Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

interview-system-designer面试系统设计师

Agent Skill

interview-system-designer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,326

周安装

95

GitHub Stars

103

下载量

752
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:interview-system-designer(面试系统设计师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/interview-system-designer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system-designer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system-designer

简介

interview-system-designer 设计角色专属面试流程,生成题库与评分标准,并检测面试官偏差。

  • 适用于 HR 与技术团队优化招聘质量,可在指定宿主环境中调用。
  • 通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 安装,具体参数与输出见仓库文档。
  • 安装前请确认权限范围与维护状态,注意是否涉及外部数据访问或文件写入。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Interview System Designer

The agent designs role-specific interview loops, generates competency-based question banks with scoring rubrics, and detects interviewer bias through statistical calibration analysis.

Quick Start

# Design a complete interview loop for a senior software engineer role
python loop_designer.py --role "Senior Software Engineer" --level senior --team platform --output loops/

# Generate a question bank for a product manager position
python question_bank_generator.py --role "Product Manager" --level senior --competencies leadership,strategy,analytics --output questions/

# Analyze interview calibration across candidates and interviewers
python hiring_calibrator.py --input interview_data.json --output calibration_report.json --analysis-type full

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Design an Interview Loop

  1. Define role requirements (title, level, team, 3-5 critical competencies)
  2. Run loop_designer.py with role parameters to generate rounds, time allocations, and scorecards
  3. Review generated loop for competency coverage -- every required competency maps to at least one round
  4. Customize interviewer skill requirements per round
  5. Validation checkpoint: 100% competency coverage; no round exceeds 90 minutes; total loop under 6 hours
python loop_designer.py --role "Staff Data Scientist" --level staff \
  --competencies ml,statistics,leadership --format json --output loops/ds-staff.json

Workflow 2: Generate a Question Bank

  1. Identify target role and experience level
  2. Select competency areas and question types (technical, behavioral, situational)
  3. Run question_bank_generator.py to produce questions with scoring rubrics
  4. Review for duplicate or overlapping questions across competency areas
  5. Validation checkpoint: <15% duplicate rate; each competency has 3+ questions; calibration examples (poor/good/great) present for every question
python question_bank_generator.py --role "Frontend Engineer" \
  --competencies react,typescript,system-design --num-questions 30

Workflow 3: Calibrate Hiring Bar

  1. Collect interview results data (minimum 10 records for statistical significance)
  2. Run hiring_calibrator.py with comprehensive analysis
  3. Review interviewer deviation metrics -- flag anyone >0.5 standard deviations from team mean
  4. Generate coaching recommendations for flagged interviewers
  5. Validation checkpoint: Bias detection precision >80%; score distribution follows target (20/40/30/10 split)
python hiring_calibrator.py --input q1_interviews.json \
  --analysis-type comprehensive --trend-analysis --period quarterly

Interview Loop Templates

Software Engineering Loops

LevelDurationRoundsFocus Areas
Junior/Mid (2-4 yr)3-4 hours3-4Coding fundamentals, debugging, system basics, growth mindset
Senior (5-8 yr)4-5 hours4-5System design, technical leadership, mentoring, code quality
Staff+ (8+ yr)5-6 hours5-6Architecture vision, org impact, technical strategy, cross-functional leadership

Senior Software Engineer Example:

  1. Technical Phone Screen (45min) -- Advanced algorithms, optimization
  2. System Design (60min) -- Scalability, trade-offs, architectural decisions
  3. Coding Excellence (60min) -- Code quality, testing strategies, refactoring
  4. Technical Leadership (45min) -- Mentoring, technical decisions, cross-team collaboration
  5. Behavioral & Culture (30min) -- Leadership examples, conflict resolution

Sample Questions by Level

Junior: "Implement a function to find the second largest element in an array" Senior: "Design a real-time chat system supporting 1M concurrent users" Staff+: "How would you evaluate and introduce a new programming language to the organization?"

Behavioral (STAR Method):

  • "Tell me about a time you had to influence a decision without formal authority"
  • "Walk me through a time when you had to make a decision with incomplete information"

Scoring Rubric

4-Point Scale

ScoreLabelDescription
4ExceedsDemonstrates mastery beyond required level
3MeetsSolid performance meeting all requirements
2PartialShows potential but has development areas
1Does Not MeetSignificant gaps in required competencies

Calibration Benchmarks

  • Target distribution: 20% (4s), 40% (3s), 30% (2s), 10% (1s)
  • Interviewer consistency: <0.5 std dev from team average
  • Pass rate: 15-25% for most roles
  • New hire correlation: >0.6 between interview scores and 6-month performance

Anti-Patterns

  • Unstandardized loops -- different question sets per candidate prevent fair comparison; always use structured guides
  • Halo effect scoring -- one strong answer inflates all dimensions; score each competency independently before debrief
  • Similarity bias -- favoring candidates with similar backgrounds; require diverse panels and rotate assignments
  • Skipping calibration -- interviewers drift over time without regular calibration sessions (monthly minimum)
  • Over-indexing on algorithms -- testing LeetCode for a staff role that requires architecture and leadership; match round focus to actual job requirements
  • No debrief structure -- unstructured debriefs lead to anchoring on the loudest voice; require independent score submission before group discussion

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Loop designer produces generic rounds with no role-specific focusThe --competencies flag was omitted, so the tool falls back to default competency mapping for the role familyRe-run with explicit --competencies listing the 3-5 most critical skills for the position
Question bank output has too many behavioral questions and too few technical onesThe --question-types flag was not provided, causing the generator to use a balanced default splitSupply --question-types technical,system-design (or whichever mix is needed) to control the ratio
Hiring calibrator reports "insufficient data" for bias detectionThe input JSON contains fewer than 10 interview records, which is below the statistical minimumCollect more interview data before running bias analysis; use --analysis-type scoring for small datasets
Calibrator trend analysis returns empty resultsThe input data lacks date fields or all records fall within a single periodEnsure each interview record has a valid date field and that the dataset spans multiple periods matching --period
Loop designer ignores the --team flagThe team value does not match any of the predefined team mappings in the toolCheck supported team names in the tool's TEAM_CONFIGS dictionary, or omit --team and rely on competency overrides
Score distribution chart shows all interviewers clustered at the same scoreInterviewers are not applying the full 1-4 rubric scale (central tendency bias)Run --analysis-type calibration to identify leniency/severity patterns and use the coaching recommendations
Question bank generates duplicate questions across competency areasOverlapping competency keywords (e.g., "leadership" appears in both behavioral and technical mappings)Use more specific competency terms or reduce --num-questions to avoid exhausting the unique question pool

Success Criteria

  • Interview loop coverage: Every generated loop maps 100% of required competencies to at least one round with a dedicated scoring dimension.
  • Question bank diversity: Generated banks contain no more than 15% duplicate or near-duplicate questions across competency areas.
  • Calibration detection accuracy: Bias detection flags interviewer score deviation greater than 0.5 standard deviations from the team mean with at least 80% precision.
  • Time-to-design reduction: Designing a complete interview loop (rounds, scorecards, question sets) takes under 10 minutes compared to the typical 2-4 hours of manual design.
  • Rubric consistency: Generated scoring rubrics achieve inter-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa) of 0.7 or higher when tested with calibration panels.
  • Candidate experience alignment: Loops designed with this tool target a candidate experience satisfaction score of 4.0/5.0 or above.
  • Hiring quality signal: Organizations using the calibrator report a correlation of 0.6 or higher between interview scores and 6-month performance reviews.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Designing end-to-end interview loops for engineering, product, design, and data roles across all seniority levels (junior through principal)
  • Generating competency-based question banks with structured scoring rubrics and calibration examples
  • Detecting statistical bias and calibration drift across interviewers and time periods
  • Producing scorecard templates, debrief guides, and interviewer assignment recommendations

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Applicant tracking system (ATS) integration, job posting, or candidate sourcing pipeline management — see hr-operations/talent-acquisition
  • Compensation benchmarking, offer negotiation strategy, or total rewards analysis — see hr-operations/hr-business-partner
  • Workforce planning, headcount modeling, or organizational design — see hr-operations/people-analytics
  • Post-hire onboarding program design or new-hire ramp-up tracking — see engineering/codebase-onboarding

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
hr-operations/talent-acquisitionFeed designed interview loops and scorecards into the talent acquisition pipeline for end-to-end hiring executionLoop JSON output → talent acquisition workflow input
hr-operations/people-analyticsSupply calibration reports and interviewer performance data for workforce-level hiring analyticsCalibrator JSON reports → people analytics dashboards
engineering/codebase-onboardingHand off hired candidate profiles and assessed competency gaps to onboarding plan generationScorecard results → onboarding skill-gap inputs
hr-operations/hr-business-partnerProvide interview quality metrics and pass-rate data to support hiring bar discussions with HR leadershipCalibration trend data → HRBP quarterly reviews
product-teamAlign PM interview loop competencies with the product team's competency frameworks and role leveling guidesCompetency matrix → PM loop designer --competencies input
engineering/pr-review-expertUse coding round evaluation criteria to inform code review standards for new hires during their ramp periodScoring rubric technical criteria → PR review checklist alignment

Tool Reference

loop_designer.py

Purpose: Generates calibrated interview loops tailored to specific roles, levels, and teams. Produces complete loops with rounds, focus areas, time allocation, interviewer skill requirements, and scorecard templates.

Usage:

python loop_designer.py --role "Senior Software Engineer" --level senior --team platform --output loops/

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--rolestrNoJob role title (e.g., "Senior Software Engineer")
--levelstrNoExperience level: junior, mid, senior, staff, principal
--teamstrNoTeam or department name (optional context for loop customization)
--competenciesstrNoComma-separated list of specific competencies to focus on
--inputstrNoInput JSON file with role definition
--outputstrNoOutput directory or file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python loop_designer.py --role "Staff Data Scientist" --level staff --competencies ml,statistics,leadership --format json --output loops/ds-staff.json

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Structured loop definition with rounds array, competency mappings, time allocations, and scorecard templates suitable for programmatic consumption.
  • Text: Human-readable interview guide with formatted round descriptions, interviewer requirements, and evaluation criteria.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified directory.

question_bank_generator.py

Purpose: Generates comprehensive, competency-based interview questions with detailed scoring criteria, follow-up probes, and calibration examples organized by competency area.

Usage:

python question_bank_generator.py --role "Frontend Engineer" --competencies react,typescript,system-design --output questions/

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--rolestrNoJob role title (e.g., "Frontend Engineer")
--levelstrNoseniorExperience level: junior, mid, senior, staff, principal
--competenciesstrNoComma-separated list of competencies to focus on
--question-typesstrNoComma-separated list of question types: technical, behavioral, situational
--num-questionsintNo20Number of questions to generate
--inputstrNoInput JSON file with role requirements
--outputstrNoOutput directory or file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python question_bank_generator.py --role "Product Manager" --level mid --question-types behavioral,situational --num-questions 30 --format text

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Array of question objects each containing the question text, competency area, difficulty level, scoring rubric (1-4 scale), follow-up probes, and calibration examples (poor/good/great answers).
  • Text: Formatted question bank grouped by competency with inline scoring guidance and example answers for interviewer reference.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified directory.

hiring_calibrator.py

Purpose: Analyzes interview scores from multiple candidates and interviewers to detect bias, calibration issues, and inconsistent rubric application. Generates calibration reports with recommendations for interviewer coaching and process improvements.

Usage:

python hiring_calibrator.py --input interview_results.json --analysis-type comprehensive --output report.json

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--inputstrYesInput JSON file with interview results data
--analysis-typestrNocomprehensiveAnalysis type: comprehensive, bias, calibration, interviewer, scoring
--competenciesstrNoComma-separated list of competencies to focus on
--trend-analysisflagNofalseEnable trend analysis over time
--periodstrNomonthlyTrend period: daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly
--outputstrNoOutput file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python hiring_calibrator.py --input q1_interviews.json --analysis-type bias --competencies technical,leadership --trend-analysis --period quarterly --format json --output calibration/q1_bias.json

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Structured calibration report containing score distributions, interviewer deviation metrics, bias indicators, trend data (if enabled), and prioritized coaching recommendations.
  • Text: Human-readable report with summary statistics, flagged interviewers, bias findings, and actionable improvement recommendations formatted for management review.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified path.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.94%
按下载量换算270

Claude

30.47%
按下载量换算229

Cursor

20.58%
按下载量换算155

Gemini CLI

10.07%
按下载量换算76

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills