Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clay-known-pitfalls(粘土已知的陷阱)

clay-known-pitfalls 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clay-known-pitfalls 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,488。

总安装 612周安装 25GitHub Stars 2,090下载 196核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clay-known-pitfalls(粘土已知的陷阱)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
仓库路径:skills/clay-known-pitfalls
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill clay-known-pitfalls
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill clay-known-pitfalls

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

Clay 已知陷阱技能汇总 Clay 使用中常见的误操作和隐藏问题,避免浪费时间和信用。包含 webhook 50K 限制、重复增强、字段映射错误等实际生产中的典型坑点。每个陷阱均提供症状、根因和修复方案,基于真实经验总结而成。适用于已有一定 Clay 使用经验的用户,帮助规避重复性错误。

clay-known-pitfalls 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/clay-known-pitfalls

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clay-known-pitfalls 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clay-known-pitfalls 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clay-known-pitfalls 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

clay-known-pitfalls 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

clay-known-pitfalls 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 612 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 196 次,GitHub 2,090 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clay-known-pitfalls 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 2,090 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clay-known-pitfalls

粘土已知的陷阱 · 本页

6122,090需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Clay Known Pitfalls

Overview

Real gotchas when using Clay's data enrichment platform. These are the mistakes that cost credits, waste time, or break integrations -- learned from production experience. Each pitfall includes the exact symptom, root cause, and fix.

Prerequisites

  • Active Clay account with tables configured
  • Understanding of Clay's credit and enrichment model
  • Experience with at least one Clay enrichment workflow

Instructions

Pitfall 1: Webhook 50K Limit Surprise

Symptom: Webhook silently stops accepting new data. No error, no notification. New rows simply don't appear.

Root cause: Each Clay webhook has a hard 50,000 submission lifetime limit. This limit persists even after deleting rows from the table.

Fix:

  • Monitor webhook submission count in your application
  • Create a new webhook on the same table when approaching 45K
  • Use the WebhookRotator pattern from clay-load-scale
  • Set up an alert at 40K submissions

Pitfall 2: Waterfall Burns Credits Without "Stop on First Result"

Symptom: Credits consumed at 3-5x the expected rate on waterfall enrichment columns.

Root cause: By default, waterfall enrichment may query ALL providers even after the first one finds data. You must explicitly enable "stop on first result."

Fix: In each waterfall column's settings, ensure the stop condition is configured. Without it, a 5-provider email waterfall costs 10-15 credits per row instead of 2-3.


Pitfall 3: Personal Email Domains Waste Credits

Symptom: Company enrichment returns empty for 30-50% of rows.

Root cause: Rows contain gmail.com, yahoo.com, hotmail.com domains. Clay's company enrichment can't match personal email domains to companies.

Fix:

const PERSONAL_DOMAINS = new Set([
  'gmail.com', 'yahoo.com', 'hotmail.com', 'outlook.com',
  'icloud.com', 'aol.com', 'protonmail.com', 'mail.com',
]);

function filterBeforeEnrichment(rows: any[]) {
  return rows.filter(r => {
    const domain = r.domain?.toLowerCase();
    if (PERSONAL_DOMAINS.has(domain)) {
      console.log(`Filtered: ${domain} (personal email domain)`);
      return false;
    }
    return true;
  });
}
// Apply BEFORE sending to Clay. Typical savings: 20-40% of credits.

Pitfall 4: Auto-Update Re-Enriches Entire Table

Symptom: Thousands of credits consumed overnight. Enrichment columns re-ran on rows that were already enriched.

Root cause: Table-level auto-update was ON, and a column edit or provider reconnection triggered re-enrichment of all existing rows.

Fix:

  • Turn off table-level auto-update before editing column configuration
  • Use conditional run rules: ISEMPTY(Work Email) to skip already-enriched rows
  • Only enable auto-update for tables with active webhook inflow

Pitfall 5: CSV Header Case Sensitivity

Symptom: Imported CSV data appears in wrong columns or creates new columns instead of mapping to existing ones.

Root cause: Clay maps CSV columns by exact header name. "Company Name" does not match "company_name" or "company name."

Fix:

// Normalize CSV headers before import
function normalizeCSVHeaders(headers: string[]): string[] {
  return headers.map(h => h.trim()); // Only trim whitespace
  // Do NOT lowercase or change case — match the exact Clay column name
}

// Better: rename your Clay columns to match your CSV format
// Or: use Clay's column mapping UI during CSV import to manually map

Pitfall 6: Reading Data Immediately After Webhook Write

Symptom: Checking the table via API or UI shows the row but enrichment columns are empty.

Root cause: Enrichment runs asynchronously after the row is created. Depending on provider speed and table queue, enrichment can take 5-60 seconds.

Fix: Use HTTP API columns to push enriched data back to your application rather than polling. If you must poll, wait at least 30 seconds and check for populated enrichment columns before reading.


Pitfall 7: Claygent Prompts That Are Too Vague

Symptom: Claygent returns "Could not find information" or generic/wrong data.

Root cause: Prompt says "Research this company" instead of specific, directed questions.

Bad prompt: "Research {{Company Name}}" Good prompt: "Go to {{domain}}/about and find the CEO's name. Then check {{domain}}/pricing for the starting price. Return: CEO Name, Starting Price."

Fix:

  • Be specific about what page to check
  • Ask for specific data points, not general research
  • Add fallback instructions: "If not on website, check LinkedIn"
  • Use Navigator mode for JavaScript-heavy sites

Pitfall 8: Not Connecting Your Own API Keys

Symptom: Monthly Clay bill much higher than expected. Credits consumed at 2-13 per enrichment.

Root cause: Using Clay's managed provider accounts instead of your own API keys. Every provider lookup costs Clay credits when using managed accounts.

Fix: Go to Settings > Connections and add your own API keys for Apollo, Clearbit, Hunter, etc. Result: 0 Clay data credits consumed per enrichment (only 1 Action consumed).

Savings comparison for 10K enrichments/month:

SetupCredits UsedApproximate Cost Impact
All managed~60K creditsFull credit consumption
Own API keys0 data credits + 10K actions70-80% savings

Pitfall 9: No Conditional Run on Expensive Columns

Symptom: Claygent and AI columns run on every row including low-quality leads, burning expensive credits.

Root cause: Claygent and AI columns are set to auto-run on all new rows without qualification criteria.

Fix: Add "Only run if" conditions:

  • Claygent: ICP Score >= 60 AND ISNOTEMPTY(Company Name)
  • AI personalization: ICP Score >= 70 AND ISNOTEMPTY(Work Email)
  • Phone lookup: ICP Score >= 80 AND ISNOTEMPTY(Work Email)

This ensures expensive operations only run on qualified prospects.


Pitfall 10: Formula Column References Break on Rename

Symptom: Formula column shows #ERROR or #REF after renaming another column.

Root cause: Clay formulas reference columns by display name (case-sensitive). Renaming a referenced column breaks the formula.

Fix: After renaming any column, review all formula columns and update their references. Consider establishing a column naming convention and documenting it so names don't change unexpectedly.

Quick Reference Anti-Pattern Checklist

Anti-PatternCost ImpactFix Difficulty
No "stop on first result"3-5x credit wasteEasy (toggle)
Personal domains not filtered20-40% credit wasteEasy (pre-filter)
No own API keys70-80% higher costEasy (paste keys)
Auto-update re-enrichmentThousands of creditsMedium (conditions)
Vague Claygent promptsLow hit rate, wasted creditsMedium (rewrite)
No conditional run rulesExpensive columns run on allEasy (add conditions)
Webhook 50K limit hitData lossMedium (rotation)

Resources

Next Steps

For comprehensive debugging when things go wrong, see clay-advanced-troubleshooting.

平台分布

Codex

35.19%
按下载量换算69

Claude

30.57%
按下载量换算60

Cursor

19.63%
按下载量换算38

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

未通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills