Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

validation(validation 搜索)

validation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

validation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,547。

总安装 1,395周安装 57GitHub Stars 318下载 447核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:validation(validation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/boshu2/agentops
仓库路径:skills/validation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill validation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill validation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

validation 全链路验证阶段协调器,严格委派各专项技能执行。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中实施综合质检。默认调用 /vibe、/post-mortem 等子技能,拒绝内联分析替代。遵循委托契约,确保评审独立性避免利益冲突。

validation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/validation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill validation;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

validation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill validation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

validation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

validation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

validation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

validation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,395 次,近一周安装 57 次,下载 447 次,GitHub 318 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

validation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
validation

validation 搜索 · 本页

1,395318只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/validation — Full Validation Phase Orchestrator

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Strict Delegation Contract (default)

Validation delegates to /vibe, /post-mortem, /retro, and /forge (plus lifecycle skills /test, /deps, /review, /perf) via Skill(skill="<name>",...) calls — separate tool invocations. Strict delegation is the default.

Anti-pattern to reject: spawning judges via Agent() in place of /vibe, inlining post-mortem analysis, skipping /forge. See ../shared/references/strict-delegation-contract.md for the full contract and supported compression escapes (--quick, --no-retro, --no-forge, --no-lifecycle, --no-behavioral, --allow-critical-deps).

See .agents/learnings/2026-04-19-orchestrator-compression-anti-pattern.md for the live compression signature.

DAG — Execute This Sequentially

mkdir -p .agents/rpi
detect complexity from execution-packet or --complexity flag (default: standard)
detect ao CLI availability

Step 0: Load Prior Validation Context

Before running the validation pipeline, pull relevant learnings from prior reviews:

if command -v ao &>/dev/null; then
    ao lookup --query "<epic or goal context> validation review patterns" --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
fi

Apply retrieved knowledge (mandatory when results returned): for each returned item, check applicability; if applicable, include as a known_risk (pattern + does-code-exhibit-it check); cite by filename when it influences a finding; record via ao metrics cite "<path>" --type applied. Skip silently if ao unavailable or returns no results.

*(orchestrator-owned: this knowledge retrieval is intentionally inline CLI, not a Skill() delegation. Do NOT expand into a separate /research --validation-context call — subsequent steps delegate to vibe/post-mortem/retro/forge.)*

Run every step in order. Do not stop between steps.

Step ordering precedence (STEPS 1 → 1.5 → 1.6 → 1.7 → 1.8 → 2 → …): STEP 1 (/vibe) runs first and determines whether the pipeline continues. STEPS 1.5 (four-surface closure), 1.6 (test pyramid), 1.7 (lifecycle checks), and 1.8 (behavioral) are separate orchestrator steps that run after vibe, not inline inside vibe. /vibe owns code quality; the surface/test/lifecycle/behavioral gates are additional closure checks layered on top.
STEP 1  ──  Skill(skill="vibe", args="recent [--quick]")
              Use --quick for fast/standard. Full council for full.
              PASS/WARN? → continue
              FAIL?      → write summary, output <promise>FAIL</promise>, stop
                           (validation cannot fix code — caller decides retry)

STEP 1.5 ── Four-Surface Closure (mandatory)
              Read `skills/validation/references/four-surface-closure.md` for the mandatory four-surface closure check.
              Check all four surfaces: Code, Documentation, Examples, Proof.
              All 4 pass? → continue
              if --strict-surfaces:
                Any surface fails? → FAIL, write summary, output <promise>FAIL</promise>, stop
              else (default):
                Code passes, others fail? → WARN, continue
                Code fails? → BLOCK, write summary, output <promise>FAIL</promise>, stop

STEP 1.6 ── Test pyramid coverage audit (advisory, append to summary)
              Check L0-L3 + BF1/BF4 per modified file. WARN only, not FAIL.

STEP 1.7 ── Lifecycle Checks (advisory except critical dependency findings)
              Skip entire step if: --no-lifecycle flag.
              Each sub-step uses --quick mode to limit context consumption.
              On budget expiry: skip remaining sub-steps, write [TIME-BOXED].

              a) if lifecycle tier >= minimal AND test_framework_detected:
                   Skill(skill="test", args="coverage --quick")
                   Append coverage delta to phase summary.

              b) if lifecycle tier >= standard AND dependency_manifest_exists:
                   Skill(skill="deps", args="vuln --quick")
                   CRITICAL vulns (CVSS >= 9.0): **FAIL** (block shipping). Opt-out: `--allow-critical-deps` for acknowledged risk acceptance.
                   Non-critical: advisory note only.

              c) if lifecycle tier >= standard:
                   Skill(skill="review", args="--diff --quick")
                   Append review findings to summary as advisory.

              d) if lifecycle tier == full AND modified_files_touch_hot_path:
                   Skill(skill="perf", args="profile --quick")
                   Append perf findings to summary as advisory.
                   Hot path detection: modified files match benchmark files
                   or patterns (handler, middleware, router, parser, engine,
                   worker, pool, codec).

STEP 1.8 ── Stage 4: Behavioral Validation (holdout scenarios + agent-built specs)
            Skip if: no .agents/holdout/ AND no .agents/specs/, or --no-behavioral
            Read `references/step-1.8-behavioral-validation.md` for full sub-steps.
            Loads holdout scenarios + agent specs → evaluator council → satisfaction gate.
            Evaluates each scenario and aggregates results into `satisfaction_score`
            (verdict schema field, `skills/council/schemas/verdict.json`: number 0.0-1.0,
            "Probabilistic satisfaction score (0.0 = unsatisfied, 1.0 = fully satisfied)").
            Per-dimension scores populate `satisfaction_breakdown`. The aggregated
            `satisfaction_score` seeds downstream gates and the phase summary.
            PASS/WARN? → continue | FAIL? → <promise>FAIL</promise>, stop

STEP 2  ──  if epic_id:
              Skill(skill="post-mortem", args="<epic-id> [--quick]")
            else:
              Skill(skill="post-mortem", args="recent [--quick]")
              Use --quick for fast/standard. Full council for full.
              PASS/WARN? → continue
              FAIL?      → write summary, output <promise>FAIL</promise>, stop

STEP 3  ──  if not --no-retro:
              Skill(skill="retro")

STEP 4  ──  if not --no-forge AND ao available:
              if [ -n "${CODEX_THREAD_ID:-}" ] || [ "${CODEX_INTERNAL_ORIGINATOR_OVERRIDE:-}" = "Codex Desktop" ]; then
                ao codex stop --auto-extract 2>/dev/null || true
              else
                ao forge transcript --last-session --queue --quiet 2>/dev/null || true
              fi

STEP 5  ──  write phase summary to .agents/rpi/phase-3-summary-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md
              ao ratchet record vibe 2>/dev/null || true
              output <promise>DONE</promise>

That's it. Steps 1→2→3→4→5. No stopping between steps.


Setup Detail

Track state inline: epic_id, complexity, no_retro, no_forge, strict_surfaces, vibe_verdict, post_mortem_verdict. Load execution packet (if available): read complexity, contract_surfaces, and done_criteria from .agents/rpi/execution-packet.json. When a current run_id is known, prefer the matching .agents/rpi/runs/<run-id>/execution-packet.json archive over the latest alias.

Gate Detail

Validation has multiple blocking conditions. Validation cannot fix code — it can only report and fail closeout when the lifecycle contract is not met.

  • Blocking FAIL conditions: vibe FAIL, code-surface failure in STEP 1.5, --strict-surfaces failure on any closure surface, CVSS >= 9.0 dependency findings in STEP 1.7b unless --allow-critical-deps, and post-mortem FAIL in STEP 2.
  • PASS/WARN: Log verdicts, continue through the remaining steps.
  • FAIL: Extract findings from the latest evaluator output, write phase summary with FAIL status, output <promise>FAIL</promise> with findings attached. Suggest: "Validation FAIL. Fix findings, then re-run /validation [epic-id]".

Why no internal retry: Retries require re-implementation (/crank). The caller (/rpi or human) decides whether to loop back.

Phase Summary Format

Write to .agents/rpi/phase-3-summary-YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md:

# Phase 3 Summary: Validation

- **Epic:** <epic-id or "standalone">
- **Vibe verdict:** <PASS|WARN|FAIL>
- **Post-mortem verdict:** <verdict or "skipped">
- **Retro:** <captured|skipped>
- **Forge:** <mined|skipped>
- **Complexity:** <fast|standard|full>
- **Status:** <DONE|FAIL>
- **Timestamp:** <ISO-8601>

Phase Budgets

Sub-stepfaststandardfull
Vibe2 min3 min5 min
Post-mortem2 min3 min5 min
Retro1 min1 min2 min
Forgeskip2 min3 min

On budget expiry: allow in-flight calls to complete, write [TIME-BOXED] marker, proceed.

Flags

FlagDefaultDescription
--complexity=<level>autoForce complexity level (fast / standard / full). Matches /rpi and /discovery syntax.
--interactiveoffHuman gates in validation report review (before writing summary). Does NOT override /vibe council autonomy.
--no-lifecycleoffSkip ALL lifecycle checks in STEP 1.7 (test, deps, review, perf)
--lifecycle=<tier>matches complexityControls which lifecycle skills fire: minimal (test only), standard (+deps, +review), full (+perf)
--no-retrooffSkip retro step only
--no-forgeoffSkip forge step only
--no-budgetoffDisable phase time budgets
--strict-surfacesoffMake all 4 surface failures blocking (FAIL instead of WARN). Passed automatically by /rpi --quality.
--allow-critical-depsoffAllow shipping with CVSS >= 9.0 vulnerabilities (acknowledged risk acceptance)

Quick Start

/validation ag-5k2                        # validate epic with full close-out
/validation                               # validate recent work (no epic)
/validation --complexity=full ag-5k2      # force full council ceremony
/validation --no-retro ag-5k2             # skip retro only
/validation --no-forge ag-5k2             # skip forge only

Completion Markers

<promise>DONE</promise>    # Validation passed, learnings captured
<promise>FAIL</promise>    # Vibe failed, re-implementation needed (findings attached)

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Vibe FAIL on first runImplementation has quality issuesFix findings via /crank, then re-run /validation
Post-mortem reviewed recent work instead of an epicNo epic-id providedPass epic-id for epic-scoped closeout: /validation ag-5k2
Codex closeout missingCodex has no session-end hook surfaceLet /validation run ao codex stop, or run ao codex stop manually before leaving the session
Forge produces no outputNo ao CLI or no transcript contentInstall ao CLI or run /retro manually
Stale execution-packetPacket from a previous RPI cycleDelete .agents/rpi/execution-packet.json and pass --complexity explicitly

Reference Documents

See Also

Core phases: vibe, post-mortem, retro, forge, crank, discovery, rpi. Lifecycle Step 1.7: test, deps, review, perf.

平台分布

Codex

36.92%
按下载量换算165

Claude

31.08%
按下载量换算139

Cursor

17.37%
按下载量换算78

Gemini CLI

9.83%
按下载量换算44

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills