Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clean-codebase(干净的代码库)

clean-codebase 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clean-codebase 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,000。

总安装 396周安装 17GitHub Stars 12下载 139核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clean-codebase(干净的代码库)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pjt222/development-guides
仓库路径:skills/clean-codebase
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pjt222/development-guides --skill clean-codebase
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pjt222/development-guides --skill clean-codebase

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

clean-codebase 自动化清理代码库卫生债务,处理 lint 警告、未使用导入和格式化不一致问题。适合快速迭代的代码库、CI/CD 工程师和维护多语言项目的团队。通过静态分析工具集成和批量修复提升代码质量和一致性水平。需指定代码根路径和主要语言,专注 hygiene 而非架构重构,避免业务逻辑改动。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/clean-codebase

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pjt222/development-guides --skill clean-codeba…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clean-codebase 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pjt222/development-guides --skill clean-codebase。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clean-codebase 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clean-codebase 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

clean-codebase 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

clean-codebase 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 396 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 139 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clean-codebase 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clean-codebase

干净的代码库 · 本页

39612需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

clean-codebase

When to Use

Use this skill when a codebase has accumulated hygiene debt:

  • Lint warnings have piled up during rapid development
  • Unused imports and variables clutter files
  • Dead code paths exist but were never removed
  • Formatting is inconsistent across files
  • Static analysis tools report fixable issues

Do NOT use for architectural refactoring, bug fixes, or business logic changes. This skill focuses purely on hygiene and automated cleanup.

Inputs

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
codebase_pathstringYesAbsolute path to codebase root
languagestringYesPrimary language (js, python, r, rust, etc.)
cleanup_modeenumNosafe (default) or aggressive
run_testsbooleanNoRun test suite after cleanup (default: true)
backupbooleanNoCreate backup before deletion (default: true)

Procedure

Step 1: Pre-Cleanup Assessment

Measure the current state to quantify improvements later.

# Count lint warnings by severity
lint_tool --format json > lint_before.json

# Count lines of code
cloc . --json > cloc_before.json

# List unused symbols (language-dependent)
# JavaScript/TypeScript: ts-prune or depcheck
# Python: vulture
# R: lintr unused function checks

Expected: Baseline metrics saved to lint_before.json and cloc_before.json

On failure: If lint tool not found, skip automated fixes and focus on manual review

Step 2: Fix Automated Lint Warnings

Apply safe automated fixes (spacing, quotes, semicolons, trailing whitespace).

JavaScript/TypeScript:

eslint --fix .
prettier --write .

Python:

black .
isort .
ruff check --fix .

R:

Rscript -e "styler::style_dir('.')"

Rust:

cargo fmt
cargo clippy --fix --allow-dirty

Expected: All safe lint warnings resolved; files formatted consistently

On failure: If automated fixes introduce test failures, revert changes and escalate

Step 3: Identify Dead Code Paths

Use static analysis to find unreferenced functions, unused variables, and orphaned files.

JavaScript/TypeScript:

ts-prune | tee dead_code.txt
depcheck | tee unused_deps.txt

Python:

vulture . | tee dead_code.txt

R:

Rscript -e "lintr::lint_dir('.', linters = lintr::unused_function_linter())"

General approach:

  1. Grep for function definitions
  2. Grep for function calls
  3. Report functions defined but never called

Expected: dead_code.txt lists unused functions, variables, and files

On failure: If static analysis tool unavailable, manually review recent commit history for orphaned code

Step 4: Remove Unused Imports

Clean up import blocks by removing references to packages never used.

JavaScript:

eslint --fix --rule 'no-unused-vars: error'

Python:

autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --in-place --recursive .

R:

# Manual review: grep for library() calls, check if package used
grep -r "library(" . | cut -d: -f2 | sort | uniq

Expected: All unused import statements removed

On failure: If removing imports breaks build, they were used indirectly — restore and document

Step 5: Remove Dead Code (Mode-Dependent)

Safe Mode (default):

  • Only remove code explicitly marked as deprecated
  • Remove commented-out code blocks (if >10 lines and >6 months old)
  • Remove TODO comments referencing completed issues

Aggressive Mode (opt-in):

  • Remove all functions identified as unused in Step 3
  • Remove private methods with zero references
  • Remove feature flags for deprecated features

For each candidate deletion:

  1. Verify zero references in codebase
  2. Check git history for recent activity (skip if modified in last 30 days)
  3. Remove code and add entry to CLEANUP_LOG.md

Expected: Dead code removed; CLEANUP_LOG.md documents all deletions

On failure: If uncertain whether code is truly dead, move to archive/ directory instead

Step 6: Normalize Formatting

Ensure consistent formatting across all files (even if not caught by linters).

  1. Normalize line endings (LF vs CRLF)
  2. Ensure single newline at end of file
  3. Remove trailing whitespace
  4. Normalize indentation (spaces vs tabs, indent width)
# Example: Fix line endings and trailing whitespace
find . -type f -name "*.js" -exec sed -i 's/\r$//' {} +
find . -type f -name "*.js" -exec sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//' {} +

Expected: All files follow consistent formatting conventions

On failure: If sed breaks binary files, skip and document

Step 7: Run Tests

Validate that cleanup didn't break functionality.

# Language-specific test command
npm test              # JavaScript
pytest                # Python
R CMD check           # R
cargo test            # Rust

Expected: All tests pass (or same failures as before cleanup)

On failure: Revert changes incrementally to identify breaking change, then escalate

Step 8: Generate Cleanup Report

Document all changes for review.

# Codebase Cleanup Report

**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Mode**: safe | aggressive
**Language**: <language>

## Metrics

| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|--------|--------|-------|--------|
| Lint warnings | X | Y | -Z |
| Lines of code | A | B | -C |
| Unused imports | D | 0 | -D |
| Dead functions | E | F | -G |

## Changes Applied

1. Fixed X lint warnings (automated)
2. Removed Y unused imports
3. Deleted Z lines of dead code (see CLEANUP_LOG.md)
4. Normalized formatting across W files

## Escalations

- [Issue description requiring human review]
- [Uncertain deletion moved to archive/]

## Validation

- [x] All tests pass
- [x] Backup created: backup_YYYYMMDD/
- [x] CLEANUP_LOG.md updated

Expected: Report saved to CLEANUP_REPORT.md in project root

On failure: (N/A — generate report regardless of outcome)

Validation Checklist

After cleanup:

  • All tests pass (or same failures as before)
  • No new lint warnings introduced
  • Backup created before any deletions
  • CLEANUP_LOG.md documents all removed code
  • Cleanup report generated with metrics
  • Git diff reviewed for unexpected changes
  • CI pipeline passes

Common Pitfalls

  1. Removing Code Still Used via Reflection: Static analysis misses dynamic calls (e.g., eval(), metaprogramming). Always check git history.
  2. Breaking Implicit Dependencies: Removing imports that were used by dependencies. Run tests after every import removal.
  3. Deleting Feature Flags for Active Features: Even if unused in current branch, feature flags may be active in other environments. Check deployment configs.
  4. Over-Aggressive Formatting: Tools like black or prettier may reformat code in ways that trigger unnecessary diffs. Configure tools to match project style.
  5. Ignoring Test Coverage: Cannot safely clean codebases without tests. If coverage is low, escalate for test additions first.
  6. Not Backing Up: Always create backup_YYYYMMDD/ directory before deleting anything, even if using git.

Related Skills

平台分布

Codex

34.65%
按下载量换算48

Claude

28.77%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

18.92%
按下载量换算26

Gemini CLI

8.93%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills