Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

browser-validator(浏览器验证器)

browser-validator 用于处理浏览器自动化、网页检查和页面信息提取,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要让 Agent 打开页面、读取网页或验证前端流程时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

browser-validator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 63,559。

总安装 315周安装 13GitHub Stars 8下载 103核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:browser-validator(浏览器验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator
仓库路径:skills/browser-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill browser-validator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill browser-validator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

browser-validator 在真实浏览器中验证前端实现与设计稿一致性。重点检查响应式布局、无障碍访问合规性与视觉呈现准确性。结合 Chrome DevTools MCP 实现自动化断言与人工复核相结合的质量门禁。主张“真实环境测试优于本地预览”的核心质量保障理念落地实践。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/browser-validator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill browser-validato…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

browser-validator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill browser-validator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

browser-validator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

browser-validator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

browser-validator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

browser-validator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 315 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 103 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

browser-validator 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
browser-validator

浏览器验证器 · 本页

3158操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Browser Validator Skill

Purpose

Validate design implementations in real browsers using Chrome DevTools MCP to ensure quality, accessibility, and responsiveness.

Philosophy

Real browser testing catches issues that code review cannot.

Core Beliefs

  1. Test in Real Environments: Browsers behave differently than localhost
  2. Multiple Breakpoints Required: Mobile, tablet, desktop have different challenges
  3. Accessibility Requires Manual Verification: Automated tools miss context-dependent issues
  4. Visual QA Prevents Surprises: Screenshots catch layout breaks before users see them

Why Browser Validation Matters

  • Cross-Browser Consistency: Ensure components work everywhere
  • Responsive Behavior: Verify breakpoints function correctly
  • Accessibility Compliance: Check keyboard navigation and screen reader compatibility
  • Professional Quality: Catch visual regressions before deployment

When This Skill Activates

This skill automatically activates when:

  • User says "test this", "validate", "check if it works"
  • After component implementation is complete
  • User asks "does it look right?"
  • User mentions "browser", "Chrome", or "DevTools"
  • Component is ready for QA
  • Before submitting for review

Decision Framework

Before validating in browser, determine:

What Needs Validation?

  1. Responsive behavior → Test layout at 320px, 768px, 1024px breakpoints
  2. Accessibility → Check contrast, keyboard nav, ARIA, focus indicators
  3. Interactions → Test hover, click, focus states
  4. Visual accuracy → Compare with design reference (if provided)
  5. Functionality → Verify buttons, forms, links work correctly

What Are the Test URLs?

Local development:

  • http://localhost:8000/component
  • http://site.ddev.site/test-page
  • http://site.test/node/123

Staging/production:

  • https://staging.example.com/feature
  • https://production.com/public-page

URL must be:

  • Accessible from your machine
  • Fully loaded (not 404, not auth-protected)
  • Stable (not constantly changing)

What Breakpoints to Test?

Standard breakpoints (always test):

  • ✅ Mobile: 320px x 568px (minimum, iPhone SE)
  • ✅ Tablet: 768px x 1024px (iPad)
  • ✅ Desktop: 1024px x 768px (laptop)
  • ⚠️ Large desktop: 1920px x 1080px (optional)

What to check at each breakpoint:

  • Layout doesn't break
  • No horizontal scrolling
  • Text is readable (no overflow)
  • Touch targets ≥ 44px (mobile), ≥ 40px (desktop)
  • Images don't extend beyond viewport

What Accessibility Checks?

WCAG 2.1 Level AA (always check):

  • ✅ Color contrast: Calculate exact ratios (4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large)
  • ✅ Keyboard navigation: Tab through all interactive elements
  • ✅ Focus indicators: Visible 2px minimum
  • ✅ Semantic HTML: Proper headings, landmarks, ARIA
  • ✅ Alt text: Content images have descriptive alt, decorative have alt=""

How to test:

  • Use mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key to Tab through page
  • Use mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot to check DOM structure
  • Calculate contrast ratios from screenshots

What Interactions to Test?

Interactive states:

  • :hover - Use mcp__chrome-devtools__hover on elements
  • :focus - Tab to elements with keyboard
  • :active - Click elements with mcp__chrome-devtools__click

Capture screenshots:

  • Initial state
  • Each breakpoint
  • Hover/focus states
  • Any dynamic behavior

What Errors to Check?

Console errors:

  • Use mcp__chrome-devtools__list_console_messages
  • Check for JavaScript errors
  • Report with stack traces

Network issues:

  • Use mcp__chrome-devtools__list_network_requests
  • Check for 404s, failed requests
  • Note slow-loading resources

Decision Tree

User requests browser validation
    ↓
Check: Chrome DevTools MCP available?
    ↓ Yes
Navigate to test URL
    ↓
Test each breakpoint (320/768/1024px)
    ↓
Capture screenshots at each breakpoint
    ↓
Check accessibility (contrast/keyboard/ARIA)
    ↓
Test interactions (hover/focus/click)
    ↓
Check console & network errors
    ↓
Generate detailed technical report

Required MCP Integration

This skill requires Chrome DevTools MCP integration. Correct tool names to use:

Navigation & Pages:

  • mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page - Navigate to URL
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__list_pages - Get available pages
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__new_page - Create new tab

Viewport & Screenshots:

  • mcp__chrome-devtools__resize_page - Change viewport size
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot - Capture screenshot
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot - Get DOM structure

Interaction:

  • mcp__chrome-devtools__click - Click element by UID
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__hover - Hover over element
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__fill - Fill form field
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key - Press keyboard key

Debugging:

  • mcp__chrome-devtools__list_console_messages - Get JavaScript errors
  • mcp__chrome-devtools__list_network_requests - Check network activity

Validation Process

Phase 1: Initial Setup

// Navigate to test page
await mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page({
  url: testUrl,
  type: "url"
});

// Wait for page load (built-in)

// Take initial full-page screenshot
await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
  filePath: "screenshots/component/initial-fullpage.png",
  fullPage: true
});

// Get page structure
const pageSnapshot = await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot({
  verbose: true
});

Phase 2: DOM Structure Validation

// Get detailed page structure
const pageStructure = await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot({
  verbose: true
});

// Check for:
// - Proper semantic HTML
// - Heading hierarchy
// - Form labels
// - Image alt attributes
// - ARIA attributes
// - No empty elements

Semantic HTML Checklist:

  • <header> for site/section header
  • <nav> for navigation
  • <main> for main content (only one per page)
  • <article> for self-contained content
  • <section> for thematic grouping
  • <aside> for tangentially related content
  • <footer> for site/section footer

Heading Hierarchy Check:

✅ GOOD:
<h1>Page Title</h1>
  <h2>Section 1</h2>
    <h3>Subsection 1.1</h3>
  <h2>Section 2</h2>

❌ BAD:
<h1>Page Title</h1>
  <h3>Section 1</h3>  ← Skipped h2
  <h2>Section 2</h2>

Image Alt Text Check:

✅ Content images: <img src="chart.png" alt="Q3 sales chart showing 25% growth">
✅ Decorative images: <img src="divider.png" alt="">
❌ Missing alt: <img src="photo.png">

Phase 3: Responsive Testing

Test at all standard breakpoints:

// Mobile (320px)
await mcp__chrome-devtools__resize_page({
  width: 320,
  height: 568
});
await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
  filePath: "screenshots/component/mobile-320px.png"
});

// Tablet (768px)
await mcp__chrome-devtools__resize_page({
  width: 768,
  height: 1024
});
await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
  filePath: "screenshots/component/tablet-768px.png"
});

// Desktop (1024px)
await mcp__chrome-devtools__resize_page({
  width: 1024,
  height: 768
});
await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
  filePath: "screenshots/component/desktop-1024px.png"
});

// Large Desktop (1920px) - optional
await mcp__chrome-devtools__resize_page({
  width: 1920,
  height: 1080
});
await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
  filePath: "screenshots/component/large-1920px.png"
});

Mobile Validation (320px-767px):

  • No horizontal scrolling
  • Text is readable (minimum 16px)
  • Touch targets are 44px minimum
  • Images scale properly
  • Content stacks vertically
  • Navigation is accessible
  • Forms are usable

Tablet Validation (768px-1023px):

  • Layout transitions smoothly
  • Multi-column layouts work
  • Navigation adapts appropriately
  • Images maintain aspect ratio
  • Spacing increases appropriately

Desktop Validation (1024px+):

  • Full layout displays correctly
  • Hover states function
  • Maximum width constraints work
  • Multi-column content aligns
  • No excessive white space

Phase 4: Interactive Elements Testing

Test all interactive elements:

// Get page snapshot with element UIDs
const snapshot = await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot({
  verbose: false
});

// Find buttons by UID from snapshot
const buttons = snapshot.elements.filter(el => el.role === 'button');

// Test each button
for (const button of buttons) {
  // Hover test
  await mcp__chrome-devtools__hover({
    uid: button.uid
  });

  await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_screenshot({
    filePath: `screenshots/component/button-${button.uid}-hover.png`
  });

  // Click test
  await mcp__chrome-devtools__click({
    uid: button.uid
  });

  // Check result (wait for any changes)
  // Take screenshot if needed
}

// Test form interactions
const formInputs = snapshot.elements.filter(el => el.role === 'textbox');

for (const input of formInputs) {
  // Fill input
  await mcp__chrome-devtools__fill({
    uid: input.uid,
    value: "Test Value"
  });

  // Verify input accepted
}

// Test keyboard navigation
await mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key({
  key: "Tab"
});

// Check focus moved to next element

Button/Link Checklist:

  • All buttons are clickable
  • Links navigate to correct URLs
  • Hover states appear
  • Focus states are visible
  • Disabled states are clear
  • Loading states work (if applicable)

Phase 5: Keyboard Navigation Testing

Test complete keyboard navigation flow:

// Start from top of page
await mcp__chrome-devtools__navigate_page({
  url: testUrl,
  type: "reload"
});

// Tab through interactive elements
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  await mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key({
    key: "Tab"
  });

  // Take snapshot to see what's focused
  const snapshot = await mcp__chrome-devtools__take_snapshot({
    verbose: false
  });

  // Check that focus indicator is visible
  // Check focus order is logical
}

// Test other keyboard interactions
await mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key({
  key: "Enter"  // Activate button
});

await mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key({
  key: "Escape"  // Close modal
});

await mcp__chrome-devtools__press_key({
  key: "Space"  // Activate button/checkbox
});

Keyboard Navigation Checklist:

  • All interactive elements are focusable
  • Focus order is logical (top→bottom, left→right)
  • Focus indicators are visible (2px outline minimum)
  • Enter/Space activates buttons
  • Escape closes modals/dialogs
  • Arrow keys work for custom components
  • No keyboard traps

Phase 6: Color Contrast Analysis

Check all text meets WCAG AA requirements:

// Get all text elements from snapshot
const textElements = snapshot.elements.filter(el => el.text);

// For each text element:
// 1. Get computed foreground color
// 2. Get computed background color
// 3. Calculate contrast ratio
// 4. Compare against WCAG requirements

// WCAG AA Requirements:
// - Normal text (< 18pt or < 14pt bold): 4.5:1
// - Large text (≥ 18pt or ≥ 14pt bold): 3:1
// - UI components: 3:1

Contrast Ratio Calculation:

Relative Luminance (L) = 0.2126 * R + 0.7152 * G + 0.0722 * B
(where R, G, B are gamma corrected)

Contrast Ratio = (L1 + 0.05) / (L2 + 0.05)
(where L1 is lighter, L2 is darker)

Example:

Text: #666666 (rgb(102, 102, 102))
Background: #ffffff (rgb(255, 255, 255))

L1 = 1.0 (white)
L2 = 0.132 (gray)

Ratio = (1.0 + 0.05) / (0.132 + 0.05) = 3.8:1
Result: ❌ Fails WCAG AA (need 4.5:1)

Fix: Use #595959 instead
New ratio = 4.54:1 ✅ Passes

Phase 7: Console and Network Analysis

Check for JavaScript errors and network issues:

// Get console messages
const consoleMessages = await mcp__chrome-devtools__list_console_messages({
  types: ["error", "warn"],
  pageSize: 100
});

// Analyze errors
const errors = consoleMessages.filter(msg => msg.type === "error");
const warnings = consoleMessages.filter(msg => msg.type === "warn");

// Get network requests
const networkRequests = await mcp__chrome-devtools__list_network_requests({
  resourceTypes: ["document", "script", "stylesheet", "image"],
  pageSize: 100
});

// Find failed requests
const failedRequests = networkRequests.filter(req => req.status >= 400);

Console Issues to Report:

  • ❌ JavaScript errors (with stack traces)
  • ⚠️ Console warnings
  • ❌ 404 errors (missing resources)
  • ❌ CORS errors
  • ⚠️ Deprecated API usage
  • ❌ Network failures

Phase 8: Accessibility Audit

Comprehensive accessibility checks:

Focus Indicators:

// Check all focusable elements have visible indicators
// Minimum 2px outline
// High contrast color
// Non-hidden

ARIA Usage:

// Check proper ARIA attributes:
// - aria-label on icon-only buttons
// - aria-describedby for complex widgets
// - aria-live for dynamic content
// - aria-hidden for decorative elements
// - role attributes where needed

Touch Targets:

// Measure all interactive elements
// Must be ≥ 44x44px on mobile viewports
// Spacing between targets ≥ 8px

Report Format

Generate detailed technical report:

# Validation Report: Component Name
**URL**: {test-url}
**Date**: {timestamp}

## 📊 Summary
✅ Passed: {N} checks
⚠️  Warnings: {N} checks
❌ Failed: {N} checks

## 📱 Responsive Behavior

### Mobile (320px)
Screenshot: screenshots/component/mobile-320px.png
**Issues:**
❌ Text overflow in heading
   File: components/hero.scss:45
   Current: font-size: 2rem;
   Fix: font-size: clamp(1.5rem, 5vw, 2rem);

### Tablet (768px)
✅ Layout optimal

### Desktop (1024px)
✅ Layout optimal

## ♿ Accessibility

### Color Contrast
❌ Body text: 3.8:1 (need 4.5:1)
   File: components/hero.scss:23
   Current: color: #666
   Fix: color: #595959
   Calculation: (255+0.05)/(89+0.05) = 4.54:1 ✅

### Keyboard Navigation
✅ All elements focusable
⚠️  Focus indicator weak (1px)
   File: base/buttons.scss:15
   Fix: outline: 2px solid; outline-offset: 2px;

### ARIA
⚠️  Icon button missing label
   File: patterns/hero.php:42
   Fix: Add aria-label="Close banner"

## 🖱️  Interactions
✅ Hover states working
✅ Click handlers functioning

## 🐛 Console & Network
✅ No JavaScript errors
✅ All resources loaded

## 📝 Recommendations (Priority Order)

🔴 CRITICAL
1. Fix body text contrast (hero.scss:23)
2. Add aria-label to icon button (hero.php:42)

🟡 IMPORTANT
3. Fix mobile text overflow (hero.scss:45)
4. Strengthen focus indicators (buttons.scss:15)

🟢 NICE TO HAVE
5. Increase touch target size (hero.scss:67)

Error Handling

Chrome DevTools MCP Not Available

If Chrome DevTools MCP is not connected, provide manual checklist:

❌ Chrome DevTools MCP not connected

Browser validation requires Chrome DevTools MCP.

**To enable:**
1. Install: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-chrome-mcp
2. Configure in Claude Code settings
3. Restart Claude Code
4. Retry validation

**Alternative: Manual Validation Checklist**

Test URL: {test-url}

📋 Responsive Testing:
□ View at 320px width (mobile)
□ View at 768px width (tablet)
□ View at 1024px+ width (desktop)
□ No horizontal scrolling on mobile
□ Touch targets ≥ 44px on mobile

📋 Accessibility:
□ Check contrast: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
□ Test Tab key navigation
□ Verify focus indicators visible
□ Check heading hierarchy
□ Verify alt text on images

📋 Interactions:
□ Test all hover states
□ Test all click actions
□ Check console for errors
□ Verify network requests successful

Test URL Not Accessible

❌ Cannot access test URL: {url}

**Possible issues:**
- Local dev server not running
- URL typo
- Network/firewall restrictions
- HTTPS certificate issues

**Solutions:**
1. Verify URL in browser first
2. Check dev server is running
3. Try alternate URL
4. Check /etc/hosts for local domains

Best Practices

  1. Test Early: Don't wait until implementation is complete
  2. Test Often: Validate after each significant change
  3. Fix Critical First: Address WCAG failures before UX issues
  4. Re-validate: Always re-run after applying fixes
  5. Real Devices: Follow up automated tests with real device testing
  6. Document Issues: Save reports for reference and tracking

Integration with Commands

This skill is used by:

/design-to-block Command

  • Validates WordPress block patterns after creation
  • Checks responsive behavior
  • Ensures accessibility compliance

/design-to-paragraph Command

  • Validates Drupal paragraph types after creation
  • Tests responsive layouts
  • Verifies accessibility

/design-validate Command

  • Standalone validation of any implementation
  • Can compare against design reference
  • Generates detailed technical report

Common Validation Failures

Text Overflow on Mobile

Symptom: Heading text wraps awkwardly or extends beyond container Fix: Use fluid typography with clamp()

Low Contrast

Symptom: Text difficult to read, fails WCAG AA Fix: Darken text color or lighten background

Weak Focus Indicators

Symptom: Hard to see which element has keyboard focus Fix: Increase outline to 2px, add offset

Small Touch Targets

Symptom: Buttons/links difficult to tap on mobile Fix: Increase padding to ensure 44px minimum

Missing ARIA Labels

Symptom: Screen readers can't identify icon-only buttons Fix: Add aria-label with descriptive text

JavaScript Errors

Symptom: Console shows errors, functionality broken Fix: Debug and fix JavaScript, verify asset paths

Testing Scope

What this validates:

  • ✅ Responsive layouts at multiple breakpoints
  • ✅ WCAG AA accessibility (contrast, keyboard nav, ARIA)
  • ✅ Interactive element functionality
  • ✅ JavaScript console errors
  • ✅ Network request failures
  • ✅ Visual accuracy (if design reference provided)

What this does NOT validate:

  • ❌ Cross-browser compatibility (Chrome only)
  • ❌ Performance metrics (use performance tools)
  • ❌ Security vulnerabilities
  • ❌ Code quality
  • ❌ SEO

平台分布

Codex

33.56%
按下载量换算35

Claude

31.07%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

18.12%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

8.37%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills