Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

chrome-release-verify(chrome 版本验证)

chrome-release-verify 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

chrome-release-verify 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,838。

总安装 192周安装 8GitHub Stars 121,132下载 64核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:chrome-release-verify(chrome 版本验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/electron/electron
仓库路径:skills/chrome-release-verify
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/electron/electron --skill chrome-release-verify
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/electron/electron --skill chrome-release-verify

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

验证 Chrome 安全修复能否成功回移植到指定分支。自动尝试应用补丁并通过 lint 检查,确保兼容性。本地操作不推送代码,降低误提交风险。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。需用户提供发布分支与博客 URL 作为输入参数。

chrome-release-verify 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/chrome-release-verify

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/electron/electron --skill chrome-release-verif…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

chrome-release-verify 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/electron/electron --skill chrome-release-verify。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

chrome-release-verify 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

chrome-release-verify 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

chrome-release-verify 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

chrome-release-verify 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 192 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 64 次,GitHub 121,132 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

chrome-release-verify 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 121,132 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
chrome-release-verify

chrome 版本验证 · 本页

192121,132操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Chrome Release → Validated Backport PR

Input: $ARGUMENTS = <release-branch> <chrome-releases-blog-url> (e.g. 41-x-y https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_15.html). Ask if either is missing.

The flow is local-first: nothing is pushed until every patch applies via e sync --3 and passes lint --patches.

1. Map CVE → bug → fix CL

Run /chrome-release-cls <blog-url> (or its inline procedure) to produce /tmp/cve_bugs.txt (CVE|bug|severity|desc) and a per-bug canonical fix CL. For each CL also note repo (path under src/: ., v8, third_party/{skia,angle,pdfium,dawn}, third_party/libaom/source/libaom) and gerrit-host.

Prefer the target-milestone merge CL if one exists (e.g. on 41-x-y ≈ M146, prefer the [M146] cherry-pick over the main CL) — it's already rebased and far less likely to conflict. Find it via git log --all --grep on the Change-Id, or Gerrit ?q=bug:<n>. If Chrome did *not* merge a fix to the target milestone, that's a strong signal the vulnerable code doesn't exist there — flag it for skip rather than forcing a port.

2. Prepare a synced worktree

Reuse bp-<NN> from e show configs if present, else e worktree add bp-<NN> ~/src/electron-bp-<NN> --source <current> --no-sync.

cd <root>/src/electron
git fetch origin <branch>
git checkout -B security-backport/<branch>/<short-date> origin/<branch>
e use bp-<NN>
e sync 2>&1 | tee /tmp/bp_sync.log

If sync fails with NotADirectoryError: '<root>/src/.git/objects/info/alternates', remove GIT_CACHE_PATH from the bp config's env and retry.

3. Verify IN-TREE vs NEEDS-BACKPORT

For each bug, three checks against the synced repo:

  1. git -C "$repo" log HEAD --since='1 year ago' -E --grep="\b${bug}\b" --format='%h %s'
  2. Fetch Change-Id from Gerrit, then git log HEAD --grep="^Change-Id: ${cid}$"
  3. grep -rlE "(\b${bug}\b|${cid})" <root>/src/electron/patches/

Any hit ⇒ IN-TREE. All empty ⇒ NEEDS-BACKPORT.

For each NEEDS-BACKPORT CL, also fetch its file list (/changes/<proj>~<cl>/revisions/current/files) and skip if every file is under chrome/browser/, chrome/android/, ios/, or components/**/android/ — Electron doesn't compile those.

Report the table now (CVE | Sev | Bug | Component | Verdict | CL) and the proposed backport set; get user sign-off before continuing.

4. Write patches locally (no push yet)

For each backport CL, fetch the raw patch and write it into patches/<dir>/:

curl -s "https://${host}.googlesource.com/changes/${proj//\//%2F}~${cl}/revisions/current/patch" \
  | base64 -d > "patches/${dir}/cherry-pick-${short}.patch"
echo "cherry-pick-${short}.patch" >> "patches/${dir}/.patches"

For repos with no Gerrit host e cherry-pick supports (e.g. libaom on aomedia), instead git cherry-pick the upstream commits onto the synced sub-repo HEAD and git format-patch the result.

For any newly-created patches/<dir>/, append to patches/config.json preserving the compact one-line-per-entry style:

  { "patch_dir": "src/electron/patches/<dir>", "repo": "src/third_party/<dir-or-nested-path>" }

5. Validate with e sync --3

e sync --3 2>&1 | tee /tmp/bp_sync3.log

On Patch failed at NNNN <subject>:

  • cd into the failing repo, inspect git diff for conflict markers.
  • Test-only files (e.g. web_tests/VirtualTestSuites, *_unittest.cc context drift): take ours (git checkout --ours -- <file>) if the security-relevant hunks merged cleanly.
  • Substantive code conflicts: check whether a target-milestone merge CL exists and swap to it. If none exists upstream and the surrounding code is structurally different, drop the patch (delete the file, remove from .patches and config.json) and note it for a separate manual-port PR — do not improvise security-fix semantics.
  • After resolving: git add <files> && git -c commit.gpgsign=false am --continue, then e patches <repo> to export the resolved patch, then re-run e sync --3. Repeat until clean.

6. Export → lint → re-apply loop

e patches all
node script/lint.js --patches   # must exit 0

If lint reports findings (typically trailing whitespace on + content lines), fixing them changes the bytes the patch writes, which invalidates the index <old>..<new> blob hashes that e patches baked in. Hand-editing a .patch and pushing it as-is will pass lint locally but fail CI's Apply Patches re-export check with a one-line index hash diff.

So whenever lint (or you) modifies any .patch file after export, round-trip once more:

# fix the lint findings in patches/**/*.patch, then:
e sync            # re-apply the edited patches (no --3 needed; they applied cleanly last time)
e patches all     # re-export so index blob hashes match the edited content
node script/lint.js --patches      # must now exit 0
git diff --quiet -- patches/ || { echo "patches changed again — repeat the loop"; }

Repeat until lint --patches exits 0 and git diff -- patches/ is empty after the final e patches all. Only then is the patch set CI-stable.

7. Commit, push, PR

git add patches/
git commit -m "chore: cherry-pick <N> changes from <dirs>"
git push origin HEAD
gh pr create --repo electron/electron --base <branch> --head <this-branch> \
  --title "chore: cherry-pick <N> changes from <dirs>" \
  --label "<branch>" --label backport-check-skip --label semver/patch --label "security 🔒" \
  --body-file /tmp/pr_body.md

PR body format:

Backports the following changes:

* [`<shortCommit>`](<gerrit-CL-url>) from <patchDir> — <subject> ([<bug>](https://crbug.com/<bug>), CVE-YYYY-NNNN)
* ...

Notes: Security: backported fixes for CVE-YYYY-NNNN, CVE-YYYY-NNNN, ....

Short commit links to the Gerrit CL; bug links to crbug.com; CVE comes from the blog mapping (the patch's own Bug: footer may differ); Notes: is the last line. Mention any dropped patches (with reason) above the Notes: line.

Restore e use <previous> when done.

平台分布

Codex

35.91%
按下载量换算23

Claude

30.03%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

15.86%
按下载量换算10

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills