branch-name（分行名称）

Branch Name

Generate clean, team-friendly Git branch names based on current code changes.

Context Reuse (Step 0)

See _shared/context-reuse.md for the context reuse protocol.

If DIFF_CONTEXT or RAW_DIFF is already provided, use it directly to save time and tokens.

Gather Change Context (Step 1)

See _shared/branch-diff-gathering.md for branch diff collection details.

Use branch-level diff as primary source (compare current branch against base branch). This gives you the full picture of what's changing.

Optionally read commit history to improve intent inference across multiple commits.

Infer Intent and Type (Step 2)

Determine primary intent from changes:

• feature (new capability)
• bugfix (defect fix)
• refactor (internal restructuring)
• docs (documentation)
• chore (maintenance/tooling)
• test (tests only)

Extract 2-5 keywords from modified modules, entities, or behavior. These keywords will form the branch name slug.

Build Naming Candidates (Step 3)

Use slash style prefix by default: <prefix>/<slug>

Prefix mapping:

• feature → feat
• bugfix → fix
• refactor → refactor
• docs → docs
• chore → chore
• test → test

Slug guidelines:

• lowercase only (easier to type, avoids case-sensitivity issues)
• words separated by - (standard Git convention)
• keep 2-6 words when possible (balance between clarity and brevity)
• avoid vague words like update, misc, changes (not descriptive)
• avoid issue IDs unless user requests them (IDs are better in commits/PRs)

Why these guidelines:

• Lowercase avoids confusion on case-sensitive filesystems
• Hyphens are the Git community standard (not underscores or camelCase)
• Descriptive slugs help teammates understand branches at a glance
• Short names are easier to type and fit better in Git UIs

Validate and Rank (Step 4)

Output 3 candidates by default, ordered from best to acceptable.

Validation:

• ≤ 48 characters preferred (hard max 63 due to filesystem limits)
• no spaces, no underscores, no trailing slash
• reflects actual diff intent

If intent is ambiguous, include one neutral fallback like chore/<area>-cleanup.

Output Format (Step 5)

Branch names are always English tokens — output English only (no bilingual output needed).

Output structure:

• Recommended: one best branch name
• Alternatives: two additional candidates
• optional one-line rationale per candidate

Example Output

Recommended: fix/auth-token-refresh-race
Alternatives:
- fix/auth-refresh-lock
- refactor/auth-token-renewal-flow

Conventions

• Do not fabricate intent beyond actual changes
• Prefer domain terms already present in file paths/symbol names (maintains consistency with codebase)
• Keep names readable for both humans and CI tooling