Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

positioning-workshop(定位车间)

positioning-workshop 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

positioning-workshop 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,083。

总安装 190周安装 8GitHub Stars 6下载 67核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:positioning-workshop(定位车间)
来源仓库:https://github.com/buyaka/product-manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/positioning-workshop
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/buyaka/product-manager-skills --skill positioning-workshop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/buyaka/product-manager-skills --skill positioning-workshop

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

positioning-workshop 引导 Geoffrey Moore 式产品定位发现。通过问题链明确目标客户、未满足需求与差异点。输出可执行的 positioning statement 并锚定证据。适用于新品类或新市场的战略定位阶段。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/positioning-workshop

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/buyaka/product-manager-skills --skill position…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

positioning-workshop 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/buyaka/product-manager-skills --skill positioning-worksh…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

positioning-workshop 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

positioning-workshop 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

positioning-workshop 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

positioning-workshop 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 190 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 67 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

positioning-workshop 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
positioning-workshop

定位车间 · 本页

1906需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Purpose

Guide product managers through discovering and articulating product positioning by asking adaptive questions about target customers, unmet needs, product category, benefits, and competitive differentiation. Use this to align stakeholders on strategic positioning before writing PRDs, launch plans, or marketing materials—ensuring you've made deliberate choices about who you serve, what need you address, and how you differ from alternatives.

This is not a brainstorming session—it's a structured discovery process that outputs a Geoffrey Moore positioning statement backed by evidence and strategic choices.

Key Concepts

The Positioning Workshop Flow

An interactive discovery process that:

  1. Gathers product context (marketing materials, competitor intel)
  2. Identifies target customer segment through questioning
  3. Uncovers underserved needs via Jobs-to-be-Done lens
  4. Defines product category and benefits
  5. Establishes competitive differentiation
  6. Outputs a complete positioning statement (uses positioning-statement.md)

Why This Works

  • Structured discovery: Prevents "positioning by committee" (too vague)
  • Evidence-based: Uses real marketing materials, customer feedback, competitive intel
  • Adaptive: Questions adjust based on B2B vs. B2C, new product vs. repositioning, etc.
  • Actionable output: Generates a Geoffrey Moore positioning statement ready for stakeholder review

Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)

  • Not a tagline generator: Positioning ≠ marketing copy
  • Not feature-first: Starts with customer problems, not product capabilities
  • Not consensus-driven: Forces hard choices (can't be "for everyone")

When to Use This

  • Defining positioning for a new product
  • Repositioning an existing product (pivot, market shift)
  • Aligning stakeholders on product strategy
  • Preparing for launch or major release
  • Before writing positioning-dependent artifacts (PRD, press release, sales deck)

When NOT to Use This

  • Before customer research (positioning requires validated insights)
  • For internal tools with captive users (no market positioning needed)
  • When positioning is already clear and validated

Facilitation Source of Truth

Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.

It defines:

  • session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
  • one-question turns with plain-language prompts
  • progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
  • interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
  • numbered recommendations at decision points
  • quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include Other (specify) when useful)

This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.

Application

This interactive skill asks up to 5 adaptive questions, offering 3-4 enumerated context-aware options at each step.

Interaction pattern: Pair with skills/workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md when you want a one-step-at-a-time flow with numbered recommendations at decision points and quick-select options for regular questions. If the user asks for a single-shot output, skip the multi-turn facilitation.


Step 0: Gather Context (Before Questions)

Agent suggests:

Before we begin, let's gather product context to ground our positioning work:

For Your Own Product:

  • Current website copy (homepage, product pages, value prop)
  • Existing positioning statements or messaging docs
  • Customer testimonials or case studies
  • Sales objections or competitive win/loss analysis
  • Product descriptions or feature lists

For Repositioning an Existing Product:

  • Current positioning (what are you saying today?)
  • Customer feedback or support tickets (what problems do they report?)
  • Competitive intel (how do competitors position themselves?)

If You Don't Have a Product Yet (or Want to Benchmark):

  • Find 2-3 competitor or analog products
  • Copy their website homepage, positioning statements, or value props
  • We'll use these as reference points

You can paste this content directly, or we can proceed with a brief description.


Question 1: Target Customer Segment

Agent asks: "Based on the context provided, who is the primary customer segment you're serving?"

Offer 4 enumerated options (adapted based on product context):

  1. B2B: SMB decision-makers — E.g., "Small business owners (10-50 employees) managing operations" (like Gusto, QuickBooks)
  2. B2B: Enterprise buyers — E.g., "IT/Product leaders at companies with 500+ employees" (like Salesforce, Workday)
  3. B2C: Mass market consumers — E.g., "Gen Z users (18-25) seeking budgeting tools" (like Mint, Venmo)
  4. B2C: Niche enthusiasts — E.g., "Fitness enthusiasts tracking macros and workouts" (like MyFitnessPal, Strava)

Or describe your own target customer segment (be specific: demographics, role, company size, behaviors).

Adaptation tip: If marketing materials mention "enterprises," "SMBs," "consumers," or specific personas, suggest those.

User response: [Selection or custom]


Question 2: Underserved Need (Jobs-to-be-Done)

Agent asks: "What underserved need or pain point does your target customer experience that your product addresses?"

Offer 4 enumerated options (adapted based on Question 1):

Example (if Q1 = B2B SMB decision-makers):

  1. Time-consuming manual work — E.g., "Spend 10+ hours/week on tasks that should be automated" (invoice processing, payroll, reporting)
  2. Lack of visibility or control — E.g., "Can't see real-time status of projects, causing missed deadlines" (project tracking, dashboards)
  3. Compliance or risk burden — E.g., "Fear of tax penalties or legal issues due to manual errors" (accounting, HR compliance)
  4. Costly inefficiency — E.g., "Losing revenue due to slow processes or customer friction" (sales ops, customer onboarding)

Or describe the specific pain point/unmet need based on customer research, support tickets, or competitive gaps.

Adaptation tip: Use language from customer testimonials or case studies in the provided materials.

User response: [Selection or custom]


Question 3: Product Category

Agent asks: "What product category does your solution fit into? (This anchors how buyers evaluate you.)"

Offer 4 enumerated options (adapted based on Q1 + Q2):

Example (if Q1 = B2B SMB, Q2 = Time-consuming manual work):

  1. Workflow automation platform — E.g., "Automates repetitive tasks across apps" (like Zapier, Integromat)
  2. Business management software — E.g., "All-in-one platform for operations (invoicing, payroll, CRM)" (like HubSpot, Zoho)
  3. Vertical SaaS — E.g., "Purpose-built for a specific industry (e.g., HVAC, legal, dental)" (like Jobber, Clio)
  4. AI-powered assistant — E.g., "AI tool that automates workflows via natural language" (like Notion AI, Jasper)

Or define your own category. Note: Creating a new category is risky—pick an existing one unless you have strong rationale.

Adaptation tip: If competitors are in a clear category, default to that unless you're deliberately creating a new one.

User response: [Selection or custom]


Question 4: Key Benefit (Outcome, Not Features)

Agent asks: "What's the primary benefit or outcome your product delivers? (Focus on what the customer *gets*, not what the product *has*.)"

Offer 3 enumerated options (adapted based on Q2 need):

Example (if Q2 = Time-consuming manual work):

  1. Time savings — E.g., "Reduces manual work from 10 hours/week to 1 hour" (measurable efficiency)
  2. Error reduction — E.g., "Eliminates 95% of manual data entry errors" (accuracy/risk mitigation)
  3. Cost savings — E.g., "Saves $500/month in labor costs by automating invoicing" (direct ROI)

Or describe the specific, measurable outcome your product delivers.

Quality check: Avoid features ("has AI," "includes dashboards"). Focus on outcomes ("makes decisions 3x faster," "prevents compliance violations").

User response: [Selection or custom]


Question 5: Competitive Differentiation

Agent asks: "What's your primary competitor or competitive alternative, and how do you differ?"

Offer 4 enumerated options (adapted based on Q3 category):

Example (if Q3 = Workflow automation platform):

  1. Incumbent SaaS leader — E.g., "Unlike Zapier (which requires technical setup), we offer no-code visual workflows accessible to non-technical users"
  2. Spreadsheets/manual processes — E.g., "Unlike Excel (which requires manual updates), we provide real-time automated sync across tools"
  3. Vertical competitor — E.g., "Unlike generic automation tools, we're pre-built for [industry] with templates and compliance features"
  4. Enterprise-only solutions — E.g., "Unlike enterprise tools (complex, expensive), we're designed for SMBs with simple pricing and 10-minute setup"

Or describe your primary competitive alternative and your unique differentiation (focus on outcomes, not features).

Adaptation tip: Use competitive intel from provided materials (win/loss analysis, sales objections).

User response: [Selection or custom]


Output: Generate Positioning Statement

After collecting responses, the agent generates a positioning statement using the positioning-statement.md format:

# Positioning Statement

**Based on your responses, here's your positioning statement:**

---

## Value Proposition

**For** [Target customer from Q1]
- **that need** [Underserved need from Q2]
- [Product name]
- **is a** [Product category from Q3]
- **that** [Key benefit from Q4]

---

## Differentiation Statement

- **Unlike** [Primary competitor from Q5]
- [Product name]
- **provides** [Unique differentiation from Q5]

---

## Positioning Summary (One-Sentence Version)

[Product name] is a [category] for [target] that [benefit], unlike [competitor] which [limitation].

**Example:** "Acme Workflows is a no-code automation platform for small business owners that reduces manual work from 10 hours/week to 1 hour, unlike Zapier which requires technical setup and coding knowledge."

---

## Next Steps

1. **Stress-test this positioning:**
   - Read it aloud to 5 target customers. Do they recognize themselves?
   - Share with stakeholders (product, marketing, sales). Does it align?
   - Check if differentiation is defensible (can competitors copy this in 6 months?).

2. **Refine based on feedback:**
   - If target feels too broad → Narrow further (e.g., "SMB owners" → "SMB owners in service industries")
   - If need isn't resonating → Validate with more customer research
   - If category confuses → Pick a clearer category or commit to category creation

3. **Apply to artifacts:**
   - Update website homepage and product pages
   - Revise sales deck and pitch materials
   - Use in PRD, press release, or roadmap planning (reference `press-release.md`, `positioning-statement.md`)

---

**Would you like to refine any part of this positioning, or shall we document it as final?**

Examples

Example 1: Good Positioning Workshop (B2B SaaS Automation)

Step 0 - Context Provided: User shares current website copy:

"Acme Workflows helps small businesses automate repetitive tasks. Connect your apps and save time."

Question 1 Response: "B2B: SMB decision-makers — Small business owners (10-50 employees) managing operations"

Question 2 Response: "Time-consuming manual work — Spend 10+ hours/week on invoice processing, data entry, reporting"

Question 3 Response: "Workflow automation platform — Automates repetitive tasks across apps"

Question 4 Response: "Time savings — Reduces manual work from 10 hours/week to 1 hour"

Question 5 Response: "Incumbent SaaS leader — Unlike Zapier (which requires technical setup), we offer no-code visual workflows accessible to non-technical users"


Generated Positioning Statement:

## Value Proposition

**For** small business owners (10-50 employees) managing daily operations
- **that need** to eliminate 10+ hours/week spent on manual tasks like invoice processing, data entry, and reporting
- Acme Workflows
- **is a** no-code workflow automation platform
- **that** reduces manual work from 10 hours/week to 1 hour by automating repetitive tasks across apps

## Differentiation Statement

- **Unlike** Zapier, which requires technical setup and coding knowledge
- Acme Workflows
- **provides** visual, no-code workflows that non-technical business owners can set up in 10 minutes

## Positioning Summary

Acme Workflows is a no-code automation platform for small business owners that reduces manual work from 10 hours/week to 1 hour, unlike Zapier which requires technical setup and coding knowledge.

Why this works:

  • Target is specific (SMB owners, 10-50 employees, operations focus)
  • Need is measurable (10+ hours/week on manual tasks)
  • Category is clear (workflow automation)
  • Benefit is outcome-focused (10 hours → 1 hour)
  • Differentiation is defensible (no-code vs. technical setup)

Example 2: Bad Positioning Workshop (Vague)

Question 1 Response: "Businesses" Question 2 Response: "Need better tools" Question 3 Response: "Software" Question 4 Response: "Productivity" Question 5 Response: "We're better than competitors"

Generated Positioning Statement:

**For** businesses
- **that need** better tools
- ProductX
- **is a** software
- **that** improves productivity

**Unlike** competitors
- ProductX
- **provides** better features

Why this fails:

  • Target is too broad ("businesses" = everyone)
  • Need is vague ("better tools" = meaningless)
  • Category is not specific ("software" says nothing)
  • Benefit is unmeasurable ("productivity" = how much?)
  • Differentiation is empty ("better features" = unverifiable)

How to fix: Go back and answer with specificity. Use customer research, not guesses.


Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: "For Everyone"

Symptom: Target is "all businesses" or "anyone who wants to be productive"

Consequence: Positioning becomes invisible—no one feels it's *for them*.

Fix: Narrow ruthlessly. Pick the *first* customer segment. You can expand later.


Pitfall 2: Need is a Feature Request

Symptom: "Need better dashboards" or "Need AI-powered analytics"

Consequence: You've jumped to solution, not problem.

Fix: Ask "Why do they need that?" Keep asking until you hit the root need.


Pitfall 3: Category Confusion

Symptom: "We're a next-generation platform for digital transformation"

Consequence: Buyers don't know how to evaluate you.

Fix: Pick a category buyers understand. If creating a new one, budget for category education.


Pitfall 4: Differentiation is a Feature

Symptom: "Unlike competitors, we have AI"

Consequence: Features are copiable. Not durable differentiation.

Fix: Focus on outcomes: "Unlike competitors, we reduce setup time from 2 hours to 10 minutes."


Pitfall 5: No Customer Validation

Symptom: Positioning created in a vacuum, never tested with customers

Consequence: It sounds good internally but doesn't resonate externally.

Fix: Read positioning statement to 5 target customers. If they don't say "Yes, that's me," revise.


References

Related Skills

  • positioning-statement.md — The output format this workshop generates
  • proto-persona.md — Defines the "For [target]" segment
  • jobs-to-be-done.md — Informs the "that need" statement
  • problem-statement.md — Problem framing supports positioning
  • press-release.md — Positioning informs press release messaging

External Frameworks

  • Geoffrey Moore, *Crossing the Chasm* (1991) — Origin of positioning statement format
  • April Dunford, *Obviously Awesome* (2019) — Modern positioning methodology

Dean's Work

  • Positioning Statement Prompt Template

Skill type: Interactive Suggested filename: positioning-workshop.md Suggested placement: /skills/interactive/ Dependencies: Uses positioning-statement.md, references proto-persona.md, jobs-to-be-done.md, problem-statement.md

平台分布

Codex

38.86%
按下载量换算26

Claude

27.15%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

19.24%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills