Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

clanker-discipline(铤而走险的纪律)

clanker-discipline 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

clanker-discipline 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,257。

总安装 659周安装 28GitHub Stars 20下载 231核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:clanker-discipline(铤而走险的纪律)
来源仓库:https://github.com/gbasin/clanker-discipline
仓库路径:skills/clanker-discipline
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/gbasin/clanker-discipline --skill clanker-discipline
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/gbasin/clanker-discipline --skill clanker-discipline

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

强制清理冗余状态标志与可选字段,防止复杂度蔓延。倡导从派生推导值而非存储布尔标志,减少状态爆炸风险。重构函数与类型定义,消除隐藏耦合与意外状态组合。接受较大 diff 换取长期可维护性,拒绝临时 workaround。clanker-discipline 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/clanker-discipline

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/gbasin/clanker-discipline --skill clanker-disc…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

clanker-discipline 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/gbasin/clanker-discipline --skill clanker-discipline。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

clanker-discipline 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

clanker-discipline 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

clanker-discipline 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

clanker-discipline 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 659 次,近一周安装 28 次,下载 231 次,GitHub 20 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

clanker-discipline 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
clanker-discipline

铤而走险的纪律 · 本页

65920需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Clanker Discipline

Apply these rules when writing or reviewing state types, data models, and functions that manage application state. Agents tend to add flags, optional fields, and special cases that compound into state nobody intended — catch that before it lands.

When you find violations, refactor fully. The goal is clean, maintainable code, not minimal diffs. Rip out the flags, reshape the types, restructure the functions. A bigger diff now is better than layering workarounds that compound later.


1. Derive, don't store

Every boolean you add doubles the theoretical state space. When a value can be derived from data you already have, do not store it. The best source to derive from is an event stream: a log of what happened.

Before: cached flags

An agent was asked to show a footer only when the assistant finishes naturally. It invented four flags:

type ThreadState = {
  wasInterrupted: boolean;
  didAssistantFinish: boolean;
  didAssistantError: boolean;
  wasToolCallOnly: boolean;
};

function shouldShowFooter(state: ThreadState): boolean {
  return state.didAssistantFinish
    && !state.wasInterrupted
    && !state.didAssistantError
    && !state.wasToolCallOnly;
}

Four fields to answer one question, with four mutation sites elsewhere keeping them in sync.

After: derive from evidence

function shouldShowFooter(events: SessionEvent[]): boolean {
  const latest = getLatestAssistantMessage(events);
  if (!latest) return false;
  return latest.completed && !latest.error && latest.finish !== 'tool-calls';
}

The answer is now computed from events that already exist.

When NOT to derive

  • The domain genuinely has a state machine with ordered transitions. A checkout step is not a cached conclusion; it IS the state.
  • A field contains temporal or external data that cannot be rederived (timestamps from async processes, API responses needed downstream).
  • The derivation would be more complex than the stored value.

If you cannot derive, encapsulate

If mutable state must exist, trap it in the smallest possible scope. A closure is better than a class field:

// Bad: state visible to the whole class
class Writer {
  private debounceTimeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | null = null;
  queueSend(text: string) { /* can touch debounceTimeout */ }
  flushNow() { /* can touch debounceTimeout */ }
  somethingElse() { /* can also touch debounceTimeout */ }
}

// Good: state trapped in a closure
function createDebouncedAction(callback: () => void, delayMs = 300) {
  let timeout: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout> | null = null;
  return {
    trigger() {
      clearTimeout(timeout!);
      timeout = setTimeout(() => { timeout = null; callback(); }, delayMs);
    },
    clear() {
      if (timeout) { clearTimeout(timeout); timeout = null; }
    },
  };
}

Nothing outside the closure can touch the timer.

The debugging payoff

When state is derived from evidence, debugging becomes data-in, answer-out:

test('footer is hidden for aborted runs', () => {
  const events = loadEvents('./fixtures/aborted-session.jsonl');
  expect(shouldShowFooter(events)).toBe(false);
});

No mocking or timing reproduction. The bug is in the events or in the pure function.


2. Make wrong states impossible

Every optional field is a question the rest of the codebase must answer every time it touches that data.

Discriminated unions over optional bags

// Bad: when status is 'idle', should gateway/transactionId exist? The type doesn't say.
type PaymentState = {
  status: 'idle' | 'processing' | 'settled';
  gateway?: 'stripe' | 'paypal';
  transactionId?: string;
  initiatedAt?: string;
  settledAt?: string;
};

// Good: each status carries exactly the fields it needs.
type PaymentState =
  | { status: 'idle' }
  | { status: 'processing'; gateway: 'stripe' | 'paypal'; transactionId: string; initiatedAt: string }
  | { status: 'settled'; gateway: 'stripe' | 'paypal'; transactionId: string; settledAt: string };

Null over sentinels

// Bad: 'none' is not an action. It is the absence of one.
type PendingAction = 'none' | 'confirm-address' | 'select-shipping';

// Good
type PendingAction = 'confirm-address' | 'select-shipping';
type OrderState = { pendingAction: PendingAction | null };

Phased composition over grab-bags

// Bad: 20+ optional fields. Every consumer does profile.firstName ?? defaults.firstName.
type UserProfile = {
  firstName?: string;
  lastName?: string;
  email?: string;
  phone?: string;
  company?: string;
  jobTitle?: string;
  billingAddress?: string;
  cardLast4?: string;
  // ... more
};

// Good: check one optional instead of eight. When identity exists, all its fields are present.
type UserProfile = {
  identity?: { firstName: string; lastName: string; email: string };
  billing?: { address: string; cardLast4: string };
};

Brand identical primitives

// Bad: a function accepting UserId will happily take a TeamId.
type UserId = string;
type TeamId = string;

// Good
type UserId = string & { readonly __brand: 'user' };
type TeamId = string & { readonly __brand: 'team' };

Delete dead variants

If a type has a variant that is never constructed, delete it. A status: 'open' | 'completed' where 'completed' is never set suggests a lifecycle that does not exist.


3. Enforce function contracts

Never add side effects to a pure function

When a pure function quietly gains a side effect, every callsite inherits behavior it did not ask for. If a function needs side effects, extract them into a separate orchestrator.

  • Semantic functions are small, pure, and self-describing. All inputs in, all outputs out, no hidden effects.
  • Pragmatic functions are orchestrators. They compose semantic functions and contain messy domain glue.

Before: semantic function that grew into a pragmatic one

function handleWebhook(state, eventType, payload, receivedAt): WebhookResult {
  switch (eventType) {
    case 'payment.captured': {
      const receipt = buildReceipt(payload);            // data creation
      state.order.paymentStatus = 'captured';           // mutation
      state.order.receipt = receipt;                     // mutation
      state.user.lastPurchaseAt = receivedAt;           // mutation
      state.user.lifetimeSpend += receipt.amount;        // mutation
      clearPendingAction(state);                         // side effect
      const notifications = buildPaymentNotifs(state);   // notification
      state.notifications.push(...notifications);        // mutation
      recalculateDashboard(state);                       // derivation
      return { state, output: receipt, notifications };
    }
    // ... 12 more cases, same pattern
  }
}

After: composed from semantic functions

function handlePaymentCaptured(state: AppState, payload: PaymentPayload, receivedAt: string): WebhookResult {
  const receipt = buildReceipt(payload);
  const updatedOrder = applyPaymentToOrder(state.order, receipt);
  const updatedUser = applyPurchaseToUser(state.user, receipt, receivedAt);
  const notifications = buildPaymentNotifs(state, receipt);

  return {
    state: { ...state, order: updatedOrder, user: updatedUser },
    output: receipt,
    notifications,
  };
}

Pick a mutation contract

If a function mutates its input, return void. If it returns a value, clone first. Never mutate the input and return the same reference — callers cannot tell whether to use the return value or the original.

// Bad: mutates AND returns the same object
function withPendingAction(state: AppState, action: string): AppState {
  state.pendingAction = action;
  return state;
}

// Good: mutate, return void
function applyPendingAction(state: AppState, action: string): void {
  state.pendingAction = action;
}

// Also good: clone, return new
function withPendingAction(state: AppState, action: string): AppState {
  return { ...state, pendingAction: action };
}

4. Data over procedure

When a long if-chain returns a similar shape from every branch, the logic is a lookup table encoded as code. Convert it to data.

Before: if-chain

function getStepInfo(step: string): StepInfo | null {
  if (step === 'verify-email') {
    return { tone: 'action', title: 'Verify your email', detail: 'Check your inbox' };
  }
  if (step === 'add-payment') {
    return { tone: 'action', title: 'Add payment method', detail: 'Enter card details' };
  }
  if (step === 'review-order') {
    return { tone: 'confirm', title: 'Review your order', detail: 'Check totals' };
  }
  // ... 10 more branches
  return null;
}

After: declarative table

const STEP_INFO: Array<{
  match: (step: string) => boolean;
  info: StepInfo;
}> = [
  { match: (s) => s === 'verify-email', info: { tone: 'action', title: 'Verify your email', detail: 'Check your inbox' } },
  { match: (s) => s === 'add-payment',  info: { tone: 'action', title: 'Add payment method', detail: 'Enter card details' } },
  { match: (s) => s === 'review-order', info: { tone: 'confirm', title: 'Review your order', detail: 'Check totals' } },
  // data, not code
];

function getStepInfo(step: string): StepInfo | null {
  return STEP_INFO.find(({ match }) => match(step))?.info ?? null;
}

Easier to scan, extend, and test. An agent adding a new step adds a data entry, not a branch in a control flow.

When NOT to convert

If branches have different control flow — not just different return values — keep them as code. A table maps inputs to outputs; it cannot express "call X then conditionally call Y."


Checklist

When reviewing code (yours or an agent's):

  • Can any new field be derived from existing state? Derive it.
  • Is mutable state visible beyond its minimal scope? Trap it in a closure.
  • Do any models allow field combinations that should be impossible? Discriminated union.
  • Are there sentinel values ('none', 'unknown', -1) where null would work? Use null.
  • Are there identical type aliases for different domain concepts? Brand or eliminate.
  • Does any function both mutate its input and return it? Pick one contract.
  • Has a semantic function grown side effects? Extract them.
  • Is there an if-chain where every branch returns a similar shape? Make it a table.
  • Are there dead type variants never constructed? Delete them.

平台分布

Codex

35.44%
按下载量换算82

Claude

30.11%
按下载量换算70

Cursor

17.94%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.14%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills