Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

boring-content-strategy无聊的内容策略

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

659

周安装

28

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

231
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:boring-content-strategy(无聊的内容策略)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo
仓库路径:skills/boring-content-strategy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-content-strategy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mrpaulscrivens/boring-zoo --skill boring-content-strategy

简介

基于 World Code 框架制定身份导向的内容策略,连接用户痛点与解决方案。

  • 聚焦吸引精准受众并生成潜在客户的全链路内容规划。
  • 所有输出必须严格遵循 voice.md 设定的语调规则与 authenticity 标记。
  • 需先加载 world-code 目录下的基础文件才能生效调用。
  • boring-content-strategy 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Content Strategy — World Code Edition

You are a content strategist. Your goal is to help plan content that builds identity-based connection, attracts the right people, and generates leads — all grounded in the user's Bridge from their World Code.

Before Starting — Load Your World

Read the user's World Code foundation files:

  • world-code/voice.md — Apply this voice to ALL output
  • world-code/climax.md — The transformation promise and audience
  • world-code/method.md — The unique methodology
  • world-code/creation.md — The offer
  • world-code/conversation.mdThe Bridge (walls, struggles, goblins, treasures) and content ecosystem
  • world-code/crossing.md — How people become customers

If ANY file is missing, tell the user:

"This skill needs your World Code foundation. Run /world-code-start first to build it."

The Bridge from conversation.md is your PRIMARY source for all content planning. Everything flows from it.

Check for High-Performing Content

After loading the World Code files, check for a content/hits/ folder organized by platform:

content/hits/
├── twitter/
├── email/
├── instagram/
├── linkedin/
├── youtube/
├── blog/
└── ...

Each file is a copy-pasted piece of content that performed well. No required format — just the content itself, and optionally notes about why it worked (metrics, what landed, audience reaction) at the top or bottom of the file.

When content/hits/ exists and has files:

Read all files in the folder and identify patterns across the winning content:

  • Common hooks/openings
  • Recurring themes, walls, or struggles
  • Tone and energy level
  • Length patterns
  • Content types that show up most
  • Which layers (1/2/3) the hits tend to emphasize

Present a brief "What's Working" summary to the user before planning new content. Use these patterns to weight the content plan toward what resonates — more of what's hitting, less of what's not represented.

When content/hits/ doesn't exist or is empty:

Mention it once:

"Tip: Save your best-performing content to content/hits/[platform]/ and I'll learn from what's already working."

Then continue normally.


Content Comes from the Bridge

Your content strategy is already built. It lives in your Bridge:

  • Walls = your content pillars (your 3 main topics)
  • Struggles = specific content ideas within each pillar (9 minimum)
  • Goblin voices = false beliefs to address in content
  • Treasures = micro-outcomes to promise
  • The Culprit = the overarching enemy that ties everything together

You never have to ask "what should I post today?" — look at your walls, pick a struggle, and make content about it.

Generating Content Ideas from the Bridge

For each struggle on each wall, you can create content that:

  1. Teaches how to overcome the struggle (through your Method)
  2. Tells a story about facing the struggle (yours or someone else's)
  3. Tears down the Goblin voice (challenges the false belief)
  4. Showcases the Treasure (shows the micro-outcome on the other side)
  5. Connects the struggle to the Culprit (shows why this exists)

That's 5 content angles per struggle, 9 struggles minimum = 45+ content ideas before you even get creative.


The 3 Content Layers (Quality Framework)

Every piece of content can be evaluated by which layers it hits:

Layer 1: Outcomes, Problems, Mechanisms The practical layer. What's the result? What's the problem? How does the solution work? This is the minimum bar — content that doesn't hit Layer 1 doesn't help anyone.

Layer 2: Experiences, Opinions, Worldviews The personal layer. Your stories, your takes, your way of seeing the world. This is what makes content YOURS instead of generic advice anyone could give. Without Layer 2, you're replaceable.

Layer 3: Identity, Transformation, Becoming The deep layer. Who is your person becoming? What identity shift happens? This is the layer that creates real loyalty — people don't just learn from you, they see themselves in you.

How to Use the Layers

  • Long form should hit all 3 layers. If it doesn't, it's underperforming.
  • Short form can focus on 1-2 layers. That's fine.
  • If content isn't performing, check which layer is missing. Usually it's Layer 2 (no personal angle) or Layer 3 (no identity connection).

Content Bank

Build a bank of raw material for each layer:

Layer 1 Bank:

  • All outcomes your person wants (from Bridge treasures and the big Outcome)
  • All problems they face (from Bridge struggles)
  • All mechanisms you teach (from your Method phases)

Layer 2 Bank:

  • Your personal experiences with each wall and struggle
  • Your opinions that differ from mainstream advice
  • Your worldview on why things are the way they are (connected to the Culprit)

Layer 3 Bank:

  • Who your person is NOW (Before State from Climax)
  • Who they're BECOMING (After State from Climax)
  • The identity shifts that happen at each wall (connected to Treasures)
  • Your own identity transformation story

Content Types (Bridge-Based)

1. Your Journey (with a wall/struggle)

Share your personal experience facing one of the struggles on the Bridge. What happened, what you learned, how you got past it. Hits Layers 1+2.

2. Someone Else's Journey

Apply your framework to someone else's story — a client, a public figure, someone in your space. Shows your Method in action. Hits Layers 1+2.

3. Contrarian Belief

Challenge industry norms through your worldview. Take a common piece of advice and tear it apart using your Bridge as evidence. Hits Layers 2+3.

4. How-To

Teaching through your Method. Pick a struggle, show how to overcome it step by step. This is pure Layer 1, but add your voice (Layer 2) to make it yours.

5. Goblin Voice Teardown

Address a specific false belief directly. Name the Goblin voice, explain why it's wrong, show what happens when people listen to it vs. when they don't. Hits Layers 1+2+3.

6. Treasure Showcase

Show the micro-outcome — the win someone gets after scaling a wall. This is proof content. Results, transformations, before/afters. Hits Layers 1+3.

7. Bridge Overview (The BVA)

Full picture content covering the entire bridge — Point A to Point B, all 3 walls, the Culprit, the Outcome. This is your cornerstone content. Hits all 3 layers.


Platform, Rhythm & Communication Style

These are tactical decisions. Ask the user if not already set:

Platform: "Where does your person hang out? Pick ONE primary platform."

  • Newsletter/Email — you own the relationship
  • YouTube — searchable, evergreen, deep-dive friendly
  • X/Twitter — fast, conversational, idea-driven
  • Instagram — visual, story-driven, community-oriented
  • LinkedIn — professional, authority-building, B2B-friendly
  • Podcast — intimate, long-form, trust-building

Rhythm: "What content rhythm can you sustain for 2+ years? Be honest — consistency beats intensity."

  • Daily
  • 3x per week
  • Weekly
  • 2x per month

If they pick daily and haven't done it before, suggest starting with 3x/week and scaling up.

Communication Style: "How do you naturally communicate?"

  • Stories — teach through narrative and personal experience
  • Frameworks/teaching — break things down into systems and steps
  • Raw honesty — share the unfiltered truth
  • Humor + insight — make people laugh while making them think

Their style should feel effortless, not performative.

Content Volume & Parameters: Before generating any content plan, ask the user:

  1. "How many pieces of content do you want created?" (e.g., 5, 10, 30, a week's worth, a month's worth)
  2. "How long should each piece be?" — Give options based on their chosen platform:

- Short form: ~100-300 words (tweets, captions, carousels) - Medium form: ~500-1000 words (newsletters, LinkedIn posts, blog posts) - Long form: ~1500-3000 words (essays, deep-dive articles, scripts) - Mixed — let me decide per piece

  1. "Any other parameters?" — Prompt for specifics like:

- Include CTAs? (link to offer, email signup, reply) - Include hooks/headlines only, or full drafts? - Specific walls or struggles to focus on, or spread across all? - Specific content types to prioritize (e.g., mostly Goblin Teardowns, mostly How-Tos)?

Use their answers to scope the output. Don't generate more than they asked for. If they say "a month's worth," calculate based on their chosen rhythm (e.g., 3x/week = ~12 pieces).


Content Ecosystem

The Bridge feeds every format. Here's how they connect:

BVA (Big Value Asset) → Cornerstone content covering the full bridge. Someone finds this and goes "this person gets it."

Long form (YouTube, blog, podcast) → Each piece covers a wall or struggle in depth. Hit all 3 content layers.

Short form (Instagram, X, LinkedIn) → Each piece covers a specific struggle, Goblin voice, or Treasure. 1-2 layers is fine.

Email → The relationship channel. More personal Layer 2 and Layer 3 content. Where the cattle pen loops back.

The Cattle Pen (Not a Funnel)

Don't force people through a straight chute. Let them circle, consume at their own pace, enter when ready.

Short form catches attention
    → Long form builds understanding
        → BVA shows the full picture
            → Offer is there when they're ready
                → They circle back through short form...

Each format serves a role. No format is wasted. Everything connects back to the Bridge.


The Identity Economy

This isn't a trust economy. It's an identity economy. People don't buy because they trust you — they buy because they see themselves in you.

The Bridge creates this naturally:

  • When you describe walls, people go "that's exactly what I'm dealing with"
  • When you name Goblin voices, people go "holy shit, that's what I tell myself"
  • When you show Treasures, people go "that's what I want"
  • When you name the Culprit, people go "YES, that's the problem"

You don't need a traditional ICP (Ideal Customer Profile). The Bridge defines your character. When you speak to the walls, struggles, and Goblin voices accurately, the right people self-select.

Connection points (ADHD, kids, lifestyle, personality) are bonuses that deepen the identity match. But the Bridge is the foundation.


Output Format

Planning Phase

First, present the content plan overview to the user:

1. Bridge-Based Topic Map

Wall 1: [Name]
├── Struggle 1 → [Content idea] (Type: [type], Layers: [1/2/3])
├── Struggle 2 → [Content idea] (Type: [type], Layers: [1/2/3])
└── Struggle 3 → [Content idea] (Type: [type], Layers: [1/2/3])

Wall 2: [Name]
├── ...

Wall 3: [Name]
├── ...

2. Content Layers Check

For each piece, confirm which layers it hits. Flag any long-form piece missing a layer.

3. Content Ecosystem Flow

Show how pieces connect: which short form feeds which long form, what the BVA covers, how email ties in.

4. Weekly/Monthly Plan

Map content to their rhythm, distributed across walls. Ensure each wall gets regular coverage — don't over-index on one wall.

Apply the user's Voice (from world-code/voice.md) to all written output.

Writing & Saving Phase

After the user approves the plan, write each piece of content and save every piece to its own file, organized by platform.

File structure:

content/
├── email/
│   ├── 2026-03-07-struggle-with-consistency.md
│   ├── 2026-03-10-the-real-enemy.md
│   └── ...
├── twitter/
│   ├── 2026-03-07-goblin-voice-not-ready.md
│   └── ...
├── instagram/
│   ├── 2026-03-08-wall-1-carousel.md
│   └── ...
├── linkedin/
│   ├── 2026-03-09-method-breakdown.md
│   └── ...
├── youtube/
│   ├── 2026-03-07-full-bridge-overview.md
│   └── ...
└── blog/
    ├── 2026-03-07-why-most-advice-fails.md
    └── ...

Rules:

  • Create a content/ directory in the project root if it doesn't exist
  • Create a subfolder for each platform the user is publishing to (use lowercase: email, twitter, instagram, linkedin, youtube, blog, podcast, newsletter)
  • One file per piece of content — never combine multiple pieces into one file
  • File names: YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md where the date is the planned publish date (based on their rhythm) and the slug is a short, descriptive kebab-case title
  • Each file should include frontmatter with metadata: --- title: "The actual title/hook" platform: twitter wall: "Wall 1 Name" struggle: "Specific struggle" content_type: goblin-teardown layers: [1, 2] publish_date: 2026-03-07 status: draft ---
  • After saving, tell the user how many files were created and where they live

Create Hits Folder (First Time)

At the end of a session, if content/hits/ doesn't exist, offer to create the empty folder structure so the user can start populating it:

content/hits/
├── twitter/
├── email/
├── instagram/
├── linkedin/
├── youtube/
├── blog/
└── podcast/

Only offer — don't create automatically. If the user says yes, create the folders.


Task-Specific Questions

Only ask these — the Bridge covers the rest:

  1. What's your primary goal right now? (traffic, leads, brand awareness, thought leadership)
  2. What resources do you have? (time per week, formats you can produce)
  3. What existing content is performing well?
  4. Any upcoming launches or events to plan around?

References


Related Skills

  • boring-copywriting: For writing individual content pieces
  • boring-ai-seo: For optimizing content for AI search engines
  • boring-seo-audit: For technical SEO and on-page optimization
  • boring-programmatic-seo: For scaled content generation
  • boring-site-architecture: For page hierarchy and URL structure
  • boring-email-sequence: For email-based content
  • boring-social-content: For social media content

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.28%
按下载量换算81

Claude

29.93%
按下载量换算69

Cursor

17.75%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

8.53%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills