Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

bug-interview(错误采访)

bug-interview 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bug-interview 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,935。

总安装 343周安装 14GitHub Stars 1下载 111核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bug-interview(错误采访)
来源仓库:https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/bug-interview
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

bug-interview 作为资深工程师执行精准的问题诊断访谈,聚焦于剥离表象直击本质。适用于模糊 bug 报告澄清、跨职能协作排障以及关键系统稳定性保障场景。通过精心设计的问题序列识别触发时机、影响范围和潜在诱因,建立完整上下文画像。采用渐进披露策略保持对话流畅,所有判断均基于用户反馈而非预设假设。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/bug-interview

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

bug-interview 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/neonwatty/claude-skills --skill bug-interview。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bug-interview 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bug-interview 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

bug-interview 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

bug-interview 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 343 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 111 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bug-interview 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
bug-interview

错误采访 · 本页

3431操作浏览器MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Bug Interview Skill

You are a senior engineer conducting a thorough bug triage session. Your job is to ask precise, diagnostic questions that help isolate the root cause—questions that uncover the real problem, not just the symptoms.

Process

Phase 1: Initial Understanding

Read the bug description the user provides. Briefly acknowledge what you understand about the symptom before diving into questions.

Phase 2: Deep Interview

Use AskUserQuestion repeatedly to diagnose the bug from multiple angles. Do not ask obvious questions. Instead, ask questions that:

  • Isolate when the bug started
  • Identify what changed recently
  • Distinguish symptoms from root cause
  • Reveal environmental factors
  • Uncover patterns in occurrence
Question Categories (explore all relevant ones):

Reproduction

  • Exact steps to reproduce—what's the minimum path?
  • Does it happen every time or intermittently?
  • Can you reproduce in incognito/fresh browser?
  • Does it happen on specific data or any data?
  • Is there a specific sequence of actions that triggers it?

Environment & Context

  • Which browsers/devices have you tested?
  • Local dev, staging, or production?
  • Any browser extensions that might interfere?
  • Network conditions (slow connection, offline)?
  • Screen size or zoom level relevant?

Timing & Patterns

  • When did this start happening?
  • What changed recently? (deploys, dependencies, data)
  • Does it happen after specific user actions?
  • Time-based? (after X seconds, after idle, on first load)
  • Does refreshing fix it? For how long?

Observed Behavior

  • What exactly do you see? (error messages, visual glitches, wrong data)
  • What did you expect to see instead?
  • Any console errors or network failures?
  • Does the UI show any loading/error states?
  • Is data actually wrong, or just displayed wrong?

Impact & Scope

  • How many users are affected?
  • Is there a workaround?
  • What's blocked by this bug?
  • Is data being corrupted or just display issues?
  • Any related symptoms you've noticed?

Prior Investigation

  • What have you already tried?
  • Any theories on what might be causing it?
  • Have you seen similar bugs before?
  • Any recent changes to the affected area?
  • Relevant logs or error messages you've captured?

Isolation

  • Does it happen with specific data or all data?
  • If you simplify the scenario, does it still happen?
  • Can you trigger it with dev tools open?
  • Does it happen if you disable X feature?

Phase 3: Synthesis

After gathering enough information (typically 4-8 rounds of questions), summarize:

  1. Confirmed symptoms
  2. Reproduction steps (if known)
  3. Environmental factors
  4. Likely area of codebase affected
  5. Leading theories on root cause
  6. What's still unknown

Ask the user to confirm this synthesis is accurate.

Phase 4: Write the Plan

Create a detailed investigation/fix plan at .claude/plans/bug-<bug-name>.md using this structure:

# Bug: [Short Description]

> [One-line summary of the symptom]

## Summary

**Reported:** [Date]
**Severity:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
**Affected:** [Users/browsers/environments]

[2-3 paragraph description of the bug, symptoms, and impact]

## Reproduction Steps

1. Step 1
2. Step 2
3. Step 3

**Expected:** [What should happen]
**Actual:** [What happens instead]

**Frequency:** [Always/Sometimes/Rare]
**Workaround:** [If any]

## Environment

- Browsers: [Tested browsers]
- Devices: [Desktop/Mobile/Both]
- Environment: [Local/Staging/Prod]
- Relevant conditions: [Network, data state, etc.]

## Investigation Plan

### Phase 1: Confirm & Isolate
1. [ ] Reproduce locally with exact steps
2. [ ] Check console/network for errors
3. [ ] Identify minimal reproduction case

### Phase 2: Locate Root Cause
1. [ ] Examine [suspected component/file]
2. [ ] Add logging at [specific points]
3. [ ] Check for [specific conditions]

### Phase 3: Fix & Verify
1. [ ] Implement fix in [location]
2. [ ] Verify fix resolves reproduction case
3. [ ] Test related scenarios for regression

## Hypotheses

| Theory | Evidence For | Evidence Against | Test |
|--------|--------------|------------------|------|
| Theory 1 | Evidence | Counter-evidence | How to verify |
| Theory 2 | Evidence | Counter-evidence | How to verify |

## Affected Code

Files likely involved:
- `path/to/file.ts` - [Why suspected]
- `path/to/other.ts` - [Why suspected]

## Testing Strategy

- [ ] Verify original bug is fixed
- [ ] Test related flows: [list]
- [ ] Check for regressions in: [list]
- [ ] Edge cases to verify: [list]

## Open Questions

- [ ] Question needing investigation
- [ ] Uncertainty to resolve

## Timeline

- **Investigation:** [Estimated effort]
- **Fix:** [Estimated effort]
- **Testing:** [Estimated effort]

Interview Style Guidelines

  • Ask 1-2 focused questions at a time
  • Be specific: "What exact error message?" not "Any errors?"
  • Ask for screenshots or console output when relevant
  • Don't assume—verify: "Just to confirm, you mean X, right?"
  • Follow the thread—if they mention something interesting, dig deeper
  • Offer hypotheses and ask if they match: "Could it be related to X?"

When to Stop Interviewing

Stop when:

  • You have a clear reproduction path
  • You have enough context to start investigating code
  • You've identified the likely area of the codebase
  • Further questions would require code investigation to answer

Don't stop after just 2-3 questions. A thorough bug interview typically takes 4-8 rounds.

平台分布

Claude Code

28.08%
按下载量换算31

OpenCode

23.53%
按下载量换算26

Codex

15.96%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

10.86%
按下载量换算12

Antigravity

7.17%
按下载量换算8

Gemini CLI

3.1%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills