Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

brief(brief 效率)

brief 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

brief 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,036。

总安装 127,296周安装 5,179GitHub Stars 7下载 41,184核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:brief(brief 效率)
来源仓库:https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills
仓库路径:skills/brief
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill brief
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill brief

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

生成可供编辑使用的 SEO 内容简介,其中包含有竞争力的 SERP 分析、大纲和 E-E-A-T 要求。

在开始写作之前分析排名靠前的结果,以确定搜索意图、内容格式差距和竞争角度 提供针对点击率和关键字定位进行优化的标题、元描述和标题层次结构的结构化模板 包括带有 YMYL 检测的 E-E-A-T 评估框架、作者资格要求以及针对内容类型定制的证据标准 提供可行的差异化策略,具体说明是什么让您的作品比当前排名更好(原始数据、实用模板、利基市场焦点、货币)

来源仓库内路径:skills/brief

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill brief;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

brief 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill brief。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

brief 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

brief 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

brief 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

brief 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 127,296 次,近一周安装 5,179 次,下载 41,184 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

brief 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
brief

brief 效率 · 本页

127,2967只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Content Brief

Produce a complete, editor-ready content brief covering intent analysis, competitive SERP review, content outline, E-E-A-T requirements, and SEO targets.

Before You Start

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

  1. Target keyword or topic. The primary keyword this content should rank for.
  2. Business context. What does the company do? What should readers do after reading (sign up, buy, contact)?
  3. Content type preference. Blog post, landing page, guide, comparison, tutorial?
  4. Audience. Who is reading this? Beginners, practitioners, decision-makers?

Step 1: SERP Analysis

Analyze what currently ranks for the target keyword:

  1. Search the keyword (use web search) and review the top 5-10 results.
  2. Identify the dominant intent. Are results informational guides, product pages, listicles, tools?
  3. Note the content format. Average word count, heading structure, use of images/tables/videos.
  4. Find the gaps. What do all top results cover? What do none of them cover well?

Record:

RankTitleURLFormatApprox. LengthUnique Angle
1......guide / listicle / tutorial......

Step 2: Intent Mapping

Determine the exact user intent and map it to content structure:

  • "How to" intent → Step-by-step tutorial with numbered sections
  • "What is" intent → Definition + context + examples + next steps
  • "Best X" intent → Curated list with comparison criteria and recommendations
  • "X vs Y" intent → Side-by-side comparison table + verdict
  • "Review" intent → Hands-on evaluation with pros/cons/alternatives

The content structure must match what the searcher expects to find.

Step 3: Content Outline

Build a detailed outline with:

Title Options (2-3 variants)

Select the formula that matches the content type:

Content TypeFormulaExample
How-to / Tutorial"How to [Goal] in [Timeframe]""How to Fix Crawl Errors in 30 Minutes"
How-to (objection)"How to [Goal] Without [Objection]""How to Build Links Without Cold Outreach"
Listicle"[N] [Adjective] [Topic] [Qualifier]""9 Proven Link Building Strategies for SaaS"
Comparison"[A] vs [B]: Which Is Better for [Goal]?""Ahrefs vs SEMrush: Which Is Better for Keyword Research?"
Definition"What Is [Topic]? [Short Clarifier]""What Is Topical Authority? How It Affects Rankings"
Ultimate guide"The [Complete/Definitive] Guide to [Topic]""The Complete Guide to Technical SEO"
Mistakes"[N] [Topic] Mistakes [Consequence]""7 Internal Linking Mistakes That Kill Rankings"

CTR boosters — test adding these elements:

ElementExpected CTR Impact
Add a number+15-25%
Add current year+10-15%
Add brackets or parentheses+10-38%
Add a power word (Proven, Essential, Ultimate)+5-12%

Rules:

  • Include the primary keyword
  • Keep under 60 characters (55 for mobile safety)
  • Use odd numbers in listicles (they outperform even)
  • Rewrite if CTR is below 2% at positions 1-3 or below 5% at positions 4-10

Meta Description

Select a template and adapt:

Content TypeTemplate
Blog / Guide"Learn [topic] with our [qualifier] guide. Covers [point 1], [point 2], and [point 3]. [CTA]."
Question-answer"[Question]? This [year] guide explains [what], [why], and [how]. Get actionable tips now."
Listicle"Discover [N] [adjective] [topic] strategies that [result]. Backed by [proof element]. Read the guide."
Comparison"[A] vs [B]: which is better for [use case]? We compared [criteria]. See the winner + detailed breakdown."
Product/Service"[Product] helps you [benefit]. [Feature 1], [Feature 2], [Feature 3]. [Price/offer]. [CTA]."

Rules:

  • 150-160 characters (aim for 140-155 for mobile safety)
  • Include the primary keyword naturally
  • End with a clear value proposition or call to action
  • Add numbers or statistics where possible (+5-15% CTR boost)

Heading Structure

Map out every H2 and H3 with brief guidance for each section:

H1: [Title]
  H2: [Section 1] — what to cover, target length
    H3: [Subsection] — specific points
  H2: [Section 2] — what to cover
  ...
  H2: FAQ — 3-5 questions from People Also Ask

Key Points Per Section

For each H2 section, specify:

  • The main point to make
  • Data or examples to include
  • How this section differs from competitor coverage
  • Internal link opportunities (link to related pages on the site)

Step 4: E-E-A-T Requirements

YMYL Check

First, determine if the keyword falls into "Your Money or Your Life" territory (health, finance, legal, safety). YMYL topics trigger elevated E-E-A-T requirements from Google:

  • YMYL keywords require: named author with verifiable credentials, citations to official sources (.gov,.edu, professional bodies), clear disclosure of affiliations, and medical/ legal/financial review where applicable.
  • Non-YMYL keywords still benefit from E-E-A-T but don't require the same rigor.

Author Qualification

Specify what credentials the author needs for this topic:

Topic TypeAuthor Requirement
YMYL (health, finance, legal)Licensed professional or verifiable expert with public credentials
Technical (code, engineering)Demonstrated practitioner experience (portfolio, GitHub, publications)
Business/marketingIndustry experience or named case studies
General informationalByline with bio is sufficient

Evidence Floor

Set the minimum evidence bar for this piece:

Content TypeMinimum SourcesSource Tier Requirement
Research/data-driven5+ citationsAt least 2 primary sources (official docs, studies,.gov/.edu)
How-to / tutorial2-3 citationsOfficial documentation for tools/methods referenced
Opinion / thought leadership3+ citationsData to support each major claim
Comparison / "best X"1 per item reviewedFirst-hand testing evidence for each

E-E-A-T Signals

Specify what the content needs:

  • Experience: First-hand examples, case studies, screenshots, "we tested this" statements
  • Expertise: Cite specific data, reference industry standards, show depth beyond surface-level
  • Authoritativeness: Link to authoritative external sources, reference recognized frameworks
  • Trustworthiness: Include dates, update frequency, author bio, transparent methodology

E-E-A-T Priority by Content Type

Different content types weight E-E-A-T signals differently. Focus effort where it matters most:

Content TypeExperienceExpertiseAuthorityTrustTop Priority
Product reviewCriticalHighMediumHighExperience — hands-on testing evidence
How-to guideHighCriticalMediumHighExpertise — demonstrate deep knowledge
Research/dataMediumCriticalCriticalCriticalAuthority + Trust — sourced data, methodology
Opinion pieceCriticalHighHighMediumExperience — personal credentials and POV
ComparisonHighHighMediumCriticalTrust — unbiased criteria, transparent methodology
News/reportingMediumMediumCriticalCriticalAuthority — recognized source, editorial standards

Content Quality Checklist (Top Priorities)

For every piece, verify at minimum:

  • Author identified with relevant credentials visible on page
  • At least 1 first-hand experience element (case study, screenshot, "we tested")
  • All statistics have named sources and dates
  • At least 2 references to primary sources (not just other blog posts)
  • Published date visible; content updated within 18 months
  • No unsupported superlatives ("best", "fastest", "most effective") without evidence

Step 5: SEO Targets

ElementTarget
Primary keyword[keyword]
Secondary keywords[2-3 related terms]
Word count range[min-max based on SERP analysis]
Internal links to include[list specific pages to link to]
External links to include[types of sources to cite]
Images/media[count and types: screenshots, diagrams, tables]
Featured snippet target[yes/no — if yes, which format: paragraph, list, table]

Step 6: Differentiation Angle

The brief must specify what makes this piece better than what already ranks:

  • More current: Updated data, recent examples
  • More practical: Templates, checklists, step-by-step screenshots
  • More comprehensive: Covers subtopics competitors skip
  • More specific: Targets a niche the broad pieces miss
  • Original data: Survey results, internal data analysis, expert quotes

Pick 1-2 angles. Trying to win on all dimensions produces generic content.

Output Format

Content Brief: [target keyword]

Overview

  • Target keyword: [keyword]
  • Search intent: [type]
  • Content format: [blog post / guide / comparison / etc.]
  • Target word count: [range]
  • Target audience: [who]
  • Business goal: [what readers should do after]

SERP Competitive Landscape [Table from Step 1]

Title Options

  1. [option 1]
  2. [option 2]
  3. [option 3]

Meta Description [150-160 char description]

Content Outline [Full heading structure with guidance per section]

SEO Targets [Table from Step 5]

E-E-A-T Checklist

  • First-hand experience demonstrated
  • Expert-level depth on core topic
  • Authoritative sources cited
  • Trust signals included (dates, author, methodology)

Differentiation [What makes this piece better than current top results]


Pro Tip: Use the free Keyword Density Analyzer and TF-IDF Tool to benchmark competitor content depth for your target keyword. SEOJuice MCP users can run /seojuice:keyword-analysis for search volume and difficulty, and /seojuice:content-strategy to check if the topic fits an existing cluster or fills a content gap.

平台分布

Codex

32.68%
按下载量换算13,459

Claude

30.93%
按下载量换算12,738

Cursor

18.28%
按下载量换算7,528

Gemini CLI

9.43%
按下载量换算3,884

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills