Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

cro-advisor(克罗顾问)

cro-advisor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

cro-advisor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,646。

总安装 1,384周安装 56GitHub Stars 103下载 435核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cro-advisor(克罗顾问)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/cro-advisor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill cro-advisor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill cro-advisor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

cro-advisor 提供从首笔收入到百万元 ARR 的可预测收入引擎建设框架。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中设计销售模型、定价策略与扩张留存机制。基于管道数学而非假设,输出 NRR、GRR 与扩容路径等核心指标建议。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill cro-advisor。使用前应确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发数据分析或建模操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/cro-advisor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill cro-advisor;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

cro-advisor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill cro-advisor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

cro-advisor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

cro-advisor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

cro-advisor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

cro-advisor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,384 次,近一周安装 56 次,下载 435 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

cro-advisor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
cro-advisor

克罗顾问 · 本页

1,384103只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CRO Advisor

Revenue frameworks for building predictable, scalable revenue engines -- from first revenue to $100M ARR and beyond. Every recommendation is grounded in pipeline math, not hope.

Keywords

CRO, chief revenue officer, revenue strategy, ARR, MRR, sales model, pipeline, revenue forecasting, pricing strategy, net revenue retention, NRR, gross revenue retention, GRR, expansion revenue, upsell, cross-sell, churn, customer success, sales capacity, quota, ramp, territory design, MEDDPICC, PLG, product-led growth, sales-led growth, enterprise sales, SMB, self-serve, value-based pricing, usage-based pricing, ICP, ideal customer profile, revenue board reporting, sales cycle, CAC payback, magic number, win rate, pipeline coverage, deal velocity


Revenue Health Diagnostic

Before applying any framework, diagnose the current state.

Revenue Health Decision Tree

START: "How healthy is our revenue engine?"
  |
  v
[Check NRR]
  |
  +-- NRR < 90% --> CRISIS. Existing customers are shrinking.
  |                  Stop scaling sales. Fix retention first.
  |
  +-- NRR 90-100% --> WARNING. Churn eating expansion.
  |                    Diagnose: product gap, CS gap, or ICP problem?
  |
  +-- NRR 100-110% --> HEALTHY. Base is stable. Focus on new logo + expansion.
  |
  +-- NRR > 110% --> STRONG. Expansion engine is working.
                      Check: is it sustainable or driven by price increases?

Revenue Waterfall

Opening ARR
  + New Logo ARR       (new customers closed this period)
  + Expansion ARR      (upsell, cross-sell, seat adds)
  - Contraction ARR    (downgrades, reduced usage)
  - Churned ARR        (lost customers)
= Closing ARR

NRR = (Opening + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) / Opening x 100
GRR = (Opening - Contraction - Churn) / Opening x 100

Revenue Metrics

Board-Level Metrics (Monthly/Quarterly)

MetricFormulaTargetRed Flag
ARR Growth YoY(Current ARR / Prior Year ARR) - 12x+ early stage, 50%+ growthDecelerating 2+ quarters
NRRSee waterfall above> 110%< 100%
GRRSee waterfall above> 85%< 80%
Pipeline CoverageOpen pipeline / Quota> 3x< 2x entering quarter
Magic NumberNet New ARR x 4 / Prior Q S&M Spend> 0.75< 0.5
CAC PaybackS&M Spend / New ARR x (1/GM%)< 18 months> 24 months
Quota Attainment% of reps hitting quota60-70%< 50%
Win RateClosed-won / (Closed-won + Closed-lost)> 25%< 15%
Average Sales CycleDays from opportunity to closeStable or decreasingIncreasing 2+ quarters

NRR Benchmarks

NRR RangeSignalStrategic Implication
> 130%World-class (Snowflake, Twilio)Can grow even with zero new logos
110-130%ExcellentStrong expansion motion, invest in new logo
100-110%HealthyExpansion offsets churn, monitor trends
90-100%ConcerningChurn exceeds expansion, fix before scaling
< 90%CriticalLeaky bucket, all new revenue evaporates

Sales Model Selection

Model Comparison Matrix

ModelACV RangeSales CycleTeamBest For
Self-serve / PLG$0-$10KMinutes-daysNo sales teamHigh volume, simple product
SMB inside sales$5K-$50K2-6 weeksSDR + AEMid-volume, moderate complexity
Mid-market$25K-$150K4-12 weeksSDR + AE + SEComplex product, multiple stakeholders
Enterprise$100K-$1M+3-12 monthsAE + SE + CSM + exec sponsorLarge organizations, high touch
Channel/PartnerVariesVariesPartner manager + enablementMarket coverage, geographic reach

Model Selection Decision Tree

START: "Which sales model?"
  |
  v
[What's the average deal size?]
  |
  +-- < $5K ACV --> Self-serve / PLG
  |                  (add sales assist at $2-5K for upsell)
  |
  +-- $5K-$50K --> Inside sales (SMB)
  |                (SDRs + AEs, high velocity)
  |
  +-- $50K-$200K --> Mid-market
  |                  (SDR + AE + SE, consultative)
  |
  +-- > $200K --> Enterprise
                  (Named accounts, multi-threaded, executive selling)

HYBRID: Most companies evolve to serve 2-3 segments.
Route by ACV and buying complexity.

Pipeline Management

Pipeline Stage Definitions

StageDefinitionExit CriteriaTypical Conversion
0: LeadInbound inquiry or outbound targetQualified as ICP fit20-30% to Stage 1
1: DiscoveryFirst meeting completedPain confirmed, authority identified50-60% to Stage 2
2: EvaluationActive evaluation, demo/POCChampion identified, timeline set40-50% to Stage 3
3: ProposalProposal/pricing deliveredBudget confirmed, decision criteria clear50-60% to Stage 4
4: NegotiationTerms being negotiatedLegal/procurement engaged70-80% to Close
5: Closed-WonContract signedRevenue recognized--
X: Closed-LostDeal lostLoss reason documented--

Pipeline Coverage Model

Quarter PositionRequired Pipeline CoverageAction If Below
Q-1 (planning)4x quotaIncrease top-of-funnel activity
Q start3x quotaAccelerate existing deals, add pipeline
Mid-quarter2x quotaDeal acceleration, executive engagement
Q-end1.5x quotaForecast adjustment, pull-in deals

Deal Qualification: MEDDPICC

ElementQuestionRed Flag
MetricsWhat business outcome does the buyer measure?No quantified value proposition
Economic BuyerWho signs the check? Have we met them?Never met the decision-maker
Decision CriteriaWhat criteria will they use to decide?"We'll know it when we see it"
Decision ProcessWhat are the steps to get to a yes?No defined process or timeline
Paper ProcessWhat legal/procurement steps are required?Unknown procurement process
Identify PainWhat problem are they solving? Is it urgent?Pain is theoretical, not acute
ChampionWho internally advocates for us?No internal champion identified
CompetitionWho else are they evaluating?"They said no competition" (always wrong)

Pricing Strategy

Pricing Model Selection

ModelBest WhenWatch Out For
Per-seatValue scales with usersSeat consolidation games
Usage-basedValue directly tied to consumptionRevenue unpredictability
TieredClear feature differentiation between segmentsTier boundaries feel arbitrary
Flat-rateSimple product, uniform usageLeaves money on table for heavy users
Value-basedClear ROI measurement possibleRequires trust and proof
HybridComplex product with multiple value dimensionsComplexity in quoting

Pricing Decision Framework

START: "How should we price?"
  |
  v
[What is the primary value driver for the customer?]
  |
  +-- Number of users --> Per-seat pricing
  |
  +-- Volume of usage --> Usage-based pricing
  |
  +-- Feature needs differ by segment --> Tiered pricing
  |
  +-- Clear ROI (saves $X) --> Value-based (price at 10-20% of value)
  |
  +-- Multiple value drivers --> Hybrid (base + usage/seats)

Pricing Health Indicators

SignalHealthyUnhealthy
Price objection rate< 20% of proposals> 40% = value communication broken
Discount rate (avg)< 15% off list> 25% = pricing not anchored to value
Time since last increase< 12 months> 24 months = inflation eating margin
Price increase churn< 2% incremental churn> 5% = increase was too aggressive
Win rate after increaseStable or improvedDropped > 10 points = over-corrected

Sales Team Scaling

Capacity Model

Required AEs = Target New ARR / (Quota x Attainment Rate x Ramp Factor)

Example:
  Target: $5M new ARR
  Quota per AE: $1M
  Attainment: 65%
  Ramp factor: 0.85 (accounts for ramp time)

  Required AEs = $5M / ($1M x 0.65 x 0.85) = 9.1 --> Hire 10 AEs

Sales Team Structure by ARR

ARRTeam StructureKey Hires
$0-$1MFounder-led salesNo sales team yet
$1-$3M1-2 AEsFirst AE, maybe first SDR
$3-$10M3-6 AEs, 2-4 SDRs, 1 sales managerFirst sales manager, first SE
$10-$25MVP Sales, 2 teams, SDR team, SE teamVP Sales, Rev Ops, CS Manager
$25-$50MCRO, multiple segments, CS orgCRO, segment leaders, enablement
$50M+Full revenue orgSVPs, regional leaders, strategy

Quota Setting Guidelines

MetricGuideline
Quota: OTE ratio4-6x (e.g., $800K quota for $160K OTE)
Ramp period3-6 months depending on sales cycle
Ramp quota25% (M1-2), 50% (M3-4), 75% (M5-6), 100% (M7+)
Quota coverage targetHire for 120-130% of plan (accounts for attrition + ramp)
% of team hitting quotaTarget 60-70%. < 50% = quota too high. > 80% = too low.

Red Flags

  • NRR declining 2 quarters in a row -- customer value proposition is broken
  • Pipeline coverage < 3x entering quarter -- forecasting a miss
  • Win rate dropping while sales cycle extends -- competitive pressure or ICP drift
  • < 50% of AEs quota-attaining -- comp plan, ramp, or quota calibration issue
  • Average deal size declining -- moving downmarket under pressure
  • Magic Number < 0.5 -- sales spend not converting to revenue
  • Forecast accuracy < 80% -- pipeline quality or rep sandbagging
  • Single customer > 15% of ARR -- concentration risk
  • "Too expensive" in > 40% of loss notes -- value demonstration broken, not price
  • Expansion ARR < 20% of total new ARR -- upsell motion missing
  • No win/loss analysis process -- learning nothing from every deal outcome
  • Sales and CS not aligned on health scoring -- churn surprises

Integration with C-Suite

When...CRO Works With...To...
Pricing changesCPO + CFOAlign value positioning, model margin impact
Product roadmapCPO (cpo-advisor)Ensure features support ICP and close pipeline
Headcount planCFO + CHROCapacity model with ROI justification
NRR decliningCPO + COORoot cause: product gap or CS process failure
Enterprise expansionCEO (ceo-advisor)Executive sponsorship for key accounts
Revenue targetsCFO (cfo-advisor)Bottom-up model to validate top-down targets
Pipeline SLACMO (cmo-advisor)MQL-to-SQL conversion, CAC by channel
Security reviewsCISO (ciso-advisor)Unblock enterprise deals with security artifacts
Sales opsCOO (coo-advisor)RevOps staffing, commission infrastructure
Sales hiringCHRO (chro-advisor)Comp plans, ramp modeling, territory design
Competitive wins/lossesCompetitive Intel (competitive-intel)Battlecard updates, positioning

Proactive Triggers

  • NRR < 100% -- retention must be fixed before scaling acquisition
  • Pipeline coverage < 3x -- forecast at risk, flag to CEO immediately
  • Win rate declining 2+ quarters -- sales process or product alignment issue
  • Top customer > 20% of ARR -- concentration risk, diversify immediately
  • No pricing review in 12+ months -- likely leaving revenue on the table
  • Expansion revenue < 15% of new ARR -- missing upsell/cross-sell opportunity
  • Sales cycle lengthening -- competitive or product issue, investigate
  • 30% discount rate on deals -- pricing or value communication problem

Output Artifacts

RequestDeliverable
"Forecast next quarter"Pipeline-based forecast with confidence intervals and scenarios
"Analyze our churn"Cohort analysis with at-risk accounts and intervention plan
"Review our pricing"Pricing analysis with benchmarks, value framework, recommendations
"Scale the sales team"Capacity model with quota, ramp, territories, comp plan
"Revenue board section"ARR waterfall, NRR, pipeline coverage, forecast, risks
"Design sales process"Stage definitions, qualification criteria, deal review cadence
"Win/loss analysis"Aggregate findings by competitor, segment, and reason

Tool Reference

1. revenue_waterfall_analyzer.py

Analyzes ARR waterfall (new logo, expansion, contraction, churn) to calculate NRR, GRR, and net new ARR. Detects trends, flags retention risks, and benchmarks against SaaS industry standards.

python scripts/revenue_waterfall_analyzer.py --input revenue_data.json --json
python scripts/revenue_waterfall_analyzer.py --input revenue_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with period-level ARR components (opening, new, expansion, contraction, churn)
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

2. pipeline_coverage_calculator.py

Calculates pipeline coverage ratios by quarter position, analyzes stage distribution health, detects deal aging risks, and generates pipeline adequacy assessments with action recommendations.

python scripts/pipeline_coverage_calculator.py --input pipeline_data.json --json
python scripts/pipeline_coverage_calculator.py --input pipeline_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with deals (stage, value, age, close date), quota, and quarter dates
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

3. sales_efficiency_scorer.py

Scores sales efficiency using Magic Number, CAC Payback, quota attainment distribution, win rate, and sales cycle metrics. Benchmarks against SaaS standards and generates improvement recommendations.

python scripts/sales_efficiency_scorer.py --input sales_data.json --json
python scripts/sales_efficiency_scorer.py --input sales_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with revenue, S&M spend, rep-level quota attainment, win/loss counts, and cycle times
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
NRR declining 2+ quartersProduct-market fit erosion, CS gap, or ICP driftSegment NRR by cohort and plan tier; diagnose whether churn is product, service, or fit-driven
Pipeline coverage below 3x entering quarterInsufficient top-of-funnel or poor lead-to-opp conversionAudit lead sources by conversion rate; increase SDR activity; align with CMO on MQL volume
Win rate dropping while sales cycle extendsCompetitive pressure, product gap, or wrong ICPAnalyze win/loss by competitor and segment; review qualification criteria; check ICP alignment
Less than 50% of AEs quota-attainingQuota calibration, ramp, or enablement issueBenchmark quota:OTE ratio (4-6x); review ramp schedule; assess territory balance
Magic Number below 0.5S&M spend not converting to revenue efficientlyReview channel ROI; reduce spend on low-performing channels; improve rep productivity before adding headcount
Forecast accuracy below 80%Pipeline quality issues, sandbagging, or weak inspectionStandardize stage exit criteria; implement MEDDPICC qualification; conduct weekly deal reviews
Expansion ARR less than 20% of total new ARRMissing upsell/cross-sell motion or no expansion playbookDesign expansion triggers with CS; implement usage-based upsell alerts; create cross-sell bundles

Success Criteria

  • NRR exceeds 110% sustained across 4 consecutive quarters
  • Pipeline coverage maintains 3-4x quota with healthy stage distribution at quarter start
  • Win rate stable or improving against top 3 competitors
  • 60-70% of ramped AEs achieving quota attainment
  • Magic Number exceeds 0.75 indicating efficient S&M spend
  • CAC Payback under 18 months with LTV:CAC ratio above 3:1
  • Forecast accuracy exceeds 85% within two quarters of implementation

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Revenue health diagnostics (NRR, GRR, ARR waterfall), sales model selection and optimization, pipeline management (stage definitions, coverage modeling, MEDDPICC qualification), pricing strategy frameworks, sales team scaling (capacity model, quota setting, territory design), revenue forecasting, and board-level revenue reporting.

Out of scope: CRM system administration or data extraction (tools consume JSON exports), individual deal coaching (tools flag patterns, not prescribe tactics), marketing attribution modeling (use cmo-advisor), customer success health scoring (use customer-success-manager), and compensation plan legal compliance. Tools analyze point-in-time revenue snapshots; continuous monitoring requires CRM/BI integration.

Limitations: Revenue benchmarks based on aggregate B2B SaaS data; targets vary by stage, ACV, and sales motion (PLG vs enterprise vs channel). Pipeline analysis assumes accurate CRM data including stage, value, age, and close date. Sales efficiency metrics require accurate financial data that early-stage companies may not track. Quota recommendations are directional; final calibration requires territory-level analysis.


Integration Points

  • cfo-advisor -- Revenue forecasts and capacity models feed financial planning; pricing impacts margin modeling
  • cpo-advisor -- Product roadmap must support ICP needs and close pipeline gaps; feature requests filtered through CPO
  • cmo-advisor -- Pipeline SLA and MQL-to-SQL conversion jointly owned; CAC optimization requires marketing alignment
  • coo-advisor -- RevOps staffing and commission infrastructure depend on operational capacity planning
  • competitive-intel -- Win/loss data and competitive win rates inform battlecard updates and positioning
  • sales-success/ -- Sales efficiency metrics cascade to account executive and sales ops execution

平台分布

Codex

39.58%
按下载量换算172

Claude

27.83%
按下载量换算121

Cursor

17.37%
按下载量换算76

Gemini CLI

10.21%
按下载量换算44

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills