Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

test-cases(测试用例)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test-cases 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 383。

总安装 18,268周安装 739GitHub Stars 2,578下载 5,735核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-cases(测试用例)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cexll/myclaude
仓库路径:skills/test-cases
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cexll/myclaude --skill test-cases
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cexll/myclaude --skill test-cases

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

根据 PRD 文档和用户需求生成全面的测试用例,并进行全覆盖映射。

将产品需求转换为按类别组织的结构化、可执行的测试用例:功能、边缘情况、错误处理和状态转换场景 生成具有唯一 ID、优先级、先决条件、分步操作和可衡量的预期结果的需求驱动的测试用例 包括将每个需求链接到相应测试用例和覆盖状态的可追溯性矩阵 遵循务实的测试理念:测试重要的内容,确保完全覆盖,并保持质量胜于数量

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-cases

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/cexll/myclaude --skill test-cases;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-cases 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/cexll/myclaude --skill test-cases。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-cases 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-cases 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

test-cases 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

test-cases 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 18,268 次,近一周安装 739 次,下载 5,735 次,GitHub 2,578 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-cases 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 来源仓库有 2,578 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
test-cases

测试用例 · 本页

18,2682,578需要联网MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Test Cases Generator

This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements.

Purpose

Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. The skill follows a pragmatic testing philosophy: test what matters, ensure every requirement has corresponding test coverage, and maintain test quality over quantity.

When to Use

Trigger this skill when:

  • User provides a PRD or requirements document and requests test cases
  • User asks to "generate test cases", "create test scenarios", or "plan QA"
  • User mentions testing coverage for a feature or requirement
  • User needs structured test documentation in markdown format

Core Testing Principles

Follow these principles when generating test cases:

  1. Requirement-driven, not implementation-driven - Test cases must map directly to requirements, not implementation details
  2. Complete coverage - Every requirement must have at least one test case covering:

- Happy path (normal use cases) - Edge cases (boundary values, empty inputs, max limits) - Error handling (invalid inputs, failure scenarios, permission errors) - State transitions (if stateful, cover all valid state changes)

  1. Clear and actionable - Each test case must be executable by a QA engineer without ambiguity
  2. Traceable - Maintain clear mapping between requirements and test cases

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Requirements

First, identify the source of requirements:

  1. If user provides a file path to a PRD, read it using the Read tool
  2. If user describes requirements verbally, capture them
  3. If requirements are unclear or incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:

- What are the core user flows? - What are the acceptance criteria? - What are the edge cases or error scenarios to consider? - Are there any state transitions or workflows? - What platforms or environments need testing?

Step 2: Extract Test Scenarios

Analyze requirements and extract test scenarios:

  1. Functional scenarios - Normal use cases from requirements
  2. Edge case scenarios - Boundary conditions, empty states, maximum limits
  3. Error scenarios - Invalid inputs, permission failures, network errors
  4. State transition scenarios - If the feature involves state, map all transitions

For each requirement, identify:

  • Preconditions (what must be true before testing)
  • Test steps (actions to perform)
  • Expected results (what should happen)
  • Postconditions (state after test completes)

Step 3: Structure Test Cases

Organize test cases using this structure:

# Test Cases: [Feature Name]

## Overview
- **Feature**: [Feature name]
- **Requirements Source**: [PRD file path or description]
- **Test Coverage**: [Summary of what's covered]
- **Last Updated**: [Date]

## Test Case Categories

### 1. Functional Tests
Test cases covering normal user flows and core functionality.

#### TC-F-001: [Test Case Title]
- **Requirement**: [Link to specific requirement]
- **Priority**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Preconditions**:
  - [Condition 1]
  - [Condition 2]
- **Test Steps**:
  1. [Step 1]
  2. [Step 2]
  3. [Step 3]
- **Expected Results**:
  - [Expected result 1]
  - [Expected result 2]
- **Postconditions**: [State after test]

### 2. Edge Case Tests
Test cases covering boundary conditions and unusual inputs.

#### TC-E-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

### 3. Error Handling Tests
Test cases covering error scenarios and failure modes.

#### TC-ERR-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

### 4. State Transition Tests
Test cases covering state changes and workflows (if applicable).

#### TC-ST-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]

## Test Coverage Matrix

| Requirement ID | Test Cases | Coverage Status |
|---------------|------------|-----------------|
| REQ-001 | TC-F-001, TC-E-001 | ✓ Complete |
| REQ-002 | TC-F-002 | ⚠ Partial |

## Notes
- [Any additional testing considerations]
- [Known limitations or assumptions]

Step 4: Generate Test Cases

For each identified scenario, create a detailed test case following the structure above. Ensure:

  1. Unique IDs - Use prefixes: TC-F (functional), TC-E (edge), TC-ERR (error), TC-ST (state)
  2. Clear titles - Descriptive titles that explain what's being tested
  3. Requirement traceability - Link each test case to specific requirements
  4. Priority assignment - Mark critical paths as High priority
  5. Executable steps - Steps must be clear enough for any QA engineer to execute
  6. Measurable results - Expected results must be verifiable

Step 5: Validate Coverage

Before finalizing, verify:

  1. Every requirement has at least one test case
  2. Happy path is covered for all user flows
  3. Edge cases are identified for boundary conditions
  4. Error scenarios are covered for failure modes
  5. State transitions are tested if feature is stateful

If coverage gaps exist, generate additional test cases.

Step 6: Output Test Cases

Write the test cases to tests/<name>-test-cases.md where <name> is derived from:

  • The feature name from the PRD
  • The user's specified name
  • A sanitized version of the requirement title

Use the Write tool to create the file with the structured test cases.

Step 7: Summary

After generating test cases, provide a brief summary in Chinese:

  • Total number of test cases generated
  • Coverage breakdown (functional, edge, error, state)
  • Any assumptions made or areas needing clarification
  • File path where test cases were saved

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing test cases, verify:

  • Every requirement has corresponding test cases
  • Happy path scenarios are covered
  • Edge cases include boundary values, empty inputs, max limits
  • Error handling covers invalid inputs and failure scenarios
  • State transitions are tested if applicable
  • Test case IDs are unique and follow naming convention
  • Test steps are clear and executable
  • Expected results are measurable and verifiable
  • Coverage matrix shows complete coverage
  • File is written to tests/-test-cases.md

Example Usage

User: "Generate test cases for the user authentication feature in docs/auth-prd.md"

Process:

  1. Read docs/auth-prd.md
  2. Extract requirements: login, logout, password reset, session management
  3. Identify scenarios: successful login, invalid credentials, expired session, etc.
  4. Generate test cases covering all scenarios
  5. Write to tests/auth-test-cases.md
  6. Summarize coverage in Chinese

References

For detailed testing methodologies and best practices, see:

  • references/testing-principles.md - Core testing principles and patterns

平台分布

OpenCode

32.21%
按下载量换算1,847

Claude Code

21.34%
按下载量换算1,224

Codex

19.63%
按下载量换算1,126

Cursor

12.34%
按下载量换算708

Gemini CLI

7.81%
按下载量换算448

Antigravity

3.45%
按下载量换算198

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills