Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

planning(规划)

planning 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

planning 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 70,176。

总安装 212周安装 9GitHub Stars 633下载 74核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:planning(规划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/citypaul/dotfiles
仓库路径:skills/planning
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/citypaul/dotfiles --skill planning
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/citypaul/dotfiles --skill planning

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持基于关键词或任务场景快速定位结果。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要结构化规划任务的场景。支持小步增量工作模式,每个阶段保持代码库可运行并通过测试。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网或文件操作。

planning 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/planning

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/citypaul/dotfiles --skill planning;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

planning 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/citypaul/dotfiles --skill planning。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

planning 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

planning 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

planning 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

planning 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 212 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 74 次,GitHub 633 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

planning 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
planning

规划 · 本页

212633操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Planning in Small Increments

All work must be done in small, known-good increments. Each increment leaves the codebase in a working state where all tests pass.

Use the /plan command to create plans. Use the /continue command to resume work after a merged PR.

Plans Directory

Plans live in plans/ at the project root. Each plan is a self-contained file named descriptively (e.g., plans/gift-tracking.md, plans/email-validation.md).

To discover active plans: ls plans/

Multiple plans can coexist — each is independent and won't conflict across branches or worktrees because they have unique filenames.

When a plan is complete: delete the plan file. If plans/ is empty, delete the directory.

Prefer Multiple Small PRs

Break work into the smallest independently mergeable units. Each PR should be reviewable in isolation and deliver a coherent slice of value.

Why this matters: Small PRs are easier to review, easier to revert, and easier to reason about. When something breaks, the cause is obvious. When a PR sits in review, it doesn't block unrelated work. The goal is to stay as close to main as possible at all times.

A PR is too big when the reviewer needs to hold multiple unrelated concepts in their head to understand it, or when you'd struggle to write a clear 1-3 sentence summary of what it does.

There will be exceptions — some changes are inherently coupled and splitting them would create broken intermediate states. Use judgement. But the default should always be to ask "can this be split?"

What Makes a "Known-Good Increment"

Each step MUST:

  • Leave all tests passing
  • Be independently deployable
  • Have clear done criteria
  • Fit in a single commit
  • Be describable in one sentence

If you can't describe a step in one sentence, break it down further.

Step Size Heuristics

Too big if:

  • Takes more than one session
  • Requires multiple commits to complete
  • Has multiple "and"s in description
  • You're unsure how to test it

Right size if:

  • One clear test case
  • One logical change
  • Can explain to someone quickly
  • Obvious when done
  • Single responsibility

TDD Integration

Every step follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR-MUTATE. See testing skill for factory patterns.

FOR EACH STEP:
    │
    ├─► RED: Write failing test FIRST
    │   - Test describes expected behavior
    │   - Test fails for the right reason
    │
    ├─► GREEN: Write MINIMUM code to pass
    │   - No extra features
    │   - No premature optimization
    │   - Just make the test pass
    │
    ├─► REFACTOR: Assess improvements
    │   - See `refactoring` skill
    │   - Only if it adds value
    │   - All tests still pass
    │
    ├─► MUTATE: Verify test effectiveness
    │   - Run `mutation-testing` skill
    │   - Fix any surviving mutants
    │
    └─► STOP: Wait for commit approval

No exceptions. No "I'll add tests later."

Commit Discipline

NEVER commit without user approval.

After completing a step (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR):

  1. Verify all tests pass
  2. Verify static analysis passes
  3. STOP and ask: "Ready to commit [description]. Approve?"

Only proceed with commit after explicit approval.

Why Wait for Approval?

  • User maintains control of git history
  • Opportunity to review before commit
  • Prevents accidental commits of incomplete work
  • Creates natural checkpoint for discussion

Plan File Structure

Each plan file in plans/ follows this structure:

# Plan: [Feature Name]

**Branch**: feat/feature-name
**Status**: Active

## Goal

[One sentence describing the outcome]

## Acceptance Criteria

[Behaviour-driven criteria — describe observable business outcomes, not implementation details.
Tests at every level (unit, browser, integration) should verify behaviour.]

- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
- [ ] Criterion 3

## Steps

Every step follows RED-GREEN-REFACTOR-MUTATE. No production code without a failing test.
Read the project's CLAUDE.md and testing rules before writing steps.

### Step 1: [One sentence description]

**RED**: What failing test will we write? (Describes expected behaviour, not implementation.)
**GREEN**: What minimum code makes the test pass?
**REFACTOR**: Assess improvements (only if they add value).
**MUTATE**: Run `mutation-testing` skill to verify tests catch real bugs.
**Done when**: How do we know it's complete?

### Step 2: [One sentence description]

**RED**: ...
**GREEN**: ...
**REFACTOR**: ...
**MUTATE**: ...
**Done when**: ...

## Pre-PR Quality Gate

Before each PR:
1. Mutation testing — run `mutation-testing` skill
2. Refactoring assessment — run `refactoring` skill
3. Typecheck and lint pass
4. DDD glossary check — if the project uses DDD, verify all domain terms match the canonical glossary

---
*Delete this file when the plan is complete. If `plans/` is empty, delete the directory.*

Plan Changes Require Approval

If the plan needs to change:

  1. Explain what changed and why
  2. Propose updated steps
  3. Wait for approval before proceeding

Plans are not immutable, but changes must be explicit and approved.

End of Feature

When all steps are complete:

  1. Verify completion — all acceptance criteria met, all tests passing
  2. Merge learnings — if significant insights were gained, use the learn agent for CLAUDE.md updates or adr agent for architectural decisions
  3. Delete plan file — remove from plans/, delete plans/ if empty

Anti-Patterns

❌ Committing without approval

  • Always wait for explicit "yes" before committing

❌ Steps that span multiple commits

  • Break down further until one step = one commit

❌ Writing code before tests

  • RED comes first, always

❌ Plans that change silently

  • All plan changes require discussion and approval

❌ Keeping plan files after feature complete

  • Delete them; knowledge lives in CLAUDE.md, ADRs, and git history

Quick Reference

START FEATURE
│
├─► Create plan in plans/ (get approval)
│
│   FOR EACH STEP:
│   │
│   ├─► RED: Failing test
│   ├─► GREEN: Make it pass
│   ├─► REFACTOR: If valuable
│   ├─► MUTATE: Verify tests catch bugs
│   └─► **WAIT FOR COMMIT APPROVAL**
│
END FEATURE
│
├─► Verify all criteria met
├─► Merge learnings if significant (learn agent, adr agent)
└─► Delete plan file from plans/

平台分布

Codex

35.52%
按下载量换算26

Claude

32.45%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

17.26%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.14%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills