## Page Inventory

| # | Page Name | Route | Module | Doc Link |
|---|-----------|-------|--------|----------|
| 1 | User List | /user/list | User Mgmt | [→](./pages/01-user-mgmt-list.md) |

## Global Notes

### Permission Model
[Summarize auth/role system if present in code]

### Common Interaction Patterns
[Global rules: all deletes require confirmation, lists default to created_at desc, etc.]
Per-Page Document Template
# [Page Name]

> **Route:** `/xxx/xxx`
> **Module:** [Module name]
> **Generated:** [Date]

## Overview
[2-3 sentences: core function and use case]

## Layout
[Region breakdown — text description or ASCII diagram]

## Fields

### [Region: e.g. "Search Filters"]
| Field | Type | Required | Options / Enum | Default | Notes |
|-------|------|----------|---------------|---------|-------|

### [Region: e.g. "Data Table"]
| Column | Format | Sortable | Filterable | Notes |
|--------|--------|----------|-----------|-------|

### [Region: e.g. "Actions"]
| Button | Visibility Condition | Behavior |
|--------|---------------------|----------|

## Interactions

### Page Load
[What happens on mount]

### [Scenario: e.g. "Search"]
- **Trigger:** [User action]
- **Behavior:** [System response]
- **Special rules:** [If any]

### [Scenario: e.g. "Create"]
- **Trigger:** ...
- **Modal/drawer content:** [Fields and logic inside]
- **Validation:** ...
- **On success:** ...

## API Dependencies

| API | Method | Path | Trigger | Notes |
|-----|--------|------|---------|-------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Page Relationships
- **From:** [Source pages + params]
- **To:** [Target pages + params]
- **Data coupling:** [Cross-page refresh triggers]

## Business Rules
[Anything that doesn't fit above]

Key Principles

1. Business Language First

Don't write "calls useState to manage loading state." Write "search button shows a spinner to prevent duplicate submissions."

Don't write "useEffect fetches on mount." Write "page automatically loads the first page of results on open."

Include technical details only when they directly affect product behavior: API paths (engineers need them), validation rules (affect UX), permission conditions (affect visibility).

2. Don't Miss Hidden Logic

Code contains logic PMs may not realize exists:

  • Field interdependencies (type A shows field X; type B shows field Y)
  • Conditional button visibility
  • Data formatting (currency with 2 decimals, date formats, status label mappings)
  • Default sort order and page size
  • Debounce/throttle effects on user input
  • Polling / auto-refresh intervals

3. Exhaustively List Enums

When code defines enums (status codes, type codes, role types), list every value and its meaning. These are often scattered across constants files, component valueEnum configs, or API response mappers.

4. Mark Uncertainty — Don't Guess

If a field or logic's business meaning can't be determined from code (e.g. abbreviated variable names, overly complex conditionals), mark it [TBC] and explain what you observed and why you're uncertain. Never fabricate business meaning.

5. Keep Page Files Self-Contained

Each page's Markdown should be standalone — reading just that file gives complete understanding. Use relative links when referencing other pages or appendix entries.


Page Type Strategies

Frontend Pages

Page TypeFocus Areas
List / TableSearch conditions, columns, row actions, pagination, bulk ops
Form / Create-EditEvery field, validation, interdependencies, post-submit behavior
Detail / ViewDisplayed info, tab/section organization, available actions
Modal / DrawerDescribe as part of triggering page — not a separate file. But fully document content
DashboardData cards, charts, metrics meaning, filter dimensions, refresh frequency

Backend Endpoints (NestJS / Django / Express)

Endpoint TypeFocus Areas
CRUD resourceAll fields (from DTO/serializer), validation rules, permissions, pagination, filtering, sorting
Auth endpointsLogin/register flow, token format, refresh logic, password reset, OAuth providers
File uploadAccepted types, size limits, storage destination, processing pipeline
Webhook / eventTrigger conditions, payload shape, retry policy, idempotency
Background jobTrigger, schedule, input/output, failure handling, monitoring
Admin views (Django)Registered models, list_display, search_fields, filters, inline models, custom actions

Execution Pacing

Large projects (>15 pages): Work in batches of 3-5 pages per module. Complete system overview + page inventory first. Output each batch for user review before proceeding.

Small projects (≤15 pages): Complete all analysis in one pass.


Common Pitfalls

PitfallFix
Using component names as page namesUserManagementTable → "User Management List"
Skipping modals and drawersThey contain critical business logic — document fully
Missing i18n field namesCheck translation files, not just component JSX
Ignoring dynamic route params/order/:id = page requires an order ID to load
Forgetting permission controlsDocument which roles see which buttons/pages
Assuming all APIs are realCheck for mock data patterns before documenting endpoints
Skipping Django admin customizationadmin.py often contains critical business rules (list filters, custom actions, inlines)
Missing NestJS guards/pipes@UseGuards, @UsePipes contain auth and validation logic that affects behavior
Ignoring database constraintsModel field constraints (unique, max_length, choices) are validation rules for the PRD
Overlooking middlewareAuth middleware, rate limiters, and CORS config define system-wide behavior

Tooling

Scripts

ScriptPurposeUsage
scripts/codebase_analyzer.pyScan codebase → extract routes, APIs, models, enums, structurepython3 codebase_analyzer.py /path/to/project
scripts/prd_scaffolder.pyGenerate PRD directory skeleton from analysis JSONpython3 prd_scaffolder.py analysis.json

Recommended workflow:

# 1. Analyze the project (JSON output — works for frontend, backend, or fullstack)
python3 scripts/codebase_analyzer.py /path/to/project -o analysis.json

# 2. Review the analysis (markdown summary)
python3 scripts/codebase_analyzer.py /path/to/project -f markdown

# 3. Scaffold the PRD directory with stubs
python3 scripts/prd_scaffolder.py analysis.json -o prd/ -n "My App"

# 4. Fill in TODO sections page-by-page using the SKILL.md workflow

Both scripts are stdlib-only — no pip install needed.

References

FileContents
references/prd-quality-checklist.mdValidation checklist for completeness, accuracy, readability
references/framework-patterns.mdFramework-specific patterns for routes, state, APIs, forms, permissions

Attribution

This skill was inspired by code-to-prd by @lihanglogan, who proposed the original concept and methodology in PR #368. The core three-phase workflow (global scan → page-by-page analysis → structured document generation) originated from that work. This version was rebuilt from scratch in English with added tooling (analysis scripts, scaffolder, framework reference, quality checklist).

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.36%
按下载量换算1,268

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills