Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

change-verification(变更验证)

change-verification 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

change-verification 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 13,884。

总安装 3,564周安装 150GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,248核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:change-verification(变更验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vahagn-madatyan/change-verification
安装命令:
openclaw skills install change-verification
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install change-verification

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

Change Verification 提供跨 Cisco、Juniper 和 Arista 设备的变更前后验证能力。适用于网络设备配置变更前的基线捕获与差异分析场景。通过 clawhub 安装,支持回滚决策指导与自动化审计流程。需确认其对生产环境设备的访问权限及潜在的操作风险。

change-verification 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install change-verification;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

change-verification 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install change-verification。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

change-verification 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

change-verification 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

change-verification 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

change-verification 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,564 次,近一周安装 150 次,下载 1,248 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

change-verification 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
change-verification

变更验证 · 本页

3,564—调用外部服务MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
change-verification
description
>-
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
safety
read-write
author
network-security-skills-suite
version
1.0.0
openclaw
{"emoji":"🔧","safetyTier":"read-write","requires":{"bins":["ssh"],"env":[]},"tags":["change","verification","rollback"],"mcpDependencies":["git-netops-mcp"],"egressEndpoints":[]}

Change Verification

Event-driven change verification skill for structured change windows. Guides baseline capture before a change, provides change execution safety patterns, performs post-change diff analysis, and supports rollback decision-making when unexpected deviations are detected.

This skill covers a single change event lifecycle (before → during → after). For ongoing configuration drift detection and compliance auditing, use the config-management skill instead.

Commands are labeled [Cisco], [JunOS], or [EOS] where syntax diverges. Unlabeled statements apply to all three vendors.

Safety Note — Read-Write Operations: This skill includes procedures that modify device state during change execution and rollback phases. Steps that write to devices are marked with ⚠️ WRITE. Always confirm authorization, change ticket approval, and maintenance window status before executing write operations. Baseline capture and post-change verification steps are read-only and safe to run at any time.

When to Use

  • Planned maintenance window requiring structured pre/post verification
  • Configuration change (routing policy, ACLs, interface config) with rollback plan
  • Software upgrade or patch requiring before/after state comparison
  • Hardware replacement (linecard, SFP, PSU) with service validation
  • Circuit turn-up or decommission with adjacency and traffic verification
  • Emergency change requiring rapid baseline capture and rollback readiness
  • Post-change soak period with periodic re-verification against baselines

Prerequisites

  • SSH or console access to all devices in the change scope (read-only for

baselines; enable/configure privilege for change execution and rollback)

  • Approved change ticket with documented scope, expected impact, and rollback

plan including timing criteria

  • Pre-identified list of devices and interfaces in the change scope
  • Knowledge of expected state changes: which routes will move, which interfaces

will bounce, which adjacencies will flap

  • Access to a file store (flash, SCP server, or local disk) for baseline

archival

  • Contact information for escalation if rollback criteria are met
  • See references/checklist-templates.md for per-change-type prerequisites

Procedure

Follow these steps sequentially for each change event. Steps 1–2 are always read-only. Steps 3–4 include write operations. Steps 5–6 are analytical and drive the rollback decision.

Step 1: Pre-Change Baseline Capture

Capture device state snapshots before any changes. Store outputs with timestamps for post-change comparison.

Routing state:

[Cisco]

show ip route summary
show ip bgp summary
show ip ospf neighbor

[JunOS]

show route summary
show bgp summary
show ospf neighbor

[EOS]

show ip route summary
show ip bgp summary
show ip ospf neighbor

Interface and adjacency state:

All vendors — capture interface status, error counters, and neighbor tables:

[Cisco]

show interfaces summary
show cdp neighbors
show ip arp

[JunOS]

show interfaces terse
show lldp neighbors
show arp no-resolve

[EOS]

show interfaces status
show lldp neighbors
show ip arp

Configuration and hardware:

[Cisco]

show running-config
show environment all
show inventory

[JunOS]

show configuration
show chassis environment
show chassis hardware

[EOS]

show running-config
show environment all
show inventory

⚠️ WRITE — Archive baseline config to persistent storage:

[Cisco] copy running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg [JunOS] request system configuration save /var/tmp/pre-change-[ticket].conf [EOS] copy running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg

Record baseline metrics for comparison: total route count, BGP peer count (Established), OSPF neighbor count (Full), interface error counters, and hardware sensor readings.

Step 2: Change Scope Documentation

Before executing any changes, document:

  1. Change description — what configuration lines are being added, modified,

or removed

  1. Expected impact — which peers will flap, which routes will shift, which

interfaces will bounce, expected duration of disruption

  1. Rollback trigger criteria — specific thresholds that mandate rollback

(see Threshold Tables below)

  1. Rollback procedure — exact commands to revert (see

references/cli-reference.md for vendor-specific rollback commands)

  1. Success criteria — what "done" looks like: all baselines restored,

intended changes visible, no unexpected deviations

  1. Soak period — how long to monitor after change before declaring success

Step 3: Change Execution

⚠️ WRITE — Apply changes using commit-confirm patterns when available.

[Cisco] — No native commit-confirm. Apply changes in config mode and immediately verify. For bulk changes, use configure replace with a prepared config file.

[JunOS] — Use commit confirmed [minutes] to auto-rollback if not confirmed within the timer window. Confirm with commit after verification.

configure
# ... apply changes ...
commit confirmed 5
# ... verify ...
commit

[EOS] — Use configure session for atomic staged changes. Review before committing.

configure session change-[ticket]
# ... apply changes ...
show session-config
commit

Staged rollout for multi-device changes: Apply to one device first, verify post-change state (Step 4), then proceed to remaining devices only after the first device passes all checks.

Step 4: Post-Change Verification

Re-capture all baseline metrics from Step 1 using identical commands. Perform a structured diff against pre-change baselines.

Key comparisons:

MetricCompare AgainstExpected Outcome
Route countPre-change summaryWithin deviation threshold
BGP peers EstablishedPre-change peer listAll peers restored (or changed per plan)
OSPF neighbors FullPre-change neighbor listAll adjacencies restored
Interface errorsPre-change countersNo new sustained errors
Config diffArchived pre-change configOnly intended lines changed

Config diff verification:

[Cisco]

show archive config differences flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg system:running-config

[JunOS]

show | compare rollback 1

[EOS]

diff running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg

Review every line in the diff output. Classify each changed line as expected (directly part of the change plan) or unexpected (not in the change scope).

Step 5: Impact Assessment

Classify all deviations from baseline into categories:

  1. Expected — Intended: Changes that are the direct goal of the change

window (e.g., new BGP peer appearing, old ACL removed). No action needed.

  1. Expected — Side Effect: Changes caused by the intended change but not

the primary goal (e.g., route count increase because a new peer is now advertising). Verify they are benign.

  1. Unexpected — Minor: Deviations not related to the change scope but low

severity (e.g., a single interface counter increment). Investigate but do not necessarily roll back.

  1. Unexpected — Critical: Deviations indicating collateral damage (e.g.,

adjacency loss on an unrelated interface, route withdrawal not in change scope). Evaluate rollback immediately.

If any deviation is classified as Unexpected — Critical, proceed directly to Step 6 rollback evaluation.

Step 6: Rollback Decision

Evaluate whether to accept the change or roll back using the criteria below.

Rollback if ANY of these conditions are true:

  • Service-affecting outage on interfaces/peers outside the change scope
  • Route count deviation exceeds threshold AND routes are not accounted for in

the change plan

  • Adjacency loss persists beyond the expected convergence window
  • Hardware errors (PSU, fan, temperature) emerged that were not present in

baseline

  • The change did not achieve its intended effect (success criteria from Step 2

not met)

Accept if ALL of these conditions are true:

  • All success criteria from Step 2 are met
  • Config diff contains only expected change lines
  • All baseline metrics are within acceptable deviation thresholds
  • No unexpected critical deviations detected
  • Soak period has elapsed without regression

⚠️ WRITE — If rolling back:

[Cisco] configure replace flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg force [JunOS] rollback 1 then commit [EOS] configure replace flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg

After rollback, re-run Step 4 post-change verification to confirm the device has returned to its pre-change state.

Threshold Tables

Acceptable Deviation Thresholds

MetricNormal DeviationWarningRollback Trigger
IPv4 route count±2% of baseline±5% of baseline>10% or unplanned loss
IPv6 route count±2% of baseline±5% of baseline>10% or unplanned loss
BGP Established peers0 lost (unless planned)1 lost (if in scope)≥1 lost outside scope
OSPF Full adjacencies0 lost (unless planned)Flap then recover <2 minLost >2 min
Interface errors (new)0 new CRC/input errors<10 in first 5 minSustained >10/min
Interface flaps0 (unless planned bounce)1 flap on in-scope intfAny flap outside scope

Rollback Timing Thresholds

PhaseMaximum DurationAction if Exceeded
Change executionPer change ticketPause and escalate
Post-change convergence5 minutesBegin rollback assessment
Adjacency re-establishment2 minutes per peerEscalate if critical peer
Route table stabilization3 minutesCheck for route oscillation
Soak period (minor change)15 minutesDeclare success or investigate
Soak period (major change)60 minutesDeclare success or investigate
Rollback execution5 minutesEscalate to senior engineer

Decision Trees

Post-Change Diff Contains Unexpected Lines

Config diff shows unexpected changes
├── Lines are in sections RELATED to change scope
│   ├── Side effect of intended change (e.g., auto-generated route-map sequence)
│   │   └── Classify as Expected — Side Effect → Document and accept
│   └── Unintended consequence (e.g., wrong interface affected)
│       └── Classify as Unexpected — Critical → Evaluate rollback
└── Lines are in sections UNRELATED to change scope
    ├── Timestamps, counters, or cosmetic changes (e.g., "Last configuration change")
    │   └── Classify as Expected — Side Effect → Ignore
    └── Substantive config changes (e.g., ACL modified, route-map added)
        └── Classify as Unexpected — Critical → Immediate rollback

Adjacency Loss Detected Post-Change

Neighbor/peer no longer in expected state
├── Device IS in the change scope
│   ├── Interface was intentionally bounced per change plan
│   │   ├── Adjacency recovers within timing threshold
│   │   │   └── Expected — document recovery time
│   │   └── Adjacency does NOT recover within threshold
│   │       └── Investigate → Check interface state, cable, peer config
│   └── Interface was NOT intentionally bounced
│       └── Unexpected — Critical → Check for config error → Rollback if unresolved
└── Device is NOT in the change scope
    ├── Peer is on a device that IS in scope (far-end impact)
    │   └── Expected side effect → Verify peer recovers within threshold
    └── Peer is on a device NOT in scope (unrelated)
        └── Unexpected — Critical → Unrelated failure, separate investigation

Route Count Deviation Outside Normal Threshold

Route count differs from baseline beyond ±2%
├── Change plan includes prefix addition or removal
│   ├── Deviation direction matches plan (added routes = count increase)
│   │   └── Expected — verify exact prefix matches plan
│   └── Deviation direction opposes plan (planned addition but count decreased)
│       └── Unexpected — Critical → Check BGP/OSPF process, peer state
├── Change plan does NOT include routing changes
│   ├── Deviation is <5% and routes are from in-scope device peers
│   │   └── Warning — likely convergence artifact → Monitor for 3 min
│   └── Deviation is >5% OR routes from out-of-scope sources
│       └── Unexpected — Critical → Evaluate rollback
└── Route oscillation detected (count fluctuating)
    └── Unexpected — Critical → Routing loop or flapping → Immediate rollback

Report Template

# Change Verification Report — [Ticket ID]

## Change Summary
- **Ticket:** [ID]
- **Date/Time:** [Start] — [End]
- **Devices:** [list]
- **Change Type:** [routing | switching | security | upgrade | other]
- **Executed By:** [name/team]

## Pre-Change Baseline
- Route count (IPv4/IPv6): [count]
- BGP peers Established: [count]
- OSPF adjacencies Full: [count]
- Interface errors (notable): [any]
- Config archived to: [location]

## Change Execution
- Method: [manual | commit-confirm | session | replace]
- Duration: [minutes]
- Issues during execution: [none | description]

## Post-Change Verification
- Route count (IPv4/IPv6): [count] (Δ [change])
- BGP peers Established: [count] (Δ [change])
- OSPF adjacencies Full: [count] (Δ [change])
- Interface errors (new): [count]
- Config diff lines: [expected: N, unexpected: N]

## Impact Assessment
- Expected — Intended: [list]
- Expected — Side Effect: [list]
- Unexpected — Minor: [list or none]
- Unexpected — Critical: [list or none]

## Decision
- **Result:** [ACCEPTED | ROLLED BACK | ESCALATED]
- **Rationale:** [reason]
- **Soak period:** [duration, outcome]

## Action Items
- [ ] [any follow-up tasks]

Troubleshooting

Baseline capture commands fail or return incomplete output

  • Verify SSH session stability — long command outputs may be truncated by

terminal buffer limits. Use terminal length 0 [Cisco/EOS] or set cli screen-length 0 [JunOS] before capture.

  • Check device CPU — high CPU may cause CLI timeouts. Run show processes cpu

[Cisco] / show system processes extensive [JunOS] / show processes top [EOS] to verify.

  • If archival to remote storage fails, save to local flash as fallback and

note the location for later retrieval.

Config diff shows excessive noise

  • Filter out timestamp and comment lines that change on every config display

(e.g., ! Last configuration change at ...).

  • On [JunOS], show | compare rollback 1 gives clean structured diffs. On

[Cisco], show archive config differences may include line-order differences that are not real changes — focus on substantive config lines.

  • Use references/checklist-templates.md checklists to focus verification on

change-relevant sections rather than full config comparison.

Adjacency does not recover after expected bounce

  • Check interface state: show interfaces [intf] — look for down/down vs

up/down to distinguish physical vs protocol issues.

  • Verify the peer device accepted the change — a mismatched configuration on

both sides of a link (e.g., mismatched OSPF area, BGP ASN) will prevent adjacency formation.

  • Check for hold-timer expiry: OSPF default dead interval is 40s; BGP default

hold time is 180s. Wait at least one full timer cycle before escalating.

Rollback command fails or produces unexpected state

  • [Cisco] configure replace requires the IOS archive feature to be

enabled. If unavailable, manually reverse the config changes line by line.

  • [JunOS] rollback N may fail if the commit history has been cleared or

the device has rebooted since the baseline commit. Use show system commit to verify available rollback points.

  • [EOS] configure replace requires the replacement file to be a complete

config, not a partial fragment. Verify the archived file is a full show running-config capture.

  • After any rollback, re-run the full post-change verification (Step 4) to

confirm the device has returned to its pre-change state.

Change window time exceeded before verification completes

  • Prioritize critical services: check routing adjacencies and interface states

first, defer detailed config diff analysis to after the window if services are healthy.

  • If the soak period must be shortened, document the reduced observation window

and schedule a follow-up verification at the next opportunity.

  • Escalate if service impact is detected and the change window has closed —

do not delay rollback due to window constraints if there is active service degradation.

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.08%
按下载量换算1,062

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills