Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

nda-triage(NDA 分类)

nda-triage 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

nda-triage 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,252。

总安装 419周安装 18GitHub Stars 103下载 147核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nda-triage(NDA 分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/nda-triage
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

nda-triage 对保密协议进行快速分类筛查,标记为绿色(标准通过)、黄色(法务复核)或红色(重大风险)。基于十项检查清单评估协议结构、定义条款、义务范围和争议性条款。适用于法律团队初筛 NDA,但不构成正式法律意见,需结合专业律师判断。实验性质较强,建议仅作参考用途,重要决策应咨询合格法律顾问。

nda-triage 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/nda-triage

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

nda-triage 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill nda-triage。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

nda-triage 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

nda-triage 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

nda-triage 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

nda-triage 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 419 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 147 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

nda-triage 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
nda-triage

NDA 分类 · 本页

419103需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.

NDA Triage

Rapid NDA screening tool that classifies incoming NDAs as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (significant issues). Uses a 10-point screening checklist to evaluate agreement structure, definitions, obligations, carveouts, and problematic provisions.


Table of Contents

- NDA Screener - NDA Checklist

- Standard NDA Triage - Bulk NDA Processing


Tools

NDA Screener

Scans NDA text for red flags and outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with reasoning.

# Screen an NDA file
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/nda_screener.py incoming_nda.md --json

# Save screening results
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt --output screening.json --json

What it detects:

  • Missing standard carveouts (public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion)
  • Non-solicitation and non-compete clauses
  • Perpetual confidentiality obligations
  • Overbroad definition of confidential information
  • Residuals clauses granting usage rights to ideas/concepts
  • IP assignment or license grants
  • Liquidated damages provisions
  • Unlimited audit rights
  • One-sided obligations

Classification Rules:

LevelCriteriaRouting
GREENAll 5 carveouts present, no problematic provisions, standard structureBusiness approver; no counsel needed
YELLOW1-2 missing carveouts, minor problematic provisions, or non-standard termsLegal counsel review within 48 hours
RED3+ missing carveouts, non-compete/non-solicitation, IP assignment, perpetual term with no exitSenior counsel review; do not sign

NDA Checklist

Generates a compliance checklist for an NDA, checking all 10 screening criteria with pass/fail status.

# Generate checklist for an NDA
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt

# JSON output
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --json

# Save checklist
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --output checklist.json --json

10-Point Screening Criteria:

#CriterionWhat It Checks
1Agreement StructureMutual vs. one-way; parties identified; purpose stated
2Definition of Confidential InfoScope, specificity, marking requirements
3ObligationsStandard of care, use restrictions, disclosure limits
4Standard Carveouts5 required: public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion
5Permitted DisclosuresRepresentatives, advisors, affiliates with need-to-know
6Term & DurationReasonable term, survival period, obligations after expiry
7Return/DestructionObligation to return or destroy upon request/termination
8RemediesInjunctive relief, damages, indemnification scope
9Problematic ProvisionsNon-solicitation, non-compete, exclusivity, residuals, IP assignment, audit rights
10Governing LawJurisdiction, dispute resolution mechanism

Reference Guides

NDA Screening Criteria

references/nda_screening_criteria.md

Complete evaluation reference covering:

  • All 10 screening criteria with detailed sub-items
  • GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification rules with specific examples
  • Common NDA issues with standard positions
  • Redline approaches for common problems

Workflows

Standard NDA Triage

  1. Receive NDA -- Save as .txt or .md file
  2. Screen -- Run nda_screener.py for quick RED/YELLOW/GREEN classification
  3. Checklist -- Run nda_checklist.py for detailed 10-point evaluation
  4. Route -- Follow routing recommendations based on classification
  5. Track -- Log screening result and routing decision

Bulk NDA Processing

# Screen multiple NDAs
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
  echo "=== $nda ==="
  python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda"
  echo ""
done

# Generate JSON report for all NDAs
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
  python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda" --json --output "results/$(basename $nda .txt).json"
done

Routing Recommendations

ClassificationApproverTimelineEscalation
GREENBusiness owner or designated approverSame day; sign within 24 hoursNone required
YELLOWLegal counsel review48-hour turnaroundEscalate to senior counsel if no response in 72 hours
REDSenior legal counsel5 business day turnaroundEscalate to General Counsel if deal-critical

GREEN Fast-Track Conditions

All of the following must be true for GREEN classification:

  • Mutual NDA (both parties bound)
  • All 5 standard carveouts present
  • No non-solicitation, non-compete, or exclusivity clauses
  • No IP assignment or license grants
  • No residuals clause
  • Term is 2-5 years (not perpetual)
  • Return/destruction obligation present
  • Standard remedies (injunctive relief, no liquidated damages)

RED Escalation Triggers

Any one of the following triggers RED classification:

  • Non-compete clause of any scope
  • Non-solicitation clause covering employees or customers
  • IP assignment or broad license grant
  • Missing 3 or more standard carveouts
  • Perpetual obligations with no termination right
  • Liquidated damages for breach
  • Exclusivity provision

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Screener classifies everything as YELLOWNDA uses non-standard formatting that breaks pattern matchingEnsure NDA is clean plain text; remove PDF artifacts and headers/footers
Missing carveouts false positiveCarveouts are present but use unusual languageReview the full "Exceptions" or "Exclusions" section manually; the screener checks common phrasings
Non-compete not detectedNon-compete is embedded in definitions or obligations section rather than standaloneSearch the full document for "compete", "competitive", "restrict" manually
Checklist shows PASS but screener shows REDChecklist evaluates presence; screener evaluates content qualityUse both tools together; the screener's RED overrides checklist PASS
Script errors on large filesNDA text exceeds expected size (>100KB)Ensure the file contains only the NDA text, not appendices or exhibits

Success Criteria

  • NDA triage under 5 minutes: Automated screening replaces 30-minute manual review.
  • Zero missed RED-severity issues: Every non-compete, IP assignment, and missing carveout is flagged.
  • GREEN NDAs signed within 24 hours: Fast-track routing eliminates bottleneck for standard agreements.
  • YELLOW NDAs resolved within 48 hours: Counsel review turnaround meets SLA.
  • Consistent classification across reviewers: 10-point checklist eliminates subjective "looks fine" approvals.
  • 100% of NDAs screened before routing: No NDA reaches an approver without automated triage.

Scope & Limitations

Covers:

  • Pattern-based screening of NDA text for structural issues and problematic provisions
  • 10-point compliance checklist against standard NDA requirements
  • GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with routing recommendations
  • Detection of non-solicitation, non-compete, IP assignment, residuals, and other problematic clauses
  • Missing carveout identification

Does NOT cover:

  • Legal advice -- classification is a screening aid, not a legal opinion
  • Negotiation or redlining -- use nda-review for deep clause analysis and redline generation
  • Multi-party NDAs -- optimized for bilateral (two-party) agreements
  • Industry-specific NDA requirements (healthcare, defense, government) -- patterns target commercial NDAs
  • Non-English NDAs -- pattern matching is English-language only

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsBetter Approach
Signing GREEN-classified NDAs without any human reviewAutomated screening cannot catch business-context risks (e.g., NDA with a direct competitor)GREEN classification means low legal risk, not zero risk; business approver must still review
Using triage as a substitute for deep NDA review on complex dealsTriage checks structure and red flags, not clause quality or negotiation positionRun nda-review skill for M&A, joint venture, or high-value partnership NDAs
Ignoring YELLOW classifications because "it's just an NDA"YELLOW items like missing carveouts or residuals clauses create real legal exposureRoute all YELLOW NDAs to counsel; missing independent development carveout alone can cost millions
Treating all NDAs as equal regardless of counterparty relationshipNDA with a startup partner requires different scrutiny than NDA with a Fortune 500 vendorAdjust review depth based on counterparty, deal value, and information sensitivity

Tool Reference

nda_screener.py

Purpose: Scans NDA text for red flags and problematic provisions. Outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with detailed reasoning.

Usage:

python scripts/nda_screener.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]

Flags:

FlagShortDefaultDescription
nda_file*(positional)*Path to NDA text file (.txt or.md)
--jsonoffOutput in JSON format
--output-o*(stdout)*Write output to file

Example Output (JSON):

{
  "file": "vendor_nda.txt",
  "classification": "YELLOW",
  "red_flags": [
    {
      "id": "missing_carveout_independent_development",
      "severity": "YELLOW",
      "description": "Missing independent development carveout",
      "recommendation": "Add standard independent development exception"
    }
  ],
  "carveouts": {
    "public_knowledge": true,
    "prior_possession": true,
    "independent_development": false,
    "third_party_receipt": true,
    "legal_compulsion": true
  },
  "summary": "1 missing carveout; no critical issues. Route to counsel for review."
}

nda_checklist.py

Purpose: Generates a 10-point compliance checklist for an NDA, evaluating each screening criterion as PASS/FAIL with notes.

Usage:

python scripts/nda_checklist.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]

Flags:

FlagShortDefaultDescription
nda_file*(positional)*Path to NDA text file (.txt or.md)
--jsonoffOutput in JSON format
--output-o*(stdout)*Write output to file

Example Output:

NDA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
========================
File: vendor_nda.txt
Overall: YELLOW (8/10 PASS)

 #  Criterion                    Status  Notes
 1  Agreement Structure          PASS    Mutual NDA; both parties identified
 2  Definition of Confidential   PASS    Reasonably scoped with marking requirement
 3  Obligations                  PASS    Standard of care; use restrictions present
 4  Standard Carveouts           FAIL    Missing: independent development
 5  Permitted Disclosures        PASS    Representatives and advisors covered
 6  Term & Duration              PASS    3-year term with 2-year survival
 7  Return/Destruction           PASS    Return or destroy within 30 days
 8  Remedies                     PASS    Injunctive relief; no liquidated damages
 9  Problematic Provisions       FAIL    Residuals clause detected
10  Governing Law                PASS    Delaware law; state courts

平台分布

Codex

33.73%
按下载量换算50

Claude

29.65%
按下载量换算44

Cursor

20.88%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills