Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agile-product-owner(敏捷产品负责人)

agile-product-owner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agile-product-owner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,203。

总安装 2,398周安装 103GitHub Stars 103下载 840核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agile-product-owner(敏捷产品负责人)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/agile-product-owner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agile-product-owner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agile-product-owner

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

聚焦敏捷产品管理,提供用户故事编写、验收标准制定与冲刺规划支持。适用于产品负责人梳理需求优先级、跟踪迭代进度与管理产品待办列表。输出 INVEST 合规的故事卡、史诗拆分模板及速度追踪仪表板。建议结合团队实际节奏调整模板,确保交付价值与业务目标对齐。

agile-product-owner 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agile-product-owner

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agile-product-ow…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agile-product-owner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agile-product-owner。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agile-product-owner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agile-product-owner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

agile-product-owner 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agile-product-owner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,398 次,近一周安装 103 次,下载 840 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agile-product-owner 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agile-product-owner

敏捷产品负责人 · 本页

2,398103操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Agile Product Owner

Backlog management and sprint execution toolkit for product owners, including user story generation, acceptance criteria patterns, sprint planning, and velocity tracking.


Table of Contents


User Story Generation Workflow

Create INVEST-compliant user stories from requirements:

  1. Identify the persona (who benefits from this feature)
  2. Define the action or capability needed
  3. Articulate the benefit or value delivered
  4. Write acceptance criteria using Given-When-Then
  5. Estimate story points using Fibonacci scale
  6. Validate against INVEST criteria
  7. Add to backlog with priority
  8. Validation: Story passes all INVEST criteria; acceptance criteria are testable

User Story Template

As a [persona],
I want to [action/capability],
So that [benefit/value].

Example:

As a marketing manager,
I want to export campaign reports to PDF,
So that I can share results with stakeholders who don't have system access.

Story Types

TypeTemplateExample
FeatureAs a [persona], I want to [action] so that [benefit]As a user, I want to filter search results so that I find items faster
ImprovementAs a [persona], I need [capability] to [goal]As a user, I need faster page loads to complete tasks without frustration
Bug FixAs a [persona], I expect [behavior] when [condition]As a user, I expect my cart to persist when I refresh the page
EnablerAs a developer, I need to [technical task] to enable [capability]As a developer, I need to implement caching to enable instant search

Persona Reference

PersonaTypical NeedsContext
End UserEfficiency, simplicity, reliabilityDaily feature usage
AdministratorControl, visibility, securitySystem management
Power UserAutomation, customization, shortcutsExpert workflows
New UserGuidance, learning, safetyOnboarding

Acceptance Criteria Patterns

Write testable acceptance criteria using Given-When-Then format.

Given-When-Then Template

Given [precondition/context],
When [action/trigger],
Then [expected outcome].

Examples:

Given the user is logged in with valid credentials,
When they click the "Export" button,
Then a PDF download starts within 2 seconds.

Given the user has entered an invalid email format,
When they submit the registration form,
Then an inline error message displays "Please enter a valid email address."

Given the shopping cart contains items,
When the user refreshes the browser,
Then the cart contents remain unchanged.

Acceptance Criteria Checklist

Each story should include criteria for:

CategoryExample
Happy PathGiven valid input, When submitted, Then success message displayed
ValidationShould reject input when required field is empty
Error HandlingMust show user-friendly message when API fails
PerformanceShould complete operation within 2 seconds
AccessibilityMust be navigable via keyboard only

Minimum Criteria by Story Size

Story PointsMinimum AC Count
1-23-4 criteria
3-54-6 criteria
85-8 criteria
13+Split the story

See references/user-story-templates.md for complete template library.


Epic Breakdown Workflow

Break epics into deliverable sprint-sized stories:

  1. Define epic scope and success criteria
  2. Identify all personas affected by the epic
  3. List all capabilities needed for each persona
  4. Group capabilities into logical stories
  5. Validate each story is ≤8 points
  6. Identify dependencies between stories
  7. Sequence stories for incremental delivery
  8. Validation: Each story delivers standalone value; total stories cover epic scope

Story Splitting Decision Logic

Apply these rules in order. Use the first rule that fits the story:

#Split RuleWhen It AppliesHow to Split
1Workflow StepsStory contains multiple sequential stepsEach step becomes its own story
2Business Rule VariationsStory introduces rule variations (e.g., pricing tiers, user roles)Each rule variation becomes its own story
3Data VariationsStory handles different data types or formatsEach data type becomes its own story
4Complex Acceptance CriteriaStory has 8+ acceptance criteria covering distinct behaviorsEach distinct behavior cluster becomes its own story
5Major EffortStory requires significant build effort (13+ points)Split along effort milestones (foundation → feature → polish)
6External DependenciesStory depends on external APIs, teams, or approvalsSplit dependent and independent work into separate stories
7DevOps EffortStory requires significant infrastructure workSplit infrastructure setup from feature implementation
8None ApplyStory is already small but unclearUse Tiny Acts of Discovery (TADs) -- small spikes to reduce uncertainty

Split Output Format

For each split, document:

## Original Story
As a [persona], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
Points: 13 | Status: Too large for sprint

## Suggested Splits

### Split 1: By Workflow Steps
- **Story A:** As a [persona], I want to [step 1] so that [partial benefit].
  Points: 5 | Independently valuable: Yes
- **Story B:** As a [persona], I want to [step 2] so that [remaining benefit].
  Points: 5 | Independently valuable: Yes

### Risks & Tradeoffs
- [What coupling exists between the split stories]
- [What is lost by delivering them separately]

### Implementation Order
1. Story A (foundation) → 2. Story B (builds on A)

Splitting Techniques (Quick Reference)

TechniqueWhen to UseExample
By workflow stepLinear process"Checkout" → "Add to cart" + "Enter payment" + "Confirm order"
By personaMultiple user types"Dashboard" → "Admin dashboard" + "User dashboard"
By data typeMultiple inputs"Import" → "Import CSV" + "Import Excel"
By operationCRUD functionality"Manage users" → "Create" + "Edit" + "Delete"
By business ruleRule variations"Discount" → "% discount" + "Fixed discount" + "BOGO"
Happy path firstRisk reduction"Feature" → "Basic flow" + "Error handling" + "Edge cases"
By dependencyExternal blockers"Integration" → "Mock integration" + "Live integration"
Tiny Acts of DiscoveryHigh uncertainty"AI feature" → "Spike: feasibility" + "MVP implementation"

Epic Example

Epic: User Dashboard

Breakdown:

Epic: User Dashboard (34 points total)
├── US-001: View key metrics (5 pts) - End User
├── US-002: Customize layout (5 pts) - Power User
├── US-003: Export data to CSV (3 pts) - End User
├── US-004: Share with team (5 pts) - End User
├── US-005: Set up alerts (5 pts) - Power User
├── US-006: Filter by date range (3 pts) - End User
├── US-007: Admin overview (5 pts) - Admin
└── US-008: Enable caching (3 pts) - Enabler

Sprint Planning Workflow

Plan sprint capacity and select stories:

  1. Calculate team capacity (velocity × availability)
  2. Review sprint goal with stakeholders
  3. Select stories from prioritized backlog
  4. Fill to 80-85% of capacity (committed)
  5. Add stretch goals (10-15% additional)
  6. Identify dependencies and risks
  7. Break complex stories into tasks
  8. Validation: Committed points ≤85% capacity; all stories have acceptance criteria

Capacity Calculation

Sprint Capacity = Average Velocity × Availability Factor

Example:
Average Velocity: 30 points
Team availability: 90% (one member partially out)
Adjusted Capacity: 27 points

Committed: 23 points (85% of 27)
Stretch: 4 points (15% of 27)

Availability Factors

ScenarioFactor
Full sprint, no PTO1.0
One team member out 50%0.9
Holiday during sprint0.8
Multiple members out0.7

Sprint Loading Template

Sprint Capacity: 27 points
Sprint Goal: [Clear, measurable objective]

COMMITTED (23 points):
[H] US-001: User dashboard (5 pts)
[H] US-002: Export feature (3 pts)
[H] US-003: Search filter (5 pts)
[M] US-004: Settings page (5 pts)
[M] US-005: Help tooltips (3 pts)
[L] US-006: Theme options (2 pts)

STRETCH (4 points):
[L] US-007: Sort options (2 pts)
[L] US-008: Print view (2 pts)

See references/sprint-planning-guide.md for complete planning procedures.


Backlog Prioritization

Prioritize backlog using value and effort assessment.

Priority Levels

PriorityDefinitionSprint Target
CriticalBlocking users, security, data lossImmediate
HighCore functionality, key user needsThis sprint
MediumImprovements, enhancementsNext 2-3 sprints
LowNice-to-have, minor improvementsBacklog

Prioritization Factors

FactorWeightQuestions
Business Value40%Revenue impact? User demand? Strategic alignment?
User Impact30%How many users? How frequently used?
Risk/Dependencies15%Technical risk? External dependencies?
Effort15%Size? Complexity? Uncertainty?

INVEST Criteria Validation

Before adding to sprint, validate each story:

CriterionQuestionPass If...
IndependentCan this be developed without other uncommitted stories?No blocking dependencies
NegotiableIs the implementation flexible?Multiple approaches possible
ValuableDoes this deliver user or business value?Clear benefit in "so that"
EstimableCan the team estimate this?Understood well enough to size
SmallCan this complete in one sprint?≤8 story points
TestableCan we verify this is done?Clear acceptance criteria

Reference Documentation

User Story Templates

references/user-story-templates.md contains:

  • Standard story formats by type (feature, improvement, bug fix, enabler)
  • Acceptance criteria patterns (Given-When-Then, Should/Must/Can)
  • INVEST criteria validation checklist
  • Story point estimation guide (Fibonacci scale)
  • Common story antipatterns and fixes
  • Story splitting techniques

Sprint Planning Guide

references/sprint-planning-guide.md contains:

  • Sprint planning meeting agenda
  • Capacity calculation formulas
  • Backlog prioritization framework (WSJF)
  • Sprint ceremony guides (standup, review, retro)
  • Velocity tracking and burndown patterns
  • Definition of Done checklist
  • Sprint metrics and targets

Tools

User Story Generator

# Generate stories from sample epic
python scripts/user_story_generator.py

# Plan sprint with capacity
python scripts/user_story_generator.py sprint 30

Generates:

  • INVEST-compliant user stories
  • Given-When-Then acceptance criteria
  • Story point estimates (Fibonacci scale)
  • Priority assignments
  • Sprint loading with committed and stretch items

Sample Output

USER STORY: USR-001
========================================
Title: View Key Metrics
Type: story
Priority: HIGH
Points: 5

Story:
As a End User, I want to view key metrics and KPIs
so that I can save time and work more efficiently

Acceptance Criteria:
  1. Given user has access, When they view key metrics, Then the result is displayed
  2. Should validate input before processing
  3. Must show clear error message when action fails
  4. Should complete within 2 seconds
  5. Must be accessible via keyboard navigation

INVEST Checklist:
  ✓ Independent
  ✓ Negotiable
  ✓ Valuable
  ✓ Estimable
  ✓ Small
  ✓ Testable

Sprint Metrics

Track sprint health and team performance.

Key Metrics

MetricFormulaTarget
VelocityPoints completed / sprintStable ±10%
Commitment ReliabilityCompleted / Committed>85%
Scope ChangePoints added or removed mid-sprint<10%
CarryoverPoints not completed<15%

Velocity Tracking

Sprint 1: 25 points
Sprint 2: 28 points
Sprint 3: 30 points
Sprint 4: 32 points
Sprint 5: 29 points
------------------------
Average Velocity: 28.8 points
Trend: Stable

Planning: Commit to 24-26 points

Definition of Done

Story is complete when:

  • Code complete and peer reviewed
  • Unit tests written and passing
  • Acceptance criteria verified
  • Documentation updated
  • Deployed to staging environment
  • Product Owner accepted
  • No critical bugs remaining

Tool Reference

user_story_generator.py

Generates INVEST-compliant user stories from a sample epic, including acceptance criteria, story point estimates, priority assignments, and sprint planning.

ArgumentTypeDefaultDescription
sprintsubcommand-Run in sprint planning mode
[capacity]int30Sprint capacity in story points (used with sprint)
# Generate stories from sample epic
python scripts/user_story_generator.py

# Sprint planning with capacity
python scripts/user_story_generator.py sprint 30
python scripts/user_story_generator.py sprint 45

Output includes:

  • Story ID, title, type, priority, and point estimate
  • User story narrative in "As a... I want... So that..." format
  • 5 acceptance criteria per story (Given-When-Then, validation, error, performance, accessibility)
  • INVEST criteria checklist per story
  • Backlog summary with priority breakdown
  • Sprint loading with committed and stretch items (in sprint mode)

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Stories too large (>8 points)Epic not broken down enoughApply splitting techniques: by workflow step, persona, or CRUD operation
Acceptance criteria untestableCriteria use vague languageRewrite using Given-When-Then format with specific, observable outcomes
Sprint commitment missed repeatedlyVelocity not stabilized or too aggressiveTrack velocity over 3+ sprints; commit to 80-85% of rolling average
Too many carryover storiesMid-sprint scope changes or poor estimationEnforce no-scope-change rule; calibrate estimates using planning poker
Stories lack clear valueMissing "so that" benefit clauseValidate every story answers: who benefits, what they get, and why it matters
Sprint has too many dependenciesStories not independentRe-sequence backlog; break dependent stories into independent slices
Stakeholders dispute priorityNo objective prioritization frameworkUse WSJF or value/effort scoring; document decision rationale

Success Criteria

CriterionTargetHow to Measure
Commitment reliability>85% of committed points completedPoints completed / Points committed per sprint
INVEST compliance100% of stories pass all 6 criteriauser_story_generator INVEST checklist
Velocity stabilityWithin +/-10% of rolling averageTrack velocity trend over 5+ sprints
Scope change<10% of sprint points added/removed mid-sprintCount points added or removed after planning
Carryover rate<15% of committed pointsPoints not completed / Points committed
Acceptance criteria qualityAll criteria testable and verifiedQA sign-off on acceptance criteria before sprint start
Backlog groomingTop 2 sprints of backlog always readyCount of refined stories with acceptance criteria

Scope & Limitations

In scope:

  • User story generation with INVEST validation
  • Acceptance criteria in Given-When-Then format
  • Sprint planning with capacity-based loading
  • Epic breakdown into sprint-sized stories
  • Backlog prioritization frameworks (WSJF, value/effort)
  • Velocity tracking and sprint metrics
  • Definition of Done enforcement

Out of scope:

  • Jira/Linear ticket creation (use JSON export with their APIs)
  • Burndown chart visualization (use project management tool dashboards)
  • Team member assignment and capacity by individual
  • Cross-team dependency management (use program-level tools)
  • Release planning beyond quarterly horizon
  • Automated acceptance test generation (see engineering skills)

Integration Points

Tool / PlatformIntegration MethodUse Case
Jira / LinearCopy story output or extend script for JSON exportImport generated stories as tickets
Confluence / NotionPaste human-readable outputDocument sprint plans and backlog
SlackShare sprint planning summaryAsync sprint kickoff communication
product-manager-toolkitRICE scores inform story priorityAlign sprint priorities with product strategy
product-strategistOKR cascade informs epic selectionConnect sprint work to quarterly objectives
ux-researcher-designerPersona data informs story personasGround user stories in research-backed personas

平台分布

Codex

36.41%
按下载量换算306

Claude

26.16%
按下载量换算220

Cursor

19.62%
按下载量换算165

Gemini CLI

10%
按下载量换算84

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills