Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro(ClawHub 记忆 tiers 专业版)

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 21,100。

总安装 4,969周安装 205GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,624核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clawhub-memory-tiers-pro(ClawHub 记忆 tiers 专业版)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dirtyrootsstudio/clawhub-memory-tiers-pro
安装命令:
openclaw skills install clawhub-memory-tiers-pro
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install clawhub-memory-tiers-pro

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ClawHub 记忆 tiers pro 是面向多代理生产环境的高级内存管理系统,支持质量评分与渐进式披露机制。适合复杂协作场景下对记忆准确性、一致性和安全性有较高要求的用户。通过结构化评分标准和分层记忆扩展,提升代理间知识共享与错误修正效率。

安装命令:openclaw skills install clawhub-memory-tiers-pro;需注意其对系统资源的影响及权限范围。使用前应评估是否需持久化存储或跨会话同步,并确保符合最小权限原则。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install clawhub-memory-tiers-pro;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install clawhub-memory-tiers-pro。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,969 次,近一周安装 205 次,下载 1,624 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clawhub-memory-tiers-pro 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clawhub-memory-tiers-pro

ClawHub 记忆 tiers 专业版 · 本页

4,969—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
agent-memory-tiers-pro
version
1.0.0
description
Production-grade agent memory and quality system for multi-agent swarms. Extends agent-memory-tiers with an 8-point quality grading rubric, progressive disclosure for token efficiency, orchestrator coordination patterns, self-improvement protocols, and agent scoring templates. Built from 3+ weeks running a 20-agent production swarm.
metadata
openclaw
category
productivity
tags
["memory", "multi-agent", "swarm", "quality", "governance", "token-efficiency", "orchestration", "production"]
requires
skills
["agent-memory-tiers"]

Agent Memory Tiers Pro

Turn a collection of agents into a production-grade swarm.

The free agent-memory-tiers skill gives your agents memory. This skill gives your swarm structure, quality standards, and self-improvement. It is the difference between "I have some agents running" and "I have a system that gets better over time."

Built from running a 20-agent swarm in production daily for 3+ weeks. Every pattern here solved a real problem.

Requires: agent-memory-tiers installed and configured first.

What This Adds

ComponentWhat It Does
Quality Grading RubricScore any agent's SOUL.md on 8 criteria. Identify weak spots before they cause failures.
Progressive Disclosure3-tier token loading system. Agents only read what they need, when they need it.
Orchestrator ProtocolPatterns for a coordinator agent to manage the whole swarm efficiently.
Self-Improvement LoopAgents log mistakes and proven approaches. The swarm learns from itself.
Agent Scoring TemplateEvaluate and compare agents objectively. Know which ones need work.

1. The 8-Point Quality Grading Rubric

Every agent SOUL.md should be scored on these 8 criteria. Use the rubric when building new agents or auditing existing ones.

## Agent Quality Rubric

| # | Criterion | A (Top Tier) | C (Functional) | F (Broken) |
|---|-----------|-------------|----------------|-----------|
| 1 | Role Clarity | One sentence, crystal clear, no ambiguity | Vague or tries to do multiple jobs | Missing or contradictory |
| 2 | Activation Triggers | Explicit triggers + exclusion conditions | Partial triggers, some guessing | No triggers defined |
| 3 | Step-by-Step Workflow | Numbered steps with file paths and tool names | General guidance, some gaps | "Figure it out" |
| 4 | Output Format | Exact template with field names and structure | Loose format guidance | No format specified |
| 5 | Quality Checklist | Pre-completion validation steps | Partial checks | None |
| 6 | Error Handling | Common failures listed with specific fixes | Some error awareness | None |
| 7 | Boundaries | Explicit CAN and CANNOT lists | Partial limits | Vague or missing |
| 8 | Token Efficiency | Under 300 lines, references externalized | Under 500 lines | Over 500 or bloated with inline data |

Targets:

  • Score A on criteria 1, 2, 4, and 7 (non-negotiable for production agents).
  • No F on any criterion.
  • Review and re-score every agent monthly.

How to Score an Agent

Read the agent's SOUL.md top to bottom. For each criterion, assign A/C/F based on the rubric. Record the scores.

## Agent Scorecard: [AGENT_NAME]

Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Scored by: [human or auditor agent name]

| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Role Clarity | A | "Security monitor for production." Clear. |
| Activation Triggers | C | Lists triggers but no exclusion conditions. |
| Workflow | A | 12 numbered steps with file paths. |
| Output Format | A | JSON template with required fields. |
| Quality Checklist | C | 2 checks, should have 4-5. |
| Error Handling | F | No failure scenarios listed. |
| Boundaries | A | CAN: scan logs, alert. CANNOT: restart services, modify configs. |
| Token Efficiency | A | 240 lines, refs externalized. |

**Overall: 5A / 2C / 1F — Priority fix: add error handling.**

Fixing Common Score Failures

Role Clarity F → A:

# BAD (F):
You help with various tasks related to content and social media and marketing.

# GOOD (A):
You are WRITER. You draft social media posts for 4 accounts (2 LinkedIn, 2 X).
You do NOT publish, schedule, or manage engagement. You only write drafts.

Error Handling F → A:

# BAD (F):
(nothing — agent has no idea what to do when things break)

# GOOD (A):
## Error Handling

| Error | Cause | Fix |
|-------|-------|-----|
| "File not found: LEADS.md" | First run, file does not exist yet | Create LEADS.md with header template, then continue |
| "API rate limit reached" | Too many requests this session | Stop current task, update L0 flags: "Rate limited — retry next activation" |
| "Output exceeds 20,000 chars" | Response too large for workspace file | Split into multiple files: output-part1.md, output-part2.md |
| "Tool call failed: web_search" | Network issue or API key expired | Skip web search, use cached data from last run, flag in L1 blockers |

Boundaries F → A:

# BAD (F):
Be careful and don't do anything dangerous.

# GOOD (A):
## Boundaries

**CAN:**
- Read and write files in own workspace
- Search the web for public information
- Draft content for human review

**CANNOT:**
- Post, publish, or send anything externally (all output goes to approval queue)
- Access other agents' workspaces (read their L0 only via orchestrator)
- Install packages, modify system config, or run shell commands
- Spend money or commit to deadlines on behalf of the user

2. Progressive Disclosure (Token Efficiency System)

Not every activation needs the full SOUL.md. Load information in tiers to minimize token cost.

## Progressive Disclosure Tiers

| Tier | What Loads | When | Token Cost |
|------|-----------|------|------------|
| T1: Identity | L0.md (4 lines) + role sentence from SOUL.md | Every activation | ~50-100 tokens |
| T2: Context | L1.md (rolling 7-day state) | Every activation | ~100-200 tokens |
| T3: Full Instructions | Complete SOUL.md | When agent activates on a matching trigger | Full SOUL.md cost |
| T4: References | External docs from references/ folder | Only when task explicitly needs them | On demand |

## Rules:
- SOUL.md must stay under 500 lines. If it exceeds this, externalize reference material.
- Large data files (logs, queues, trackers) go in workspace, NOT in SOUL.md.
- Tables and templates are more token-efficient than prose. Prefer structured formats.
- If a section of SOUL.md is only used for 1 out of 10 activations, move it to references/.

SOUL.md Size Budgets

## SOUL.md Section Budget

| Section | Max Lines | Purpose |
|---------|-----------|---------|
| Role + Identity | 5 | Who am I, one sentence purpose |
| Quick Context (L0/L1 loader) | 5 | Pointer to memory files |
| Activation Triggers | 10 | When to wake up, when NOT to |
| Core Workflow | 60-80 | Numbered steps for primary tasks |
| Output Templates | 40-60 | Exact format for deliverables |
| Quality Checklist | 10-15 | Pre-completion validation |
| Error Handling | 15-20 | Failure table |
| Boundaries | 10-15 | CAN/CANNOT lists |
| End-of-Run (L0/L1 update) | 15 | Memory update mandate |
| **TOTAL** | **~200-300** | **Target range for production agents** |

Externalizing References

When SOUL.md gets too large, move supporting material to separate files.

## Reference Externalization Pattern

In SOUL.md, replace large sections with pointers:

  For detailed style guidelines, read `references/STYLE_GUIDE.md`.
  For the full client list and history, read `references/CLIENTS.md`.
  For API endpoint documentation, read `references/API_DOCS.md`.

Rules:
- Agent reads reference files ONLY when the current task needs them.
- Never inline reference content back into SOUL.md.
- Reference files have no size limit but should be focused (one topic per file).
- Update references independently of SOUL.md — they are living documents.

3. Orchestrator Coordination Protocol

When one agent (the orchestrator) manages a swarm of specialist agents, use these patterns.

Swarm Status Check

## Orchestrator: Morning Status Check

1. Read L0.md for every agent in the swarm.
2. Build a status table:

| Agent | Focus | Last Active | Flags |
|-------|-------|-------------|-------|
| WRITER | Draft LinkedIn posts | 2026-03-16 | None |
| SCOUT | Find 5 leads this week | 2026-03-16 | None |
| WATCHDOG | Monitor v2.4 deploy | 2026-03-15 | Grafana intermittent |

3. Flag any agent with:
   - Last active > 48 hours ago (may be stuck or disabled)
   - Non-empty flags (needs attention)
   - Focus misaligned with current priorities

4. Present status brief to human operator. Do NOT auto-reassign tasks.

Task Routing

## Orchestrator: Task Routing Protocol

When a new task arrives:

1. Identify which agent's role matches the task.
2. Read that agent's L0.md — check flags for blockers.
3. Read that agent's L1.md "Blockers" section — confirm agent is not stuck.
4. If agent is clear:
   - Route the task with a structured brief: WHAT (task), WHY (context), DEADLINE (if any), OUTPUT (expected deliverable format).
5. If agent is blocked:
   - Check if a backup agent can handle it.
   - If no backup, escalate to human operator with: blocked agent name, blocker description, suggested fix.
6. Never route a task to an agent whose L0 flags indicate it cannot execute right now.

Cross-Agent Handoffs

## Orchestrator: Handoff Protocol

When Agent A's output feeds into Agent B's input:

1. Agent A completes its task and writes output to a shared handoff file:
   `workspace/handoffs/[AGENT_A]-to-[AGENT_B]-YYYY-MM-DD.md`

2. Agent A updates its L0.md line 3: "Handed off [deliverable] to [AGENT_B]."

3. Orchestrator reads Agent A's L0, confirms handoff file exists.

4. Orchestrator triggers Agent B with:
   - Pointer to the handoff file
   - Context: what Agent A produced and why
   - Expected output format

5. Agent B reads the handoff file, executes its task, writes output.

6. Agent B updates its L0.md and L1.md as normal.

Rules:
- Handoff files are write-once. Agent B never modifies Agent A's output.
- Handoff files older than 7 days can be archived to handoffs/archive/.
- If the handoff file is missing or malformed, Agent B stops and flags the orchestrator.

4. Self-Improvement Protocol

The swarm should get better over time. These two files make that happen.

Lessons File

Create workspace/lessons.md in your main workspace. Any agent (or human) can append to it.

# Lessons Learned

Format: Date | Category | What Happened | Root Cause | Fix Applied

## Template:
- YYYY-MM-DD | [agent/system/workflow] | [what went wrong] | [why] | [what we changed]

## Examples:
- 2026-03-05 | agent | HERALD used wrong model, task failed | Model ID was invalid for provider | Updated all agents to correct model in config
- 2026-03-08 | workflow | Agent output exceeded file size cap | No size check before write | Added pre-write size validation to SOUL.md workflow
- 2026-03-10 | system | Credentials exposed in config file | Env vars stored in committed file | Moved secrets to .env.local, rotated all keys
- 2026-03-12 | agent | SCOUT searched wrong platforms | Activation trigger too broad | Added exclusion conditions to SOUL.md triggers

Patterns File

Create workspace/patterns.md in your main workspace. When something works well, record it.

# Proven Patterns

Format: Pattern Name | When to Use | How It Works

## Template:
### [Pattern Name]
**When:** [situation where this applies]
**How:** [step by step]
**Why it works:** [one sentence]

## Example:
### Batch-Then-Review
**When:** Agent needs to produce multiple outputs (posts, reports, emails).
**How:** Generate all items in one run. Write to a review queue file. Human reviews the batch. Approved items move to the action queue.
**Why it works:** One activation for N outputs is cheaper than N activations for N outputs. Batch review is faster for the human too.

Monthly Swarm Audit

## Monthly Audit Checklist

Run this on the 1st of every month:

1. Score every agent using the 8-point rubric. Record in scorecards/.
2. Review lessons.md — are the same mistakes repeating? If yes, the fix was insufficient.
3. Review patterns.md — are proven patterns actually being used? If not, add them to SOUL.md workflows.
4. Check L0/L1 freshness — any agent with "Last run" older than 14 days is either unused or broken.
5. Check SOUL.md sizes — any over 400 lines needs externalization.
6. Archive old handoff files (> 7 days) and resolved blockers.
7. Update the orchestrator's agent roster with any new or retired agents.

Output: One-page swarm health report for the human operator.

5. Agent Scoring and Comparison

Use this template to track agent quality over time.

## Swarm Scorecard — YYYY-MM

| Agent | Role | Clarity | Triggers | Workflow | Output | Quality | Errors | Bounds | Tokens | Grade |
|-------|------|---------|----------|----------|--------|---------|--------|--------|--------|-------|
| WRITER | Content | A | A | A | A | C | A | A | A | 7A 1C |
| SCOUT | Leads | A | A | C | A | C | C | A | A | 5A 3C |
| WATCHDOG | Security | A | C | A | A | A | F | A | A | 6A 1C 1F |

**Swarm Average:** X.X / 8.0
**Weakest Criterion (swarm-wide):** [identify which criterion has the most C/F scores]
**Priority Fix:** [one action item to raise the weakest area]

Tracking Improvement Over Time

## Swarm Quality Trend

| Month | Agents | Avg Score | A% | C% | F% | Top Agent | Needs Work |
|-------|--------|-----------|----|----|----|---------|-----------|
| 2026-03 | 20 | 6.8 | 78% | 18% | 4% | LEDGER | WATCHDOG |
| 2026-04 | 22 | 7.1 | 82% | 16% | 2% | LEDGER | SCOUT |

Target: 85%+ A scores, 0% F scores within 3 months of deployment.

Permissions

This skill requires:

  • File read/write in agent workspace directories — to manage L0.md, L1.md, scorecards, lessons, patterns, and handoff files.
  • File read across agent workspaces — orchestrator needs to read other agents' L0.md files (read only, never write).
  • No network access required.
  • No external API access required.
  • No sensitive data access required.

Credits

Built and battle-tested by the Megaport swarm team across a 20-agent production deployment. Quality rubric inspired by Anthropic's skill-building guidelines and the OpenViking tiered memory architecture.

License

MIT — use it, modify it, share it.

平台分布

OpenClaw

98.1%
按下载量换算1,593

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills