Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

discovery(discovery 搜索)

discovery 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

discovery 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 38,973。

总安装 1,483周安装 60GitHub Stars 318下载 466核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:discovery(discovery 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/boshu2/agentops
仓库路径:skills/discovery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill discovery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill discovery

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

discovery 全流程发现阶段协调器,严格委派 /brainstorm、/design、/research 等子技能。拒绝内联搜索或合并规划步骤,确保各环节独立验证与输出。输出标准化中间产物供后续 /plan 使用,提升整体效率与可追溯性。适用于复杂项目启动,避免遗漏关键上下文或约束条件。

discovery 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/discovery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill discovery;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

discovery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill discovery。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

discovery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

discovery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

discovery 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

discovery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,483 次,近一周安装 60 次,下载 466 次,GitHub 318 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

discovery 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
discovery

discovery 搜索 · 本页

1,483318调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/discovery — Full Discovery Phase Orchestrator

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Strict Delegation Contract (default)

Discovery delegates to /brainstorm (conditional), /design (conditional), /research, /plan, and /pre-mortem via Skill(skill="<name>",...) calls — separate tool invocations per step. Strict delegation is the default.

Anti-pattern to reject: inlining /research work (grep + read + synthesize), collapsing /plan into an inline decomposition, skipping /pre-mortem. See ../shared/references/strict-delegation-contract.md for the full contract and supported compression escapes (--quick, --skip-brainstorm, --interactive/--auto, --no-scaffold).

See .agents/learnings/2026-04-19-orchestrator-compression-anti-pattern.md for the live compression signature.

DAG — Execute This Sequentially

mkdir -p .agents/rpi
detect bd and ao CLI availability

Run every step in order. Do not stop between steps.

STEP 1  ──  if not --skip-brainstorm AND goal is vague (<50 chars or vague keywords):
              Skill(skill="brainstorm", args="<goal>")
              Use refined goal for subsequent steps if produced.

STEP 1.5 ── if PRODUCT.md exists in repo root
              AND goal appears to be a feature or capability
              (not a bug fix, chore, or docs task — i.e., goal does NOT start with
               "fix", "chore", "docs", "typo", "bump", "update dep", "lint", "format"):
                Skill(skill="design", args="<goal> [--quick]")
                FAIL verdict? → output <promise>BLOCKED</promise>, stop (design is a blocking product-alignment gate).
              Skip silently if PRODUCT.md does not exist or goal is non-feature.

STEP 2  ──  if ao available:
              ao search "<goal keywords>" 2>/dev/null || true
              ao lookup --query "<goal keywords>" --limit 5 2>/dev/null || true
              Assemble ranked packet: compiled planning rules + active findings
              + unconsumed high-severity next-work items. Carry forward as context.
              For each returned learning, check applicability to the goal. If applicable,
              cite by filename and record: ao metrics cite "<path>" --type applied 2>/dev/null || true
              (orchestrator-owned: this knowledge retrieval is intentionally inline CLI,
               not a Skill() delegation. Do NOT expand into a separate /research call.)

STEP 3  ──  Skill(skill="research", args="<goal> [--auto]")
              Pass --auto unless --interactive. Output lands in .agents/research/.
              After: identify applicable test levels (L0-L3) for downstream /plan.

STEP 4  ──  Skill(skill="plan", args="<goal> [--auto]")
              Pass --auto unless --interactive.
              After: extract epic-id, auto-detect complexity from issue count
              (1-2 → fast, 3-6 → standard, 7+ → full) unless --complexity override.

STEP 4.5 ── if --no-scaffold is NOT set (alias: --no-lifecycle, deprecated)
              AND plan output contains new project/module creation
              (keywords: scaffold, new project, bootstrap, init, create module,
               new package, new service):
                detect language from plan context or existing project files
                Skill(skill="scaffold", args="<detected-language> <project-name>")
                Scaffold output becomes input context for pre-mortem.
              Skip if: --no-scaffold flag (or deprecated --no-lifecycle), no new project/module detected in plan.

STEP 5  ──  Skill(skill="pre-mortem", args="<plan-path> [--quick]")
              Use --quick for fast/standard. Full council for full.
              PASS/WARN? → continue to STEP 6
              FAIL?      → re-plan with findings, re-run pre-mortem (max 3 total)
                           Still FAIL after 3? → output <promise>BLOCKED</promise>, stop

STEP 6  ──  Write execution-packet.json (latest alias) + per-run packet archive
              to .agents/rpi/ and .agents/rpi/runs/<run-id>/ when run_id exists.
              Include plan_path, test_levels, ranked_packet_path, epic-id, complexity.
              ao ratchet record discovery 2>/dev/null || true
              Output <promise>DONE</promise>

That's it. Steps 1→1.5→2→3→4→5→6. No stopping between steps.


Setup Detail

State:

discovery_state = {
  goal: "<goal string>",
  interactive: <true if --interactive>,
  complexity: <fast|standard|full or null for auto-detect>,
  skip_brainstorm: <true if --skip-brainstorm or goal is >50 chars and specific>,
  epic_id: null,
  attempt: 1,
  verdict: null
}

CLI dependency detection:

if command -v bd &>/dev/null; then TRACKING_MODE="beads"; else TRACKING_MODE="tasklist"; fi
if command -v ao &>/dev/null; then AO_AVAILABLE=true; else AO_AVAILABLE=false; fi

Gate Detail

Discovery has two blocking gates.

  • STEP 1.5 (design gate): FAIL blocks discovery immediately for feature/capability goals when PRODUCT.md exists.
  • STEP 5 (pre-mortem gate): Max 3 attempts with plan→pre-mortem retry loop.

- PASS/WARN: Store verdict, apply any required pre-mortem hardening back into the plan issues or file-backed task specs, then proceed to STEP 6. - FAIL: Log "Pre-mortem: FAIL (attempt N/3) -- retrying plan with feedback". Re-invoke /plan with findings context, then re-invoke /pre-mortem. After 3 total failures: output <promise>BLOCKED</promise>, stop.

Step Detail

STEP 1 (brainstorm): Skip if --skip-brainstorm, or goal >50 chars with no vague keywords (improve, better, something, somehow, maybe), or brainstorm artifact already exists in .agents/brainstorm/.

STEP 1.5 (design gate): Optional. Runs /design when PRODUCT.md exists at repo root and the goal is a feature or capability (not a bug fix, chore, or docs task). Design verdict FAIL blocks discovery; PASS or WARN continues. Skipped silently when PRODUCT.md is absent.

STEP 2 (search history): Ranked packet assembly — match compiled planning rules, active findings from .agents/findings/*.md, and unconsumed high-severity items from .agents/rpi/next-work.jsonl. Rank by goal-text overlap → issue-type overlap → file-path overlap.

STEP 3.1 (test levels): After research, determine L0-L3 applicability. External APIs/I/O → L0+L1+L2 min. Cross-module → add L2. Full subsystem → add L3. Record in discovery_state.test_levels.

STEP 4 (plan): After plan, record the exact plan_path for STEP 5. If tracker probes are healthy, extract epic-id via bd list --type epic --status open. If tracker probes are degraded, keep the objective + plan_path in .agents/rpi/execution-packet.json and continue in tasklist mode without inventing an epic.

STEP 5 (pre-mortem): Pass the recorded plan_path into /pre-mortem. Do not rely on “most recent” plan/spec selection during discovery retries.

STEP 5.5 (pre-mortem fix propagation): Before STEP 6, copy any required pseudocode fixes from the pre-mortem report into the affected plan issues or file-backed task specs. Workers read issue/task bodies, not the pre-mortem report.

STEP 6 (output): Write execution packet and phase summary per references/output-templates.md. Keep .agents/rpi/execution-packet.json as the latest alias and archive the same packet to .agents/rpi/runs/<run-id>/execution-packet.json when run_id exists. Include plan_path, test_levels, and ranked_packet_path in the execution packet for /crank and standalone /validation consumption.

Flags

FlagDefaultDescription
--autoonFully autonomous (no human gates). Inverse of --interactive. Passed through to /research and /plan.
--interactiveoffHuman gates in research and plan (STEP 3, STEP 4). Does NOT affect pre-mortem gate.
--skip-brainstormautoSkip STEP 1 brainstorm when goal is already specific
--complexity=<level>autoForce complexity level (fast / standard / full)
--no-budgetoffDisable phase time budgets
--no-scaffoldoffSkip scaffold auto-invocation in STEP 4.5 (canonical name)
--no-lifecycleoffDEPRECATED ALIAS for --no-scaffold. Honored through v2.40.0 for transition. When both flags are passed, they are equivalent.
Deprecation note: When Claude encounters --no-lifecycle on /discovery, treat it as --no-scaffold and mention the deprecation inline in the phase summary (e.g., "used deprecated --no-lifecycle, prefer --no-scaffold"). This surfaces guidance in the RPI output without a runtime parser.

Quick Start

/discovery "add user authentication"              # full discovery
/discovery --interactive "refactor payment module" # human gates in research + plan
/discovery --skip-brainstorm "fix login bug"       # skip brainstorm for specific goals
/discovery --complexity=full "migrate to v2 API"   # force full council ceremony

Completion Markers

<promise>DONE</promise>      # Discovery complete, epic-id + execution-packet ready
<promise>BLOCKED</promise>   # Pre-mortem failed 3x, manual intervention needed

Troubleshooting

Read references/troubleshooting.md for common problems and solutions.

Reference Documents

See also: brainstorm, design, research, plan, pre-mortem, crank, rpi, scaffold

平台分布

Codex

37.72%
按下载量换算176

Claude

31.64%
按下载量换算147

Cursor

17.16%
按下载量换算80

Gemini CLI

9.73%
按下载量换算45

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills