Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

bookforge-business-development-pipeline(Bookforge 业务发展渠道)

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,530。

总安装 1,717周安装 73GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 602核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bookforge-business-development-pipeline(Bookforge 业务发展渠道)
来源仓库:https://github.com/quochungto/bookforge-business-development-pipeline
安装命令:
openclaw skills install bookforge-business-development-pipeline
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install bookforge-business-development-pipeline

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于构建基于属性的业务开发管道。整合五种合作伙伴类型和九步 BD 流程。支持系统化拓展合作关系。bookforge-business-development-pipeline 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用时需定义目标伙伴属性和筛选标准。建议分阶段推进并建立反馈机制。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install bookforge-business-development-pipeline;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install bookforge-business-development-pipeline。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,717 次,近一周安装 73 次,下载 602 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bookforge-business-development-pipeline 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
bookforge-business-development-pipeline

Bookforge 业务发展渠道 · 本页

1,717—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
business-development-pipeline
description
Build a business development pipeline with 5 partnership types, attribute-based partner selection, and a 9-step BD process. Use whenever a founder or BD lead is planning partnerships, pursuing integration deals, negotiating licensing, structuring joint ventures, setting up distribution deals, sourcing supply partnerships, or transitioning from traditional BD to low-touch self-serve BD. Activates on phrases like 'business development', 'BD', 'partnerships', 'strategic partner', 'integration partner', 'licensing deal', 'distribution partner', 'joint venture', 'channel partner', 'co-marketing', 'white label', 'BD deal'.
version
1.0.0
homepage
https://github.com/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/tree/main/books/traction/skills/business-development-pipeline
metadata
{"openclaw":{"emoji":"📚","homepage":"https://github.com/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills"}}
status
draft
source-books
title
Traction: A Startup Guide to Getting Customers
authors
["Gabriel Weinberg", "Justin Mares"]
chapters
[18]
domain
startup-growth
tags
[startup-growth, business-development, partnerships, strategic-alliances, channel-partnerships]
depends-on
[bullseye-channel-selection]
execution
tier
1
mode
hybrid
inputs
description
Company objectives, candidate partners, existing partnerships
tools-required
[Read, Write]
tools-optional
[AskUserQuestion]
mcps-required
[]
environment
Plain-text working directory for BD pipeline spreadsheet and deal docs
discovery
goal
Build a BD pipeline with partner attributes, prioritization, outreach plan, and term sheets
tasks
audience
roles
[startup-founder, bd-lead, head-of-partnerships]
experience
intermediate
when_to_use
triggers
prerequisites
why
BD should be selected via Bullseye
not_for
environment
codebase_required
false
codebase_helpful
false
works_offline
true
quality
scores
with_skill
null
baseline
null
delta
null
tested_at
null
eval_count
0
assertion_count
11
iterations_needed
0

Business Development Pipeline

When to Use

The startup is pursuing partnerships — not pure sales. BD differs from sales: BD exchanges value through partnerships; sales exchanges dollars for a product. Use this skill when:

  • A partner has distribution, inventory, or brand you need
  • You need integration deals to complete a product story
  • Licensing (either direction) is on the table
  • Planning a joint venture or co-marketing arrangement

Context & Input Gathering

Required Context (must have — ask if missing)

  • Company objectives: what BD should serve

→ Check prompt for: "need distribution", "want integration with", "raising next round" → If missing, ask: "What specific company objectives should BD help achieve? Distribution? Brand credibility? Product completeness? Inventory?"

  • Current state: existing partnerships, team resources

→ Check prompt for: partners, BD lead, prior deals

Observable Context

  • Product category: determines which partners are relevant
  • Investor/advisor network: source of warm introductions

Default Assumptions

  • Partners identified by attributes, not brand names
  • Pipeline size: 10-20 focused partners, not 100+
  • Warm introductions only for initial outreach
  • 1-page term sheets, not 20-page contracts

Sufficiency Threshold

SUFFICIENT: company objectives + candidate attributes known
PROCEED WITH DEFAULTS: objectives known, infer partner attributes
MUST ASK: no clear objective for BD

Process

Use TodoWrite:

  • [ ] Step 1: Define company objectives BD serves
  • [ ] Step 2: Pick the 1-2 partnership types that fit
  • [ ] Step 3: Build pipeline by partner attributes
  • [ ] Step 4: Get warm introductions
  • [ ] Step 5: Negotiate simple term sheets
  • [ ] Step 6: Document deal completion
  • [ ] Step 7: Plan Low-touch BD 2.0

Step 1: Define Company Objectives

ACTION: Start by listing the 1-3 key company objectives BD should serve. Every BD deal should map to an objective. Common objectives:

  • Growth / distribution — need access to a larger customer base
  • Revenue — shared revenue models, white-label
  • Product — integration completes a product story
  • Credibility — partnership with a recognizable brand
  • Inventory / supply — access to key inputs (content, data, goods)

Work backwards: "What does our fundraising deck need to show in 12 months?" Use this to define which partnerships are strategic.

WHY: BD is easy to do badly — partnerships that feel prestigious but don't advance company goals. Tying BD to specific objectives prevents "shiny partnership" traps where you spend 3 months negotiating a deal that doesn't matter.

Step 2: Pick the 1-2 Partnership Types That Fit

ACTION: The 5 partnership types (see references/partnership-types.md):

  1. Standard Partnership — joint product enhancement (Nike+/Apple)
  2. Joint Venture — new product built together (Starbucks/Pepsi Frappuccino)
  3. Licensing — brand or IP licensed (Starbucks ice cream, Spotify music)
  4. Distribution Deal — product/service exchanged for customer access (Groupon, Kayak/AOL)
  5. Supply Partnership — access to key inputs (Half.com used books, YouTube channel partners)

Pick the 1-2 that match the objective. Don't pursue all 5.

WHY: Different deal types have different negotiation patterns, legal structures, and risk profiles. Mixing types produces muddled deals that don't close cleanly. Choosing type upfront aligns expectations.

Step 3: Build the Pipeline by Partner Attributes

ACTION: Instead of listing brand names ("let's partner with Microsoft"), list partner *attributes*:

Example attribute filter: "Internet retailers ranked 50-250 on IR500, with shipping infrastructure in North America, revenue $10M-$500M, distributing consumer electronics"

Build a pipeline of 10-20 partners matching these attributes. Score by:

  • Strategic fit to company objective
  • Ease of reach (warm intro available?)
  • Deal size / impact
  • Probability of close

Write the pipeline to bd-pipeline.csv with columns: company, type, contact, size, relevance, ease, priority_score.

WHY: Attribute-based selection avoids the "big brand bias" where founders chase marquee partners who won't take the meeting. Attribute selection produces partners who are the right size, the right industry, and the right stage — who actually return calls. Chris Fralic (Half.com): the pipeline should prioritize fit, not fame.

Step 4: Get Warm Introductions

ACTION: For every partner in the pipeline, identify a warm introduction path:

  • Investors who know the partner
  • Advisors with relationships
  • Former colleagues now at the partner
  • Conference connections
  • Customer mutual friends

Prepare a 1-page proposal overview the introducer can forward. Make it easy to pass along.

Never cold-email BD prospects. Cold sales works; cold BD doesn't. Partners respond to introductions, not pitches.

WHY: BD deals involve trust and strategic alignment, which cold contact cannot establish. Warm introductions signal credibility — the introducer's reputation is at stake, so the recipient pays attention. Cold BD outreach produces 1-2% response rates; warm intros produce 40%+.

IF no warm intro path exists → build one. Attend industry events, join investor networks, or trade favors with advisors.

Step 5: Negotiate Simple Term Sheets

ACTION: Keep initial term sheets to 1 page. Include:

  • Deal lifetime — duration of the partnership
  • Exclusivity — exclusive or non-exclusive, and to what scope
  • Payment structure — revenue share, flat fee, equity swap
  • Commitment level — what each side commits to deliver
  • Guarantees — any minimums or SLAs
  • Revenue share — if applicable, specific percentages

Long contracts (20+ pages) at initial stage kill deals. 1-page term sheets get signed; 20-page contracts get stuck in legal review for months.

WHY: Complexity kills early-stage BD. The goal is to establish clear terms fast so both sides can start executing. Lawyers can add detail later. Over-engineered initial contracts signal distrust and consume negotiation energy that should be spent on the relationship.

Step 6: Document "How the Deal Was Done"

ACTION: After closing, write a memo documenting:

  • How the partnership came together (intro path, first meeting, breakthroughs)
  • Who the key contacts were
  • Sticking points encountered and how they were resolved
  • What interested the partner (the specific hook)
  • What the next 90 days look like

Save to bd-deal-postmortem.md per deal.

WHY: BD knowledge is tacit. Founders who do 3 deals and don't document anything lose the patterns. Documenting creates a playbook for the next deal. Chris Fralic's (Half.com) approach: every closed deal gets a "how it was done" memo, and those memos inform the next negotiation.

Step 7: Plan Low-Touch BD 2.0

ACTION: After 2-3 traditional partnerships establish the model, transition to self-serve BD. Build API integrations, embed codes, or partner portals that enable new partners to integrate without custom negotiation.

Delicious/Mozilla example: after manual integration with Mozilla, Delicious built an API that let any partner integrate at scale without BD team involvement.

WHY: Manual BD doesn't scale. Every new partner means new negotiations, contracts, custom integrations. Low-touch BD converts the manual work into a product that partners onboard themselves. This is the transition from BD as a channel to BD as a product surface.

Inputs

  • Company objectives (specifically what BD serves)
  • Partner attribute criteria
  • Warm intro network (investors, advisors)

Outputs

Five files:

  1. bd-objectives.md — Company objectives BD serves
  2. bd-pipeline.csv — Prioritized partner list by attributes
  3. bd-term-sheets.md — 1-page term sheets per active deal
  4. bd-deal-postmortem.md — "How the deal was done" memo per closed deal
  5. bd-low-touch-plan.md — Transition plan to self-serve integrations (if scale warrants)

Key Principles

  • BD is not sales. BD exchanges value; sales exchanges money. WHY: Confusing the two leads to wrong conversations — pitching a sales deal to a BD prospect, or vice versa. The distinction determines everything from introduction style to contract structure.
  • Attributes, not brand names. Pipeline by fit, not by prestige. WHY: Big-brand BD targets rarely return calls to early-stage startups. Attribute-based pipelines produce partners who are the right size and actually engage.
  • Warm intros only. Cold BD doesn't work. WHY: BD requires trust that cold outreach can't establish. The investor/advisor who introduces you has reputation at stake, which is the credibility substitute.
  • 1-page term sheets at the start. Long contracts kill deals. WHY: Complexity at the negotiation stage produces legal delays and fatigue. Simple terms get signed; complex ones get stuck. Detail is added later.
  • Every deal gets a "how it was done" memo. BD knowledge is tacit and perishable. WHY: Without documentation, patterns are lost and each deal is a first-time experience. Documentation creates the BD playbook.
  • Transition to low-touch BD 2.0 after 2-3 deals. Manual BD doesn't scale past a handful. WHY: Every new partner is a bespoke negotiation unless you build a self-serve layer. At scale, BD must become a product surface.

Examples

Scenario: Early-stage SaaS needing integration partners

Trigger: "We built a project management tool and need integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Notion. How do we do BD?"

Process: (1) Objective: product completeness (integration story). (2) Type: Standard Partnership (product enhancement). (3) Attributes: top 20 tools in PM-adjacent categories that have integration APIs and partner programs. Most don't need BD — they have self-serve partner programs. (4) Warm intros for the 3-5 that require custom integration. (5) 1-page terms: "free integration, mutual logo placement, co-marketing blog post at launch". (6) Post-close memo. (7) After 3 integrations, build an integration framework and self-serve partner docs.

Output: BD pipeline focused on strategic integrations, self-serve path for the rest.

Scenario: Distribution deal negotiation

Trigger: "A big retailer wants to distribute our hardware product. They're asking for 40% margin and exclusivity. Is this a good deal?"

Process: (1) Objective check: does this match our distribution objective? (2) Type: Distribution Deal. (3) Evaluate terms against standard distribution ranges: 30-45% margin is normal, exclusivity is negotiable. (4) 1-page term sheet: 40% margin OK, but exclusivity limited to a specific category/region/time period. Guarantees: minimum $X annual purchase. (5) Warm intro path to their CEO (via your board advisor) if negotiations stall. (6) Post-close: document sticking points for next deal.

Output: Term sheet with specific negotiation levers and a backup intro path.

Scenario: Founder pursuing "marquee" BD

Trigger: "I want to partner with Apple. We'd be on every iPhone. How do I get a meeting?"

Process: (1) Reality check: Apple doesn't do BD meetings with early-stage startups without existing traction. Marquee targets rarely return calls. (2) Attribute filter: instead of Apple specifically, list all companies with large iOS developer audiences (Stripe, Firebase, Twilio, etc.). These are reachable partners. (3) Pipeline of 15 reachable partners. (4) Warm intros for the top 5. (5) After 2-3 deals close, THEN the Apple conversation becomes plausible — you have credibility to bring.

Output: Redirected BD pipeline from marquee-chasing to attribute-based reachable partners.

References

License

This skill is licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Source: BookForge — Traction: A Startup Guide to Getting Customers by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares.

Related BookForge Skills

Install related skills from ClawhHub:

  • clawhub install bookforge-bullseye-channel-selection — Select BD as a channel
  • clawhub install bookforge-startup-sales-process — Sales vs BD distinction
  • clawhub install bookforge-startup-critical-path-planning — BD deals are often critical path milestones

Or install the full book set from GitHub: bookforge-skills

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.53%
按下载量换算425

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills