Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clawmage-learning-loop(爪法师学习循环)

clawmage-learning-loop 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clawmage-learning-loop 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,107。

总安装 9,672周安装 403GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,224核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clawmage-learning-loop(爪法师学习循环)
来源仓库:https://github.com/clawmage/clawmage-learning-loop
安装命令:
openclaw skills install clawmage-learning-loop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install clawmage-learning-loop

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

记录任务执行中的错误与经验缺口持续优化能力。clawmage-learning-loop 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合客服与高频交互类 Agent 的知识沉淀场景。通过 clawhub 安装后,可自动分类决策路径并提取课程要点。需定期清理冗余记忆条目,防止模型注意力分散。

建议结合人工审核机制,确保学习内容符合业务规范。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install clawmage-learning-loop;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clawmage-learning-loop 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install clawmage-learning-loop。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clawmage-learning-loop 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clawmage-learning-loop 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

clawmage-learning-loop 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

clawmage-learning-loop 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,672 次,近一周安装 403 次,下载 3,224 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clawmage-learning-loop 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clawmage-learning-loop

爪法师学习循环 · 本页

9,672—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
learning-loop
description
>
metadata
{"openclaw":{"emoji":"🔄","homepage":"https://clawmage.ai","requires":{"bins":[]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}

Learning Loop

A proactive learning engine. Your agent reflects, journals, tracks decisions, extracts lessons, and gets smarter every day — without being told to.

What Makes This Different

Most self-improvement skills are reactive — they only learn when corrected. Learning Loop is proactive:

  • Journals daily — synthesizes what happened, not just what went wrong
  • Tracks decisions with categories — analyze accuracy by type over time
  • Generalizes lessons — asks "where else does this apply?" before saving
  • Manages lesson lifecycle — ACTIVE → VALIDATED → CHALLENGED → ARCHIVED
  • Tiers memory automatically — hot/warm/cold based on recency and usage
  • Staggered review chain — nightly → monthly → quarterly → year-end
  • Correction tracking — counts repetitions, promotes to rules after 3x
  • Quiet day protocol — idle time becomes maintenance time

Setup

On first use, create the workspace structure (only missing dirs):

brain/
├── journal/        # Daily logs (YYYY-MM-DD.md)
├── decisions/      # Decision log with categories
├── lessons/        # Extracted insights with lifecycle
├── inbox/          # Quick captures, filed later
├── knowledge/
│   ├── domains/    # By field (code, writing, ops)
│   ├── people/     # Notes about people
│   └── concepts/   # Mental models
├── projects/       # Active work
└── archive/        # Completed/inactive items

Also ensure memory/ exists at workspace root. Never overwrite existing files.

Core Loop

1. Capture (Real-Time)

During normal work, write immediately:

Journal → brain/journal/YYYY-MM-DD.md

  • One line per significant event, with timestamps

Decisions → brain/decisions/NNN-short-name.md

  • Only decisions with real consequences (see format below)

Corrections → Journal + corrections count

  • Human correction = high-priority learning signal
  • Flag for nightly reflection
  • Track repetition count for promotion

Quick capture → brain/inbox/

  • Anything worth saving without a clear home — file it during reflection

2. Reflect (Nightly)

Run at end of day. Write findings to journal.

  1. Read today's journal
  2. Review new decisions, update any OPEN → RESOLVED
  3. Extract lessons (see Lesson Extraction)
  4. Process inbox — file items or discard
  5. Check correction counts — promote any hitting 3x threshold
  6. Update MEMORY.md if hot items changed
  7. Write end-of-day summary (2-3 sentences: what mattered, what to carry forward)

If nothing happened: Run Quiet Day Protocol instead.

3. Review (Staggered Chain)

Each level reads the level below:

CycleFrequencyReadsProduces
🌙 NightlyDailyToday's journal + inboxJournal summary, lesson extraction
📊 Monthly1st of monthAll journals from past monthMonthly summary, decision accuracy by category
📅 QuarterlyJan/Apr/Jul/OctMonthly summariesQuarterly patterns, lesson validation sweep
🎆 Year-EndJan 1Quarterly reportsAnnual review, archive stale items

Quiet Day Protocol

On days with zero activity, use reflection for:

  • Memory maintenance (tier hot/warm/cold items)
  • Lesson review (validate or challenge existing lessons)
  • Cross-referencing old journals for missed patterns
  • Inbox processing
  • Documentation cleanup

Idle time is maintenance time, not wasted time.

Correction Tracking

When the user corrects you:

  1. Log in journal with timestamp
  2. Increment correction counter for that pattern
  3. Flag for nightly reflection

Promotion rules:

  • Same correction 1x → tentative, watch for repetition
  • Same correction 2x → emerging pattern
  • Same correction 3x → ask user: "Should I always do X? (Yes always / Only in [context] / Case by case)"
  • User confirms → promote to permanent rule
  • User says case-by-case → keep as contextual note

Learning signals (phrases that trigger logging):

  • "No, that's not right..." / "Actually, it should be..."
  • "I prefer X, not Y" / "Always do X" / "Never do Y"
  • "I told you before..." / "Stop doing X" / "Why do you keep..."

Ignore (don't log):

  • One-time instructions ("do X now")
  • Hypotheticals ("what if...")
  • Context-specific ("in this file...")

Decision Format

# DEC-NNN: [Short Title]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Category:** tool-selection | strategy | communication | architecture | spending | creative | process
**Status:** OPEN | RESOLVED

## What was decided
[One sentence]

## Why
[Brief reasoning]

## Alternatives considered
- Option A — rejected because...

## Outcome
[Fill in when known]

## Lesson
[Fill in when outcome is clear]

Category tracking enables: "I'm 90% accurate on tool-selection but 60% on strategy." Monthly reviews surface this. That's where real growth happens.

Lesson Extraction

Create in brain/lessons/:

# LESSON-NNN: [Title]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** ACTIVE | VALIDATED | CHALLENGED | ARCHIVED
**Source:** [correction, reflection, or decision outcome]

## The Lesson
[One actionable statement]

## Generalization
[The CLASS of problem this applies to]
[Ask: "Where else does this pattern show up?"]

## Evidence
- [First instance — date, context]

Lifecycle

StatusMeaningTransition
ACTIVENew, believed trueDefault
VALIDATEDConfirmed by 2+ experiencesWhen applied successfully again
CHALLENGEDContradicted by new evidenceWhen counter-evidence appears
ARCHIVEDOutdated or supersededAfter 90+ days unused

Nothing is ever deleted — archived items move to brain/archive/.

Generalization Quality

Before saving, ask:

  1. Specific enough to act on? ("Be careful" = useless. "Verify API responses before parsing" = actionable.)
  2. General enough to reuse? ("Fix line 47" = too narrow. "Validate input at boundaries" = transferable.)
  3. What's the CLASS of mistake? (Not "forgot return code" but "Assumptions about external systems.")

Anti-patterns: over-correcting from one data point, confirmation bias, correlation ≠ causation.

Memory Tiering

MEMORY.md is the boot file — loaded every session. Keep it lean.

TempLocationRule
🔥 HotMEMORY.mdUsed in last 7 days. Target <50 lines.
🌡️ Warmbrain/8-30 days unused. Condense or demote.
❄️ Coldbrain/archive/30+ days unused. Move out entirely.

Rules:

  • Tiering happens during nightly reflection
  • Cold items promote back when relevant again
  • If MEMORY.md exceeds 50 lines → ask user what to deprioritize (don't auto-demote confirmed rules)
  • Nothing is deleted — cold moves to archive

Namespace Isolation

Knowledge inherits down this chain:

Global (MEMORY.md, brain/lessons/)
  └── Domain (brain/knowledge/domains/)
       └── Project (brain/projects/)

Conflict resolution: Most specific wins. Project overrides domain, domain overrides global. Same level: most recent wins. If ambiguous: ask user.

Security Boundaries

Never Store

Credentials, API keys, financial data, medical info, biometrics, third-party personal info, location routines.

Store with Caution

Work context (decay after project ends), emotional states (only if explicitly shared), relationships (roles only, no personal details).

Transparency

  • Every action from memory → cite source
  • User asks "what do you know?" → full export
  • No hidden state — if it affects behavior, it must be visible

Journal Format

brain/journal/YYYY-MM-DD.md:

# YYYY-MM-DD

## Events
- [HH:MM] Description

## Decisions Made
- DEC-NNN: [title]

## Lessons Extracted
- LESSON-NNN: [title]

## Corrections Received
- [What was corrected → what was learned]

## End of Day
[2-3 sentences: what mattered, what to carry forward]

Quick Commands

User saysAction
"What did you learn today?"Today's journal lessons
"Decision log"Recent decisions with status
"Lesson stats"Count by ACTIVE/VALIDATED/CHALLENGED/ARCHIVED
"What decisions am I bad at?"Accuracy by category from resolved decisions
"Reflect now"Run nightly reflection
"What's in the inbox?"Unprocessed captures
"Memory stats"Tier sizes, last reflection, MEMORY.md line count
"Forget X"Archive from all locations (confirm first)
"Export memory"Archive all brain/ files

Integration

Works alongside existing workspace files:

  • AGENTS.md — Add: "Use brain/ for structured knowledge. See learning-loop skill."
  • HEARTBEAT.md — Add: "Run nightly reflection per learning-loop skill if work was done today."
  • MEMORY.md — Learning Loop keeps this lean via automatic tiering.

Everything stays in brain/ within the workspace. No external directories, no network calls.

Scope

This skill ONLY:

  • Writes to brain/ and memory/ within the workspace
  • Reads its own files for reflection and review
  • Suggests edits to MEMORY.md, AGENTS.md, HEARTBEAT.md (with user confirmation)

This skill NEVER:

  • Creates files outside the workspace
  • Makes network requests
  • Accesses email, calendar, or external services
  • Deletes files (archive only)
  • Modifies its own SKILL.md
  • Infers preferences from silence

*Built by ClawMage — the setup guide for brilliant AI agents.* *This is the learning engine from the ClawMage 10-Phase System.* *Want the full system? → clawmage.ai*

平台分布

OpenClaw

91.13%
按下载量换算2,938

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills