Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

building-agents-patterns(建筑 Agent 模式)

building-agents-patterns 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

building-agents-patterns 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,463。

总安装 781周安装 12GitHub Stars 9,578下载 97核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-agents-patterns(建筑 Agent 模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/adenhq/hive
仓库路径:skills/building-agents-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/adenhq/hive --skill building-agents-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/adenhq/hive --skill building-agents-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

building-agents-patterns 提供构建稳健目标驱动型 Agent 的设计模式与最佳实践。涵盖事件循环节点、MCP 验证集成、文件写入优先等实用编码技巧。推荐先完成基础结构搭建,再结合具体场景选用合适的工作流模板。所有代码示例均需用户确认后执行,避免自动生成不可控逻辑。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/building-agents-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/adenhq/hive --skill building-agents-patterns;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

building-agents-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/adenhq/hive --skill building-agents-patterns。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

building-agents-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

building-agents-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

building-agents-patterns 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

building-agents-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 781 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 97 次,GitHub 9,578 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

building-agents-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 来源仓库有 9,578 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
building-agents-patterns

建筑 Agent 模式 · 本页

7819,578调用外部服务MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Building Agents - Patterns & Best Practices

Design patterns, examples, and best practices for building robust goal-driven agents.

Prerequisites: Complete agent structure using building-agents-construction.

Practical Example: Hybrid Workflow

How to build a node using both direct file writes and optional MCP validation:

# 1. WRITE TO FILE FIRST (Primary - makes it visible)
node_code = '''
search_node = NodeSpec(
    id="search-web",
    node_type="event_loop",
    input_keys=["query"],
    output_keys=["search_results"],
    system_prompt="Search the web for: {query}. Use web_search, then call set_output to store results.",
    tools=["web_search"],
)
'''

Edit(
    file_path="exports/research_agent/nodes/__init__.py",
    old_string="# Nodes will be added here",
    new_string=node_code
)

# 2. OPTIONALLY VALIDATE WITH MCP (Secondary - bookkeeping)
validation = mcp__agent-builder__test_node(
    node_id="search-web",
    test_input='{"query": "python tutorials"}',
    mock_llm_response='{"search_results": [...mock results...]}'
)

User experience:

  • Immediately sees node in their editor (from step 1)
  • Gets validation feedback (from step 2)
  • Can edit the file directly if needed

Multi-Turn Interaction Patterns

For agents needing multi-turn conversations with users, use client_facing=True on event_loop nodes.

Client-Facing Nodes

A client-facing node streams LLM output to the user and blocks for user input between conversational turns. This replaces the old pause/resume pattern.

# Client-facing node blocks for user input
intake_node = NodeSpec(
    id="intake",
    name="Intake",
    description="Gather requirements from the user",
    node_type="event_loop",
    client_facing=True,
    input_keys=[],
    output_keys=["repo_url", "project_url"],
    system_prompt="You are the intake agent. Ask the user for their repo URL and project URL. When you have both, call set_output for each.",
)

# Internal node runs without user interaction
scanner_node = NodeSpec(
    id="scanner",
    name="Scanner",
    description="Scan the repository",
    node_type="event_loop",
    input_keys=["repo_url"],
    output_keys=["scan_results"],
    system_prompt="Scan the repository at {repo_url}...",
    tools=["scan_github_repo"],
)

How it works:

  • Client-facing nodes stream LLM text to the user and block for input after each response
  • User input is injected via node.inject_event(text)
  • When the LLM calls set_output to produce structured outputs, the judge evaluates and ACCEPTs
  • Internal nodes (non-client-facing) run their entire loop without blocking

When to Use client_facing

Scenarioclient_facingWhy
Gathering user requirementsYesNeed user input
Human review/approval checkpointYesNeed human decision
Data processing (scanning, scoring)NoRuns autonomously
Report generationNoNo user input needed
Final confirmation before actionYesNeed explicit approval
Legacy Note: The pause_nodes / entry_points pattern still works for backward compatibility but client_facing=True is preferred for new agents.

Edge-Based Routing and Feedback Loops

Conditional Edge Routing

Multiple conditional edges from the same source replace the old router node type. Each edge checks a condition on the node's output.

# Node with mutually exclusive outputs
review_node = NodeSpec(
    id="review",
    name="Review",
    node_type="event_loop",
    client_facing=True,
    output_keys=["approved_contacts", "redo_extraction"],
    nullable_output_keys=["approved_contacts", "redo_extraction"],
    max_node_visits=3,
    system_prompt="Present the contact list to the operator. If they approve, call set_output('approved_contacts', ...). If they want changes, call set_output('redo_extraction', 'true').",
)

# Forward edge (positive priority, evaluated first)
EdgeSpec(
    id="review-to-campaign",
    source="review",
    target="campaign-builder",
    condition=EdgeCondition.CONDITIONAL,
    condition_expr="output.get('approved_contacts') is not None",
    priority=1,
)

# Feedback edge (negative priority, evaluated after forward edges)
EdgeSpec(
    id="review-feedback",
    source="review",
    target="extractor",
    condition=EdgeCondition.CONDITIONAL,
    condition_expr="output.get('redo_extraction') is not None",
    priority=-1,
)

Key concepts:

  • nullable_output_keys: Lists output keys that may remain unset. The node sets exactly one of the mutually exclusive keys per execution.
  • max_node_visits: Must be >1 on the feedback target (extractor) so it can re-execute. Default is 1.
  • priority: Positive = forward edge (evaluated first). Negative = feedback edge. The executor tries forward edges first; if none match, falls back to feedback edges.

Routing Decision Table

PatternOld ApproachNew Approach
Conditional branchingrouter nodeConditional edges with condition_expr
Binary approve/rejectpause_nodes + resumeclient_facing=True + nullable_output_keys
Loop-back on rejectionManual entry_pointsFeedback edge with priority=-1
Multi-way routingRouter with routes dictMultiple conditional edges with priorities

Judge Patterns

Judges control when an event_loop node's loop exits. Choose based on validation needs.

Implicit Judge (Default)

When no judge is configured, the implicit judge ACCEPTs when:

  • The LLM finishes its response with no tool calls
  • All required output keys have been set via set_output

Best for simple nodes where "all outputs set" is sufficient validation.

SchemaJudge

Validates outputs against a Pydantic model. Use when you need structural validation.

from pydantic import BaseModel

class ScannerOutput(BaseModel):
    github_users: list[dict]  # Must be a list of user objects

class SchemaJudge:
    def __init__(self, output_model: type[BaseModel]):
        self._model = output_model

    async def evaluate(self, context: dict) -> JudgeVerdict:
        missing = context.get("missing_keys", [])
        if missing:
            return JudgeVerdict(
                action="RETRY",
                feedback=f"Missing output keys: {missing}. Use set_output to provide them.",
            )
        try:
            self._model.model_validate(context["output_accumulator"])
            return JudgeVerdict(action="ACCEPT")
        except ValidationError as e:
            return JudgeVerdict(action="RETRY", feedback=str(e))

When to Use Which Judge

JudgeUse WhenExample
Implicit (None)Output keys are sufficient validationSimple data extraction
SchemaJudgeNeed structural validation of outputsAPI response parsing
CustomDomain-specific validation logicScore must be 0.0-1.0

Fan-Out / Fan-In (Parallel Execution)

Multiple ON_SUCCESS edges from the same source trigger parallel execution. All branches run concurrently via asyncio.gather().

# Scanner fans out to Profiler and Scorer in parallel
EdgeSpec(id="scanner-to-profiler", source="scanner", target="profiler",
         condition=EdgeCondition.ON_SUCCESS)
EdgeSpec(id="scanner-to-scorer", source="scanner", target="scorer",
         condition=EdgeCondition.ON_SUCCESS)

# Both fan in to Extractor
EdgeSpec(id="profiler-to-extractor", source="profiler", target="extractor",
         condition=EdgeCondition.ON_SUCCESS)
EdgeSpec(id="scorer-to-extractor", source="scorer", target="extractor",
         condition=EdgeCondition.ON_SUCCESS)

Requirements:

  • Parallel event_loop nodes must have disjoint output_keys (no key written by both)
  • Only one parallel branch may contain a client_facing node
  • Fan-in node receives outputs from all completed branches in shared memory

Context Management Patterns

Tiered Compaction

EventLoopNode automatically manages context window usage with tiered compaction:

  1. Pruning — Old tool results replaced with compact placeholders (zero-cost, no LLM call)
  2. Normal compaction — LLM summarizes older messages
  3. Aggressive compaction — Keeps only recent messages + summary
  4. Emergency — Hard reset with tool history preservation

Spillover Pattern

For large tool results, use save_data() to write to disk and pass the filename through set_output. This keeps the LLM context window small.

LLM calls save_data(filename, large_data) → file written to spillover/
LLM calls set_output("results_file", filename) → filename stored in output
Downstream node calls load_data(filename) → reads from spillover/

The load_data() tool supports offset and limit parameters for paginated reading of large files.

Anti-Patterns

What NOT to Do

  • Don't rely on export_graph — Write files immediately, not at end
  • Don't hide code in session — Write to files as components are approved
  • Don't wait to write files — Agent visible from first step
  • Don't batch everything — Write incrementally, one component at a time

MCP Tools - Correct Usage

MCP tools OK for:

  • test_node — Validate node configuration with mock inputs
  • validate_graph — Check graph structure
  • configure_loop — Set event loop parameters
  • create_session — Track session state for bookkeeping

Just don't: Use MCP as the primary construction method or rely on export_graph

Error Handling Patterns

Graceful Failure with Fallback

edges = [
    # Success path
    EdgeSpec(id="api-success", source="api-call", target="process-results",
             condition=EdgeCondition.ON_SUCCESS),
    # Fallback on failure
    EdgeSpec(id="api-to-fallback", source="api-call", target="fallback-cache",
             condition=EdgeCondition.ON_FAILURE, priority=1),
    # Report if fallback also fails
    EdgeSpec(id="fallback-to-error", source="fallback-cache", target="report-error",
             condition=EdgeCondition.ON_FAILURE, priority=1),
]

Handoff to Testing

When agent is complete, transition to testing phase:

Pre-Testing Checklist

  • Agent structure validates: python -m agent_name validate
  • All nodes defined in nodes/init.py
  • All edges connect valid nodes with correct priorities
  • Feedback edge targets have max_node_visits > 1
  • Client-facing nodes have meaningful system prompts
  • Agent can be imported: from exports.agent_name import default_agent

Related Skills

  • building-agents-core — Fundamental concepts (node types, edges, event loop architecture)
  • building-agents-construction — Step-by-step building process
  • testing-agent — Test and validate agents
  • agent-workflow — Complete workflow orchestrator

Remember: Agent is actively constructed, visible the whole time. No hidden state. No surprise exports. Just transparent, incremental file building.

平台分布

Gemini CLI

30.98%
按下载量换算30

Antigravity

23.35%
按下载量换算23

windsurf

17.19%
按下载量换算17

Claude Code

12.19%
按下载量换算12

OpenCode

8.51%
按下载量换算8

Codex

3.3%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills