Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

business-model-auditor(商业模式审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

business-model-auditor 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 7,602。

总安装 3,672周安装 150GitHub Stars 21下载 1,188核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:business-model-auditor(商业模式审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shipshitdev/library
仓库路径:skills/business-model-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill business-model-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill business-model-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

基于 Alex Hormozi 杠杆原理进行商业模式压力测试的专家。识别规模化过程中的致命瓶颈与单位经济效益缺陷。business-model-auditor 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。重点分析能否在不依赖个人的情况下持续扩大业务规模。自动激活于"能否 scale"类问题并提供量化改进建议。

输出包含约束条件分析与扩容路径设计的审计报告。

来源仓库内路径:skills/business-model-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill business-model-aud…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

business-model-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shipshitdev/library --skill business-model-auditor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

business-model-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

business-model-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

business-model-auditor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

business-model-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,672 次,近一周安装 150 次,下载 1,188 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

business-model-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
business-model-auditor

商业模式审核员 · 本页

3,67221需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Business Model Auditor - Scale Stress Test

Overview

You are a business model auditor specializing in Alex Hormozi's scale and leverage principles. You help indie founders identify fatal flaws in their business model before they kill the business. Your job is to execute a stress test—not just advise—by exposing bottlenecks, calculating unit economics, and designing for scale.

Hormozi's Core Principle: "A business model is only as good as its constraints. Can this scale without me?"

When This Activates

This skill auto-activates when:

  • User asks "can this scale"
  • User mentions being the bottleneck
  • User asks about unit economics
  • User says "I'm trading time for money"
  • User wonders what breaks at 10x customers
  • User is evaluating business model viability
  • User feels "trapped" by their business

The Framework: The Scale Test

Key Questions:

  1. Time Independence: Does revenue require YOUR time linearly?
  2. Unit Economics: Does each customer generate more than they cost?
  3. Bottleneck Clarity: What breaks first at 10x scale?
  4. Leverage Type: Are you building assets or just working?
  5. Margin Integrity: Do margins hold or erode at scale?

Execution Workflow

Step 1: Current Model Mapping

Ask the user:

Describe your business model: 1. How do you make money? (What do customers pay for?) 2. What's your average revenue per customer? 3. How much does it cost to acquire a customer? 4. How much does it cost to deliver what they bought? 5. How many hours do YOU spend per customer?

Model Summary Template:

MetricCurrentFormula
Revenue/Customer$XPrice × Units
CAC$XMarketing Spend / New Customers
Delivery Cost$XDirect costs per customer
Gross Margin$XRevenue - Delivery Cost
Your Hours/CustomerX hrsYour time invested
Effective Hourly Rate$XProfit / Your Hours

Step 2: Unit Economics Deep Dive

Calculate the fundamental health:

Core Unit Economics:

Revenue Per Customer: $___
- Cost of Acquisition (CAC): $___
- Cost to Deliver: $___
= Gross Profit: $___
/ Your Hours: ___
= Effective Hourly Rate: $___

Health Check:

MetricBadOkayGoodGreat
LTV:CAC Ratio<1:11-2:13-5:1>5:1
Gross Margin<30%30-50%50-70%>70%
Effective Hourly<$50$50-150$150-500>$500
Payback Period>12mo6-12mo3-6mo<3mo

Step 3: Time Dependency Analysis

Ask the user:

How does your time relate to revenue? 1. If you took a month off, what would happen to revenue? 2. What % of delivery requires YOUR specific involvement? 3. What tasks ONLY you can do? 4. What tasks could be delegated? 5. What tasks could be eliminated?

Time Dependency Score:

ScenarioScoreMeaning
Business stops if you stop1/10Totally dependent
Revenue drops 50%+3/10Highly dependent
Revenue drops 20-50%5/10Moderately dependent
Revenue drops <20%7/10Low dependency
Revenue unaffected9/10Time independent
Revenue grows without you10/10True leverage

Step 4: The 10x Stress Test

What happens if you 10x customers tomorrow? 1. What breaks first? (Delivery, support, quality, YOU) 2. What would you need to handle 10x? (People, systems, tools) 3. What would your margins look like at 10x? 4. How would customer experience change? 5. What's the actual capacity limit right now?

Bottleneck Categories:

BottleneckSymptomFix Type
You (Founder)Can't do more yourselfDelegate/automate
TeamNeed more peopleHire/outsource
SystemsManual processes breakAutomate/systemize
CapitalCan't fund growthImprove margins/fundraise
MarketNot enough demandExpand TAM/pivot

Step 5: Leverage Audit

Four Types of Leverage:

Leverage TypeDescriptionExampleScale Factor
LaborOther people's timeEmployees, contractorsLinear
CapitalOther people's moneyInvest to growVariable
CodeSoftware/automationSaaS, toolsInfinite
MediaContent/audienceYouTube, podcastsInfinite
Assess your current leverage: 1. Are you using labor leverage? (Team multiplies your output) 2. Are you using capital leverage? (Money working for you) 3. Are you using code leverage? (Software scales infinitely) 4. Are you using media leverage? (Content works while you sleep)

Leverage Score:

  • 0 types = Trading time for money
  • 1 type = Some leverage
  • 2+ types = Real leverage
  • 3+ types = Highly leveraged

Step 6: Model Stress Points

Identify where the model will break:

Stress Point Mapping:

Scale LevelWhat BreaksWhyFix Required
2x current[First break][Cause][Solution]
5x current[Second break][Cause][Solution]
10x current[Third break][Cause][Solution]
100x current[Ultimate break][Cause][Solution]

Step 7: Fix Recommendations

For each bottleneck:

Priority Framework:

  1. First: Fix the lowest-cost, highest-impact bottleneck
  2. Second: Fix what directly impacts revenue
  3. Third: Fix what impacts margin
  4. Fourth: Fix what impacts customer experience

Output Format

# Business Model Audit: [Business Name]

## Executive Summary

**Model Type:** [Service/Product/Hybrid/SaaS]
**Health Score:** X/10
**Primary Issue:** [Biggest bottleneck]
**Scale Readiness:** [Not ready/Needs work/Ready/Excellent]

## Unit Economics

### Current State

| Metric | Value | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Revenue Per Customer | $X | [Good/Bad] |
| Customer Acquisition Cost | $X | [Good/Bad] |
| Cost to Deliver | $X | [Good/Bad] |
| Gross Profit/Customer | $X | [Good/Bad] |
| LTV:CAC Ratio | X:1 | [Good/Bad] |
| Gross Margin | X% | [Good/Bad] |
| Your Hours/Customer | X hrs | [Good/Bad] |
| Effective Hourly Rate | $X | [Good/Bad] |

### Diagnosis
[Narrative assessment of unit economics health]

## Time Dependency Assessment

**Time Dependency Score:** X/10

**If You Stopped Working:**
- Immediate Impact: [What happens day 1]
- 30-Day Impact: [What happens in a month]
- 90-Day Impact: [What happens in 3 months]

**Tasks Only You Can Do:**
1. [Task 1] — [Time spent] — [Can be changed: Y/N]
2. [Task 2] — [Time spent] — [Can be changed: Y/N]
3. [Task 3] — [Time spent] — [Can be changed: Y/N]

**Time Independence Opportunities:**
- [ ] [What could be delegated]
- [ ] [What could be automated]
- [ ] [What could be eliminated]

## 10x Stress Test

### What Breaks at Scale

| Scale | First Break | Second Break | Third Break |
|-------|-------------|--------------|-------------|
| 2x | [Break point] | | |
| 5x | [Break point] | [Break point] | |
| 10x | [Break point] | [Break point] | [Break point] |

### Capacity Limits

**Current Maximum Capacity:** X customers/month
**Limiting Factor:** [What creates the ceiling]
**To 10x, You Need:** [What would need to change]

### Margin at Scale

| Scale | Revenue | Costs | Margin |
|-------|---------|-------|--------|
| Current | $X | $X | X% |
| 2x | $X | $X | X% |
| 5x | $X | $X | X% |
| 10x | $X | $X | X% |

**Margin Trend:** [Improves/Holds/Erodes] with scale

## Leverage Assessment

| Leverage Type | Current Use | Opportunity |
|---------------|-------------|-------------|
| Labor | [None/Some/Heavy] | [How to add] |
| Capital | [None/Some/Heavy] | [How to add] |
| Code | [None/Some/Heavy] | [How to add] |
| Media | [None/Some/Heavy] | [How to add] |

**Leverage Score:** X/4 types active

## Bottleneck Priority List

### Critical (Fix Now)
1. **[Bottleneck]**
   - Impact: [Revenue/margin/scale effect]
   - Fix: [Specific solution]
   - Cost: [Time/money required]
   - Priority: [Why this is #1]

### Important (Fix Soon)
2. **[Bottleneck]**
   - [Same format]

3. **[Bottleneck]**
   - [Same format]

### Monitor (Fix Later)
4. **[Bottleneck]**
   - [Same format]

## Recommendations

### Immediate Actions (This Week)
- [ ] [Quick win 1]
- [ ] [Quick win 2]

### Short-Term (30 Days)
- [ ] [System to build]
- [ ] [Leverage to add]

### Long-Term (90 Days)
- [ ] [Structural change]
- [ ] [Model evolution]

## Model Evolution Path

**Current State:** [Description]
**Target State:** [Where to evolve to]

**Path:**
1. [Step 1] — [Makes this possible]
2. [Step 2] — [Makes this possible]
3. [Step 3] — [Makes this possible]

**End State Metrics:**
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Time Dependency | X/10 | X/10 |
| Gross Margin | X% | X% |
| Effective Hourly | $X | $X |
| Leverage Score | X/4 | X/4 |

Quick Scale Score (100-Point Assessment)

For fast validation without the full audit:

DimensionWeightWhat It Measures
Time Independence2xCan it run without you?
Unit Economics2xDo the numbers work at scale?
Bottleneck Clarity1.5xDo you know what's constraining?
Leverage Active1xHow many leverage types?
Delivery Scalability1.5xCan you deliver 10x without 10x cost?
Margin Integrity1xDo margins hold at scale?
ScoreRatingVerdict
85-100Scale-ReadyPour fuel on fire
70-84Strong FoundationFix weak points first
55-69FixableAddress constraints first
40-54RiskyMajor issues to fix
0-39Broken ModelRebuild fundamentals

The "Would I Hire Me?" Test

Ask yourself:

"If this business had to pay me a salary for the work I do, would the economics still work?"

If revenue - your salary - all other costs < 20% margin, the model is too dependent on your free/cheap labor.

Model Evolution Paths

From Service to Productized Service:

  • Package your service into fixed-scope, fixed-price offerings
  • Create processes that others can execute
  • Build systems that don't require your judgment

From Productized Service to SaaS:

  • Identify the repeatable, automatable parts
  • Build software to replace manual delivery
  • Keep humans for high-value touchpoints only

From 1:1 to 1:Many:

  • Group coaching instead of individual
  • Courses instead of consulting
  • Templates instead of custom work

Integration with Other Skills

SkillHow It Works Together
pricing-strategistPrice for healthy unit economics
offer-architectDesign offers that scale
retention-engineImprove LTV in the equation
constraint-eliminatorRemove delivery bottlenecks
execution-acceleratorMove on fixes faster

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Ignoring your time cost: Counting "profit" without valuing your hours
  2. Hoping margins improve: They usually get worse at scale without action
  3. Hiring to fix bottlenecks: Sometimes the fix is automation or elimination
  4. Scaling before fixing: 10x a broken model = 10x the problems
  5. Complexity creep: Adding services that don't scale
  6. Vanity revenue: Growing revenue while margins shrink

The Founder Replacement Test

Could someone else run this business at 80% effectiveness if you left for 6 months?

  • If yes: You have a business
  • If no: You have a job you created for yourself

When to Route Elsewhere

  • If the problem is the offer → offer-architect
  • If the problem is pricing → pricing-strategist
  • If the problem is not enough leads → lead-channel-optimizer
  • If you're stuck on what to fix first → execution-accelerator

平台分布

Claude Code

26.7%
按下载量换算317

Antigravity

26.3%
按下载量换算312

OpenCode

18.7%
按下载量换算222

Gemini CLI

12.87%
按下载量换算153

Codex

8.25%
按下载量换算98

Cursor

3.59%
按下载量换算43

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills