Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

interview-system-designer(面试系统设计师)

interview-system-designer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

interview-system-designer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,663。

总安装 2,326周安装 95GitHub Stars 103下载 752核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:interview-system-designer(面试系统设计师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/interview-system-designer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system-designer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system-designer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

interview-system-designer 设计角色专属面试流程,生成题库与评分标准,并检测面试官偏差。适用于 HR 与技术团队优化招聘质量,可在指定宿主环境中调用。通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 安装,具体参数与输出见仓库文档。

安装前请确认权限范围与维护状态,注意是否涉及外部数据访问或文件写入。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/interview-system-designer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

interview-system-designer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill interview-system-designer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

interview-system-designer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

interview-system-designer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

interview-system-designer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

interview-system-designer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,326 次,近一周安装 95 次,下载 752 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

interview-system-designer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
interview-system-designer

面试系统设计师 · 本页

2,326103只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Interview System Designer

The agent designs role-specific interview loops, generates competency-based question banks with scoring rubrics, and detects interviewer bias through statistical calibration analysis.

Quick Start

# Design a complete interview loop for a senior software engineer role
python loop_designer.py --role "Senior Software Engineer" --level senior --team platform --output loops/

# Generate a question bank for a product manager position
python question_bank_generator.py --role "Product Manager" --level senior --competencies leadership,strategy,analytics --output questions/

# Analyze interview calibration across candidates and interviewers
python hiring_calibrator.py --input interview_data.json --output calibration_report.json --analysis-type full

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Design an Interview Loop

  1. Define role requirements (title, level, team, 3-5 critical competencies)
  2. Run loop_designer.py with role parameters to generate rounds, time allocations, and scorecards
  3. Review generated loop for competency coverage -- every required competency maps to at least one round
  4. Customize interviewer skill requirements per round
  5. Validation checkpoint: 100% competency coverage; no round exceeds 90 minutes; total loop under 6 hours
python loop_designer.py --role "Staff Data Scientist" --level staff \
  --competencies ml,statistics,leadership --format json --output loops/ds-staff.json

Workflow 2: Generate a Question Bank

  1. Identify target role and experience level
  2. Select competency areas and question types (technical, behavioral, situational)
  3. Run question_bank_generator.py to produce questions with scoring rubrics
  4. Review for duplicate or overlapping questions across competency areas
  5. Validation checkpoint: <15% duplicate rate; each competency has 3+ questions; calibration examples (poor/good/great) present for every question
python question_bank_generator.py --role "Frontend Engineer" \
  --competencies react,typescript,system-design --num-questions 30

Workflow 3: Calibrate Hiring Bar

  1. Collect interview results data (minimum 10 records for statistical significance)
  2. Run hiring_calibrator.py with comprehensive analysis
  3. Review interviewer deviation metrics -- flag anyone >0.5 standard deviations from team mean
  4. Generate coaching recommendations for flagged interviewers
  5. Validation checkpoint: Bias detection precision >80%; score distribution follows target (20/40/30/10 split)
python hiring_calibrator.py --input q1_interviews.json \
  --analysis-type comprehensive --trend-analysis --period quarterly

Interview Loop Templates

Software Engineering Loops

LevelDurationRoundsFocus Areas
Junior/Mid (2-4 yr)3-4 hours3-4Coding fundamentals, debugging, system basics, growth mindset
Senior (5-8 yr)4-5 hours4-5System design, technical leadership, mentoring, code quality
Staff+ (8+ yr)5-6 hours5-6Architecture vision, org impact, technical strategy, cross-functional leadership

Senior Software Engineer Example:

  1. Technical Phone Screen (45min) -- Advanced algorithms, optimization
  2. System Design (60min) -- Scalability, trade-offs, architectural decisions
  3. Coding Excellence (60min) -- Code quality, testing strategies, refactoring
  4. Technical Leadership (45min) -- Mentoring, technical decisions, cross-team collaboration
  5. Behavioral & Culture (30min) -- Leadership examples, conflict resolution

Sample Questions by Level

Junior: "Implement a function to find the second largest element in an array" Senior: "Design a real-time chat system supporting 1M concurrent users" Staff+: "How would you evaluate and introduce a new programming language to the organization?"

Behavioral (STAR Method):

  • "Tell me about a time you had to influence a decision without formal authority"
  • "Walk me through a time when you had to make a decision with incomplete information"

Scoring Rubric

4-Point Scale

ScoreLabelDescription
4ExceedsDemonstrates mastery beyond required level
3MeetsSolid performance meeting all requirements
2PartialShows potential but has development areas
1Does Not MeetSignificant gaps in required competencies

Calibration Benchmarks

  • Target distribution: 20% (4s), 40% (3s), 30% (2s), 10% (1s)
  • Interviewer consistency: <0.5 std dev from team average
  • Pass rate: 15-25% for most roles
  • New hire correlation: >0.6 between interview scores and 6-month performance

Anti-Patterns

  • Unstandardized loops -- different question sets per candidate prevent fair comparison; always use structured guides
  • Halo effect scoring -- one strong answer inflates all dimensions; score each competency independently before debrief
  • Similarity bias -- favoring candidates with similar backgrounds; require diverse panels and rotate assignments
  • Skipping calibration -- interviewers drift over time without regular calibration sessions (monthly minimum)
  • Over-indexing on algorithms -- testing LeetCode for a staff role that requires architecture and leadership; match round focus to actual job requirements
  • No debrief structure -- unstructured debriefs lead to anchoring on the loudest voice; require independent score submission before group discussion

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Loop designer produces generic rounds with no role-specific focusThe --competencies flag was omitted, so the tool falls back to default competency mapping for the role familyRe-run with explicit --competencies listing the 3-5 most critical skills for the position
Question bank output has too many behavioral questions and too few technical onesThe --question-types flag was not provided, causing the generator to use a balanced default splitSupply --question-types technical,system-design (or whichever mix is needed) to control the ratio
Hiring calibrator reports "insufficient data" for bias detectionThe input JSON contains fewer than 10 interview records, which is below the statistical minimumCollect more interview data before running bias analysis; use --analysis-type scoring for small datasets
Calibrator trend analysis returns empty resultsThe input data lacks date fields or all records fall within a single periodEnsure each interview record has a valid date field and that the dataset spans multiple periods matching --period
Loop designer ignores the --team flagThe team value does not match any of the predefined team mappings in the toolCheck supported team names in the tool's TEAM_CONFIGS dictionary, or omit --team and rely on competency overrides
Score distribution chart shows all interviewers clustered at the same scoreInterviewers are not applying the full 1-4 rubric scale (central tendency bias)Run --analysis-type calibration to identify leniency/severity patterns and use the coaching recommendations
Question bank generates duplicate questions across competency areasOverlapping competency keywords (e.g., "leadership" appears in both behavioral and technical mappings)Use more specific competency terms or reduce --num-questions to avoid exhausting the unique question pool

Success Criteria

  • Interview loop coverage: Every generated loop maps 100% of required competencies to at least one round with a dedicated scoring dimension.
  • Question bank diversity: Generated banks contain no more than 15% duplicate or near-duplicate questions across competency areas.
  • Calibration detection accuracy: Bias detection flags interviewer score deviation greater than 0.5 standard deviations from the team mean with at least 80% precision.
  • Time-to-design reduction: Designing a complete interview loop (rounds, scorecards, question sets) takes under 10 minutes compared to the typical 2-4 hours of manual design.
  • Rubric consistency: Generated scoring rubrics achieve inter-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa) of 0.7 or higher when tested with calibration panels.
  • Candidate experience alignment: Loops designed with this tool target a candidate experience satisfaction score of 4.0/5.0 or above.
  • Hiring quality signal: Organizations using the calibrator report a correlation of 0.6 or higher between interview scores and 6-month performance reviews.

Scope & Limitations

This skill covers:

  • Designing end-to-end interview loops for engineering, product, design, and data roles across all seniority levels (junior through principal)
  • Generating competency-based question banks with structured scoring rubrics and calibration examples
  • Detecting statistical bias and calibration drift across interviewers and time periods
  • Producing scorecard templates, debrief guides, and interviewer assignment recommendations

This skill does NOT cover:

  • Applicant tracking system (ATS) integration, job posting, or candidate sourcing pipeline management — see hr-operations/talent-acquisition
  • Compensation benchmarking, offer negotiation strategy, or total rewards analysis — see hr-operations/hr-business-partner
  • Workforce planning, headcount modeling, or organizational design — see hr-operations/people-analytics
  • Post-hire onboarding program design or new-hire ramp-up tracking — see engineering/codebase-onboarding

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
hr-operations/talent-acquisitionFeed designed interview loops and scorecards into the talent acquisition pipeline for end-to-end hiring executionLoop JSON output → talent acquisition workflow input
hr-operations/people-analyticsSupply calibration reports and interviewer performance data for workforce-level hiring analyticsCalibrator JSON reports → people analytics dashboards
engineering/codebase-onboardingHand off hired candidate profiles and assessed competency gaps to onboarding plan generationScorecard results → onboarding skill-gap inputs
hr-operations/hr-business-partnerProvide interview quality metrics and pass-rate data to support hiring bar discussions with HR leadershipCalibration trend data → HRBP quarterly reviews
product-teamAlign PM interview loop competencies with the product team's competency frameworks and role leveling guidesCompetency matrix → PM loop designer --competencies input
engineering/pr-review-expertUse coding round evaluation criteria to inform code review standards for new hires during their ramp periodScoring rubric technical criteria → PR review checklist alignment

Tool Reference

loop_designer.py

Purpose: Generates calibrated interview loops tailored to specific roles, levels, and teams. Produces complete loops with rounds, focus areas, time allocation, interviewer skill requirements, and scorecard templates.

Usage:

python loop_designer.py --role "Senior Software Engineer" --level senior --team platform --output loops/

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--rolestrNo—Job role title (e.g., "Senior Software Engineer")
--levelstrNo—Experience level: junior, mid, senior, staff, principal
--teamstrNo—Team or department name (optional context for loop customization)
--competenciesstrNo—Comma-separated list of specific competencies to focus on
--inputstrNo—Input JSON file with role definition
--outputstrNo—Output directory or file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python loop_designer.py --role "Staff Data Scientist" --level staff --competencies ml,statistics,leadership --format json --output loops/ds-staff.json

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Structured loop definition with rounds array, competency mappings, time allocations, and scorecard templates suitable for programmatic consumption.
  • Text: Human-readable interview guide with formatted round descriptions, interviewer requirements, and evaluation criteria.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified directory.

question_bank_generator.py

Purpose: Generates comprehensive, competency-based interview questions with detailed scoring criteria, follow-up probes, and calibration examples organized by competency area.

Usage:

python question_bank_generator.py --role "Frontend Engineer" --competencies react,typescript,system-design --output questions/

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--rolestrNo—Job role title (e.g., "Frontend Engineer")
--levelstrNoseniorExperience level: junior, mid, senior, staff, principal
--competenciesstrNo—Comma-separated list of competencies to focus on
--question-typesstrNo—Comma-separated list of question types: technical, behavioral, situational
--num-questionsintNo20Number of questions to generate
--inputstrNo—Input JSON file with role requirements
--outputstrNo—Output directory or file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python question_bank_generator.py --role "Product Manager" --level mid --question-types behavioral,situational --num-questions 30 --format text

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Array of question objects each containing the question text, competency area, difficulty level, scoring rubric (1-4 scale), follow-up probes, and calibration examples (poor/good/great answers).
  • Text: Formatted question bank grouped by competency with inline scoring guidance and example answers for interviewer reference.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified directory.

hiring_calibrator.py

Purpose: Analyzes interview scores from multiple candidates and interviewers to detect bias, calibration issues, and inconsistent rubric application. Generates calibration reports with recommendations for interviewer coaching and process improvements.

Usage:

python hiring_calibrator.py --input interview_results.json --analysis-type comprehensive --output report.json

Flags/Parameters:

FlagTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
--inputstrYes—Input JSON file with interview results data
--analysis-typestrNocomprehensiveAnalysis type: comprehensive, bias, calibration, interviewer, scoring
--competenciesstrNo—Comma-separated list of competencies to focus on
--trend-analysisflagNofalseEnable trend analysis over time
--periodstrNomonthlyTrend period: daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly
--outputstrNo—Output file path
--formatstrNobothOutput format: json, text, or both

Example:

python hiring_calibrator.py --input q1_interviews.json --analysis-type bias --competencies technical,leadership --trend-analysis --period quarterly --format json --output calibration/q1_bias.json

Output Formats:

  • JSON: Structured calibration report containing score distributions, interviewer deviation metrics, bias indicators, trend data (if enabled), and prioritized coaching recommendations.
  • Text: Human-readable report with summary statistics, flagged interviewers, bias findings, and actionable improvement recommendations formatted for management review.
  • Both (default): Writes both JSON and text outputs to the specified path.

平台分布

Codex

35.94%
按下载量换算270

Claude

30.47%
按下载量换算229

Cursor

20.58%
按下载量换算155

Gemini CLI

10.07%
按下载量换算76

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills