Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow(构建漏洞扫描工作流程)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,597。

总安装 774周安装 31GitHub Stars 5,917下载 250核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow(构建漏洞扫描工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

设计端到端的漏洞扫描工作流程,超越 CVSS 评分实现智能优先级排序。适用于将扫描结果融入 SIEM 实现攻击面关联分析。结合资产上下文与威胁情报动态调整修复顺序,提升 ROI。需配置扫描范围排除规则与敏感数据过滤机制,降低业务干扰。定期校准扫描策略,避免重复工作与资源浪费。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill building…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 774 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 250 次,GitHub 5,917 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,917 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow

构建漏洞扫描工作流程 · 本页

7745,917需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Building Vulnerability Scanning Workflow

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • SOC teams need to establish or improve recurring vulnerability scanning programs
  • Scan results require prioritization beyond raw CVSS scores using asset context and threat intelligence
  • Vulnerability data must be integrated into SIEM for correlation with exploitation attempts
  • Remediation tracking needs formalization with SLA-based dashboards and reporting

Do not use for penetration testing or active exploitation — vulnerability scanning identifies weaknesses, penetration testing validates exploitability.

Prerequisites

  • Vulnerability scanner (Tenable Nessus Professional, Qualys VMDR, or OpenVAS/Greenbone)
  • Asset inventory with criticality classifications (business-critical, standard, development)
  • Network access from scanner to all target segments (agent-based or network scan)
  • SIEM integration for scan result ingestion and correlation
  • Patch management system (WSUS, SCCM, Intune) for remediation tracking

Workflow

Step 1: Define Scan Scope and Scheduling

Create scan policies covering all asset types:

Nessus Scan Configuration (API):

import requests

nessus_url = "https://nessus.company.com:8834"
headers = {"X-ApiKeys": f"accessKey={access_key};secretKey={secret_key}"}

# Create scan policy
policy = {
    "uuid": "advanced",
    "settings": {
        "name": "SOC Weekly Infrastructure Scan",
        "description": "Weekly credentialed scan of all server and workstation segments",
        "scanner_id": 1,
        "policy_id": 0,
        "text_targets": "10.0.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12",
        "launch": "WEEKLY",
        "starttime": "20240315T020000",
        "rrules": "FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=SA",
        "enabled": True
    },
    "credentials": {
        "add": {
            "Host": {
                "Windows": [{
                    "domain": "company.local",
                    "username": "nessus_svc",
                    "password": "SCAN_SERVICE_PASSWORD",
                    "auth_method": "Password"
                }],
                "SSH": [{
                    "username": "nessus_svc",
                    "private_key": "/path/to/nessus_key",
                    "auth_method": "public key"
                }]
            }
        }
    }
}

response = requests.post(f"{nessus_url}/scans", headers=headers, json=policy,
                         verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true")  # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
scan_id = response.json()["scan"]["id"]
print(f"Scan created: ID {scan_id}")

Qualys VMDR Scan via API:

import qualysapi

conn = qualysapi.connect(
    hostname="qualysapi.qualys.com",
    username="api_user",
    password="API_PASSWORD"
)

# Launch vulnerability scan
params = {
    "action": "launch",
    "scan_title": "Weekly_Infrastructure_Scan",
    "ip": "10.0.0.0/16",
    "option_id": "123456",  # Scan profile ID
    "iscanner_name": "Internal_Scanner_01",
    "priority": "0"
}

response = conn.request("/api/2.0/fo/scan/", params)
print(f"Scan launched: {response}")

Step 2: Process and Prioritize Scan Results

Download results and apply risk-based prioritization:

import requests
import csv

# Export Nessus results
response = requests.get(
    f"{nessus_url}/scans/{scan_id}/export",
    headers=headers,
    params={"format": "csv"},
    verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true",  # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
)

# Parse and prioritize
vulns = []
reader = csv.DictReader(response.text.splitlines())
for row in reader:
    cvss = float(row.get("CVSS v3.0 Base Score", 0))
    asset_criticality = get_asset_criticality(row["Host"])  # From asset inventory

    # Risk-based priority calculation
    risk_score = cvss * asset_criticality_multiplier(asset_criticality)

    # Boost score if actively exploited (check CISA KEV)
    if row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list:
        risk_score *= 1.5

    vulns.append({
        "host": row["Host"],
        "plugin_name": row["Name"],
        "severity": row["Risk"],
        "cvss": cvss,
        "cve": row.get("CVE", "N/A"),
        "risk_score": round(risk_score, 1),
        "asset_criticality": asset_criticality,
        "kev": row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list
    })

# Sort by risk score
vulns.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)

CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) Check:

import requests

kev_response = requests.get(
    "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
)
kev_data = kev_response.json()
cisa_kev_list = {v["cveID"] for v in kev_data["vulnerabilities"]}

# Check if vulnerability is actively exploited
def is_actively_exploited(cve_id):
    return cve_id in cisa_kev_list

Step 3: Define Remediation SLAs

Apply SLA-based remediation timelines:

PriorityCVSS RangeAsset TypeSLAExamples
P1 Critical9.0-10.0 + KEVAll assets24 hoursLog4Shell, EternalBlue on prod servers
P2 High7.0-8.9 or 9.0+ non-KEVBusiness-critical7 daysRCE without known exploit
P3 Medium4.0-6.9Business-critical30 daysAuthenticated privilege escalation
P4 Low0.1-3.9Standard90 daysInformation disclosure, low-impact DoS
P5 Informational0.0DevelopmentNext cycleBest practice findings, config hardening

Step 4: Integrate with SIEM for Exploitation Detection

Correlate vulnerability scan data with SIEM alerts to detect active exploitation:

index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval vuln_key = Host.":".CVE
| join vuln_key type=left [
    search index=ids_ips sourcetype="snort" OR sourcetype="suricata"
    | eval vuln_key = dest_ip.":".cve_id
    | stats count AS exploit_attempts, latest(_time) AS last_exploit_attempt by vuln_key
  ]
| where isnotnull(exploit_attempts)
| eval risk = "CRITICAL — Vulnerability being actively exploited"
| sort - exploit_attempts
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, exploit_attempts, last_exploit_attempt, risk

Alert when KEV vulnerabilities are detected on critical assets:

index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" severity="Critical"
| lookup cisa_kev_lookup.csv cve_id AS CVE OUTPUT kev_status, due_date
| where kev_status="active"
| lookup asset_criticality_lookup.csv ip AS Host OUTPUT criticality
| where criticality IN ("business-critical", "mission-critical")
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, kev_status, due_date, criticality

Step 5: Build Remediation Tracking Dashboard

Splunk Dashboard for Vulnerability Metrics:

-- Open vulnerabilities by severity
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| stats count by severity
| eval order = case(severity="Critical", 1, severity="High", 2, severity="Medium", 3,
                    severity="Low", 4, 1=1, 5)
| sort order

-- SLA compliance tracking
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| eval sla_days = case(
    severity="Critical", 1,
    severity="High", 7,
    severity="Medium", 30,
    severity="Low", 90
  )
| eval days_open = round((now() - first_detected) / 86400)
| eval sla_status = if(days_open > sla_days, "OVERDUE", "Within SLA")
| stats count by severity, sla_status

-- Remediation trend over 90 days
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval is_open = if(status="open", 1, 0)
| eval is_closed = if(status="fixed", 1, 0)
| timechart span=1w sum(is_open) AS opened, sum(is_closed) AS remediated

Step 6: Automate Remediation Ticketing

Create tickets automatically for high-priority findings:

import requests

servicenow_url = "https://company.service-now.com/api/now/table/incident"
headers = {
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
    "Authorization": f"Bearer {snow_token}"
}

for vuln in vulns:
    if vuln["risk_score"] >= 8.0:
        ticket = {
            "short_description": f"[VULN] {vuln['cve']} — {vuln['plugin_name']} on {vuln['host']}",
            "description": (
                f"Vulnerability: {vuln['plugin_name']}\n"
                f"CVE: {vuln['cve']}\n"
                f"CVSS: {vuln['cvss']}\n"
                f"Host: {vuln['host']}\n"
                f"Asset Criticality: {vuln['asset_criticality']}\n"
                f"CISA KEV: {'YES' if vuln['kev'] else 'NO'}\n"
                f"Risk Score: {vuln['risk_score']}\n"
                f"Remediation SLA: {'24 hours' if vuln['kev'] else '7 days'}"
            ),
            "urgency": "1" if vuln["kev"] else "2",
            "impact": "1" if vuln["asset_criticality"] == "business-critical" else "2",
            "assignment_group": "IT Infrastructure",
            "category": "Vulnerability"
        }
        response = requests.post(servicenow_url, headers=headers, json=ticket)
        print(f"Ticket created: {response.json()['result']['number']}")

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
CVSSCommon Vulnerability Scoring System — standardized severity rating (0-10) for vulnerabilities
CISA KEVKnown Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog — CISA-maintained list of vulnerabilities with confirmed active exploitation
Credentialed ScanVulnerability scan using authenticated access for deeper detection than network-only scanning
Asset CriticalityBusiness impact classification determining remediation priority (mission-critical, business-critical, standard)
Remediation SLAService Level Agreement defining maximum time allowed to patch vulnerabilities by severity
EPSSExploit Prediction Scoring System — ML-based probability score predicting likelihood of exploitation

Tools & Systems

  • Tenable Nessus / Tenable.io: Enterprise vulnerability scanner with 200,000+ plugin checks and compliance auditing
  • Qualys VMDR: Cloud-based vulnerability management with asset discovery, prioritization, and patching integration
  • OpenVAS (Greenbone): Open-source vulnerability scanner with community-maintained vulnerability feed
  • CISA KEV Catalog: US government maintained list of actively exploited vulnerabilities requiring mandatory remediation
  • Rapid7 InsightVM: Vulnerability management platform with live dashboards and remediation project tracking

Common Scenarios

  • Zero-Day Response: New CVE published — run targeted scan for affected software, cross-reference with KEV and exploit databases
  • Compliance Audit Prep: Generate PCI DSS or HIPAA vulnerability report showing scan coverage and remediation status
  • Post-Patch Verification: Rescan patched systems to confirm vulnerability closure and update tracking dashboard
  • Network Expansion: New subnet added to infrastructure — onboard to scan scope with appropriate policy
  • Third-Party Risk: Scan externally-facing assets to validate vendor patch compliance before integration

Output Format

VULNERABILITY SCAN REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Scan Date:    2024-03-16 02:00 UTC
Scan Scope:   10.0.0.0/16 (1,247 hosts scanned)
Duration:     4h 23m
Coverage:     98.7% (16 hosts unreachable)

Findings:
  Severity     Count    New    CISA KEV
  Critical     23       5      3
  High         187      34     12
  Medium       892      78     0
  Low          1,456    112    0
  Info         3,891    201    0

Top Priority (P1 — 24hr SLA):
  CVE-2024-21762  FortiOS RCE           3 hosts   KEV: YES
  CVE-2024-1709   ConnectWise RCE       1 host    KEV: YES
  CVE-2024-3400   Palo Alto PAN-OS RCE  2 hosts   KEV: YES

SLA Compliance:
  Critical: 82% within SLA (4 overdue)
  High:     91% within SLA (17 overdue)
  Medium:   88% within SLA (107 overdue)

Tickets Created: 39 (ServiceNow)

平台分布

Codex

38.73%
按下载量换算97

Claude

26.77%
按下载量换算67

Cursor

20.04%
按下载量换算50

Gemini CLI

8.57%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills