Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

voice-matching-wizard语音匹配向导

Agent Skill

用于辅助音频、音乐、语音转写、语音合成或声音素材处理。它适合让 Agent 生成配乐说明、整理音频流程、调用语音工具或处理播客和视频配音素材。使用时需要确认输入音频来源、输出格式、时长和模型限制;涉及人声克隆、版权音乐或公开发布时,应先核对授权和合规边界。

总安装

392

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

9

下载量

125
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:voice-matching-wizard(语音匹配向导)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack
仓库路径:skills/voice-matching-wizard
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack --skill voice-matching-wizard
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack --skill voice-matching-wizard

简介

创建可重用的语音匹配技能,捕捉任何写作风格的识别特征。

  • 适用于品牌声音建立、作者风格复制和内容一致性场景。
  • 使用时需收集样本、提取多维模式和生成可部署的技能文件。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,支持主流宿主环境,建议核对样本授权和用途合规性。
  • voice-matching-wizard 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Voice Matching Wizard

Create a voice skill that captures the patterns, rhythms, and sensibilities of any writing style.

What This Does

Voice matching is the art of identifying what makes writing *recognizable*. Not just the obvious markers—vocabulary, sentence length—but the deeper patterns: how ideas unfold, where the writer pauses, what they leave unsaid.

This wizard walks you through the process of:

  1. Gathering representative samples
  2. Extracting patterns across multiple dimensions
  3. Synthesizing a usable voice profile
  4. Generating a working skill file

The output is a voice-[name].skill.md you can use alongside other skills (like anti-ai-writing) for consistent, authentic content.


Before You Begin

What makes a good sample:

  • At least 500 words
  • Writing you're proud of (or writing you want to emulate)
  • Representative of the voice you want to capture
  • From the same medium (all newsletters, all blog posts, etc.)

What to avoid:

  • Heavily edited committee writing
  • Content written under constraints
  • Mixed formats (tweets + longform together)
  • Very old work that doesn't reflect current voice

How many samples:

  • 2-3 samples: Basic patterns
  • 4-5 samples: Good coverage
  • 10+: Comprehensive capture

Three Paths Through This Wizard

Path A: "I have samples of my own writing"

You want to codify your existing voice so AI can match it consistently. → Skip to Phase 1: Gather Your Samples

Path B: "I want to write like [someone I admire]"

You want to emulate an author, publication, or brand voice. → If the writer is well-known (major author, publication), you may be able to use their name directly in prompts. For custom or lesser-known voices, you'll still need samples. → Proceed to Phase 1: Gather Your Samples

Path C: "I'm not sure what my voice is yet"

You want to discover and develop your voice through this process. → Start with Phase 0: Voice Discovery (below)


Phase 0: Voice Discovery (Optional)

*Skip this if you already have samples or know what voice you want.*

To discover your voice, we need to understand how you naturally communicate when you're not performing.

Answer these questions:

  1. How do you explain things to friends?

- Do you use stories and examples? - Do you build logical arguments? - Do you make jokes? - Do you ask questions to draw them in?

  1. What writers or publications do you gravitate toward?

- Not who you think you *should* read—who do you actually read? - What about their style appeals to you?

  1. What's your natural sentence length?

- Short and punchy? - Long and flowing? - Variable depending on the point?

  1. How do you feel about jargon?

- Love it (signals expertise)? - Hate it (pretentious)? - Use it sparingly when precise?

  1. What's your relationship with your reader?

- Peer/friend? - Mentor/teacher? - Curious explorer?

Based on your answers, find 2-3 pieces you've written that feel authentic. Use those for Phase 1.


Phase 1: Gather Samples

Collect 2-5 writing samples. Paste each one into a separate document, or note where they can be found.

For each sample, note:

  • Source/context (blog post, newsletter, etc.)
  • When it was written
  • Why you chose it

Phase 2: Extract Patterns

Analyze each sample across these dimensions:

2.1 Sentence Architecture

ElementWhat to Look For
LengthAverage sentence length (short/medium/long)
VariationDoes length vary deliberately for rhythm?
ComplexitySimple declarative? Compound? Complex?
PunctuationEm dashes? Semicolons? Minimal?
FragmentsUsed for emphasis? Never?

Signature structures to identify:

  • Opening patterns ("Here's the thing:")
  • Rhythm breaks ("But.")
  • List patterns ("First... Second... Third...")
  • Closing moves (questions, callbacks, calls to action)

2.2 Word Choice

ElementWhat to Look For
Vocabulary levelSimple/moderate/sophisticated
Formality1-5 scale (casual to formal)
ContractionsAlways/sometimes/never
JargonIndustry terms? Avoided?
Strong languageProfanity level/style if any

Identify:

  • Favorite words (appears 3+ times across samples)
  • Avoided words (never appears despite opportunity)
  • Signature phrases

2.3 Tone & Attitude

ElementWhat to Look For
Emotional registerWarm? Cool? Intense? Measured?
Reader relationshipPeer? Mentor? Friend? Expert?
Humor styleSarcasm? Wordplay? Self-deprecation? None?
Certainty levelDefinitive or exploratory?
Attitude toward subjectPassionate? Skeptical? Curious?

2.4 Structural Moves

ElementWhat to Look For
OpeningsStory? Question? Bold claim? Scene-setting?
TransitionsSeamless? Signposted? Abrupt?
ClosingsCall to action? Question? Summary? Callback?
Paragraph lengthShort punchy? Long flowing? Mixed?

2.5 Distinctive Techniques

What makes this voice *recognizable*?

  • Rhetorical devices (questions, analogies, callbacks)
  • Signature moves unique to this writer
  • How evidence is presented (data? anecdotes? logic?)
  • Pattern interrupts (how does the writer surprise?)

2.6 What They DON'T Do

Just as important:

  • Phrases never used
  • Structures avoided
  • Topics skipped
  • Formality levels never hit

Phase 3: Synthesize

The Voice in One Paragraph

Write a single paragraph capturing the essence:

"[Name]'s voice is [primary characteristics]. They write like [relationship to reader], using [key techniques]. Their tone is [tone], with [humor style if applicable]. Sentences tend to be [structure]. They favor [word choice] and avoid [avoidances]. The overall effect is [feeling/impact]."

Voice Spectrum

Rate the voice on these scales (1-5):

Formal ←――――――――――→ Casual         [ ]
Expert ←――――――――――→ Peer           [ ]
Serious ←―――――――――→ Playful        [ ]
Reserved ←――――――――→ Opinionated    [ ]
Abstract ←――――――――→ Concrete       [ ]

Phase 4: Generate the Voice Skill

Using your analysis, create voice-[name].skill.md with this structure:

---
name: voice-[name]
description: Write in [Name]'s distinctive voice. [One sentence characterization]. Use with anti-ai-writing for authentic content.
---

# Voice: [Name]

[Your one-paragraph voice description from Phase 3]

## Voice Spectrum

- Formal/Casual: [1-5]
- Expert/Peer: [1-5]
- Serious/Playful: [1-5]
- Reserved/Opinionated: [1-5]
- Abstract/Concrete: [1-5]

## Core Characteristics

### Sentence Architecture
[Your findings from 2.1]

### Word Choice
[Your findings from 2.2]

### Tone & Attitude
[Your findings from 2.3]

### Structural Moves
[Your findings from 2.4]

### Distinctive Techniques
[Your findings from 2.5]

### Avoidances
[Your findings from 2.6]

## Example Patterns

### Signature Openings
[3-5 examples from samples with pattern explanation]

### Signature Transitions
[3-5 examples]

### Signature Closings
[3-5 examples]

### Signature Sentences
[5-10 exemplary sentences that capture the voice]

## The [Name] Test

Before publishing, ask:
- [ ] Would [Name] actually write this sentence?
- [ ] Does it match the voice spectrum above?
- [ ] Are signature patterns present?
- [ ] Are avoidances absent?
- [ ] Does it *feel* right?

## Anti-Patterns

If you see these, you've drifted from the voice:
- [List 5-10 patterns that would violate this voice]

Phase 5: Validate

Test your voice skill:

  1. Write a short piece using only the voice skill
  2. Compare to original samples
  3. Identify gaps or mischaracterizations
  4. Refine based on testing

Validation checklist:

  • Voice description captures the essence
  • Spectrum ratings feel accurate
  • Example patterns are genuinely representative
  • Test output sounds like the samples
  • Nothing important was missed

Human Writing Fundamentals

*Every voice skill should build on these principles from anti-ai-writing.*

The Energy Transfer Principle

The best writing is a transfer of energy from writer to reader. When analyzing samples, notice how the writer transfers energy:

  • Do they write conversations or speeches?
  • Do they speak WITH their audience or AT them?
  • Where do they use specific, concrete language vs. abstract ideas?

The SUCKS Framework

Apply this when generating voice output:

S - Specific: Who is the ONE reader? U - Unique & Useful: Does it change how they think, feel, or act? C - Clear, Curious, Conversational: Does it read like talking to a friend? K - Kept Simple & Structured: Simple ideas, clear structure? S - Sticky: Are there memorable phrases they'll repeat?

Sticky Sentence Techniques

When identifying signature sentences in Phase 2, look for these techniques:

Alliteration — Same starting sounds

  • "Specificity is the secret"
  • "The best jobs are neither decreed nor degreed"

Symmetry — Parallel structure

  • "Read for awareness. Write for understanding."
  • "It's not 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 iterations."

Contrast — Opposing ideas

  • "To be everywhere is to be nowhere."
  • "Be clear, not clever. Concise, not complex."

Rhythm — Pleasing cadence

  • Sentence length variation for effect
  • Short sentences for emphasis
  • Longer sentences for flow

Include the writer's use of these techniques in your voice skill.

AI Tells to Eliminate

When using your voice skill, watch for these patterns that signal AI involvement:

The Correlative Construction (most common):

  • ❌ "X aren't just Y - they're Z"
  • ❌ "It's not about X, it's about Y"

Forbidden Openers:

  • ❌ "In the ever-evolving world of..."
  • ❌ "Gone are the days when..."
  • ❌ "Let that sink in"

Hedging Language:

  • ❌ "This might help you" → "This will help you"
  • ❌ "It could be argued..." → state it directly

Overused Softeners:

  • Too much "just" and "actually"
  • Passive voice ("was determined")
  • Corporate jargon

Test: For each sentence, ask: Would this appear in ChatGPT output? If yes, rewrite it.


Using Your Voice Skill

Save to: .claude/skills/voice-[name]/SKILL.md

Invoke alongside other skills:

  • voice-[name] + anti-ai-writing = Authentic, humanized content
  • voice-[name] + ghostwriter = Long-form pieces in voice
  • voice-[name] + social-content-creation = Platform-specific posts

Update as needed: Your voice evolves. Revisit the skill quarterly or when something feels off.


Related Skills

  • anti-ai-writing — Core humanization engine (use with all voice work)
  • ghostwriter — For long-form content in someone else's voice
  • transcript-polisher — For interview-based content

*One well-crafted voice skill compounds across everything you create.*

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.6%
按下载量换算45

Claude

31.69%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

19.64%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

10.38%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills