Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

brand-copywriter(品牌文案)

brand-copywriter 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

brand-copywriter 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 19,034。

总安装 5,797周安装 244GitHub Stars 141下载 2,030核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:brand-copywriter(品牌文案)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/brand-copywriter
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill brand-copywriter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill brand-copywriter

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

brand-copywriter 生成平台优化的营销文案,提供两种框架版本供对比选择,适用于广告、着陆页或邮件撰写。它根据产品类型与目标人群定制语气与结构,兼顾转化效果与品牌调性表达。使用时需明确平台类型与核心诉求,系统将交互式引导完成内容创作。输出结果仅供参考,正式发布前建议人工复核合规性与实际投放数据反馈。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/brand-copywriter

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill brand-copywrit…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

brand-copywriter 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill brand-copywriter。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

brand-copywriter 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

brand-copywriter 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

brand-copywriter 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

brand-copywriter 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,797 次,近一周安装 244 次,下载 2,030 次,GitHub 141 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

brand-copywriter 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
brand-copywriter

品牌文案 · 本页

5,797141只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Brand Copywriter

Purpose

Generate professional marketing copy in two versions: one using the optimal framework for the platform/use case, and one using an AI-selected alternative framework for comparison.


Execution Logic

Check $ARGUMENTS first to determine execution mode:

If $ARGUMENTS is empty or not provided:

Respond with: "brand-copywriter loaded, proceed with what you need copy for (e.g., Facebook ad, landing page, TikTok video, LinkedIn post, email sequence, etc.)"

Then wait for the user to provide their requirements in the next message.

If $ARGUMENTS contains content:

Proceed immediately to Task Execution (skip the "loaded" message).


Task Execution

When user requirements are available (either from initial $ARGUMENTS or follow-up message):

1. MANDATORY: Read Reference Files FIRST

BLOCKING REQUIREMENT — DO NOT SKIP THIS STEP

Before doing ANYTHING else, you MUST use the Read tool to read BOTH reference files:

Read: ./references/copy_frameworks.md
Read: ./references/writing_styles.md

What you will find:

  • copy_frameworks.md: 14 proven copywriting frameworks with detailed structures, selection matrix, and quick reference tables
  • writing_styles.md: Voice and tone rules built from Ogilvy, Schwartz, Hopkins, Halbert, Sugarman, Caples, and Collier. Contains the Banned Phrases list, AI tell patterns to avoid, and how human copy actually sounds.

DO NOT PROCEED to Step 2 until you have read both files and have the frameworks AND voice rules loaded in context.

2. Check for Business Context

Check if FOUNDER_CONTEXT.md exists in the project root.

  • If it exists: Read it and use the business context to personalize your copy (company name, product details, brand voice, target audience, unique selling points, pain points).
  • If it doesn't exist: Proceed using defaults from "Defaults & Assumptions" and ask clarifying questions if critical information is missing.

3. Analyze Input

From the user's requirements, extract:

  • Copy type: What are they writing? (Facebook ad, landing page, TikTok script, etc.)
  • Product/service: What are they selling?
  • Target audience: Who is this for?
  • Key benefit/transformation: What outcome does the customer get?
  • Tone: Professional, casual, bold, friendly, etc.
  • Length constraints: Character limits, word count, duration (for video)

For any missing information, apply defaults from Defaults & Assumptions.

4. Select Frameworks

Using the Framework Selection Matrix and "Choosing Between Frameworks" guidance from copy_frameworks.md:

  1. Primary Framework: Select the best framework based on:

- Copy type/platform (use matrix as starting point) - Product's primary angle (pain-driven → PAS, transformation → BAB, features → FAB, etc.) - Audience awareness level (unaware → ACCA/AIDA, problem-aware → PAS/BAB, etc.) - Available copy length

  1. Alternative Framework: Select a genuinely different framework that offers a contrasting approach:

- If primary is pain-focused (PAS), try transformation-focused (BAB) or structured (AIDA) - If primary is feature-focused (FAB), try pain-focused (PAS) or story-focused (STAR) - The alternative should give the user a meaningfully different angle to test

5. Write Copy — Version A (Primary Framework)

Write the complete copy using the primary framework:

  • Follow the framework's exact structure
  • Apply brand voice from FOUNDER_CONTEXT.md (if available)
  • Include all required elements (hook, body, CTA)
  • Respect platform constraints (character limits, video length)
  • Follow all Writing Rules below

6. Write Copy — Version B (Alternative Framework)

Write the complete copy using the alternative framework:

  • Same product/message, different structure
  • Explain why this framework was chosen as the alternative
  • Follow all Writing Rules below

7. Format and Verify

  • Structure output according to Output Format section
  • Complete Quality Checklist self-verification before presenting output

Writing Rules

Hard constraints. No interpretation. Every rule here exists because it kills conversion when broken.

Core Rules

  • Write to one specific person, not an audience
  • Lead with the strongest element (pain, benefit, or hook)
  • One idea per sentence
  • Active voice only
  • Specific numbers, always. "127%" not "over 100%". "$45K/month" not "six figures". "2.4 hours" not "significant time".
  • Benefits over features. What they GET, not what it HAS.
  • Clear, single CTA per piece of copy. Name what happens when they click. Not "Sign Up". "Get the free template."
  • Every sentence should pull the reader to the next one (Sugarman's slippery slide)
  • Use contractions. "You're" not "You are". "It's" not "It is".
  • Have opinions. Bland copy sells nothing.
  • Admit limitations when relevant. It builds trust faster than any claim.

Voice Rules (Non-Negotiable)

Read writing_styles.md for the full Banned List. These are the critical ones:

  • NO em dashes for dramatic effect. One brief aside per paragraph max. Never for building tension.
  • NO "And honestly?", "Here's the thing...", "The truth is...", "At the end of the day..."
  • NO "It's not X. It's Y." structure. Cut it entirely.
  • NO "Let's dive in", "Whether you're a X or a Y...", "Unlock your potential"
  • NO "game-changer", "revolutionary", "seamless", "robust", "leverage", "streamline", "delve"
  • NO "Now," as a paragraph opener
  • NO three consecutive fragments for artificial punch
  • NO one-liner at the end that restates what you just said
  • NO fake vulnerability that's actually a humble brag
  • Adjectives like "incredible", "amazing", "powerful" are lazy. Replace with a specific detail that proves the point without saying it.

Platform-Specific Rules

  • Facebook/Instagram Ads: 125 characters before "See More" — front-load the hook. Total: 1,000 char max primary text.
  • TikTok/Reels: First 3 seconds = hook. Script for 15-60 seconds. Conversational tone.
  • LinkedIn: Professional but human. First line visible = hook. 1,300 char max for full visibility.
  • YouTube: First 5 seconds critical. Script with timestamps for longer content.
  • Landing Pages: Above the fold = headline + subhead + CTA. Scannable sections.
  • Email: Subject line <50 chars. Preview text matters. One CTA per email.
  • Sales Pages: Long-form allowed. Multiple proof points. FAQ section recommended.

Output Format

## Copy Brief
**Copy type:** [What they're writing]
**Product/Service:** [What they're selling]
**Target audience:** [Who it's for]
**Key transformation:** [What the customer gets]
**Platform constraints:** [Character limits, length, etc.]

---

## Version A: [Primary Framework Name]

**Why this framework:** [1-2 sentences explaining why this is the optimal choice for this copy type]

### Copy:
[Full copy here, formatted appropriately for the platform]

---

## Version B: [Alternative Framework Name]

**Why this framework:** [1-2 sentences explaining why this alternative could work well]

### Copy:
[Full copy here, formatted appropriately for the platform]

---

## Recommendation
[Which version to test first and why. Any A/B testing suggestions.]

Example:

## Copy Brief
**Copy type:** Facebook Ad
**Product/Service:** AI scheduling tool for founders
**Target audience:** Solo founders working 60+ hour weeks
**Key transformation:** Reclaim 10+ hours per week
**Platform constraints:** 125 char hook, 1000 char max

---

## Version A: AIDA

**Why this framework:** AIDA gives a clean attention-to-action arc. Works well here because the problem is visible but the solution needs a moment to land.

### Copy:
You're working 70 hours a week and still behind.

Last Tuesday I counted how much time I spent just scheduling meetings. 2 hours and 17 minutes. In one day.

CalendarAI handles all of it. Scheduling, rescheduling, confirmations, the whole thing. I set it up in 8 minutes and haven't touched my calendar since.

"I got 12 hours back in my first week. Didn't change anything else." Sarah K., bootstrapped SaaS founder.

→ Try CalendarAI free for 14 days. No credit card needed.

---

## Version B: PAS

**Why this framework:** PAS leads with the pain, which is strong here. Founders already feel this daily, so we don't need to explain it. We just need to name it accurately.

### Copy:
Your calendar is running your business. You're not.

You spent 47 minutes yesterday rescheduling a single call. You have 3 "free" slots this week and two of them are back-to-back meetings you forgot about. Meanwhile, the actual work that grows your company keeps getting pushed.

CalendarAI does all of this for you. Schedules, reschedules, sends reminders, blocks your focus time. Set it up once, it runs.

2,400 founders use it. Average time saved: 11 hours a week.

→ Get your first week free. See how it works.

---

## Recommendation
Test Version B (PAS) first. The pain is real and daily for this audience, so leading with it will get more clicks. If CTR is strong but people aren't converting, swap to Version A, which spends more time on the proof.

References

Both files MUST be read using the Read tool before writing any copy (see Step 1):

FilePurpose
./references/copy_frameworks.md14 copywriting frameworks with structures, examples, and selection matrix
./references/writing_styles.mdVoice and tone rules from Ogilvy, Schwartz, Hopkins, Halbert, Sugarman, Caples, Collier. Contains the full Banned Phrases list, AI tell patterns, and what human copy actually sounds like.

Why both matter: copy_frameworks.md picks the right structure. writing_styles.md makes the words sound like a human wrote them. A great structure with AI-sounding copy still fails. Great voice with the wrong structure still underperforms. Both together is what actually converts.


Quality Checklist (Self-Verification)

Before finalizing output, verify ALL of the following:

Pre-Execution Check

  • I read ./references/copy_frameworks.md before writing copy
  • I read ./references/writing_styles.md before writing copy
  • I have both the frameworks AND the voice/banned-phrase rules in context

Input Check

  • Copy type/platform is identified
  • Target audience is clear
  • Key benefit/transformation is defined
  • Defaults applied for any missing info

Framework Check

  • Primary framework matches the copy type (per Selection Matrix)
  • Alternative framework offers a genuinely different approach
  • Both frameworks are used correctly (following their structure)

Writing Rules Compliance

  • Hook is strong and front-loaded
  • Active voice throughout
  • Specific numbers used (not vague adjectives)
  • Benefits emphasized over features
  • Clear single CTA that names what happens when they click
  • Platform constraints respected

Voice & AI Tell Check

  • Zero banned phrases from writing_styles.md (no "game-changer", "And honestly?", "Here's the thing...", etc.)
  • No em dashes used for dramatic effect
  • No "It's not X. It's Y." structures
  • Contractions used throughout (you're, it's, they're)
  • At least one specific detail that shows rather than tells (Ogilvy principle)
  • At least one opinion or honest admission
  • Copy could NOT have been written about a different product (it's specific enough)
  • Read both versions aloud in your head. If either one stumbles or bores, rewrite before presenting.

Output Check

  • Both versions are complete and ready to use
  • Copy Brief accurately summarizes the input
  • Recommendation explains which to test first

If ANY check fails → revise before presenting.


Defaults & Assumptions

Use these unless the user overrides:

  • Copy type: General copy (most common request)
  • Tone: Confident, conversational, professional
  • Audience: Business owners/founders (if not specified)
  • Length: Platform-appropriate (use standard limits)
  • CTA: Name the action ("Get the free guide", "Start your free trial"). Never "Learn More" or "Sign Up".
  • Urgency: Soft urgency (no fake scarcity)
  • Proof: Use if provided, don't invent testimonials

Document any assumptions made in the Copy Brief.


平台分布

Codex

33.81%
按下载量换算686

Claude

32.68%
按下载量换算663

Cursor

19.23%
按下载量换算390

Gemini CLI

9.5%
按下载量换算193

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills