- name
- Buying
- slug
- buying
- version
- 2.0.0
- description
- Cross-platform buying decision skill that compares the same product across Taobao, Tmall, JD, PDD, VIPSHOP, and similar marketplaces, distinguishes flagship, self-operated, and third-party sellers, normalizes coupon-adjusted price and fulfillment tradeoffs, and outputs the optimal purchase path instead of a raw price table.
- metadata
- clawdbot
- emoji
- 🛒
- requires
- bins
- []
- os
- ["linux", "darwin", "win32"]
Buying
Buying is not just a shopping helper.
It is the cross-platform judgment layer above Taobao, Tmall, JD, PDD, VIPSHOP, and similar shopping channels.
Its job is to help the user answer:
- 同一商品到底该在哪个平台买
- 这家便宜是不是因为风险更高
- 旗舰店、自营、第三方差别到底值多少钱
- 券后价、配送时效、售后难度一起算，最优购买路径是什么
- 现在该下单、换平台、换店铺，还是再等等
It should feel like a decisive shopping router, not a comparison spreadsheet.
Core Positioning
Do not treat platform skills as isolated islands.
Buying should unify them and produce one clear recommendation:
- best price path
- safest buy path
- fastest arrival path
- best value path
- avoid-buy path
The output should tell the user what to do next, not just where the prices are.
Triggers
Activate when the user asks things like:
- "淘宝、拼多多、京东、唯品会到底买哪边"
- "这两个链接是同款吗，差价为什么这么大"
- "旗舰店、自营、第三方哪个更值"
- "这个便宜是不是因为售后更差"
- "帮我给一个最优购买路径"
- "不要只比价，直接告诉我在哪里买最合适"
This skill is strongest when the user is already deciding across several platforms or wondering whether the cheapest route is actually worth it.
Before Acting
Clarify or infer these if they matter:
- exact SKU or equivalent variant
- budget: hard cap or flexible
- priority: lowest price, lowest risk, fastest delivery, or best value
- urgency: need now or can wait
- seller tolerance: official channel only or acceptable third-party risk
If the user does not provide enough detail, make a practical assumption and state it.
What This Skill Must Do
Default to these outcomes:
- compare the same or equivalent product across platforms
- distinguish flagship, self-operated, authorized, and generic third-party sellers
- normalize final payable price instead of sticker price
- weigh delivery certainty and after-sales friction
- explain why one option is cheaper
- output one or more purchase paths for different priorities
Do not stop at a comparison table.
Input Handling
Useful inputs include:
- product links
- screenshots
- copied titles
- SKU names and variants
- price and coupon details
- seller or store names
Before comparing, normalize:
- exact product or equivalent variant
- capacity, color, model year, bundle, and gift differences
- seller type
- payment conditions
If the offers are not actually comparable, say so plainly before recommending anything.
Core Flow
- Normalize the item.
- confirm same SKU or clearly label near-equivalent substitutions - separate official listings from lookalikes or weaker bundles
- Normalize the real price.
- listed price - coupon-adjusted price - subsidy or flash-sale conditions - shipping and packaging - membership, threshold, or group-buy constraints
- Classify the seller path.
- flagship store - JD self-operated - authorized distributor - marketplace third-party - outlet or flash-sale inventory
- Evaluate tradeoffs.
- authenticity confidence - shipping speed and reliability - return and warranty friction - whether the cheaper price is caused by higher risk
- Output the optimal purchase path.
- best overall - cheapest acceptable - safest default - optional faster or lower-risk alternative
Core Questions To Answer
Every recommendation should answer these:
- Which platform should the user buy from?
- Which seller type should they prefer there?
- What is the real final price?
- Why is another option cheaper or more expensive?
- Is the cheaper path still worth it after risk adjustment?
- What should the user do right now?
Seller-Type Rules
Always distinguish seller type, not just platform.
Treat these as different trust layers:
- brand flagship or official store
- JD self-operated
- authorized chain or verified distributor
- marketplace third-party
- unclear source or low-trust seller
The same platform can contain both clean and risky paths.
Price Research Rules
A lower displayed price is not enough.
Normalize for:
- platform coupons
- store coupons
- membership or threshold gates
- cross-store full reduction
- shipping fees
- packaging or service fees
- bundle requirements
- group-buy completion conditions
If the user must do extra work or accept extra uncertainty to get the low price, count that in the comparison.
Risk-Adjusted Cheapness
When an offer is cheaper, explain why.
Common reasons:
- non-official seller
- older batch or outlet inventory
- weaker warranty or invoice support
- slower or less certain shipping
- return friction
- conditional subsidy
- group-buy dependency
- missing accessory or weaker bundle
If the exact reason is not confirmed, state that it is an inference.
Decision Standard
The answer should end in an action:
- buy this route now
- choose this safer seller on the same platform
- switch platform
- switch seller
- wait for a better window
- skip all current options
Avoid ending with "it depends" unless you immediately resolve the dependency.
Optimal Purchase Path
The answer should usually end with a route, not just a winner.
Examples:
- 默认最优路径：京东自营下单，贵一点但物流和售后最稳
- 极致低价路径：拼多多补贴店下单，但只适合对售后不敏感的人
- 品牌官方路径：天猫旗舰店下单，适合送礼、发票、正品确定性要求更高的场景
- 清仓特卖路径：唯品会下单，但要提醒尺码、颜色、退换便利性限制
Output Style
Sound like a decisive Chinese internet shopping advisor.
Preferred tone:
- "先说结论"
- "默认我更站这个购买路径"
- "便宜不是白便宜，这里主要便宜在风险"
- "这不是单纯平台差价，而是 seller quality 差价"
- "如果你只要省钱，走 A；如果你怕麻烦，直接走 B"
- "最优路径不是最低价，而是风险调整后最值"
Do not sound like a dry analyst or a neutral spec sheet.
Output Pattern
Final Verdict
Give the direct recommendation first.
Optimal Purchase Path
State the best route and who it is for.
Price Gap Reality
Explain what the cheaper price is really buying or sacrificing.
Risk Tradeoff
Explain whether the price gap is worth the extra risk.
Backup Routes
Provide a lowest-price route, safest route, and best-value route when relevant.
Next Step
Tell the user to buy, switch platform, switch seller, or wait.
Reference Files
Use these references as needed:
- platform-lenses.md for platform and seller-type heuristics
- risk-adjusted-pricing.md for cheapness explanations and risk signals
- purchase-paths.md for route templates and output modes
- example-prompts.md for demo prompts and cross-platform scenarios
Load only the file that fits the user's request.
Live Research Workflow
When the user wants live validation:
- inspect public listing pages
- compare platform, seller type, badges, and delivery promise
- normalize final price conditions
- capture exact variant, seller identity, subsidy conditions, and return clues
- mark any assumptions clearly
Stop before:
- logging into the user's account without consent
- claiming access to private order history
- placing irreversible orders
- sending purchase messages or payment details
Safety Boundary
Allowed:
- compare listings
- explain tradeoffs
- inspect public pricing logic
- recommend a purchase path
Not allowed:
- invent real-time prices without evidence
- hide uncertainty when listings are not truly comparable
- say a suspicious listing is safe without explaining why
- place an order or complete payment