Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

cathedral-audit(大教堂审计)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

cathedral-audit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,653。

总安装 7,688周安装 308GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,489核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cathedral-audit(大教堂审计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hydroculator/cathedral-audit
安装命令:
openclaw skills install cathedral-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install cathedral-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

对 Cathedral 代码库执行规范代码审计。适用于构建后、重构后或怀疑代码漂移时的安全复查。生成前瞻性审计报告,识别潜在规范偏离问题。cathedral-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。不能将工具输出直接作为最终结论,需人工复核高风险项。

涉及密钥或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限和操作边界。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install cathedral-audit;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

cathedral-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install cathedral-audit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

cathedral-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

cathedral-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

cathedral-audit 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

cathedral-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,688 次,近一周安装 308 次,下载 2,489 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

cathedral-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
cathedral-audit

大教堂审计 · 本页

7,688—只读MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
cathedral-audit
description
Run a full spec-code audit on the Cathedral codebase. Use after build waves, major refactors, or when spec-code drift is suspected. Produces forward audit (specs→code), reverse audit (code→specs), bug report, and prioritized fix plan. Drives execution of fixes through CC sessions.

Cathedral Audit

A structured process for measuring and closing spec-code drift in the Cathedral C# codebase.

When to Run

  • After a build wave (multiple features/refactors landed)
  • Before starting a new major feature (establish baseline)
  • When spec-code drift is suspected
  • Periodically as a health check (not on a calendar — trigger on events)

Process Overview

1. Forward Audit (specs → code)
2. Reverse Audit (code → specs)
3. Consolidation & Prioritization
4. Execution
5. Verification

Step 1: Forward Audit (Specs → Code)

For each spec in kitty-specs/, compare what the spec says against what the code does.

Output per spec: One of:

  • ✅ Conformant — code matches spec
  • ⚠️ Divergent — code exists but differs from spec
  • ❌ Missing — spec describes something not built

Deliverable: kitty-specs/000-project-context/spec-audit-YYYY-MM-DD.md

Use parallel CC agents (one per spec batch) for speed if memory allows. On memory-constrained hosts (e.g., WSL2), run sequentially — two concurrent CC sessions will OOM. Provide each agent read-only access.

Step 2: Reverse Audit (Code → Specs)

Scan all .cs files in src/Cathedral.Core/ and src/Cathedral.TestHarness/. For each file/subsystem, determine:

  • Is it covered by a spec?
  • Does it match what the spec says?
  • Is it dead/orphaned code?

Output sections:

  1. Executive Summary — counts with delta from previous audit
  2. Unspecced Code — files/subsystems with no spec coverage
  3. Architectural Divergences — code takes a fundamentally different path than spec
  4. Code Exceeding Spec — code has features the spec doesn't document
  5. Dead/Orphaned Code — files with no callers or references
  6. Bugs Discovered — runtime, data, or logic bugs found during review
  7. Comparison with Previous Audit — what improved, what remains

Deliverable: kitty-specs/000-project-context/reverse-audit-YYYY-MM-DD.md

Use parallel CC agents (group files by directory/subsystem) for speed if memory allows. Run sequentially on memory-constrained hosts.

Step 3: Consolidation & Prioritization

Merge findings from both audits into a prioritized action plan:

PriorityCategoryCriteria
P0Bug fixesRuntime impact — broken endpoints, data corruption, crashes
P1Dead code removalSafe deletes that reduce confusion and LOC
P2Data quality fixesDropped data, wrong defaults, double-logging
P3Spec coverageWrite new specs for unspecced code (no code changes)
P4Spec accuracyUpdate existing specs to document code-exceeding-spec features
P5Mechanical refactorsRenames, wiring, entity-scoping completion
P6Architectural gapsV2 features where code diverges from spec by design (defer)

Rules:

  • Bugs always get their own section with severity ratings
  • "Code exceeding spec" = spec update, not code change
  • Architectural divergences that are intentionally deferred (V2 work) go to P6 and are documented but not actioned
  • Each priority level should be achievable in a single CC session

Deliverable: Recommendations section in the reverse audit report.

Step 4: Execution

Execute fixes by priority tier (P0 first, P6 last or deferred).

Per priority tier:

  1. Log intent to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md — tier name, CC session name, what's being attempted
  2. Write a task briefing for CC (see references/cc-task-template.md)
  3. Launch CC session: cat /tmp/task.md | claude -p --allowedTools 'Edit,Write,Read,Bash'
  4. Set up monitoring cron (every 5 min)
  5. When CC completes: log results to daily memory — files changed, what was done, any issues
  6. Verify build before committing — dotnet build must pass
  7. If CC gets killed (OOM): check git diff --stat, verify build manually, fix any issues, log the incident
  8. Commit with descriptive message referencing the priority tier
  9. Log commit hash to daily memory

Hard rules:

  • ⚠️ ALWAYS verify dotnet build passes before committing. No exceptions. CC may get OOM-killed mid-build-check.
  • ⚠️ ALWAYS log to daily memory file at every step. Log intent before launch, results after completion, commit hash after commit. If the session dies, the log survives for recovery.
  • One commit per priority tier (or logical grouping)

Logging template for daily memory:

## [Priority Tier Name]
- CC session: [name] (launched ~HH:MM CST)
- Task: [brief description]
- Status: [RUNNING | ✅ COMPLETE | ❌ FAILED | ⚠️ KILLED]
- Files changed: [count]
- Key actions: [what was done]
- Issues: [any problems encountered]
- Committed as [hash]

Step 5: Verification

After all tiers are complete, optionally run a quick re-audit to measure improvement:

  • Compare counts: unspecced, divergent, dead code, bugs
  • Verify delta matches expectations
  • Document remaining gaps and whether they're P6/deferred or newly discovered

Deliverable: Updated audit files with comparison section.

Logging

Every audit produces a complete trail in memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md:

  • Audit launch — which audits are being run, baseline reference
  • Audit results — summary counts, key findings
  • Each priority tier — intent, CC session, results, issues, commit hash
  • Final summary — total commits, total lines changed, what's resolved vs deferred

This is non-negotiable. The Feb 17-18 amnesia incident proved that unlogged work is lost work. Log-then-act: write what you're about to do BEFORE doing it, then update with results.

Baseline Tracking

Always compare against the previous audit. Store audits as:

kitty-specs/000-project-context/
  spec-audit-YYYY-MM-DD.md      (forward)
  reverse-audit-YYYY-MM-DD.md   (reverse)

The executive summary table with deltas is the key metric:

| Category | Previous | Current | Delta |
|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| Unspecced Code | 38 | 24 | -14 |
| Divergences | 12 | 7 | -5 |
| Dead Code | 14 | 8 | -6 |
| Bugs | 0 | 8 | +8 |
| Conformant | ~60 | ~120 | +60 |

CC Task Briefing Template

See references/cc-task-template.md for the standard format for CC task briefings.

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.59%
按下载量换算2,305

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills