Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

academic-search(学术搜索)

academic-search 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

academic-search 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 5,984。

总安装 23,632周安装 956GitHub Stars 89下载 7,419核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:academic-search(学术搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills
仓库路径:skills/academic-search
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill academic-search
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill academic-search

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

academic-search 协助学术文献检索与研究方法指导。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中进行论文调研和综述撰写。通过 GitHub 仓库安装,提供数据库推荐和查询策略建议。使用前需明确研究主题和所需资源类型。注意该工具不提供全文访问或原创研究成果。

来源仓库内路径:skills/academic-search

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill academic-s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

academic-search 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill academic-search。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

academic-search 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

academic-search 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

academic-search 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

academic-search 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 23,632 次,近一周安装 956 次,下载 7,419 次,GitHub 89 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

academic-search 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
academic-search

学术搜索 · 本页

23,63289需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Academic Search Skill

Overview

I help you navigate academic literature, find relevant papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize findings for your research projects or literature reviews.

What I can do:

  • Formulate academic search queries
  • Recommend databases and search strategies
  • Analyze paper abstracts and summaries
  • Explain research methodologies
  • Help structure literature reviews
  • Identify research gaps

What I cannot do:

  • Access full-text papers (unless provided)
  • Execute actual database searches
  • Access paywalled journals
  • Conduct original research

How to Use Me

Step 1: Define Your Research Topic

Tell me:

  • Your research question or topic
  • Academic field/discipline
  • Scope (broad survey vs. specific topic)
  • Purpose (literature review, thesis, curiosity)

Step 2: Get Search Strategy

I'll provide:

  • Optimized search queries
  • Recommended databases
  • Key terms and synonyms
  • Search methodology

Step 3: Analyze Findings

If you share papers/abstracts, I can:

  • Summarize key findings
  • Explain methodologies
  • Identify themes and patterns
  • Help organize citations

Academic Databases

General Databases

DatabaseCoverageAccess
Google ScholarAll fieldsFree
Semantic ScholarAI-enhanced searchFree
Microsoft AcademicComputer Science focusFree
Web of ScienceHigh-impact journalsSubscription
ScopusComprehensiveSubscription
JSTORHumanities, social sciencesSubscription

Field-Specific Databases

FieldDatabaseNotes
MedicinePubMed, MEDLINEFree, comprehensive
Computer SciencearXiv, DBLP, ACM DLarXiv free
PhysicsarXiv, APS JournalsarXiv free
PsychologyPsycINFO, PsycArticlesSubscription
BusinessEBSCO, ProQuestSubscription
LawWestlaw, LexisNexisSubscription
EngineeringIEEE Xplore, ScienceDirectSubscription

Preprint Servers

ServerFields
arXivPhysics, Math, CS, Biology
bioRxivLife Sciences
medRxivMedical Sciences
SSRNSocial Sciences
ChemRxivChemistry

Search Query Formulation

Boolean Operators

AND: Both terms must appear
     "machine learning" AND healthcare

OR:  Either term can appear
     "deep learning" OR "neural network"

NOT: Exclude term
     climate change NOT politics

():  Group terms
     (AI OR "artificial intelligence") AND ethics

Advanced Techniques

1. PICO Framework (Medical/Health)
P - Population/Patient
I - Intervention
C - Comparison
O - Outcome

Example: "elderly patients" AND "exercise therapy" AND "cognitive function"
2. Concept Mapping
Main Concept: Machine Learning in Education
├── Synonyms: AI, artificial intelligence, deep learning
├── Related: adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring
└── Applications: personalization, assessment, analytics

Query: ("machine learning" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "deep learning")
       AND (education OR learning OR "tutoring system")
3. Citation Chaining
Forward citation: Who cited this paper?
Backward citation: What did this paper cite?
→ Both methods help find related work

Search Filters

FilterUse Case
Date rangeRecent developments
Publication typeReview vs. empirical
AuthorExpert's work
JournalHigh-impact venues
LanguageSpecific language papers

Paper Analysis Framework

Reading Strategy: Three-Pass Method

Pass 1: Survey (5-10 min)
  • Read title, abstract, introduction
  • Scan headings and figures
  • Read conclusion
  • Outcome: Decide if worth reading more
Pass 2: Understanding (30-60 min)
  • Read carefully but skip proofs/details
  • Note key points and questions
  • Understand figures and tables
  • Outcome: Grasp main contributions
Pass 3: Deep Dive (hours)
  • Virtually re-implement the work
  • Challenge every assumption
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Outcome: Expert-level understanding

Critical Analysis Questions

AspectQuestions
Research QuestionIs it clear? Important? Novel?
MethodologyAppropriate? Rigorous? Reproducible?
ResultsConvincing? Statistically valid?
LimitationsAcknowledged? How severe?
ContributionWhat's new? How significant?

Output Format

Search Strategy Output

# Academic Search Strategy: [Topic]

**Research Question**: [Your question]
**Field**: [Discipline]
**Date**: [Date]

---

## Search Queries

### Primary Query

[Optimized query with Boolean operators]

### Alternative Queries
1. `[Broader query]`
2. `[Narrower query]`
3. `[Related angle]`

---

## Recommended Databases

| Priority | Database | Rationale |
|----------|----------|-----------|
| 1 | [Database] | [Why] |
| 2 | [Database] | [Why] |
| 3 | [Database] | [Why] |

---

## Key Terms & Synonyms

| Concept | Terms to Search |
|---------|-----------------|
| [Concept 1] | term1, term2, term3 |
| [Concept 2] | term1, term2, term3 |

---

## Search Methodology

1. Start with [database] using [query]
2. Apply filters: [filters]
3. Review first [X] results by relevance
4. Use citation chaining on key papers
5. Search [database 2] for [specific aspect]

---

## Expected Paper Types

- Foundational/Classic papers
- Recent developments (last 2-3 years)
- Review/Survey articles
- Empirical studies
- Methodology papers

---

## Quality Indicators to Look For

- [ ] Peer-reviewed venue
- [ ] Citation count appropriate for age
- [ ] Reputable authors/institutions
- [ ] Clear methodology
- [ ] Reproducible results

Literature Review Output

# Literature Review: [Topic]

**Scope**: [What's covered]
**Papers Analyzed**: [Number]
**Date**: [Date]

---

## Overview

[Summary of the research landscape]

---

## Themes

### Theme 1: [Name]
[Summary of papers in this theme]

**Key Papers**:
- [Author] ([Year]): [Key finding]
- [Author] ([Year]): [Key finding]

### Theme 2: [Name]
[Summary of papers in this theme]

---

## Methodological Approaches

| Approach | Papers Using It | Pros | Cons |
|----------|-----------------|------|------|
| [Method 1] | [X] | | |
| [Method 2] | [X] | | |

---

## Key Findings

1. [Finding 1] - supported by [papers]
2. [Finding 2] - supported by [papers]
3. [Finding 3] - supported by [papers]

---

## Research Gaps

1. [Gap 1]: [Why it matters]
2. [Gap 2]: [Why it matters]

---

## Recommendations for Future Research

1. [Direction 1]
2. [Direction 2]

---

## References

[Formatted citations]

Citation Formats

APA 7th Edition

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of article.
Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page–Page. https://doi.org/xxxxx

IEEE

[1] A. Author and B. Author, "Title of article," Journal Name,
vol. X, no. X, pp. XX–XX, Month Year.

Chicago

Author Last, First. "Title of Article." Journal Name Volume,
no. Issue (Year): Page–Page.

Tips for Better Results

  1. Start with review articles to understand the landscape
  2. Use citation chaining - both forward and backward
  3. Check author profiles for related work
  4. Set up alerts for new papers on your topic
  5. Use reference managers (Zotero, Mendeley)
  6. Read abstracts first to filter efficiently
  7. Focus on recent + seminal papers

Limitations

  • Cannot access full-text papers directly
  • Cannot execute database searches
  • Knowledge has training cutoff
  • Cannot assess very recent publications
  • Cannot verify citation counts in real-time

*Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!*

平台分布

Codex

34.57%
按下载量换算2,565

Claude

31.95%
按下载量换算2,370

Cursor

18.56%
按下载量换算1,377

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算676

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills