code-no-test（代码没有测试）

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task: - Check downstream references before deleting. Deleting components causes documentation and code staleness cascades. Map all referencing files before removal. - Verify AI-generated content against actual code. AI hallucinates APIs, class names, and method signatures. Always grep to confirm existence before documenting or referencing. - Trace full dependency chain after edits. Changing a definition misses downstream variables and consumers derived from it. Always trace the full chain. - Trace ALL code paths when verifying correctness. Confirming code exists is not confirming it executes. Always trace early exits, error branches, and conditional skips — not just happy path. - When debugging, ask "whose responsibility?" before fixing. Trace whether bug is in caller (wrong data) or callee (wrong handling). Fix at responsible layer — never patch symptom site. - Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing. Before changing any constant, limit, flag, or pattern: read comments, check git blame, examine surrounding code. - Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. Changes touching multiple stacks require verifying EVERY output. One green check is not all green checks. - Holistic-first debugging — resist nearest-attention trap. When investigating any failure, list EVERY precondition first (config, env vars, DB names, endpoints, DI registrations, data preconditions), then verify each against evidence before forming any code-layer hypothesis. - Surgical changes — apply the diff test. Bug fix: every changed line must trace directly to the bug. Don't restyle or improve adjacent code. Enhancement task: implement improvements AND announce them explicitly. - Surface ambiguity before coding — don't pick silently. If request has multiple interpretations, present each with effort estimate and ask. Never assume all-records, file-based, or more complex path.

Understand Code First — HARD-GATE: Do NOT write, plan, or fix until you READ existing code. 1. Search 3+ similar patterns (grep/glob) — cite file:line evidence 2. Read existing files in target area — understand structure, base classes, conventions 3. Run python.claude/scripts/code_graph trace <file> --direction both --json when .code-graph/graph.db exists 4. Map dependencies via connections or callers_of — know what depends on your target 5. Write investigation to .ai/workspace/analysis/ for non-trivial tasks (3+ files) 6. Re-read analysis file before implementing — never work from memory alone 7. NEVER invent new patterns when existing ones work — match exactly or document deviation BLOCKED until: - [] Read target files - [] Grep 3+ patterns - [] Graph trace (if graph.db exists) - [] Assumptions verified with evidence

• docs/project-reference/domain-entities-reference.md — Domain entity catalog, relationships, cross-service sync (read when task involves business entities/models) (content auto-injected by hook — check for [Injected:...] header before reading)

Quick Summary

Goal: Execute an implementation plan phase end-to-end without running tests (code + review + commit).

Workflow:

1. Plan Detection — Find latest plan or use provided path, auto-select next incomplete phase
2. Analysis — Extract tasks from phase file, initialize todo tracking
3. Implementation — Code changes step-by-step, run type checks
4. Code Review — Subagent reviews for security, performance, architecture violations
5. User Approval — Blocking gate requiring explicit approval
6. Finalize — Update plan status, docs, auto-commit

Key Rules:

• One phase per command run, steps must complete in order
• Critical code review issues block progression (must be 0)
• User must explicitly approve before finalize step

MUST ATTENTION READ CLAUDE.md then THINK HARDER to start working on the following plan follow the Orchestration Protocol, Core Responsibilities, Subagents Team and Development Rules:

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

$ARGUMENTS

Role Responsibilities

• You are a senior software engineer who must study the provided implementation plan end-to-end before writing code.
• Validate the plan's assumptions, surface blockers, and confirm priorities with the user prior to execution.
• Drive the implementation from start to finish, reporting progress and adjusting the plan responsibly while honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles.

IMPORTANT: Remind these rules with subagents communication:

• Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports.
• In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
• Ensure token efficiency while maintaining high quality.

Step 0: Plan Detection & Phase Selection

If $ARGUMENTS is empty:

1. Find latest plan.md in ./plans | find./plans -name "plan.md" -type f -exec stat -f "%m %N" {} \; 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2-
2. Parse plan for phases and status, auto-select next incomplete (prefer IN_PROGRESS or earliest Planned)

If $ARGUMENTS provided: Use that plan and detect which phase to work on (auto-detect or use argument like "phase-2").

Output: ✓ Step 0: [Plan Name] - [Phase Name]

Subagent Pattern (use throughout):

Task(subagent_type="[type]", prompt="[task description]", description="[brief]")

Workflow Sequence

Rules: Follow steps 1-6 in order. Each step requires output marker starting with "✓ Step N:". Mark each complete in TaskCreate before proceeding. Do not skip steps.

Step 1: Analysis & Task Extraction

Read plan file completely. Map dependencies between tasks. List ambiguities or blockers. Identify required skills/tools and activate from catalog. Parse phase file and extract actionable tasks. If the plan references analysis files in .ai/workspace/analysis/, re-read them before implementation.

TaskCreate Initialization & Task Extraction:

• Initialize TaskCreate with Step 0: [Plan Name] - [Phase Name] and all command steps (Step 1 through Step 6)
• Read phase file (e.g., phase-01-preparation.md)
• Look for tasks/steps/phases/sections/numbered/bulleted lists
• MUST ATTENTION convert to TaskCreate tasks:

- Phase Implementation tasks → Step 2.X (Step 2.1, Step 2.2, etc.) - Phase Code Review tasks → Step 3.X (Step 3.1, Step 3.2, etc.)

• Ensure each task has UNIQUE name (increment X for each task)
• Add tasks to TaskCreate after their corresponding command step

Output: ✓ Step 1: Found [N] tasks across [M] phases - Ambiguities: [list or "none"]

Mark Step 1 complete in TaskCreate, mark Step 2 in_progress.

Step 2: Implementation

Implement selected plan phase step-by-step following extracted tasks (Step 2.1, Step 2.2, etc.). Mark tasks complete as done. For UI work, call ui-ux-designer subagent: "Implement [feature] UI per./docs/design-guidelines.md". Use ai-multimodal skill for image assets, media-processing skill for editing. Run type checking and compile to verify no syntax errors.

Output: ✓ Step 2: Implemented [N] files - [X/Y] tasks complete, compilation passed

Mark Step 2 complete in TaskCreate, mark Step 3 in_progress.

Step 3: Code Review

Call code-reviewer subagent: "Review changes for plan phase [phase-name]. Check security, performance, architecture, YAGNI/KISS/DRY". If critical issues found: STOP, fix all, re-run tester to verify, re-run code-reviewer. Repeat until no critical issues.

Critical issues: Security vulnerabilities (XSS, SQL injection, OWASP), performance bottlenecks, architectural violations, principle violations.

Output: ✓ Step 3: Code reviewed - [0] critical issues

Validation: If critical issues > 0, Step 3 INCOMPLETE - do not proceed.

Mark Step 3 complete in TaskCreate, mark Step 4 in_progress.

Step 4: User Approval ⏸ BLOCKING GATE

Present summary (3-5 bullets): what implemented, code review outcome.

Ask user explicitly: "Phase implementation complete. Code reviewed. Approve changes?"

Stop and wait - do not output Step 5 content until user responds.

Output (while waiting): ⏸ Step 4: WAITING for user approval

Output (after approval): ✓ Step 4: User approved - Ready to complete

Mark Step 4 complete in TaskCreate, mark Step 5 in_progress.

Step 5: Finalize

Prerequisites: User approved in Step 4 (verified above).

1. STATUS UPDATE - BOTH MANDATORY - PARALLEL EXECUTION:

• Call project-manager sub-agent: "Update plan status in [plan-path]. Mark plan phase [phase-name] as DONE with timestamp. Update roadmap."
• Call docs-manager sub-agent: "Update docs for plan phase [phase-name]. Changed files: [list]."

1. ONBOARDING CHECK: Detect onboarding requirements (API keys, env vars, config) + generate summary report with next steps.
2. AUTO-COMMIT (after steps 1 and 2 completes):

• Run only if: Steps 1 and 2 successful + User approved + Tests passed
• Auto-stage, commit with message [phase - plan] and push

Validation: Steps 1 and 2 must complete successfully. Step 3 (auto-commit) runs only if conditions met.

Mark Step 5 complete in TaskCreate.

Phase workflow finished. Ready for next plan phase.

Critical Enforcement Rules

Step outputs must follow unified format: ✓ Step [N]: [Brief status] - [Key metrics]

Examples:

• Step 0: ✓ Step 0: [Plan Name] - [Phase Name]
• Step 1: ✓ Step 1: Found [N] tasks across [M] phases - Ambiguities: [list]
• Step 2: ✓ Step 2: Implemented [N] files - [X/Y] tasks complete
• Step 3: ✓ Step 3: Code reviewed - [0] critical issues
• Step 4: ✓ Step 4: User approved - Ready to complete
• Step 5: ✓ Step 5: Finalize - Status updated - Git committed

If any "✓ Step N:" output missing, that step is INCOMPLETE.

TaskCreate tracking required: Initialize at Step 0, mark each step complete before next.

Mandatory subagent calls:

• Step 3: code-reviewer
• Step 4: project-manager AND docs-manager (when user approves)

Blocking gates:

• Step 3: Critical issues must be 0
• Step 4: User must explicitly approve
• Step 5: Both project-manager and docs-manager must complete successfully

REMEMBER:

• Do not skip steps. Do not proceed if validation fails. Do not assume approval without user response.
• One plan phase per command run. Command focuses on single plan phase only.
• You can always generate images with ai-multimodal skill on the fly for visual assets.
• You always read and analyze the generated assets with ai-multimodal skill to verify they meet requirements.
• For image editing (removing background, adjusting, cropping), use media-processing skill or similar tools as needed.

Next Steps (Standalone: MUST ATTENTION ask user via AskUserQuestion. Skip if inside workflow.)

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — NO EXCEPTIONS: If this skill was called outside a workflow, you MUST ATTENTION use AskUserQuestion to present these options. Do NOT skip because the task seems "simple" or "obvious" — the user decides:

• "Proceed with full workflow (Recommended)" — I'll detect the best workflow to continue from here (code implemented, no tests). This ensures review, testing, and docs steps aren't skipped.
• "/code-simplifier" — Simplify implementation
• "/workflow-review-changes" — Review changes before commit
• "Skip, continue manually" — user decides

If already inside a workflow, skip — the workflow handles sequencing.

Closing Reminders

• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act)
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION validate decisions with user via AskUserQuestion — never auto-decide MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting:
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search 3+ existing patterns and read code BEFORE any modification. Run graph trace when graph.db exists.
• IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ CLAUDE.md before starting
• MUST ATTENTION apply critical thinking — every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact.
• MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — holistic-first debugging, fix at responsible layer, surface ambiguity before coding, re-read files after compaction.

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.