Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

browser-exploitation-v8(浏览器利用 v8)

browser-exploitation-v8 用于处理浏览器自动化、网页检查和页面信息提取,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要让 Agent 打开页面、读取网页或验证前端流程时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

browser-exploitation-v8 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 17,589。

总安装 6,515周安装 277GitHub Stars 349下载 2,282核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:browser-exploitation-v8(浏览器利用 v8)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills
仓库路径:skills/browser-exploitation-v8
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill browser-exploitation-v8
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill browser-exploitation-v8

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于 V8 引擎与 Chrome 浏览器漏洞利用技术研究。涵盖 JIT 编译、类型混淆与 ArrayBuffer 内存操作。涉及 WASM RWX 页与指针压缩等高级主题。源自 CTF 实战与 Project Zero 研究成果整理。仅供安全研究人员学习参考,严禁非法使用。

browser-exploitation-v8 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/browser-exploitation-v8

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill browser-exploitati…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

browser-exploitation-v8 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill browser-exploitation-v8。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

browser-exploitation-v8 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

browser-exploitation-v8 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

browser-exploitation-v8 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

browser-exploitation-v8 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,515 次,近一周安装 277 次,下载 2,282 次,GitHub 349 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

browser-exploitation-v8 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
browser-exploitation-v8

浏览器利用 v8 · 本页

6,515349操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SKILL: Browser / V8 Exploitation — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert V8/Chrome exploitation techniques. Covers V8 compilation pipeline, JIT type confusion, addrof/fakeobj primitives, ArrayBuffer corruption, WASM RWX pages, V8 sandbox (pointer compression), and Chrome sandbox escape overview. Distilled from ctf-wiki browser sections, Project Zero research, and CTF competition patterns. Base models often confuse V8 object representation details and miss the pointer compression barrier.

0. RELATED ROUTING

Advanced Reference

Load V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md when you need:

  • Detailed exploitation patterns and code templates
  • Heap layout manipulation and GC interaction
  • V8 sandbox bypass techniques
  • Object map confusion patterns

1. V8 ARCHITECTURE

Compilation Pipeline

JavaScript Source
    ↓ Parser
  AST (Abstract Syntax Tree)
    ↓ Ignition
  Bytecode (interpreted, profiling)
    ↓ Sparkplug (non-optimizing baseline, V8 ≥ 9.1)
  Baseline code (fast startup)
    ↓ Maglev (mid-tier, V8 ≥ 10.2)
  Mid-optimized code
    ↓ TurboFan (optimizing JIT)
  Optimized machine code (with speculative optimizations)
    ↓ Deoptimization (if speculation fails)
  Back to Ignition bytecode

Key V8 Concepts

ConceptDescription
Tagged pointersSMI (Small Integer): value << 1, HeapObject: `ptr \1`
Pointer compressionV8 ≥ 8.0: objects addressed via 32-bit offset from cage base (4GB sandbox)
Maps (Hidden Classes)Define object shape: property names, types, offsets
Elements kindsInternal array type: PACKED_SMI_ELEMENTS, PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS, PACKED_ELEMENTS, etc.
Write barrierGC bookkeeping when heap pointers are written
Garbage collectionOrinoco GC: minor (Scavenge) and major (Mark-Compact)

Object Representation (64-bit, pointer compression)

HeapObject in V8 heap (compressed):
  +0x00: Map pointer (compressed, 32-bit offset)
  +0x04: Properties/Hash
  +0x08: Elements pointer (compressed)
  +0x0C: Length (for arrays)
  +0x10: Inline properties or backing store data

2. COMMON V8 BUG CLASSES

Bug ClassDescriptionExample
JIT Type ConfusionTurboFan assumes wrong type after optimizationSpeculative type guard eliminated, wrong operation applied
Incorrect Bounds EliminationJIT removes array bounds check based on wrong range analysisCheckBounds node eliminated → OOB access
Prototype Chain ConfusionOptimization assumes stable prototype, mutations invalidatePrototype change after optimization → wrong property access
Turbofan Reduction BugIncorrect strength reduction or constant foldingInteger overflow in range analysis
Race ConditionSharedArrayBuffer + worker thread raceType confusion via concurrent modification
Off-by-one in BuiltinBoundary error in built-in function implementationString/Array bounds
Typer BugIncorrect type range computation in TurboFanTyper says value is in [0, N] but can be N+1

Triggering JIT Optimization

function vuln(arr) {
    // ... vulnerable code path ...
}
// Force optimization by calling many times
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
    vuln(arr);
}
// Or use V8 intrinsics (d8 only):
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(vuln);
vuln(arr);

3. EXPLOITATION PRIMITIVES

addrof — Leak Object Address

// Goal: get the raw heap address of a JavaScript object
// Method: type confusion between object array and float array
// If we can confuse PACKED_ELEMENTS array with PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS:
// - Write object reference to element of object array
// - Read same element as double from confused float array
// - Float bits = compressed pointer of the object

function addrof(obj) {
    // Setup depends on specific bug
    // Typically: trigger type confusion so array reads obj ref as float
    object_array[0] = obj;
    return ftoi(confused_float_array[0]);  // float-to-int conversion
}

fakeobj — Create Fake Object Reference

// Goal: create a JS reference to an arbitrary heap address
// Method: reverse of addrof — write float (raw pointer bits) to float array,
//         read from confused object array → treated as object reference

function fakeobj(addr) {
    confused_float_array[0] = itof(addr);  // int-to-float conversion
    return object_array[0];                 // now a "pointer" to addr
}

Building Arbitrary R/W from addrof + fakeobj

// 1. Create a Float64Array with known layout
let rw_array = new Float64Array(0x100);
let rw_array_addr = addrof(rw_array);

// 2. Fake a Float64Array object at controlled address with modified backing_store
// 3. Corrupt backing_store pointer to target address
// 4. Read/write through the fake Float64Array → arbitrary R/W

function read64(addr) {
    // Set fake array's backing_store = addr
    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);
    return fake_float64array[0];
}

function write64(addr, value) {
    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);
    fake_float64array[0] = value;
}

4. OOB READ/WRITE VIA CONFUSED ARRAY BOUNDS

When TurboFan incorrectly eliminates bounds checks:

function trigger(arr, idx) {
    // TurboFan thinks idx is always < arr.length
    // But due to bug, idx can exceed bounds
    return arr[idx];  // OOB read
}

// OOB read adjacent memory (next heap object's metadata)
// OOB write to corrupt next object's map/elements/length

What's Adjacent in V8 Heap?

Objects are allocated sequentially in V8's young generation (new space). By controlling allocation order:

let arr1 = new Array(0x10);    // spray object
let arr2 = new Float64Array(0x10);  // target: adjacent to arr1
// OOB from arr1 can reach arr2's metadata
// Corrupt arr2's length → unconstrained OOB on arr2

5. ARRAYBUFFER ARBITRARY R/W

ArrayBuffer's backing store is a raw pointer to allocated memory. Corrupting it gives absolute memory R/W.

let ab = new ArrayBuffer(0x100);
let view = new DataView(ab);
// If we can overwrite ab's backing_store pointer:
// ab.backing_store = target_addr
// view.getFloat64(0) → reads 8 bytes from target_addr
// view.setFloat64(0, val) → writes to target_addr

V8 Sandbox (Pointer Compression) Impact

Since V8 ≥ 8.0 (pointer compression) and V8 sandbox (≥ 11.x):

  • ArrayBuffer.backing_store is a sandbox pointer (within the V8 cage, 4GB region)
  • Cannot directly point outside the V8 cage
  • Need sandbox escape to get full process memory access

6. WASM RWX PAGE

WebAssembly JIT code is placed on RWX (Read-Write-Execute) pages on some platforms.

// Allocate WASM module → JIT compiles to RWX page
let wasm_code = new Uint8Array([0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, ...]);
let mod = new WebAssembly.Module(wasm_code);
let instance = new WebAssembly.Instance(mod);
// instance.exports.func → points to RWX page

// If we can find and write to this page:
// 1. addrof(instance) → find WASM instance object
// 2. Follow pointers: instance → jump_table_start → RWX page
// 3. Use arbitrary write to overwrite RWX page with shellcode
// 4. Call instance.exports.func() → executes shellcode

Modern Chrome: W^X enforcement means WASM pages are either RW or RX, not RWX simultaneously. JIT code is written in RW mode, then switched to RX. Exploitation requires finding a write window or using JIT spray.


7. V8 SANDBOX

Architecture (V8 ≥ 11.x)

Process Virtual Address Space:
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│  V8 Sandbox Cage (4GB region)        │
│  ├── V8 Heap (JS objects)            │
│  ├── ArrayBuffer backing stores      │
│  ├── WASM memory                     │
│  └── External pointer table          │
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Process memory outside cage         │
│  ├── libc, Chrome code               │
│  ├── Stack                           │
│  └── Other allocations               │
└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Sandbox Escape Vectors

VectorMethod
External pointer tableCorrupt entries in the external pointer table to reference arbitrary addresses
WASM code pointerOverwrite WASM function entry to jump to controlled shellcode
JIT code corruptionWrite to JIT code page via race condition or confused pointer
Mojo IPC (Chrome)Exploit Chrome IPC to attack browser process from compromised renderer
Backing store seal bypassFind type confusion to get unsandboxed pointer

8. CHROME SANDBOX ESCAPE (OVERVIEW)

After renderer RCE (via V8 exploit), the process is still sandboxed. Full compromise requires:

StageTargetExample
Renderer exploitV8 / Blink DOMType confusion → shellcode
IPC/Mojo bugChrome IPC layerUse-after-free in Mojo interface
Browser process exploitPrivileged browser processCode execution outside sandbox

Mojo interfaces (Chrome's IPC) expose attack surface: find UAF or type confusion in Mojo message handlers.


9. TOOLS

# V8 debugging
d8 --allow-natives-syntax exploit.js  # Enable V8 intrinsics (%DebugPrint, etc.)
d8 --trace-turbo exploit.js           # Dump TurboFan IR
d8 --print-opt-code exploit.js        # Print optimized machine code

# Turbolizer: visual TurboFan IR graph
# Chrome DevTools Memory panel: heap snapshots

# Build V8 for debugging
git clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git
gclient sync
gn gen out/debug --args='is_debug=true v8_enable_sandbox=false'
ninja -C out/debug d8

10. DECISION TREE

V8 vulnerability identified
├── Bug type?
│   ├── JIT type confusion → trigger optimization, confuse array element kinds
│   ├── Bounds check elimination → OOB read/write on array
│   ├── Typer bug → incorrect range leads to OOB
│   └── Builtin bug → direct memory corruption primitive
│
├── Build primitives
│   ├── Can confuse object array ↔ float array?
│   │   └── addrof + fakeobj → arbitrary R/W within V8 heap
│   ├── OOB on array?
│   │   └── Corrupt adjacent object (length/backing_store) → expand to full R/W
│   └── Direct write primitive?
│       └── Target WASM instance or ArrayBuffer metadata
│
├── V8 sandbox enabled?
│   ├── YES (modern Chrome) →
│   │   ├── R/W limited to V8 cage (4GB)
│   │   ├── Need sandbox escape: external pointer table corruption,
│   │   │   WASM code pointer overwrite, or Mojo bug
│   │   └── Then proceed to shellcode execution
│   └── NO (older V8, CTF, d8) →
│       ├── Corrupt ArrayBuffer backing_store → absolute R/W
│       └── Overwrite WASM RWX page → shellcode
│
├── Code execution method
│   ├── WASM RWX page available? → write shellcode, call WASM func
│   ├── JIT code writable? → overwrite JIT code
│   └── ROP needed? → corrupt stack or return address
│
└── Full browser exploit chain
    ├── Stage 1: V8 bug → renderer RCE
    ├── Stage 2: Mojo IPC bug → browser process compromise
    └── Stage 3: OS-level escalation (if needed)

平台分布

Codex

40.47%
按下载量换算924

Claude

29.78%
按下载量换算680

Cursor

17.7%
按下载量换算404

Gemini CLI

9.12%
按下载量换算208

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

未通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills