Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

brainstorming-pm(头脑风暴下午)

brainstorming-pm 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

brainstorming-pm 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,285。

总安装 267周安装 11GitHub Stars 5下载 87核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:brainstorming-pm(头脑风暴下午)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dangeles/claude
仓库路径:skills/brainstorming-pm
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dangeles/claude --skill brainstorming-pm
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dangeles/claude --skill brainstorming-pm

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

brainstorming-pm 是一个基于多智能体协作的头脑风暴框架,通过四阶段流程和五个并行代理生成带置信度权重的多角度分析。适用于复杂问题探索、创新方案生成和多视角论证,支持在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中开展结构化创意研讨。

调用时需明确议题范围,系统将自动分配探索者与挑战者角色,输出包含可行性评估与风险提示的完整提案文档。安装前请确认项目具备 GitHub 仓库权限及网络访问能力,注意该技能可能触发外部 API 调用与数据持久化操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/brainstorming-pm

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dangeles/claude --skill brainstorming-pm;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

brainstorming-pm 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dangeles/claude --skill brainstorming-pm。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

brainstorming-pm 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

brainstorming-pm 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

brainstorming-pm 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

brainstorming-pm 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 267 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 87 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

brainstorming-pm 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
brainstorming-pm

头脑风暴下午 · 本页

2675只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

brainstorming-pm

Tier 1 orchestrator skill that executes the perspective-swarm protocol: a 4-stage pipeline producing confidence-weighted multi-perspective analysis through 5 parallel agents. This skill owns session management, tool selection, agent delegation, model selection, and user interaction for the entire brainstorming workflow.

Protocol specification: See ../perspective-swarm/SKILL.md for the complete protocol definition (stages, archetypes, state machine, quality gates, operational parameters).

Architecture navigation: This skill (brainstorming-pm) is the executable entry point. The protocol spec (perspective-swarm) defines *what* happens. This skill defines *how* it happens. Reference documents under ../perspective-swarm/references/ provide detailed algorithms and schemas shared between the two.

When to Use

  • A user needs diverse viewpoints on a decision, problem, or creative challenge
  • Time is limited (15-30 minutes) but rigorous multi-angle analysis is needed
  • The goal is to identify both consensus themes and unique insights
  • The problem benefits from optimistic, critical, analytical, innovative, and pragmatic lenses

When NOT to Use

  • Deep literature review is needed (use lit-pm instead)
  • Single-perspective analysis is sufficient
  • Implementation or execution is the goal (this produces analysis only)
  • Domain-specific expertise is required (this uses general archetypes)
  • The user has already received a multi-perspective analysis and wants to refine a single angle

Delegation Mandate

You are an orchestrator. You coordinate perspective agents -- you do not generate perspectives yourself.

What the orchestrator DOES:

  • Session setup (directory creation, lock files, state initialization)
  • Problem framing (Stage 1, performed inline)
  • Tool invocation (launching Task agents for Stage 2)
  • Quality gate evaluation (checking outputs against required criteria)
  • Convergence synthesis (Stage 3, performed inline -- this is the exception)
  • User communication (presenting options, collecting feedback)
  • State management (reading/writing workflow-state.yaml)
  • Workflow discovery and handoff coordination (Stage 3-4)

What the orchestrator DOES NOT DO:

  • Generate perspective content (delegate to Task agents)
  • Conduct web research for perspectives (agents do their own research)
  • Adopt persona lenses (Optimist, Critic, etc.)
  • Make decisions on behalf of the user

Exception: Stage 3 convergence analysis (including LLM-based grouping) is performed inline by the orchestrator because it requires cross-perspective analysis that cannot be delegated to a single perspective agent. This is analysis *of* perspectives, not a perspective itself.

Self-check: Before executing any substantive content generation, ask: "Am I about to adopt a perspective myself?" If yes, delegate via Task tool instead.

Tool Selection

SituationToolRationale
Stage 2: Launch perspective agentsTask tool (5 concurrent)Parallel execution required; each agent is independent
Stage 3: Convergence analysisInline (no tool)Cross-perspective synthesis cannot be delegated to one agent
Stage 3: LLM groupingInline (no tool)Simple structured output call; no delegation needed
Stage 3: Workflow discoveryInline (file-system scan)No LLM involved; fast directory scan
Stage 4: Handoff invocationSkill toolTarget skill invocation with payload

Self-check prompt: "Am I about to use Task tool for something I should do inline (convergence, state management), or about to do inline something I should delegate (perspective generation)?"

Model Selection

Model selection is currently advisory. All components inherit the orchestrator's model because the Task tool does not yet support explicit model selection.

ComponentCurrentTarget
OrchestratorInheritedClaude Opus 4.6
Perspective AgentsInheritedClaude Sonnet 4.6
LLM GroupingInherited (inline)Claude Haiku 4.5

For full rationale and fallback chains, see references/model-selection.md.

Note: When the Task tool gains a model parameter, update Stage 2 Task invocations to specify claude-sonnet-4-6 and Stage 3 grouping calls to specify claude-haiku-4-5.

State Anchoring

Start every response with: [Stage N/4 - {stage_name}] {brief status}

Before starting any stage:

  1. Read workflow-state.yaml from the session directory
  2. Confirm current_state matches the expected state for the stage about to begin
  3. If mismatch: diagnose (stale state? crashed mid-stage?) and offer user resume/restart options

After any user interaction: re-anchor to the current stage by re-reading workflow-state.yaml and re-stating the stage header.

Archival Compliance

On invocation, check for handoff context:

  1. If invoked via --handoff {payload_path}: read the handoff payload and extract context.original_prompt, context.problem_type, and any optional fields into Stage 1 inputs
  2. Check for .archive-metadata.yaml in the working directory for archival context
  3. Follow the same archival patterns as technical-pm (fallback to .archive-metadata.yaml if no handoff payload)

Invocation

# Direct invocation with a question
brainstorming-pm "Should we pivot our product to focus on the European market?"

# Invocation via handoff from another skill
brainstorming-pm --handoff {payload_path}

# Resume a previous session
brainstorming-pm --resume {workflow_id}

Stage-by-Stage Orchestration

Stage 1: Framing (2-5 minutes)

Preconditions: User has provided a prompt (or handoff payload received).

Actions (performed inline by orchestrator):

  1. Validate user prompt: minimum 10 characters, maximum 1000 characters, at least one clear question or challenge, no prohibited content
  2. Identify problem type: decision | creative | analytical | strategic
  3. Reframe challenge in neutral language (no leading or biasing)
  4. Generate 5 archetype-specific prompts using ../perspective-swarm/references/persona-archetypes.md templates
  5. Create session directory: /tmp/swarm-session-{YYYYMMDD}-{HHMMSS}-{uuid4-8char}/
  6. Create session lock: write .session.lock with workflow_id and ISO8601 timestamp
  7. Initialize workflow-state.yaml with current_state: FRAMING
  8. Save framing output: stage-1-framing.yaml

Quality Gate:

  • Problem clearly articulated
  • All 5 agent prompts generated
  • No leading/biasing language in reframed challenge

Optional Checkpoint: Present reframed challenge to user before proceeding.

  • On approve: continue to Stage 2
  • On refine: re-enter framing with user feedback
  • On abort: update state to ABORTED, release session lock, inform user

State Update: current_state: FRAMING -> DIVERGING (on gate pass)

Stage 2: Parallel Perspective Generation (5-15 minutes)

Preconditions: Stage 1 complete. 5 archetype prompts generated. Session directory exists.

Actions:

  1. Launch 5 Task tool invocations concurrently. Each Task receives:

- Archetype persona instructions (from ../perspective-swarm/references/persona-archetypes.md) - Reframed challenge text - Session directory path and output location (perspectives/{archetype}.md) - Research guidance: "Conduct 1-2 WebSearch queries to support your analysis" - Output format requirements: key insight (1-2 sentences), supporting evidence (2-3 bullets with sources), confidence level (1-5, self-assessed), blind spots acknowledged - Token target: ~2000 tokens (advisory)

  1. Maintain status board and display to user: [Stage 2/4 - DIVERGING] Parallel perspectives in progress | Agent | Status | Elapsed | |------------|-------------|---------| | Optimist | complete | 6:30 | | Critic | in_progress | 8:15 | | Analyst | complete | 7:45 | | Innovator | timeout | 10:00 | | Pragmatist | complete | 8:00 |
  2. Apply timeouts: 10 minutes per agent, 15 minutes stage total (wall-clock ceiling shared by all concurrent agents)

Quality Gate (per agent):

  • Key insight present (required)
  • At least 1 evidence point (required)
  • Confidence level 1-5 (required; clamp if out of range)
  • Blind spots acknowledged (required)

Minimum agents required: 4 of 5

On < 4 agents completing: Present user options:

PERSPECTIVE GENERATION INCOMPLETE: Only {N} of 5 agents completed

Completed: {list}
Failed: {list with reasons}

Options:
(A) Retry failed agents (estimated +5 min)
(B) Abort workflow

Note: "Proceed with N perspectives" is only offered when N >= 2. When N = 0 or N = 1, only retry or abort are available because meaningful convergence analysis requires at least 2 perspectives.

On >= 4 agents completing: Proceed automatically to Stage 3.

On 4 agents completing (1 failed/timed out): Present user options:

4 of 5 perspectives complete. 1 failed: {archetype} ({reason})

Options:
(A) Retry {archetype} (estimated +5 min)
(B) Proceed with 4 perspectives (reduced diversity)
(C) Abort workflow

State Update: Record each agent's completion status, confidence, search success in workflow-state.yaml. Then current_state: DIVERGING -> CONVERGING.

Stage 3: Convergence + Parallel Discovery (5-10 minutes)

Preconditions: Stage 2 complete. At least 4 perspective outputs available.

The orchestrator executes two parallel tracks during Stage 3:

  • Track A (primary, blocking): Convergence analysis
  • Track B (secondary, non-blocking): Workflow discovery

Track B is non-blocking with respect to Track A: convergence analysis proceeds regardless of discovery status. At the Stage 3/4 transition, if discovery has not completed, the orchestrator waits up to 30 seconds before proceeding without cached results.

Track A: Convergence Analysis (inline)
  1. Collect all perspective outputs from perspectives/*.md
  2. Extract key insights, confidence levels, evidence, and research-backed status from each
  3. Perform LLM-based semantic grouping (see ../perspective-swarm/references/convergence-algorithm.md, Step 2a for implementation details including JSON schema and fallback triggers)
  4. Apply convergence scoring algorithm (see ../perspective-swarm/references/convergence-algorithm.md, Steps 3-5)
  5. The convergence analysis identifies convergent insights (themes appearing in 2+ perspectives) with confidence weighting
  6. Divergent insights (unique to single perspectives) are attributed to their originating archetype
  7. Handle missing archetypes using the compensation table in the protocol spec
  8. Conflicts are presented neutrally -- do not force artificial consensus
  9. Generate stage-3-synthesis.md
Track B: Workflow Discovery (parallel)
  1. Run workflow discovery algorithm per ../perspective-swarm/references/workflow-discovery.md
  2. Cache results to available-workflows.yaml
  3. Self-exclusion: filter out brainstorming-pm and perspective-swarm from discovery results (prevent self-handoff)
  4. Relevance scoring is deferred to Stage 4 (requires synthesis content)

Quality Gate:

  • All available perspectives incorporated
  • At least 2 convergent insights OR explicit "portfolio of options" framing
  • At least 3 divergent insights captured
  • Conflicts presented neutrally
  • Discovery results cached (or explicitly noted as unavailable)

State Update: Record convergent_count, divergent_count, grouping_method, grouping_latency_ms, and discovery status in workflow-state.yaml. Then current_state: CONVERGING -> AWAITING_USER.

Stage 4: User Review + Handoff

Preconditions: Stage 3 complete. Synthesis document generated. Discovery results available from Stage 3 (cached in available-workflows.yaml). If Stage 3 discovery did not complete, the orchestrator runs discovery synchronously (5-second timeout) before presenting options.

Actions:

  1. Score discovered workflows for relevance against synthesis content (see ../perspective-swarm/references/workflow-discovery.md, Relevance Scoring Algorithm)
  2. The orchestrator presents synthesis to user with options:
[Stage 4/4 - OUTPUT] Synthesis Complete

[Executive summary of convergent and divergent insights]

Options:
(A) Accept - Workflow complete
(B) Refine - Provide feedback, return to Stage 3

Continue with another workflow:
(C) [research] lit-pm - Comprehensive literature review (4-24 hours)
(D) [implementation] programming-pm - Software implementation (2-8 hours)
  1. Handle user choice:

- Accept: current_state -> COMPLETED. Archive session. - Refine: current_state -> CONVERGING. Capture user feedback. Loop back to Stage 3 with feedback incorporated into synthesis. - Handoff (C/D/...): Validate target skill still available. Generate handoff-payload.yaml per ../perspective-swarm/references/handoff-schema.md. Invoke target skill with payload path. current_state -> COMPLETED on successful handoff.

State Update: Record user_decision, any refinement_feedback, and handoff_target in workflow-state.yaml.


Session Management

Session directory structure and lock protocol are defined in the perspective-swarm protocol spec (../perspective-swarm/SKILL.md, "Session Directory Structure" and "Session Lock Protocol" sections). The orchestrator follows those specifications exactly.

Atomic writes: All writes to workflow-state.yaml must use the atomic write pattern:

  1. Write complete state to a .tmp file
  2. Validate YAML syntax of the .tmp file
  3. Rename .tmp to target path (workflow-state.yaml)
  4. Retain .bak of previous version

The orchestrator reads the complete state file, updates relevant fields in memory, and writes the complete file atomically. File-level replace semantics, not field-level merge.

Session recovery: On invocation, the orchestrator checks for existing sessions in /tmp/swarm-session-*/. See the protocol spec for the recovery prompt format and options (Resume / Start fresh / Cancel).

Error Handling

WebSearch Failure

Classification and handling follow the protocol spec (see ../perspective-swarm/SKILL.md, "Error Handling" section):

  • Transient: retry after 30 seconds
  • Rate limited: exponential backoff (30s, 60s, 120s)
  • No results: proceed without search, note "limited research"
  • Service down: proceed with reasoning-only, reduce confidence by 1

Agent Timeout

  • Per-agent timeout: 10 minutes. Mark as timed out, proceed with available agents.
  • Stage 2 total timeout: 15 minutes. Hard ceiling for all agent completion.
  • If < 4 agents complete after timeout: present user options (retry/abort).

Catastrophic Failure

  • < 4 agents complete AND user chooses abort: current_state -> FAILED
  • Unrecoverable error at any stage: current_state -> FAILED, preserve session for debugging
  • Global 45-minute safety ceiling: escalate to user regardless of stage

Timeout Summary

StageTimeoutAction on Timeout
1 (Framing)5 minEscalate to user
2 (Perspectives)15 min totalProceed with available (min 4)
2 (per agent)10 minMark incomplete, proceed
3 (Synthesis)10 minDeliver partial synthesis
3 (Discovery)30 sec wait + 5 sec syncProceed without cached results
4 (User Review)No timeoutUser-controlled
Global45 minSafety ceiling, escalate

Handoffs

ConditionHand Off To
User accepts synthesis (Stage 4, option A)User (workflow complete)
User requests deeper research (Stage 4, option C+)Discovered workflow target (via handoff payload)
User aborts at any stageUser (session preserved for potential resume)

Incoming handoff: When invoked via --handoff {payload_path}, extract context.original_prompt and context.problem_type from the payload. Map optional fields (synthesis_summary, suggested_terms, uncertainties) to Stage 1 framing inputs. Proceed directly to Stage 1 with pre-populated context.

References

平台分布

Codex

33.16%
按下载量换算29

Claude

31.92%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

18.73%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.63%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills