Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

budget-vs-actual(预算与实际)

budget-vs-actual 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

budget-vs-actual 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 6,592。

总安装 9,135周安装 366GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,957核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
98.0.2

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:budget-vs-actual(预算与实际)
来源仓库:https://github.com/samledger67-dotcom/budget-vs-actual
安装命令:
openclaw skills install budget-vs-actual
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install budget-vs-actual

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

budget-vs-actual 对比企业计划与实际收支,识别有利/不利差异项。适合财务人员分析季度或月度业绩偏差原因。budget-vs-actual 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。安装后输入预算表与实际流水,自动生成差异报告与根因建议。需确保数据格式一致,否则可能导致分析错误。

建议结合业务背景解读结果,避免机械套用结论。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install budget-vs-actual;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

budget-vs-actual 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install budget-vs-actual。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

budget-vs-actual 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

budget-vs-actual 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

budget-vs-actual 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

budget-vs-actual 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,135 次,近一周安装 366 次,下载 2,957 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

budget-vs-actual 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
budget-vs-actual

预算与实际 · 本页

9,135—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
budget-vs-actual
description
>
Outputs
variance table, waterfall narrative, and updated rolling forecast. Use when a CFO, controller,
version
1.0.0
author
PrecisionLedger
tags

Budget vs. Actual Variance Analysis Skill

Perform rigorous period-end budget vs. actual analysis. This skill guides Sam Ledger through pulling actuals, comparing against budget, calculating variances, identifying root causes, drafting management commentary, and producing a reforecast update.


When to Use This Skill

Trigger phrases:

  • "Run budget vs. actual for [month/quarter]"
  • "Explain our variances this month"
  • "Why did we miss/beat revenue?"
  • "Prepare the management report for [period]"
  • "Update the rolling forecast based on actuals"
  • "Board needs BvA commentary"
  • "What drove the EBITDA miss?"
  • "Reforecast the rest of the year"

NOT for:

  • Building the original budget — use startup-financial-model
  • Tax filings or tax provision work — use compliance workflows
  • Real-time bookkeeping or transaction categorization — use qbo-automation or expense-categorization
  • Multi-entity consolidations with intercompany eliminations (requires dedicated consolidation tooling)
  • Strategic planning or multi-year long-range planning (LRP)

Core Concepts

Variance Types

TypeFormulaMeaning
Absolute VarianceActual − BudgetDollar difference
Percentage Variance(Actual − Budget) / Budget × 100Magnitude relative to budget
Favorable (F)Revenue: Actual > Budget / Expense: Actual < BudgetBetter than plan
Unfavorable (U)Revenue: Actual < Budget / Expense: Actual > BudgetWorse than plan

Materiality Thresholds (Default — customize per engagement)

Revenue line items:    ≥ $5,000 or ≥ 5% of budgeted line → investigate
Expense line items:    ≥ $2,500 or ≥ 10% of budgeted line → investigate
Total EBITDA:          ≥ $10,000 or ≥ 5% of budgeted EBITDA → board commentary required
YTD cumulative:        Carry forward monthly variances; flag if YTD > full-year materiality

Variance Root Causes — Taxonomy

Revenue Variances:

  • Volume variance: More/fewer units/customers than planned
  • Price/rate variance: ASP or pricing differed from assumption
  • Mix variance: Different product/segment mix than modeled
  • Timing variance: Deal closed in wrong period (pulled forward or pushed out)
  • New vs. existing: Over/under-performance in specific cohort

Expense Variances:

  • Headcount timing: Hire later/earlier than budgeted
  • Contractor/vendor: Over/under-spend vs. plan
  • One-time items: Non-recurring expenses not in budget
  • Volume-linked: COGS, sales commission scaled with revenue
  • Pricing/inflation: Vendor price changes not modeled

Step-by-Step Workflow

Step 1: Collect Inputs

Required:
□ Period (Month, Quarter, YTD)
□ Budget/forecast file (CSV, Sheets, or typed data)
□ Actuals file or QBO export (same period, same account mapping)
□ Chart of Accounts mapping (if budget and actuals use different labels)
□ Materiality threshold (use defaults if not specified)
□ Audience (internal management, board, investors)

Optional:
□ Prior period actuals (for trend context)
□ Prior year same period (for YoY context)
□ Existing narrative from last period

Step 2: Normalize Data

Map actuals to budget line items. Standard P&L mapping:

Budget Label          → QBO/Actuals Equivalent
-------------------------------------------------
Revenue               → Total Income
COGS                  → Cost of Goods Sold / Direct Costs
Gross Profit          → (calculated)
Sales & Marketing     → Advertising, Sales Commissions, Marketing Expenses
R&D / Engineering     → Contract Labor (tech), Software Tools
G&A                   → Payroll (admin), Legal, Accounting, Insurance
Total OpEx            → (sum of above)
EBITDA                → (Gross Profit − Total OpEx)

Step 3: Calculate Variances

For each line item:

# Variance calculation logic
for each line_item:
    absolute_var = actual - budget
    pct_var = (actual - budget) / abs(budget) * 100  # handle $0 budget edge case
    
    if is_revenue_line:
        favorable = actual > budget
    else:  # expense line
        favorable = actual < budget
    
    flag = abs(pct_var) >= threshold_pct or abs(absolute_var) >= threshold_dollar

Step 4: Build the Variance Table

Standard Output Format:

PERIOD: March 2026 | Budget vs. Actual

Line Item          | Budget    | Actual    | $ Var     | % Var  | F/U | Flag
-------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|-----|------
REVENUE            |           |           |           |        |     |
  Product Revenue  | $120,000  | $108,500  | ($11,500) | -9.6%  |  U  |  ⚠️
  Service Revenue  |  $30,000  |  $34,200  |  $4,200   | +14.0% |  F  |  ⚠️
  Total Revenue    | $150,000  | $142,700  |  ($7,300) | -4.9%  |  U  |
                   |           |           |           |        |     |
COGS               |  $45,000  |  $43,100  |  $1,900   | +4.2%  |  F  |
Gross Profit       | $105,000  |  $99,600  |  ($5,400) | -5.1%  |  U  |  ⚠️
Gross Margin %     |   70.0%   |   69.8%   |   -0.2pp  |        |     |
                   |           |           |           |        |     |
OPERATING EXPENSES |           |           |           |        |     |
  S&M              |  $25,000  |  $27,400  |  $2,400   | +9.6%  |  U  |  ⚠️
  R&D              |  $20,000  |  $18,500  | ($1,500)  | -7.5%  |  F  |
  G&A              |  $15,000  |  $16,200  |  $1,200   | +8.0%  |  U  |
  Total OpEx       |  $60,000  |  $62,100  |  $2,100   | +3.5%  |  U  |
                   |           |           |           |        |     |
EBITDA             |  $45,000  |  $37,500  |  ($7,500) | -16.7% |  U  |  🚨
EBITDA Margin      |   30.0%   |   26.3%   |   -3.7pp  |        |     |

Step 5: Root Cause Analysis

For each flagged variance, drill down:

Revenue miss example (Product Revenue -$11,500 / -9.6%):

Root cause analysis:
- Volume: Closed 8 deals vs. 10 budgeted = -2 deals
- Price: Avg deal size $13,563 vs. $12,000 budget → +$1,563 per deal (favorable mix)
- Net: 2 fewer deals × $12,000 ASP = -$24,000 volume miss
       + 8 deals × $1,563 price premium = +$12,500 price/mix offset
       = ($11,500) net as reported ✓

Assessment: Volume issue, not pricing. Sales pipeline slipped — 2 deals moved to April.

S&M overrun example ($2,400 / +9.6% unfavorable):

Root cause analysis:
- Planned: $15k paid ads + $10k salaries
- Actual: $15k paid ads + $10k salaries + $2,400 conference registration (unbudgeted)
- Classification: One-time / non-recurring — will not repeat next month
Assessment: Benign. Budget for next year; no action required.

Step 6: Management Commentary

Draft in this structure for each material variance:

[LINE ITEM] — [VARIANCE DIRECTION] by $[AMOUNT] ([PERCENT]%)

WHAT: [What the number shows in plain English]
WHY:  [Root cause — specific, not generic]
ACTION: [What we're doing about it, or why no action needed]
OUTLOOK: [Impact on full-year forecast]

Example commentary:

EBITDA — Unfavorable $7,500 (-16.7%) WHAT: March EBITDA of $37,500 missed the $45,000 budget by $7,500, driven by a revenue shortfall partially offset by lower R&D spend. WHY: Product revenue missed by $11,500 due to 2 enterprise deals slipping to April (pipeline confirmed, not lost). S&M ran $2,400 over budget on a one-time conference registration. R&D came in $1,500 favorable as one contractor engagement started late. ACTION: The 2 slipped deals are expected to close in April (both in final contract stage). Conference registration expensed — not recurring. R&D contractor now onboarded; expect full burn starting April. OUTLOOK: Revising Q2 forecast to front-load the 2 slipped deals. Full-year EBITDA forecast unchanged at $540,000.

Step 7: Update Rolling Forecast

After analyzing actuals, update the remainder of the year:

Reforecast logic:
1. Lock actuals for closed periods (do not re-budget history)
2. Roll forward: identify permanent vs. timing variances
   - Timing: shift to next period (deal slippage, late hire)
   - Permanent: adjust full-year assumption (market softness, new run rate)
3. Update full-year totals:
   - YTD actuals + remaining budget (adjusted)
   - Recalculate runway/cash if applicable
4. Flag changes from last forecast:
   - Revenue: +/- $X vs. prior forecast
   - EBITDA: +/- $X vs. prior forecast
   - Cash EOY: +/- $X vs. prior forecast

Reforecast summary table:

                   | Original  | Prior     | Current   | Change
                   | Budget    | Forecast  | Forecast  | (vs Prior)
-------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|----------
Full-Year Revenue  | $1,800,000| $1,750,000| $1,762,000| +$12,000
Full-Year EBITDA   |  $540,000 |  $510,000 |  $512,500 |  +$2,500
Year-End Cash      |  $850,000 |  $790,000 |  $793,000 |  +$3,000

Output Formats

1. Management Report (Narrative + Table)

Full commentary with variance table, root causes, and reforecast. For CFO/CEO/Board use.

2. Quick BvA Flash (1 Page)

Three sections only:

  • Headline KPIs: Revenue, Gross Margin, EBITDA, Cash (actual vs budget, one line each)
  • Top 3 variances with one-sentence explanations
  • Reforecast change vs. prior

3. Structured JSON (for downstream processing)

{
  "period": "2026-03",
  "period_type": "month",
  "generated_at": "2026-04-02",
  "summary": {
    "total_revenue_budget": 150000,
    "total_revenue_actual": 142700,
    "total_revenue_variance_abs": -7300,
    "total_revenue_variance_pct": -4.87,
    "ebitda_budget": 45000,
    "ebitda_actual": 37500,
    "ebitda_variance_abs": -7500,
    "ebitda_variance_pct": -16.67
  },
  "line_items": [
    {
      "name": "Product Revenue",
      "budget": 120000,
      "actual": 108500,
      "variance_abs": -11500,
      "variance_pct": -9.58,
      "favorable": false,
      "material": true,
      "root_cause": "2 enterprise deals slipped to April (pipeline confirmed)",
      "action": "Deals expected April close; no change to full-year forecast"
    }
  ],
  "reforecast": {
    "full_year_revenue_original": 1800000,
    "full_year_revenue_current": 1762000,
    "full_year_ebitda_original": 540000,
    "full_year_ebitda_current": 512500
  }
}

QBO Integration Workflow

When actuals come from QuickBooks Online (via qbo-automation):

1. Export: QBO → Reports → Profit & Loss (select period, compare to prior)
2. Or via API: GET /v3/company/{id}/reports/ProfitAndLoss?start_date=&end_date=&summarize_column_by=Month
3. Map QBO account names to budget line items using COA mapping table
4. Validate totals: QBO Revenue total must match sum of line items (catch mapping errors)
5. Feed into variance calculation above

Common QBO mapping pitfalls:

  • QBO may break out subcategories that are lumped in budget → aggregate up
  • Owner draws in QBO are not an expense → exclude from P&L analysis
  • Payroll taxes may be in separate QBO accounts → roll up to loaded headcount cost

Handling Common Edge Cases

Budget is $0 for a line item that has actuals

Never divide by zero. Instead:
  variance_pct = "N/A (no budget)"
  Flag as material if actual > materiality dollar threshold
  Commentary: "Unbudgeted spend of $X in [account]"

Prior period restatements

If actuals from a prior period changed:
  Flag the restatement explicitly
  Show: prior reported → restated → delta
  Update YTD accordingly
  Note audit trail in commentary

Multiple departments / cost centers

Run variance analysis at:
  1. Consolidated company level (always)
  2. Department level (if cost center tracking exists)
  Highlight cross-departmental offsets where applicable
  (e.g., R&D under-spend masked by G&A over-spend at total level)

Seasonal businesses

Include YoY comparison alongside BvA:
  March 2026 Actual vs. March 2026 Budget (primary)
  March 2026 Actual vs. March 2025 Actual (context)
  Flag: is variance seasonal (expected) or structural (new issue)?

Metrics Glossary

TermDefinition
BvABudget vs. Actual
FFavorable (better than plan)
UUnfavorable (worse than plan)
ppPercentage points (for margin comparisons)
YTDYear-to-date (cumulative from Jan 1)
QTDQuarter-to-date
MTDMonth-to-date
ReforecastUpdated projection for remainder of year, based on actuals to date
FlashQuick preliminary BvA before full close (estimates OK)
Hard closeFinal, locked actuals (no further adjustments)
Soft closePreliminary actuals, subject to accruals and adjustments

Integration Points

  • qbo-automation — Pull actuals directly from QuickBooks Online
  • startup-financial-model — Original budget/forecast data source
  • kpi-alert-system — Trigger alerts when variance thresholds are breached
  • report-generator — Format BvA output into board-ready PDF or deck
  • financial-analysis-agent — Deep-dive trend analysis when root cause isn't obvious

Example Intake Prompt

"March is closed. Budget had us at $150k revenue and $45k EBITDA. Actuals came in at $142k revenue and $37.5k EBITDA. Product was $11.5k short — two enterprise deals slipped. Service came in $4.2k over. S&M ran $2.4k over on a conference. R&D was $1.5k under — contractor started late. Draft the BvA table, root cause summary, and board commentary. Flag reforecast impact."

Sam will:

  1. Build the variance table with F/U flags and materiality indicators
  2. Write root-cause summaries for all flagged lines
  3. Draft management commentary in WHAT/WHY/ACTION/OUTLOOK format
  4. Produce the reforecast delta (timing vs. structural adjustments)
  5. Output structured JSON if downstream processing is needed

平台分布

OpenClaw

88.25%
按下载量换算2,610

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills