Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agent-designer(Agent 设计师)

agent-designer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-designer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,980。

总安装 2,424周安装 107GitHub Stars 103下载 792核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-designer(Agent 设计师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/agent-designer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agent-designer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agent-designer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

为多智能体系统提供架构设计与评估框架,支持复杂任务分解与协作模式构建。适用于工程团队设计可扩展的 AI 代理系统,涵盖通信策略与性能评估机制。基于 LangGraph、CrewAI 等框架输出结构化设计方案与实现路径。需结合具体业务需求选择架构模式,避免过度设计导致资源浪费。

agent-designer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agent-designer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agent-designer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agent-designer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill agent-designer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-designer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-designer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

agent-designer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agent-designer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,424 次,近一周安装 107 次,下载 792 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-designer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agent-designer

Agent 设计师 · 本页

2,424103需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Agent Designer - Multi-Agent System Architecture

Tier: POWERFUL Category: Engineering Tags: AI agents, architecture, system design, orchestration, multi-agent systems

Overview

Agent Designer is a comprehensive toolkit for designing, architecting, and evaluating multi-agent systems. It provides structured approaches to agent architecture patterns, tool design principles, communication strategies, and performance evaluation frameworks for building robust, scalable AI agent systems.

Core Capabilities

1. Agent Architecture Patterns

Single Agent Pattern
  • Use Case: Simple, focused tasks with clear boundaries
  • Pros: Minimal complexity, easy debugging, predictable behavior
  • Cons: Limited scalability, single point of failure
  • Implementation: Direct user-agent interaction with comprehensive tool access
Supervisor Pattern
  • Use Case: Hierarchical task decomposition with centralized control
  • Architecture: One supervisor agent coordinating multiple specialist agents
  • Pros: Clear command structure, centralized decision making
  • Cons: Supervisor bottleneck, complex coordination logic
  • Implementation: Supervisor receives tasks, delegates to specialists, aggregates results
Swarm Pattern
  • Use Case: Distributed problem solving with peer-to-peer collaboration
  • Architecture: Multiple autonomous agents with shared objectives
  • Pros: High parallelism, fault tolerance, emergent intelligence
  • Cons: Complex coordination, potential conflicts, harder to predict
  • Implementation: Agent discovery, consensus mechanisms, distributed task allocation
Hierarchical Pattern
  • Use Case: Complex systems with multiple organizational layers
  • Architecture: Tree structure with managers and workers at different levels
  • Pros: Natural organizational mapping, clear responsibilities
  • Cons: Communication overhead, potential bottlenecks at each level
  • Implementation: Multi-level delegation with feedback loops
Pipeline Pattern
  • Use Case: Sequential processing with specialized stages
  • Architecture: Agents arranged in processing pipeline
  • Pros: Clear data flow, specialized optimization per stage
  • Cons: Sequential bottlenecks, rigid processing order
  • Implementation: Message queues between stages, state handoffs

2. Agent Role Definition

Role Specification Framework
  • Identity: Name, purpose statement, core competencies
  • Responsibilities: Primary tasks, decision boundaries, success criteria
  • Capabilities: Required tools, knowledge domains, processing limits
  • Interfaces: Input/output formats, communication protocols
  • Constraints: Security boundaries, resource limits, operational guidelines
Common Agent Archetypes

Coordinator Agent

  • Orchestrates multi-agent workflows
  • Makes high-level decisions and resource allocation
  • Monitors system health and performance
  • Handles escalations and conflict resolution

Specialist Agent

  • Deep expertise in specific domain (code, data, research)
  • Optimized tools and knowledge for specialized tasks
  • High-quality output within narrow scope
  • Clear handoff protocols for out-of-scope requests

Interface Agent

  • Handles external interactions (users, APIs, systems)
  • Protocol translation and format conversion
  • Authentication and authorization management
  • User experience optimization

Monitor Agent

  • System health monitoring and alerting
  • Performance metrics collection and analysis
  • Anomaly detection and reporting
  • Compliance and audit trail maintenance

3. Tool Design Principles

Schema Design
  • Input Validation: Strong typing, required vs optional parameters
  • Output Consistency: Standardized response formats, error handling
  • Documentation: Clear descriptions, usage examples, edge cases
  • Versioning: Backward compatibility, migration paths
Error Handling Patterns
  • Graceful Degradation: Partial functionality when dependencies fail
  • Retry Logic: Exponential backoff, circuit breakers, max attempts
  • Error Propagation: Structured error responses, error classification
  • Recovery Strategies: Fallback methods, alternative approaches
Idempotency Requirements
  • Safe Operations: Read operations with no side effects
  • Idempotent Writes: Same operation can be safely repeated
  • State Management: Version tracking, conflict resolution
  • Atomicity: All-or-nothing operation completion

4. Communication Patterns

Message Passing
  • Asynchronous Messaging: Decoupled agents, message queues
  • Message Format: Structured payloads with metadata
  • Delivery Guarantees: At-least-once, exactly-once semantics
  • Routing: Direct messaging, publish-subscribe, broadcast
Shared State
  • State Stores: Centralized data repositories
  • Consistency Models: Strong, eventual, weak consistency
  • Access Patterns: Read-heavy, write-heavy, mixed workloads
  • Conflict Resolution: Last-writer-wins, merge strategies
Event-Driven Architecture
  • Event Sourcing: Immutable event logs, state reconstruction
  • Event Types: Domain events, system events, integration events
  • Event Processing: Real-time, batch, stream processing
  • Event Schema: Versioned event formats, backward compatibility

5. Guardrails and Safety

Input Validation
  • Schema Enforcement: Required fields, type checking, format validation
  • Content Filtering: Harmful content detection, PII scrubbing
  • Rate Limiting: Request throttling, resource quotas
  • Authentication: Identity verification, authorization checks
Output Filtering
  • Content Moderation: Harmful content removal, quality checks
  • Consistency Validation: Logic checks, constraint verification
  • Formatting: Standardized output formats, clean presentation
  • Audit Logging: Decision trails, compliance records
Human-in-the-Loop
  • Approval Workflows: Critical decision checkpoints
  • Escalation Triggers: Confidence thresholds, risk assessment
  • Override Mechanisms: Human judgment precedence
  • Feedback Loops: Human corrections improve system behavior

6. Evaluation Frameworks

Task Completion Metrics
  • Success Rate: Percentage of tasks completed successfully
  • Partial Completion: Progress measurement for complex tasks
  • Task Classification: Success criteria by task type
  • Failure Analysis: Root cause identification and categorization
Quality Assessment
  • Output Quality: Accuracy, relevance, completeness measures
  • Consistency: Response variability across similar inputs
  • Coherence: Logical flow and internal consistency
  • User Satisfaction: Feedback scores, usage patterns
Cost Analysis
  • Token Usage: Input/output token consumption per task
  • API Costs: External service usage and charges
  • Compute Resources: CPU, memory, storage utilization
  • Time-to-Value: Cost per successful task completion
Latency Distribution
  • Response Time: End-to-end task completion time
  • Processing Stages: Bottleneck identification per stage
  • Queue Times: Wait times in processing pipelines
  • Resource Contention: Impact of concurrent operations

7. Orchestration Strategies

Centralized Orchestration
  • Workflow Engine: Central coordinator manages all agents
  • State Management: Centralized workflow state tracking
  • Decision Logic: Complex routing and branching rules
  • Monitoring: Comprehensive visibility into all operations
Decentralized Orchestration
  • Peer-to-Peer: Agents coordinate directly with each other
  • Service Discovery: Dynamic agent registration and lookup
  • Consensus Protocols: Distributed decision making
  • Fault Tolerance: No single point of failure
Hybrid Approaches
  • Domain Boundaries: Centralized within domains, federated across
  • Hierarchical Coordination: Multiple orchestration levels
  • Context-Dependent: Strategy selection based on task type
  • Load Balancing: Distribute coordination responsibility

8. Memory Patterns

Short-Term Memory
  • Context Windows: Working memory for current tasks
  • Session State: Temporary data for ongoing interactions
  • Cache Management: Performance optimization strategies
  • Memory Pressure: Handling capacity constraints
Long-Term Memory
  • Persistent Storage: Durable data across sessions
  • Knowledge Base: Accumulated domain knowledge
  • Experience Replay: Learning from past interactions
  • Memory Consolidation: Transferring from short to long-term
Shared Memory
  • Collaborative Knowledge: Shared learning across agents
  • Synchronization: Consistency maintenance strategies
  • Access Control: Permission-based memory access
  • Memory Partitioning: Isolation between agent groups

9. Scaling Considerations

Horizontal Scaling
  • Agent Replication: Multiple instances of same agent type
  • Load Distribution: Request routing across agent instances
  • Resource Pooling: Shared compute and storage resources
  • Geographic Distribution: Multi-region deployments
Vertical Scaling
  • Capability Enhancement: More powerful individual agents
  • Tool Expansion: Broader tool access per agent
  • Context Expansion: Larger working memory capacity
  • Processing Power: Higher throughput per agent
Performance Optimization
  • Caching Strategies: Response caching, tool result caching
  • Parallel Processing: Concurrent task execution
  • Resource Optimization: Efficient resource utilization
  • Bottleneck Elimination: Systematic performance tuning

10. Failure Handling

Retry Mechanisms
  • Exponential Backoff: Increasing delays between retries
  • Jitter: Random delay variation to prevent thundering herd
  • Maximum Attempts: Bounded retry behavior
  • Retry Conditions: Transient vs permanent failure classification
Fallback Strategies
  • Graceful Degradation: Reduced functionality when systems fail
  • Alternative Approaches: Different methods for same goals
  • Default Responses: Safe fallback behaviors
  • User Communication: Clear failure messaging
Circuit Breakers
  • Failure Detection: Monitoring failure rates and response times
  • State Management: Open, closed, half-open circuit states
  • Recovery Testing: Gradual return to normal operation
  • Cascading Failure Prevention: Protecting upstream systems

Implementation Guidelines

Architecture Decision Process

  1. Requirements Analysis: Understand system goals, constraints, scale
  2. Pattern Selection: Choose appropriate architecture pattern
  3. Agent Design: Define roles, responsibilities, interfaces
  4. Tool Architecture: Design tool schemas and error handling
  5. Communication Design: Select message patterns and protocols
  6. Safety Implementation: Build guardrails and validation
  7. Evaluation Planning: Define success metrics and monitoring
  8. Deployment Strategy: Plan scaling and failure handling

Quality Assurance

  • Testing Strategy: Unit, integration, and system testing approaches
  • Monitoring: Real-time system health and performance tracking
  • Documentation: Architecture documentation and runbooks
  • Security Review: Threat modeling and security assessments

Continuous Improvement

  • Performance Monitoring: Ongoing system performance analysis
  • User Feedback: Incorporating user experience improvements
  • A/B Testing: Controlled experiments for system improvements
  • Knowledge Base Updates: Continuous learning and adaptation

This skill provides the foundation for designing robust, scalable multi-agent systems that can handle complex tasks while maintaining safety, reliability, and performance at scale.

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Pattern selection returns single_agent for complex systemsLow complexity score due to vague task descriptionsProvide detailed task descriptions including keywords like "parallel", "sequential", or "distributed" to improve heuristic matching
Supervisor bottleneck under high agent countAll specialist agents report to one supervisor, overwhelming its coordination capacitySwitch to hierarchical pattern for teams exceeding 8 agents, or introduce sub-supervisors within the supervisor pattern
Swarm agents produce conflicting outputsNo consensus mechanism configured; agents act on stale shared stateSet consensus_threshold above 0.6 and implement event-driven communication with conflict resolution strategies
Pipeline stage timeouts cascade downstreamA slow stage blocks the entire sequential chain with no backpressure handlingAdd per-stage circuit breakers, increase stage_timeout, and implement buffered message queues between stages
Generated Mermaid diagrams render incorrectlyAgent names contain special characters or spaces that break Mermaid syntaxUse snake_case agent names without special characters; the planner sanitizes names automatically
Tool schema validation failures in productionInput schemas generated without sufficient constraints for edge-case dataRun tool_schema_generator.py with --validate to catch schema gaps before deployment
Evaluation report shows 0 throughputExecution logs missing or malformed start_time/end_time fieldsEnsure logs use ISO 8601 datetime format (e.g., 2026-01-15T10:30:00Z) for all timestamp fields

Success Criteria

  • Architecture pattern accuracy: Selected pattern matches system requirements in 90%+ of evaluations (validated by team review)
  • Agent role completeness: Every task in the requirements maps to at least one agent's responsibilities with no orphaned tasks
  • Communication topology coverage: All agent pairs that need to exchange data have explicit communication links defined
  • Tool schema compliance: 100% of generated schemas pass validation against both OpenAI function calling and Anthropic tool use formats
  • Evaluation report actionability: Performance reports identify at least 3 concrete optimization recommendations with estimated impact
  • Design-to-implementation time: Architecture designs reduce multi-agent system implementation time by 40%+ compared to ad-hoc design
  • Failure handling coverage: Every agent in the design has defined retry policies, fallback strategies, and escalation paths

Scope & Limitations

Covers:

  • Multi-agent architecture pattern selection (single agent, supervisor, swarm, hierarchical, pipeline)
  • Agent role definition with responsibilities, capabilities, tools, and communication interfaces
  • Tool schema generation in OpenAI and Anthropic formats with validation rules and error handling
  • Performance evaluation from execution logs including bottleneck analysis and optimization recommendations

Does NOT cover:

  • Runtime agent orchestration or execution engines (see engineering/agent-workflow-designer for workflow execution)
  • LLM prompt engineering or system prompt design (see engineering/prompt-engineer-toolkit)
  • MCP server implementation or protocol details (see engineering/mcp-server-builder)
  • Self-improving agent feedback loops or autonomous learning (see engineering/self-improving-agent)

Integration Points

SkillIntegrationData Flow
engineering/agent-workflow-designerWorkflow definitions consume architecture designs from Agent DesignerAgent roles and communication topology feed into workflow step definitions
engineering/prompt-engineer-toolkitSystem prompts are crafted per agent role defined by Agent DesignerAgent role specifications and responsibilities inform prompt structure and constraints
engineering/mcp-server-builderTool schemas generated here map to MCP server tool implementationstool_schema_generator.py output provides the schema contract that MCP servers implement
engineering/self-improving-agentEvaluation reports feed into self-improvement loopsagent_evaluator.py bottleneck analysis drives autonomous optimization decisions
engineering/observability-designerMonitoring architecture aligns with agent topology and communication linksAgent definitions and communication patterns define what to instrument and alert on
engineering/agent-protocolProtocol standards govern inter-agent message formats designed hereCommunication topology patterns must comply with agent protocol specifications

Tool Reference

agent_planner.py

Purpose: Designs multi-agent system architectures from system requirements. Selects an architecture pattern, defines agent roles, generates communication topology, produces a Mermaid diagram, and creates an implementation roadmap.

Usage:

python agent_planner.py <input_file> [-o OUTPUT] [--format {json,yaml,both}]

Parameters:

ParameterTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
input_filepositionalYes--JSON file containing system requirements (goal, description, tasks, constraints, team_size, performance_requirements, safety_requirements, integration_requirements, scale_requirements)
-o, --outputstringNoagent_architectureOutput file prefix for generated files
--formatchoiceNobothOutput format: json, yaml, or both

Example:

python agent_planner.py requirements.json -o my_system --format both

Output Formats:

  • {prefix}.json -- Full architecture design including agents, communication topology, guardrails, scaling strategy, and metadata
  • {prefix}_diagram.mmd -- Mermaid diagram of the agent architecture (generated when format is both)
  • {prefix}_roadmap.json -- Implementation roadmap with phases, tasks, deliverables, risks, and success criteria (generated when format is both)
  • Console summary showing pattern, agent count, communication links, and estimated duration

agent_evaluator.py

Purpose: Evaluates multi-agent system performance from execution logs. Calculates success rates, cost analysis, latency distribution, error patterns, bottleneck identification, and optimization recommendations.

Usage:

python agent_evaluator.py <input_file> [-o OUTPUT] [--format {json,both}] [--detailed]

Parameters:

ParameterTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
input_filepositionalYes--JSON file containing execution logs (array of log entries with task_id, agent_id, task_type, status, duration_ms, tokens_used, cost_usd, tools_used, error_details, etc.)
-o, --outputstringNoevaluation_reportOutput file prefix for generated report files
--formatchoiceNobothOutput format: json or both
--detailedflagNooffInclude detailed per-agent and per-task-type breakdowns in the report

Example:

python agent_evaluator.py execution_logs.json -o perf_report --format both --detailed

Output Formats:

  • {prefix}.json -- Complete evaluation report with system metrics, agent metrics, task type metrics, tool usage analysis, error analysis, bottleneck analysis, and optimization recommendations
  • Console summary with key performance indicators (when format is both, additional breakdowns are written to separate files)

tool_schema_generator.py

Purpose: Generates structured tool schemas compatible with OpenAI function calling and Anthropic tool use formats. Includes input validation rules, error response formats, example calls, and rate limit suggestions.

Usage:

python tool_schema_generator.py <input_file> [-o OUTPUT] [--format {json,both}] [--validate]

Parameters:

ParameterTypeRequiredDefaultDescription
input_filepositionalYes--JSON file containing tool descriptions (array of objects with name, purpose, category, inputs, outputs, error_conditions, side_effects, idempotent, rate_limits, dependencies, examples, security_requirements)
-o, --outputstringNotool_schemasOutput file prefix for generated schema files
--formatchoiceNobothOutput format: json or both
--validateflagNooffValidate generated schemas against JSON Schema standards and report any issues

Example:

python tool_schema_generator.py tools.json -o my_tools --format both --validate

Output Formats:

  • {prefix}.json -- Complete tool schemas including OpenAI format, Anthropic format, validation rules, error responses, rate limits, and example usage for each tool
  • Console summary with schema count, validation results (when --validate is used), and any detected issues

平台分布

Codex

34.08%
按下载量换算270

Claude

32.15%
按下载量换算255

Cursor

17.53%
按下载量换算139

Gemini CLI

9.93%
按下载量换算79

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills