Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

newsletter-creation-curation时事通讯创作策划

Agent Skill

newsletter-creation-curation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,592

周安装

67

GitHub Stars

262

下载量

557
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:newsletter-creation-curation(时事通讯创作策划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/brianrwagner/ai-marketing-skills
仓库路径:skills/newsletter-creation-curation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/brianrwagner/ai-marketing-skills --skill newsletter-creation-curation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/brianrwagner/ai-marketing-skills --skill newsletter-creation-curation

简介

newsletter-creation-curation 依据业务特性定制 B2B 通讯内容,拒绝标准化模板输出。

  • 适用于在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中策划高质量邮件列表运营。
  • 提供刊期大纲、完整版本或含四周日历的规划服务,适配不同发布节奏需求。
  • 每封邮件强调读者价值与明确行动号召,支撑可持续订阅增长目标。
  • 涉及用户数据收集时必须遵守 GDPR 等隐私法规,禁止用于未经同意的营销推送。

SKILL.md

Newsletter Creation & Curation Skill

Use this skill to create B2B newsletters that match business context, not generic content templates.

Deep strategic guidance is in PLAYBOOK.md. Use this file as the executable operating manual.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: *"Outline only, full edition, or full edition + calendar?"*

ModeWhat you getBest for
quickEdition outline + 3 lead story angles, no writingPlanning, editorial direction
standardFull newsletter edition, all sections writtenPublishing this week
deepFull edition + 4-week content calendar + audience segmentation recommendationsLaunching or systematizing a newsletter

Default: standard — use quick if they're still deciding what to write. Use deep if they're building a newsletter from scratch or scaling.


Context Loading Gates

Before generating any newsletter content, collect:

  • Company context: What product/service? Who is the ICP?
  • Newsletter goal: Lead gen / thought leadership / personal brand / category ownership
  • Industry vertical: Sales Tech / HR Tech / Fintech / Operations Tech
  • Company stage: Series A / Series B / Series C+
  • Role: Founder / VP-Director / PMM-Content / Enterprise employee
  • Geography: US-first / India-first
  • Prior issues: Any existing issues to maintain consistency and voice?
  • Approval constraints: Does this need legal/brand/manager review?

Structured intake — answer all 5 dimensions before proceeding:

Goal: [lead_gen | thought_leadership | personal_brand | category_ownership]
Industry: [sales_tech | hr_tech | fintech | ops_tech]
Stage: [series_a | series_b | series_c_plus]
Role: [founder | vp_director | pmm_content | enterprise_employee]
Geography: [us_first | india_first]

Phase 1: Context Analysis

Before drafting, reason through:

  1. Template match: Which industry template best fits? (Sales Tech = data-heavy; HR Tech = research-led; Fintech = compliance-aware; Ops Tech = practical)
  2. Cadence match: Series A = weekly/bi-weekly for simplicity; Series B = weekly with process; Series C+ = media-grade weekly with pillars
  3. Role constraints: Founder = direct POV allowed; Employee = approval checkpoint required before final draft
  4. Geography adjustments: India-first = IST timing + local examples; US-first = EST/PST + US benchmarks
  5. Goal-content alignment: Lead gen needs a clear conversion CTA; thought leadership needs original insight, not general content

Output one-line strategy statement:

For [ICP], we publish [cadence] to achieve [goal] with [format].

Phase 2: Issue Blueprint

Before writing full draft, produce an issue blueprint:

## Issue Blueprint

**Strategy:** For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
**Industry tone:** [tactical/research-led/compliance-aware/practical]
**Approval required:** [yes/no — who]

**Sections:**
1. Subject lines (3 options) — [~words each]
2. Hook — [target ~75 words]
3. Core insight — [target ~200 words]
4. Actionable playbook — [target ~150 words, 3-5 steps]
5. CTA — [1 sentence, singular action]

Get confirmation or proceed to draft.


Phase 3: Full Issue Draft

Generate complete publish-ready draft. Required structure — every issue:

Subject Line Options (3 required)

Produce 3 distinct angles:

  • A: Curiosity/open loop ("The metric most [ICP] ignore")
  • B: Specific + benefit ("How [Company type] achieves [X] in [timeframe]")
  • C: Contrarian/bold ("Stop [common behavior]. Do this instead.")

Hook

  • First 2 sentences must earn the read
  • Lead with the problem + stakes
  • Target: busy reader can extract the point in 60 seconds

Core Insight

  • One primary takeaway per issue — not three
  • Support with: data, framework, or named pattern
  • Include specific numbers or named examples wherever possible

Actionable Playbook

  • 3-5 steps or checklist items
  • Each step must be implementable, not just conceptual
  • Series A = simpler steps; Series C+ = more sophisticated process

CTA

  • ONE measurable action only
  • Options: reply with [X], click [link], share [asset], book [demo]
  • Never use vague CTAs ("Learn more")

Phase 4: Refinement Checklist

Run before delivering:

  • Clarity: Can a busy reader extract value in 60 seconds?
  • Specificity: Does each section include concrete guidance or evidence?
  • Relevance: Does tone match industry and role constraints?
  • Compliance: For fintech/employee-led, is a legal/manager review step included?
  • Consistency: Does voice align with prior issues (if any were provided)?
  • CTA: Is there exactly ONE measurable CTA — not two, not zero?

Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)

After completing the draft, evaluate:

  • Does the subject line A option create genuine curiosity without being clickbait?
  • Does the hook deliver a problem + stakes in the first 2 sentences?
  • Is the core insight something subscribers couldn't get from a generic AI prompt?
  • Does the playbook have steps that are specific to this audience, not generic "tips"?
  • Is the CTA actually measurable — i.e., can they track whether it worked?
  • For fintech/employee contexts: is there an explicit approval checkpoint?

Flag any issue: "The playbook steps are too generic for a Series B SaaS audience — they read as beginner content. Revised to assume existing process maturity."


Iteration Protocol

After delivering the draft:

  1. Ask: "Does the hook earn the read? Does the playbook feel actionable for your audience?"
  2. If hook is weak → rewrite using a different angle (data-led, story-led, or contrarian)
  3. If playbook is too generic → ask for a specific example from their own experience to ground it
  4. For next issue: "Want me to save these content themes so the next issue builds on this one?"

Output Structure

## Newsletter Issue: [Name] — Issue #[X] — [Date]
**Strategy:** For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].

---

### Subject Line Options
A) [Curiosity/open loop]
B) [Specific + benefit]
C) [Contrarian/bold]
**Recommended:** [A/B/C] — [reason]

---

### Hook
[2-3 sentences — problem + stakes]

---

### Core Insight
[200-300 words — data, framework, or named pattern]

---

### Actionable Playbook
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]

---

### CTA
[Single measurable action]

---

### Distribution Plan
- **Send time:** [Day, Time, Timezone]
- **LinkedIn amplification:** [Post angle / hook]
- **Secondary channel:** [Platform + angle]

### KPI Targets
- Open rate goal: [%]
- CTR goal: [%]
- Primary metric: [SQLs / subscribers / replies]

### Approval Required
[Yes — [who] | No]

### Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + revisions made]

Playbook Map (Deep Dives in PLAYBOOK.md)

  • Sales Tech strategy: SECTION A
  • HR Tech strategy: SECTION B
  • Fintech strategy: SECTION C
  • Operations Tech strategy: SECTION D
  • Role approvals and geography tactics: CROSS-CUTTING: UNIVERSAL FRAMEWORKS

*Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com*

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.89%
按下载量换算183

Claude

30.66%
按下载量换算171

Cursor

18.04%
按下载量换算100

Gemini CLI

9.55%
按下载量换算53

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills