Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

code-silent-degradation(代码静默降级)

code-silent-degradation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

code-silent-degradation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,467。

总安装 776周安装 32GitHub Stars 28下载 253核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-silent-degradation(代码静默降级)
来源仓库:https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/code-silent-degradation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-silent-degradation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-silent-degradation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于检测代码中静默失败或无效操作的退化模式。识别成功但无实际产出的逻辑缺陷。code-silent-degradation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于批量扫描与安全性审查场景。安装前需审核 shell 命令权限,防止误执行。建议与安全审查工具配合使用以提高覆盖率。

来源仓库内路径:skills/code-silent-degradation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-silent-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

code-silent-degradation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-silent-degradatio…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-silent-degradation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-silent-degradation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

code-silent-degradation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

code-silent-degradation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 776 次,近一周安装 32 次,下载 253 次,GitHub 28 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-silent-degradation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
code-silent-degradation

代码静默降级 · 本页

77628接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Silent Degradation Scanner

Detect code patterns where operations complete "successfully" but produce empty or useless results because preconditions are silently unmet.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when...Use /code:review instead when...
A feature reports success but produces nothingYou need general code quality review
Scan/batch operations return 0 results silentlyYou want security or performance review
Users see green success banners for empty outcomesYou need SOLID principles assessment
Config-dependent features skip without warningYou want test coverage analysis
Multi-detector/multi-step operations silently skip stepsYou need architecture review

Context

  • Scan path: $ARGUMENTS (defaults to current directory if empty)
  • Source files:!find. -maxdepth 1 \(-name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" \) -type f
  • Config patterns:!find. -maxdepth 1 \(-name ".env*" -o -name "config.*" -o -name "settings.*" \) -type f

Parameters

Parse from $ARGUMENTS:

  • PATH: Directory or file to scan (defaults to .)
  • --fix: Apply recommended fixes (add precondition checks, warning messages, status indicators)

Execution

Execute this silent degradation scan:

Step 1: Discover source files

Use Glob to find source files in the target path:

  • **/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js, **/*.jsx for TypeScript/JavaScript
  • **/*.py for Python
  • **/*.go for Go
  • **/*.rs for Rust

Exclude node_modules, dist, build, .git, vendor, __pycache__ directories.

Step 2: Scan for silent degradation patterns

Search each source file for these five pattern categories. Use Grep and Read to find matches.

Pattern 1: Silent skip on missing config

Code that checks for a config value and silently returns empty results when absent.

Indicators:

  • if (!apiKey) or if not api_key: followed by return [] or return 0 or continue
  • Environment variable checks that skip entire code paths without logging
  • Feature flag checks that silently disable functionality
  • process.env.X or os.environ.get() or os.Getenv() used in conditions that gate result-producing logic

Example of the problem:

// Silently returns nothing when Gemini isn't configured
if (!config.geminiApiKey) {
  return { suggestions: [] };  // No warning, no status
}
Pattern 2: Success message on zero results

Code that reports success regardless of whether meaningful work was performed.

Indicators:

  • Success/completion messages that don't distinguish between "found results" and "found nothing because preconditions failed"
  • Toast/notification/banner showing success with count === 0
  • Log messages like "Completed" or "Done" or "Scan finished" when result set is empty
  • HTTP 200 responses with empty arrays where the emptiness indicates a configuration problem, not genuinely zero matches

Example of the problem:

// Green banner whether it found 50 items or 0
toast.success(`Scan completed. Created ${results.length} suggestions.`);
Pattern 3: Multi-step operations with silent step skipping

Operations composed of multiple detectors/processors/steps where individual steps are skipped without surfacing this to the caller.

Indicators:

  • Loop over detectors/analyzers/processors that catches errors and continues
  • Skipped steps added to a list but not surfaced in the UI
  • try/catch blocks that swallow errors and continue iteration
  • Conditional execution of steps where skip reasons aren't propagated to the final result

Example of the problem:

for (const detector of detectors) {
  if (!detector.isAvailable()) {
    skipped.push(detector.name);  // Tracked but never shown
    continue;
  }
  results.push(...detector.run());
}
// skipped list exists but UX ignores it
Pattern 4: Missing precondition validation

Functions that require preconditions (data present, services configured, dependencies available) but don't validate or communicate them upfront.

Indicators:

  • Functions that query a data source and produce results only if specific data shapes exist (e.g., "entities with embeddings", "orphan records", "records older than N days")
  • No upfront check for whether the precondition is satisfiable
  • No documentation or runtime message explaining what data/config is needed
  • Database queries that naturally return empty when prerequisite data hasn't been set up

Example of the problem:

# Returns empty if no themes have embeddings - but doesn't check or warn
def find_similar_themes(threshold=0.85):
    themes = db.query(Theme).filter(Theme.embedding.isnot(None)).all()
    # If no embeddings exist, this silently returns []
    pairs = [(a, b) for a, b in combinations(themes, 2)
             if cosine_similarity(a.embedding, b.embedding) > threshold]
    return pairs
Pattern 5: Degraded mode without indication

Code that falls back to a degraded mode of operation (fewer features, reduced functionality) without any indication to the user that they're getting a partial experience.

Indicators:

  • Feature availability checks that reduce functionality without notification
  • Graceful degradation that's invisible to users
  • Optional dependency checks that silently disable capabilities
  • API version checks that fall back to limited functionality

Example of the problem:

// User has no idea they're getting a degraded scan
const detectors = [basicDetector];
if (geminiKey) detectors.push(aiDetector);      // silently omitted
if (hasEmbeddings) detectors.push(simDetector);  // silently omitted
return runDetectors(detectors);  // runs 1 of 3 with no indication

Step 3: Classify and report findings

For each finding, report:

FieldContent
Filefile:line reference
PatternWhich of the 5 patterns it matches
Severityhigh (success message on empty), medium (silent skip), low (missing validation)
What happensDescribe the silent failure from the user's perspective
PreconditionsList what must be true for the code to produce results
FixSpecific code change to surface the degradation

Severity guide:

  • High: User sees explicit success messaging when nothing worked (Pattern 2, 3)
  • Medium: Functionality silently disabled based on config/environment (Pattern 1, 5)
  • Low: Missing upfront validation that would help users understand requirements (Pattern 4)

Step 4: Generate summary

Print a summary table:

Silent Degradation Scan: <path>

| Pattern                    | Findings | Severity |
|----------------------------|----------|----------|
| Silent config skip         | N        | medium   |
| Success on zero results    | N        | high     |
| Silent step skipping       | N        | high     |
| Missing precondition check | N        | low      |
| Degraded mode hidden       | N        | medium   |

Total: N findings across M files

Step 5: Apply fixes (if --fix)

If --fix is specified, apply these fixes for each finding:

  1. Silent config skip: Add warning log before the early return
  2. Success on zero results: Change success message to distinguish "nothing found" from "couldn't check" and surface skip reasons
  3. Silent step skipping: Propagate skipped step information to the return value and surface in UI
  4. Missing precondition check: Add upfront validation with descriptive error messages listing what's needed
  5. Degraded mode hidden: Add status indicator showing which capabilities are active vs disabled

After applying fixes, list all changes made with file:line references.

Recommended Fixes Reference

Fix: Add precondition status panel

Before running multi-detector operations, check and display precondition status:

// Before
const results = await runScan();
toast.success(`Done. ${results.length} found.`);

// After
const status = checkPreconditions();
if (status.issues.length > 0) {
  showPreconditionPanel(status);  // "Gemini: not configured, Embeddings: 0 themes"
}
const results = await runScan();
toast.info(`Scan: ${results.active}/${results.total} detectors ran. ${results.length} found.`);

Fix: Distinguish "nothing found" from "couldn't check"

// Before
return { success: true, count: results.length };

// After
return {
  success: true,
  count: results.length,
  skipped: skippedDetectors,
  degraded: activeDetectors.length < totalDetectors,
  missingPreconditions: missingPrereqs,
};

Agentic Optimizations

ContextCommand
Quick scan/code:silent-degradation src/
Scan and fix/code:silent-degradation src/ --fix
Specific file/code:silent-degradation src/features/scanner.ts

Related Configure Skills

  • If error tracking not configured → /configure:sentry for error monitoring
  • If feature flags not managed → /configure:feature-flags for controlled rollouts

平台分布

Codex

34.26%
按下载量换算87

Claude

29.12%
按下载量换算74

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算48

Gemini CLI

9.4%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills