Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

scientific-writing科学写作

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

349

周安装

15

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

122
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:scientific-writing(科学写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/braselog/researchassistant
仓库路径:skills/scientific-writing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/braselog/researchassistant --skill scientific-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/braselog/researchassistant --skill scientific-writing

简介

用于撰写符合出版标准的科学论文,支持 IMRAD 结构与引用格式化。

  • 适用于摘要、方法、图表制作及报告规范(如 CONSORT)的应用指导。
  • 可协助准备期刊投稿材料,提升稿件接受率。
  • 需用户提供原始数据与研究背景,避免凭空补充实验结果。
  • scientific-writing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Scientific Writing

Write clear, precise, and publication-ready scientific manuscripts.

When to Use

  • Drafting manuscript sections (abstract, intro, methods, results, discussion)
  • Structuring a research paper using IMRAD format
  • Formatting citations and references
  • Creating or improving figures and tables
  • Applying reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA)
  • Preparing manuscripts for journal submission
  • During the WRITING or REVIEW phases

Manuscript Structure (IMRAD)

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TITLE                                                       │
│ Concise, specific, informative (12-15 words)               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ABSTRACT (150-250 words)                                    │
│ Background → Objective → Methods → Results → Conclusion     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ INTRODUCTION                                                │
│ Context → Gap → Objective → Approach                        │
│ Funnel: Broad → Narrow → Your question                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ METHODS                                                     │
│ Study design → Participants → Procedures → Analysis         │
│ Enough detail for replication                              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ RESULTS                                                     │
│ Objective findings, no interpretation                       │
│ Text + Figures + Tables                                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ DISCUSSION                                                  │
│ Key findings → Context → Limitations → Implications         │
│ Reverse funnel: Specific → Broad                           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ REFERENCES                                                  │
│ Consistent style, verified DOIs                            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Section-by-Section Guidance

Abstract

Purpose: Standalone summary of the entire paper

Structure (for structured abstracts):

  • Background: Why this matters (1-2 sentences)
  • Objective: What you did (1 sentence)
  • Methods: How you did it (2-3 sentences)
  • Results: Key findings with numbers (3-4 sentences)
  • Conclusion: Main takeaway (1-2 sentences)

Tips:

  • Write LAST after all other sections
  • Include specific numbers/results
  • Avoid abbreviations (or define them)
  • Stay within word limit (usually 150-250)

Introduction

Purpose: Establish context, gap, and rationale

Structure (Funnel):

  1. Broad context (1-2 paragraphs): Why does this field matter?
  2. Current knowledge (2-3 paragraphs): What's known? What approaches exist?
  3. Gap/Problem (1 paragraph): What's missing? What's the controversy?
  4. Your study (1 paragraph): What did you do? Why this approach?

Tips:

  • End with clear objectives or hypotheses
  • Cite 20-40 references typically
  • Use present tense for established facts
  • Be specific about what you're studying

Methods

Purpose: Enable replication

Key Sections:

  1. Study Design: Type of study, setting, dates
  2. Participants/Samples: Selection, criteria, sample size, ethics
  3. Procedures: What was done, in order
  4. Measurements: What and how measured
  5. Statistical Analysis: Tests, software, significance criteria

Common Mistakes:

MistakeProblemFix
Vague methods"Standard methods"Specify exact protocol
Missing stats"Data were analyzed"Name specific tests
No software versionsNot reproducibleInclude version numbers
Missing sample size justificationWhy this n?Add power analysis

Tips:

  • Use past tense
  • Be specific: model numbers, concentrations, durations
  • Reference published protocols if applicable
  • Include ethical approvals

Results

Purpose: Present findings objectively

Organization:

  1. Order by importance or by methods flow
  2. Each paragraph: finding + evidence (figure/table reference)
  3. Stats: test, statistic, df, p-value, effect size

Structure Pattern:

[What was found] (Figure X).
[Statistical support] (t(df) = X.XX, p = .XXX, d = X.XX).
[Additional detail or subgroup analysis].

Tips:

  • NO interpretation (save for Discussion)
  • Include negative/null results
  • Reference every figure and table
  • Use past tense
  • Include exact p-values (not just p < 0.05)

Discussion

Purpose: Interpret findings in context

Structure (Reverse Funnel):

  1. Key findings (1-2 paragraphs): Main results, directly address objectives
  2. Comparison to literature (2-3 paragraphs): How do findings fit with prior work?
  3. Mechanisms (1-2 paragraphs): Why might this happen?
  4. Limitations (1 paragraph): Be honest and specific
  5. Implications (1-2 paragraphs): Clinical, practical, theoretical significance
  6. Future directions (optional): What next?
  7. Conclusion (1 paragraph): Main takeaway

Tips:

  • Start with your results, not literature
  • Acknowledge limitations honestly
  • Don't overstate conclusions
  • Distinguish correlation from causation

Citation Styles

APA (7th Edition)

In-text: (Author, Year) or Author (Year)

Previous research found significant effects (Smith, 2023).
Smith (2023) reported significant effects.

Reference list:

Smith, J. D., Johnson, M. L., & Williams, K. R. (2023). Title of
    article. Journal Name, 22(4), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.xxx/yyy

Vancouver/ICMJE

In-text: Superscript or bracketed numbers¹ or [1]

Previous research found significant effects.¹
Multiple studies support this finding.¹⁻³

Reference list (numbered):

1. Smith JD, Johnson ML, Williams KR. Title of article. J Name.
   2023;22(4):301-18.

Nature

In-text: Superscript numbers¹

Previous research found significant effects¹.

Reference list:

1. Smith, J. D., Johnson, M. L. & Williams, K. R. Title of article.
   Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 301-318 (2023).

Figures and Tables

When to Use Which

Use Tables ForUse Figures For
Exact values neededTrends and patterns
Many variablesComparisons
Summary statisticsRelationships
Participant characteristicsProcesses

Figure Checklist

  • Self-explanatory with caption
  • Axes labeled with units
  • Error bars defined (SEM, SD, CI)
  • Significance markers explained
  • Colorblind-safe
  • Resolution ≥300 DPI

Table Checklist

  • Clear, descriptive title
  • Column headers with units
  • Appropriate precision (not too many decimals)
  • Notes for abbreviations
  • n values included

Caption Template

**Figure 1. Brief descriptive title.**

(A) Description of panel A. (B) Description of panel B.
Data shown as mean ± SEM (n = X per group). Statistical
comparisons by [test name]. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Reporting Guidelines

Which Guideline to Use

Study TypeGuidelineURL
Randomized trialCONSORTconsort-statement.org
Observational (cohort, case-control)STROBEstrobe-statement.org
Systematic reviewPRISMAprisma-statement.org
Diagnostic accuracySTARDstard-statement.org
Prediction modelsTRIPODtripod-statement.org
Animal researchARRIVEarriveguidelines.org
Case reportsCAREcare-statement.org
Quality improvementSQUIREsquire-statement.org

Using Checklists

  1. Download checklist from guideline website
  2. Complete each item during writing
  3. Include page/line numbers
  4. Submit with manuscript (often required)

Writing Principles

Clarity

  • Use precise, unambiguous language
  • One idea per sentence
  • Define technical terms at first use
  • Use active voice when possible

Example:

❌ "The samples were subjected to analysis"
✓ "We analyzed the samples using..."

❌ "It has been shown that..."
✓ "Smith et al. (2023) showed that..."

Conciseness

WordyConcise
"Due to the fact that""Because"
"In order to""To"
"A large number of""Many"
"At the present time""Now" / "Currently"
"In the event that""If"
"Has the ability to""Can"

Accuracy

  • Report exact values with appropriate precision
  • Use consistent terminology
  • Distinguish observation from interpretation
  • Acknowledge uncertainty

Objectivity

  • Present results without bias
  • Don't overstate findings
  • Acknowledge contradictory evidence
  • Maintain professional, neutral tone

Field-Specific Terminology

General Principles

  • Match terminology to the target journal
  • Use established nomenclature systems
  • Define abbreviations at first use
  • Be consistent throughout

Quick Reference

FieldConvention
GenesItalics (*BRCA1*)
ProteinsRoman (BRCA1)
SpeciesItalics, full at first (*Escherichia coli*), then abbreviated (*E. coli*)
StatisticsItalics (p, n, t, F, r)
DrugsGeneric name first, brand in parentheses

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Top Rejection Reasons

  1. Incomplete or inappropriate statistics
  2. Over-interpretation of results
  3. Poor methods description
  4. Inadequate sample size
  5. Poor writing quality
  6. Inadequate literature review
  7. Unclear figures
  8. Failure to follow guidelines

Writing Issues

IssueExampleFix
Tense mixing"We collected... and analyze"Past for methods/results
Excessive jargonToo many undefined termsDefine or simplify
Paragraph breaksRandom breaksOne topic per paragraph
Missing transitionsAbrupt section changesAdd linking sentences

Manuscript Development Workflow

Recommended Order

  1. Figures/Tables first (core data story)
  2. Methods (often easiest to draft)
  3. Results (describe figures/tables)
  4. Discussion (interpret findings)
  5. Introduction (set up the question)
  6. Abstract (synthesize everything)
  7. Title (last refinement)

Revision Checklist

  • Logical flow throughout
  • Consistent terminology
  • All figures/tables referenced
  • All citations verified
  • Word counts met
  • Reporting checklist complete
  • Journal format requirements met

Integration with RA Workflow

WRITING Phase Files

FilePurpose
manuscript/background.mdIntroduction content
manuscript/methods.mdMethods section
manuscript/results.mdResults + figure refs
manuscript/discussion.mdDiscussion section
manuscript/figures/figN/caption.mdFigure captions

Connected Skills

  • /write_background: Drafts introduction
  • /write_methods: Generates methods from scripts
  • /write_results: Drafts results from figures
  • /peer_review: Self-review before submission

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

32.62%
按下载量换算40

Claude

31.67%
按下载量换算39

Cursor

17.31%
按下载量换算21

Gemini CLI

9.74%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills