Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

business-literacy(商业素养)

business-literacy 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

business-literacy 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,495。

总安装 475周安装 20GitHub Stars 21下载 166核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:business-literacy(商业素养)
来源仓库:https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/business-literacy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill business-literacy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill business-literacy

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于管理者角色与团队背景提供上下文感知的商业建议。business-literacy 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。优先读取 EM 上下文文件或请求最小化人员档案信息。聚焦团队使命、人员配置与挑战分析给出针对性解决方案。适用于跨部门协作、绩效改进和资源调配等业务决策支持。

输出需保持与组织现状和约束条件相匹配的可行性方案。

来源仓库内路径:skills/business-literacy

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill busines…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

business-literacy 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill business-literacy。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

business-literacy 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

business-literacy 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

business-literacy 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

business-literacy 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 475 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 166 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

business-literacy 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
business-literacy

商业素养 · 本页

47521需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Business Literacy

Before Starting

Check for EM context first. If .agents/em-context.md exists, read it.

If .agents/em-context.md does not exist, ask for a minimal manager profile first and save it before giving detailed advice: role/title, team size, team mission or ownership area, and current challenge or priority.

If a specific person is central to the conversation and .agents/reports/[name].md does not exist, ask for a minimal profile for that person first and save it before giving detailed advice: title/level, tenure, strengths, and current challenge or growth area.

If the conversation reveals durable new context later, update .agents/em-context.md or .agents/reports/[name].md automatically. Save stable facts and patterns, not guesses, transient frustration, or unresolved interpretations.

Response Style

Keep the first answer concise and useful. Do not dump the whole framework unless the user asks for depth.

Default to:

  • State the likely diagnosis or recommendation first
  • Ask at most 2-3 targeted questions only if the missing context changes the advice
  • Give the next concrete action and, when useful, exact wording the manager can use
  • Mention the relevant framework briefly, but do not explain every part of it
  • Offer a deeper version only after the direct answer

How to Use This Skill

  • Need to decode a business term you heard in a meeting → The Terms That Come Up Most
  • Want to make the case for engineering work in business language → Using These in Practice
  • Want to build credibility with business leaders or the P&L owner → The 3 Layers of Business Impact

Default Response Shape

When translating business concepts for an EM, make the answer operational:

  1. Plain-English definition: explain the term without finance theater.
  2. Why an EM should care: connect it to roadmap, staffing, reliability, cost, or prioritization.
  3. Engineering translation: show how engineering work can move or protect the metric.
  4. Example sentence: give wording the EM can use with a business stakeholder.
  5. Caveat: note where the metric can mislead or be gamed.

For stakeholder-facing asks, end with a concise business-framed version of the engineering request.


Why This Matters

Engineers can succeed without understanding business language. Engineering managers cannot. If you want to have influence, convince stakeholders, and shape the roadmap — you need to speak the language leadership uses.

Understanding these terms also makes you a better advocate for your team. When you can connect engineering decisions to business outcomes — margins, retention, CAC — you move from "we need this refactor" to "this reduces our hosting cost by 15% and improves our gross margin."


The Terms That Come Up Most

Money In

ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) — total yearly revenue from subscriptions. The core metric for SaaS companies. When leadership says "we're at $5M ARR," this is it.

MoM (Month-over-Month) — growth rate from one month to the next. A 10% MoM growth rate is exceptional.

TAM (Total Addressable Market) — the total revenue potential if you captured 100% of your target market. Used to justify investment size.

Costs

COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) — costs directly tied to delivering the product (hosting, infra, third-party APIs). For SaaS, engineering teams directly influence COGS.

Gross Margin — (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue. For SaaS, 70–80% is healthy. Below 60% means your delivery costs are high relative to what customers pay. This is where engineering decisions show up in financials. Reducing third-party API dependency, optimizing infra costs, or improving efficiency all improve gross margin.

OpEx (Operating Expenses) — ongoing costs not directly tied to production: salaries, rent, marketing.

CapEx (Capital Expenditure) — large investments with long-term value. Building a new data center is CapEx; monthly AWS bill is OpEx.

Burn Rate — how much cash the company spends per month. High burn + low revenue = limited runway.

Net Margin — what's left after ALL costs. Most startups have negative net margin for years.

EBITDA — Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization. A profitability measure that strips out financing. Matters more at late-stage.

Customers

CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) — average cost to acquire a customer. If you spend $100k on marketing and get 100 customers, CAC = $1,000.

LTV (Lifetime Value) — average revenue from a customer over their full relationship. LTV should be 3–5x CAC for a healthy business. If not, growth is expensive.

Churn — percentage of customers lost per period. The silent killer. 5% monthly churn = ~46% of customers gone per year.

Retention — the inverse of churn. Net Revenue Retention (NRR) > 100% means expansion from existing customers outweighs churn.

GRR (Gross Revenue Retention) — what percentage of last year's revenue you kept, excluding expansion.

NPS (Net Promoter Score) — "How likely are you to recommend us?" Scores 9–10 = promoters, 7–8 = passives, 0–6 = detractors.

Business Health

Default Alive — if you stop raising money, does current revenue growth make you profitable before cash runs out? If not, you're "default dead."

Moat — what makes you hard to copy. Deep tech, network effects, proprietary data, brand. Engineering decisions (especially around data and platform) often build or erode moats.

AARRR (Pirate Metrics) — Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue. A framework for diagnosing where growth is leaking. If retention is 20%, pouring money into acquisition just fills a leaky bucket. Fix the leak first.


Using These in Practice

When proposing technical work, translate it:

  • Not: "we need to migrate off this legacy API" → Yes: "this API costs us $40k/year and is our top cause of outages; removing it improves gross margin and reduces customer churn"
  • Not: "we should invest in platform" → Yes: "right now each new feature takes 2 weeks to wire up; a platform investment gets that to 2 days, directly improving our CAC by reducing time-to-value"

When reviewing the roadmap, ask the business question: which AARRR stage are we weakest at right now? Invest there first.


The 3 Layers of Business Impact

EMs who drive real business impact typically work across three layers, in increasing order of difficulty:

Layer 1 — Product: Do you and your team understand how your features are used? Have a dashboard showing feature usage that everyone can see. Know the product's AARRR metrics. A feature that ships but nobody adopts has zero impact.

Layer 2 — Business Economics: Can you connect your team's work to what the business cares about financially? Find the "GM" — the manager who owns P&L (profit and loss) for the business area your team serves. Have a conversation: what do they care about, and how does your team's work connect to it? Once you can answer that, start using business metrics in technical arguments. "This saves $125k/year" wins conversations that "better infrastructure" loses.

Layer 3 — Industry/Domain: Do you understand the industry your company operates in well enough to speak credibly with domain experts? Most engineering managers are domain-agnostic, which makes non-technical leaders underestimate them.

Three levels of domain knowledge:

  • Level 1 (Passive): Know the terminology. Industry-specific terms you hear repeatedly but don't fully understand undermine your credibility. Spend 10–15 minutes/week on industry content (articles, newsletters, an LLM tutor). Ask it to explain the domain as an instructor would.
  • Level 2 (Sharing): Share what you learn. Post a relevant article with your takeaway in a shared channel with peers and PMs. People who see you engaging with the domain start treating you as a peer.
  • Level 3 (Insider): Find one concrete way to experience the industry firsthand. Shadow a customer, use your own product as an actual user for a month, or (for the committed) get a domain certification. The gap between knowing the domain and experiencing it is the difference between being taken seriously and being tolerated.

Dive Deeper

If the user asks where a framework came from, wants to read the original article, or wants more context on any topic in this skill — read references/sources.md for the full list of source articles (with links) and books.


Related Skills

  • working-with-pm — PMs use this language constantly; understanding it makes you a real partner
  • roadmap-planning — Tech debt and platform work need business justification to get prioritized
  • developer-productivity — For connecting engineering metrics (DORA, velocity) to business outcomes
  • influence — Business fluency directly enables the 3rd level of positioning (being trusted)

平台分布

Codex

36.03%
按下载量换算60

Claude

27.67%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

18.72%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

10.42%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills