Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

qms-audit-expert(质量管理体系审核专家)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

qms-audit-expert 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 35,529。

总安装 2,070周安装 88GitHub Stars 103下载 725核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qms-audit-expert(质量管理体系审核专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/qms-audit-expert
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

qms-audit-expert 提供 ISO 13485 内部审核方法论,覆盖审计计划、执行与非符合项管理。支持风险分级、外部审计准备与文档控制流程设计,确保 QMS 合规运行。输出审计检查表与整改跟踪机制,提升质量管理体系有效性。结果仅供内部审计使用,不能替代第三方认证机构评估。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/qms-audit-expert

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

qms-audit-expert 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qms-audit-expert 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qms-audit-expert 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

qms-audit-expert 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

qms-audit-expert 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,070 次,近一周安装 88 次,下载 725 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qms-audit-expert 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
qms-audit-expert

质量管理体系审核专家 · 本页

2,070103只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

QMS Audit Expert

ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.


Table of Contents


Audit Planning Workflow

Plan risk-based internal audit program:

  1. List all QMS processes requiring audit
  2. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
  3. Review previous audit findings and trends
  4. Determine audit frequency by risk level
  5. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
  6. Create annual audit schedule
  7. Communicate schedule to process owners
  8. Validation: All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle

Risk-Based Audit Frequency

Risk LevelFrequencyCriteria
HighQuarterlyDesign control, CAPA, production validation
MediumSemi-annualPurchasing, training, document control
LowAnnualInfrastructure, management review (if stable)

Audit Scope by Clause

ClauseProcessFocus Areas
4.2Document ControlDocument approval, distribution, obsolete control
5.6Management ReviewInputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked
6.2TrainingCompetency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified
7.3Design ControlInputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes
7.4PurchasingSupplier evaluation, incoming inspection
7.5ProductionWork instructions, process validation, DHR
7.6CalibrationEquipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance
8.2.2Internal AuditSchedule compliance, auditor independence
8.3NC ProductIdentification, segregation, disposition
8.5CAPARoot cause, implementation, effectiveness

Auditor Independence

Verify auditor independence before assignment:

  • Auditor not responsible for area being audited
  • No direct reporting relationship to auditee
  • Not involved in recent activities under audit
  • Documented qualification for audit scope

Audit Execution

Conduct systematic internal audit:

  1. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
  2. Review relevant documentation before audit
  3. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
  4. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
  5. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
  6. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
  7. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
  8. Validation: All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence

Evidence Collection

MethodUse ForDocumentation
Document reviewProcedures, recordsDocument number, version, date
InterviewProcess understandingInterviewee name, role, summary
ObservationActual practiceWhat, where, when observed
Record traceProcess flowRecord IDs, dates, linkage

Audit Questions by Clause

Document Control (4.2):

  • Show me the document master list
  • How do you control obsolete documents?
  • Show me evidence of document change approval

Design Control (7.3):

  • Show me the Design History File for [product]
  • Who participates in design reviews?
  • Show me design input to output traceability

CAPA (8.5):

  • Show me the CAPA log with open items
  • How do you determine root cause?
  • Show me effectiveness verification records

See references/iso13485-audit-guide.md for complete question sets.

Finding Documentation

Document each finding with:

Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]

Example:

Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
at specified intervals.

Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
12 months. Today is 2025-03-20.

Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
representing a gap in calibration program execution.

Nonconformity Management

Classify and manage audit findings:

  1. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
  2. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
  3. Document finding with objective evidence
  4. Communicate to process owner
  5. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
  6. Track to closure
  7. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
  8. Validation: Finding closed only after effective CAPA

Classification Criteria

CategoryDefinitionCAPA RequiredTimeline
MajorSystematic failure or absence of elementYes30 days
MinorIsolated lapse or partial implementationRecommended60 days
ObservationImprovement opportunityOptionalAs appropriate

Classification Decision

Is required element absent or failed?
├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
│   └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
│       └── No → MINOR
└── No → Deviation from procedure?
    ├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
    │   └── No → MINOR
    └── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION

CAPA Integration

Finding SeverityCAPA DepthVerification
MajorFull root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone)Next audit or within 6 months
MinorImmediate cause identificationNext scheduled audit
ObservationNot requiredNoted at next audit

See references/nonconformity-classification.md for detailed guidance.


External Audit Preparation

Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:

  1. Complete all scheduled internal audits
  2. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
  3. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
  4. Conduct management review with audit as input
  5. Prepare facility and personnel
  6. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
  7. Brief personnel on audit protocol
  8. Validation: Mock audit findings addressed before external audit

Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist

Documentation:

  • Quality Manual current
  • Procedures reflect actual practice
  • Records complete and retrievable
  • Previous audit findings closed

Personnel:

  • Key personnel available during audit
  • Subject matter experts identified
  • Personnel briefed on audit protocol
  • Escorts assigned

Facility:

  • Work areas organized
  • Documents at point of use current
  • Equipment calibration status visible
  • Nonconforming product segregated

Mock Audit Protocol

  1. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
  2. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
  3. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
  4. Document findings as for real audit
  5. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
  6. Brief management on readiness status

Reference Documentation

ISO 13485 Audit Guide

references/iso13485-audit-guide.md contains:

  • Clause-by-clause audit methodology
  • Sample audit questions for each clause
  • Evidence collection requirements
  • Common nonconformities by clause
  • Finding severity classification

Nonconformity Classification

references/nonconformity-classification.md contains:

  • Severity classification criteria and decision tree
  • Impact vs. occurrence matrix
  • CAPA integration requirements
  • Finding documentation templates
  • Closure requirements by severity

Tools

Audit Schedule Optimizer

# Generate optimized audit schedule
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json

# Interactive mode
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json

Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:

  • Process risk level
  • Previous findings
  • Days since last audit
  • Criticality scores

Output includes:

  • Prioritized audit schedule
  • Quarterly distribution
  • Overdue audit alerts
  • Resource recommendations

Sample Process Input

{
  "processes": [
    {
      "name": "Design Control",
      "iso_clause": "7.3",
      "risk_level": "HIGH",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
      "previous_findings": 2
    },
    {
      "name": "Document Control",
      "iso_clause": "4.2",
      "risk_level": "MEDIUM",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
      "previous_findings": 0
    }
  ]
}

Audit Program Metrics

Track audit program effectiveness:

MetricTargetMeasurement
Schedule compliance>90%Audits completed on time
Finding closure rate>95%Findings closed by due date
Repeat findings<10%Same finding in consecutive audits
CAPA effectiveness>90%Verified effective at follow-up
Auditor utilization4 days/monthAudit days per qualified auditor

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Schedule optimizer produces no audits for a processlast_audit_date is recent and risk level is LowLow-risk processes are scheduled annually. If the last audit was within 365 days, no new audit is generated. Increase risk_level or criticality_score to trigger earlier scheduling.
Optimizer flags all processes as overdueDate format in processes.json is incorrectUse ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD) for last_audit_date. Invalid dates cause the tool to treat the last audit as missing.
Interactive mode does not accept inputTerminal does not support stdin promptsUse file-based input with --processes processes.json instead of --interactive.
Audit schedule does not cover all ISO 13485 clausesInput process list is incompleteThe optimizer schedules only the processes provided. Ensure all required clauses (4.2, 5.6, 6.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 8.2.2, 8.3, 8.5) are represented in the input.
Finding classified as Minor but should be MajorClassification was applied inconsistentlyApply the decision tree: systematic failure or absent element = Major; isolated lapse = Minor. Consider whether the finding could affect product safety (auto-escalate to Major).
External auditor raises finding already closed internallyCAPA effectiveness verification not completed before external auditEnsure all internal audit findings have completed CAPA with documented effectiveness verification before the external audit date. Close the loop, do not just complete the action.
Audit report rejected by process ownerFindings not supported by objective evidenceEvery finding must reference specific evidence (document number, record ID, observation details). Rework findings using the Requirement-Evidence-Gap format documented in this skill.

Success Criteria

  • Annual audit schedule covers 100% of ISO 13485 clauses with risk-based frequency (quarterly for high-risk, semi-annual for medium, annual for low)
  • Schedule compliance rate exceeds 90% (audits completed on time vs. planned)
  • All Major findings result in full root cause analysis CAPA initiated within 30 days and verified effective within 6 months
  • Finding closure rate exceeds 95% by due date, with no overdue Major findings at any point
  • Repeat finding rate below 10% across consecutive audit cycles, demonstrating effective corrective actions
  • Auditor independence verified and documented for every audit assignment (no self-auditing of own work area)
  • Mock audit conducted before every external certification or surveillance audit with all Major and Minor findings resolved

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • ISO 13485:2016 internal audit planning, scheduling, and execution
  • Risk-based audit frequency optimization
  • Nonconformity classification (Major/Minor/Observation) with decision tree
  • CAPA integration for audit findings
  • External audit preparation and mock audit protocols
  • Audit program metrics and effectiveness tracking

Out of Scope:

  • External audit execution (this skill supports preparation for and response to external audits, not conducting them)
  • Regulatory inspection management (FDA, Notified Body inspections have jurisdiction-specific protocols beyond internal audit scope)
  • Detailed CAPA root cause analysis methodology (use capa-officer skill for 5-Why, Fishbone, FTA, FMEA)
  • ISO 19011 auditor certification or training program administration
  • Technical product testing or process validation
  • QMSR-specific audit checklist generation (use quality-manager-qms-iso13485 for QMSR gap analysis)

Integration Points

SkillIntegration
quality-manager-qms-iso13485Provides the QMS process framework that the audit program evaluates; audit results feed into management review inputs
capa-officerMajor and Minor audit findings trigger CAPA initiation; CAPA effectiveness verification closes the audit finding loop
quality-documentation-managerDocument control audit coverage (Clause 4.2) validates document numbering, approval workflows, and Part 11 compliance
quality-manager-qmrAudit program results are a required management review input (Clause 5.6.2); QMR oversees audit program effectiveness
risk-management-specialistRisk management process audit (Clause 7.1) verifies ISO 14971 implementation and risk file completeness

Tool Reference

audit_schedule_optimizer.py

Generates risk-based audit schedules optimized by process risk, findings history, and time since last audit.

FlagRequiredDescription
--processesYes (or --interactive)Path to JSON file containing process definitions with name, iso_clause, risk_level (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), last_audit_date, previous_findings, and criticality_score
--interactiveNoLaunch interactive mode for guided process entry (alternative to file input)
--outputNoOutput format: json for structured output, omit for human-readable text

平台分布

Codex

37.75%
按下载量换算274

Claude

30.05%
按下载量换算218

Cursor

20.09%
按下载量换算146

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算70

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills