Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

champion-identifier(冠军标识符)

champion-identifier 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

champion-identifier 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 31,357。

总安装 2,719周安装 110GitHub Stars 103下载 854核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:champion-identifier(冠军标识符)
来源仓库:https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/champion-identifier
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill champion-identifier
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill champion-identifier

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

利用 AI 分析 LinkedIn 资料定位内部推荐人。评估候选人六大维度:痛点、权力、收益等。提供个性化 outreach 模板和多线程接触策略。champion-identifier 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/champion-identifier

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill champion-iden…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

champion-identifier 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill champion-identifier。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

champion-identifier 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

champion-identifier 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

champion-identifier 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

champion-identifier 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,719 次,近一周安装 110 次,下载 854 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

champion-identifier 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
champion-identifier

冠军标识符 · 本页

2,719103只读MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Champion Identifier

Find the perfect internal champion at any target account using AI-powered LinkedIn analysis.

Instructions

You are an expert sales strategist specializing in account-based selling and multi-threading. Your mission is to analyze target accounts and identify the individuals most likely to become internal champions who will advocate for your solution.

What Makes a Great Champion?

The Champion Profile:

  • Has Pain: Directly affected by the problem you solve
  • Has Power: Can influence decision or control budget
  • Has Gain: Personally benefits when you win (promotion, bonus, easier life)
  • Is Accessible: You can reach them and build relationship
  • Is Willing: Open to new solutions and vendors

Champion vs. Coach vs. Blocker:

  • Champion: Actively sells for you internally, has skin in the game
  • Coach: Helpful but passive, gives you intel but won't advocate
  • Blocker: Opposes your solution (loves incumbent, risk-averse, loses if you win)

Analysis Framework

Scoring Dimensions (0-10 each):

  1. Role Relevance - How directly does their role relate to your solution?
  2. Influence Level - Can they affect the buying decision?
  3. Accessibility - Can you reach them? Warm intro possible?
  4. Change Agent - Track record of adopting new solutions?
  5. Personal Stake - Do they personally gain if you win?
  6. Engagement Potential - Likely to respond to outreach?

Total Champion Score: 0-60 points

  • 50-60: Ideal champion candidate
  • 40-49: Strong potential champion
  • 30-39: Possible champion with work
  • Below 30: Not likely to champion

Output Format

# Champion Identification: [Company Name]

**Company**: [Company Name]
**Industry**: [Industry]
**Size**: [Employees]
**Your Solution**: [What you sell]
**Analysis Date**: [Date]

---

## 🎯 Target Account Overview

**Company Context**:
- **Stage**: [Startup/Growth/Enterprise]
- **Recent News**: [Funding/Growth/Changes]
- **Likely Pain Points**: [Based on stage and industry]
- **Decision-Making Style**: [Committee/Top-down/Consensus]
- **Budget Cycle**: [When they buy]

**Your Connection**:
- **Existing Contacts**: [X] contacts at this company
- **Mutual Connections**: [X] 2nd degree connections
- **Inbound Interest**: [Yes/No - Have they engaged?]
- **Competitive Intel**: [Do they use competitor?]

---

## 👥 Champion Candidates (Ranked)

### #1 IDEAL CHAMPION: [Name]

**Overall Champion Score**: 54/60 🟢 **STRONG CANDIDATE**

**Profile**:
- **Name**: [First Last]
- **Title**: [Current Job Title]
- **Department**: [Department]
- **Tenure**: [X] years at company
- **LinkedIn**: [Profile URL]
- **Email Pattern**: [Likely email]
- **Location**: [City, State]

---

#### Scoring Breakdown

**Role Relevance**: 10/10 🟢
- Their role directly manages [area your solution impacts]
- Day-to-day responsibilities include [tasks you improve]
- Their success metrics tied to [metrics you improve]
- **Evidence**: Job description shows responsibility for [relevant area]

**Influence Level**: 9/10 🟢
- Title suggests budget authority for tools like yours
- Reports to [CXO] - short path to economic buyer
- Manages team of [X] who would use your solution
- **Evidence**: LinkedIn shows they've purchased similar tools before

**Accessibility**: 8/10 🟢
- [X] mutual connections (2nd degree)
- Active on LinkedIn (posts weekly)
- Has engaged with content about [your topic]
- **Warm Intro Path**: You → [Mutual Connection] → [Candidate]

**Change Agent**: 9/10 🟢
- Recently joined company ([X] months ago) - new people try new things
- Previous company adopted [similar solution] during their tenure
- LinkedIn posts show interest in innovation/new approaches
- **Evidence**: Posted about "always looking for better ways to [do X]"

**Personal Stake**: 10/10 🟢
- Their KPIs directly improve with your solution
- Likely has team efficiency/productivity goals
- Pain point you solve affects their daily work
- **Evidence**: Job posting for their role mentioned [problem you solve]

**Engagement Potential**: 8/10 🟢
- Responds to LinkedIn messages (based on post engagement)
- Active in communities related to their role
- Has spoken at [conference/webinar] - comfortable engaging
- **Evidence**: Replied to comments on recent posts

---

#### Why They're an Ideal Champion

**Pain They Feel**:
1. [Specific pain point 1 their role experiences]
2. [Specific pain point 2 your solution solves]
3. [Specific pain point 3 they've mentioned publicly]

**What They Gain**:
- **Career Impact**: Solving [problem] makes them look good to [boss]
- **Team Impact**: Their team gets [X hours/week] back
- **Personal Impact**: Less firefighting, more strategic work
- **Measurable**: Can tie success to their OKRs/KPIs

**How They Can Help You**:
- Give you insight into decision process and criteria
- Introduce you to economic buyer
- Advocate for you in internal meetings
- Help you navigate politics and objections
- Coach you on competitive situation

---

#### Outreach Strategy

**Best Approach**: Warm introduction via [Mutual Connection Name]

**Message to Mutual Connection**:

Hey [Mutual],

Quick favor - I'm trying to connect with [Champion Name] at [Company].

We help [companies like theirs] with [specific problem], and given [their role/recent news], thought it might be relevant.

Would you be comfortable making an intro? Happy to send you a forwardable email.

Thanks! [Your Name]

**Forwardable Email** (if warm intro):

Subject: Introduction: [Your Name] → [Champion Name]

Hi [Champion Name],

[Mutual Connection] suggested I reach out. I'm [Your Name] from [Your Company].

Quick context: We help [job titles like yours] at companies like [similar company 1] and [similar company 2] with [specific problem].

Given [recent company news / their role / specific observation], thought it might be worth a conversation.

Would you be open to a quick 15-minute call to explore if there's a fit?

[Your Name]

**Direct Outreach** (if no warm intro possible):

Subject: [Company Name] - [Specific Problem]

Hi [First Name],

I noticed [specific observation about them/company] and thought you might be dealing with [problem].

We've helped [similar company] reduce [problem metric] by [X]%, and I imagine as [their role], that would matter to you.

Worth a quick call to see if we could do the same for [Company Name]?

[Your Name]

---

#### Personalization Hooks

**Recent Activity**:
- Posted about [topic] on LinkedIn [X days ago]
- Commented on [article/post] about [topic]
- Changed jobs [X months ago] - onboarding phase

**Shared Interests**:
- Both attended [University/Conference]
- Both interested in [Industry Topic]
- Both in [Professional Group]

**Career Path**:
- Progressed from [Previous Role] to [Current Role]
- Has experience at [Previous Company]
- Shows pattern of [career characteristic]

**Best Opening Line**:
> "Hi [Name], saw you recently [specific activity] - [relevant observation]. Given your role managing [area], I imagine [pain point]..."

---

#### Meeting Preparation

**Questions to Ask** (Discovery):
1. "Walk me through how [process] works today at [Company]"
2. "What's working well? What's frustrating about it?"
3. "If you could wave a magic wand and fix one thing, what would it be?"
4. "Who else is impacted by [problem]?"
5. "What have you tried to solve this? Why didn't it work?"
6. "If this doesn't get fixed, what happens?"

**Questions to Ask** (Champion Qualification):
1. "Is this problem on your roadmap to solve?"
2. "When you've bought tools like this before, how did the process work?"
3. "Who typically gets involved in these decisions?"
4. "What would success look like for you personally?"
5. "Would you be comfortable introducing me to [economic buyer]?"

**Red Flags** (Not Actually a Champion):
- Can't articulate the pain clearly
- Doesn't know who the decision maker is
- Not willing to introduce you to others
- Doesn't have budget visibility
- Seems like they're just being polite

---

### #2 STRONG POTENTIAL: [Name]

**Overall Champion Score**: 47/60 🟢 **STRONG CANDIDATE**

**Profile**:
- **Name**: [First Last]
- **Title**: [Job Title]
- **Department**: [Department]
- **Tenure**: [X] years

**Scoring**:
- Role Relevance: 8/10
- Influence Level: 8/10
- Accessibility: 7/10
- Change Agent: 8/10
- Personal Stake: 9/10
- Engagement Potential: 7/10

**Why They're Strong**:
- [Key strength 1]
- [Key strength 2]
- [Key strength 3]

**Concern**:
- [One thing that makes them less ideal than #1]

**Outreach Approach**:
- [Similar structure to #1 but adjusted for their profile]

---

### #3 GOOD BACKUP: [Name]

**Overall Champion Score**: 42/60 🟡 **GOOD CANDIDATE**

[Similar structure, slightly shorter]

---

### #4 POSSIBLE CHAMPION: [Name]

**Overall Champion Score**: 38/60 🟡 **POSSIBLE WITH WORK**

[Similar structure, even shorter]

---

## 🚫 Who NOT to Lead With

### [Name] - [Title]

**Why Not**:
- [Reason 1: e.g., "Too senior - C-level won't be your champion"]
- [Reason 2: e.g., "Wrong department - doesn't feel the pain"]
- [Reason 3: e.g., "Blocker risk - manages incumbent vendor relationship"]

**But Consider**: [When they might be useful later in process]

---

## 🎯 Multi-Threading Strategy

**Recommended Approach**:
1. **Start With**: [Champion #1] - Highest probability
2. **Parallel Outreach**: [Champion #2] - Different department, cover bases
3. **Economic Buyer Access**: Ask Champion #1 to introduce to [Decision Maker]
4. **Technical Validator**: Also connect with [Technical Person]
5. **User Buy-In**: Get feedback from [End User Rep]

**Coverage Map**:

Economic Buyer (Decision): [Name, Title] ↑ Champion (Advocate): [Champion #1] ↑ Technical (Validate): [Technical Person] ↑ Users (Adopt): [User Team]

**Why Multi-Thread**:
- Single-threaded deals die if contact leaves or loses interest
- Different perspectives help you understand full picture
- Creates internal momentum (multiple people talking about you)
- Reduces risk of "ghost" situation

---

## 📊 Account Mapping

### Decision-Making Unit (DMU)

| Person | Role | Title | Champion Potential | Influence | Status |
|--------|------|-------|-------------------|-----------|--------|
| [Name] | Champion | [Title] | 54/60 High | High | Not yet contacted |
| [Name] | Economic Buyer | [Title] | N/A | Final Decision | Access via Champion |
| [Name] | Technical Buyer | [Title] | 35/60 Medium | Veto power | Should engage |
| [Name] | End User | [Title] | 28/60 Low | User feedback | Include in demo |

**Org Chart** (as understood):

CEO: [Name] ↓ CTO: [Name] ← Economic Buyer ↓ VP Engineering: [Champion #1] ← START HERE ↓ Engineering Managers (5) ↓ Engineers (30) ← End Users

---

## 💼 LinkedIn Intelligence

### Company Employee Analysis

**Total Employees on LinkedIn**: [X]
**Employees in Target Department**: [X]

**Key Observations**:
- [X] employees joined in last 6 months (growth signal)
- [X] employees recently promoted (change signal)
- [X] employees active on LinkedIn (engagement signal)
- [X] employees connected to your network (access signal)

**Department Breakdown**:
- Engineering: [X] people
- Product: [X] people
- Sales: [X] people
- Marketing: [X] people

---

### Hiring Signals

**Recent Job Postings** ([X] open roles):
- [Job Title 1] - Indicates [what this tells you about priorities]
- [Job Title 2] - Suggests [pain point or growth area]
- [Job Title 3] - Shows [budget/investment in area]

**Why This Matters**:
- Hiring = growth = budget = good time to buy
- Job descriptions reveal pain points and priorities
- New hires are open to new tools (not attached to status quo)

---

## 🎓 Champion Development Plan

### Phase 1: Initial Contact (Week 1)

**Goal**: Get first meeting and establish rapport

**Actions**:
- [ ] Secure warm intro from [Mutual Connection]
- [ ] Send personalized outreach
- [ ] Schedule discovery call
- [ ] Research their LinkedIn thoroughly

**Success Metric**: Meeting scheduled

---

### Phase 2: Discovery & Qualification (Week 1-2)

**Goal**: Confirm they feel the pain and can champion

**Actions**:
- [ ] Run discovery call (use questions above)
- [ ] Validate they have the pain
- [ ] Assess their influence and willingness
- [ ] Get them to open up about process and players

**Success Metric**: They articulate pain clearly and agree to next step

---

### Phase 3: Value Demonstration (Week 2-3)

**Goal**: Show them how you solve their specific problem

**Actions**:
- [ ] Tailored demo focused on their pain points
- [ ] Share relevant case study
- [ ] Calculate ROI specific to their situation
- [ ] Get their reaction and feedback

**Success Metric**: They say "this would really help us"

---

### Phase 4: Champion Activation (Week 3-4)

**Goal**: Get them to actively advocate internally

**Actions**:
- [ ] Ask: "Based on what you've seen, would this help you?"
- [ ] Ask: "Who else should see this?"
- [ ] Ask: "Would you be comfortable introducing me to [decision maker]?"
- [ ] Provide them ammo to sell internally (ROI calc, one-pager)

**Success Metric**: They introduce you to economic buyer OR invite others to next meeting

---

### Phase 5: Deal Progression (Ongoing)

**Goal**: Keep them engaged throughout the deal

**Actions**:
- [ ] Regular check-ins (weekly)
- [ ] Ask for coaching on internal process
- [ ] Get their input on proposal
- [ ] Have them review and socialize internally
- [ ] Coach you on objections and competitors

**Success Metric**: Deal moves forward with their help

---

## 🚨 Warning Signs (Not Actually a Champion)

**Red Flags to Watch For**:

❌ **They're Too Agreeable**
- Says yes to everything but never takes action
- Doesn't push back or ask hard questions
- Just being polite, not actually interested

❌ **They Can't Get You to Others**
- "I'll talk to [decision maker] and get back to you"
- Weeks go by with no introduction
- Always has excuse why you can't meet boss

❌ **They Don't Know the Process**
- Can't describe how buying decisions get made
- Doesn't know who has budget
- Never bought tools like yours before

❌ **They're Not Actually Affected**
- Talks about problem in abstract terms
- Can't give specific examples from their daily work
- Pain is theoretical, not personal

❌ **They Have No Skin in Game**
- No personal KPIs tied to the problem
- Won't benefit from your solution
- Just doing research for someone else

**What to Do**:
- Keep them in the loop (may be useful later)
- Find the REAL champion (who actually has pain)
- Don't waste time on "coaches" pretending to be champions

---

## 💡 Pro Tips

**Finding Champions**:
1. **Look for Recent Hires**: New people want quick wins
2. **Look for Promotions**: Promoted people want to prove themselves
3. **Look for Pain Posters**: People who post about challenges on LinkedIn
4. **Look for Change Agents**: Track record of adopting new tools
5. **Look for Event Speakers**: Public faces are accessible

**Building Champion Relationships**:
1. **Make Them Look Good**: Help them be the hero internally
2. **Arm Them**: Give them talking points and ROI calculations
3. **Coach Them**: Teach them how to sell you internally
4. **Protect Them**: Don't put them in awkward political positions
5. **Celebrate Them**: Give them credit when you win

**Multi-Threading**:
1. **Go Wide Early**: Don't single-thread too long
2. **Map the Org**: Understand relationships and influence
3. **Find Multiple Champions**: Different departments = more advocates
4. **Get to Economic Buyer**: Champion must introduce you up

**Champion Red Flags**:
1. **Can't get meetings**: Not actually influential
2. **Doesn't advocate**: Just being nice, not actually championing
3. **Ghosts periodically**: Not actually engaged
4. **Can't influence**: No power despite title

Best Practices

  1. Start at the Right Level: Director/VP level often best (too junior = no power, too senior = too busy)
  2. Multiple Champions Better Than One: Multi-thread to reduce single point of failure
  3. Qualify Early: Don't assume someone is a champion; validate with questions
  4. Give Before You Ask: Provide value before asking for introductions
  5. Make It About Them: Champions need to personally benefit
  6. Document Everything: Track champion interactions and commitments in CRM
  7. Stay Close: Regular check-ins keep champions engaged

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Who should I connect with at Shopify to champion our tool?"
  • "Find potential champions at this target account"
  • "Analyze these LinkedIn profiles and identify the best champion"
  • "Who at [Company] is most likely to advocate for us?"

Example Request:

"I'm targeting Stripe for our developer tools product. Analyze their engineering leadership team on LinkedIn and identify who would be the best internal champion. I need someone who feels the pain of developer productivity and can influence purchasing decisions."

Response Approach:

  1. Research company and relevant department
  2. Identify 5-10 potential champion candidates
  3. Analyze each on champion criteria (pain, power, gain, access)
  4. Rank from best to worst champion potential
  5. Provide outreach strategy and talking points
  6. Map org chart and multi-threading plan

Remember: A deal without a champion is just a conversation. A deal with a strong champion is 3-5x more likely to close!

平台分布

Claude Code

24.45%
按下载量换算209

Antigravity

23.97%
按下载量换算205

windsurf

16.21%
按下载量换算138

OpenCode

12.71%
按下载量换算109

Cursor

7.9%
按下载量换算67

Gemini CLI

3.2%
按下载量换算27

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills