Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

swift-testing(Swift 测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

swift-testing 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 2,082。

总安装 2,928周安装 122GitHub Stars 72下载 976核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:swift-testing(Swift 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bocato/swift-testing-agent-skill
仓库路径:skills/swift-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bocato/swift-testing-agent-skill --skill swift-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bocato/swift-testing-agent-skill --skill swift-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

swift-testing 用于辅助 Swift 项目的测试设计与实现,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中编写单元测试、端到端测试或分析测试问题时使用。

它基于 Swift Testing 框架,遵循 Arrange-Act-Assert 模式和 F.I.R.S.T. 原则,支持测试夹具、快照测试和迁移指导。使用时需确认项目是否已集成 Swift Testing,并配合本地构建和测试命令验证结果。

涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境,避免误改真实逻辑。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/swift-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bocato/swift-testing-agent-skill --skill swift…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

swift-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bocato/swift-testing-agent-skill --skill swift-testing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

swift-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

swift-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

swift-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

swift-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,928 次,近一周安装 122 次,下载 976 次,GitHub 72 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

swift-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
swift-testing

Swift 测试 · 本页

2,92872需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Swift Testing

Overview

This skill provides expert guidance on Swift Testing, covering the modern Swift Testing framework, test doubles (mocks, stubs, spies), fixtures, integration testing, snapshot testing, and migration from XCTest. Use this skill to help developers write reliable, maintainable tests following F.I.R.S.T. principles and Arrange-Act-Assert patterns.

Agent Behavior Contract (Follow These Rules)

  1. Use Swift Testing framework (@Test, #expect, #require, @Suite) for all new tests, not XCTest.
  2. Always structure tests with clear Arrange-Act-Assert phases.
  3. Follow F.I.R.S.T. principles: Fast, Isolated, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.
  4. Use proper test double terminology per Martin Fowler's taxonomy (Dummy, Fake, Stub, Spy, SpyingStub, Mock).
  5. Place fixtures close to models with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.
  6. Place test doubles close to interfaces with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.
  7. Prefer state verification over behavior verification - simpler, less brittle tests.
  8. Use #expect for soft assertions (continue on failure) and #require for hard assertions (stop on failure).

Quick Decision Tree

When a developer needs testing guidance, follow this decision tree:

  1. Starting fresh with Swift Testing?

- Read references/test-organization.md for suites, tags, traits - Read references/async-testing.md for async test patterns

  1. Need to create test data?

- Read references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns and placement - Read references/test-doubles.md for mock/stub/spy patterns

  1. Testing multiple inputs?

- Read references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing

  1. Testing module interactions?

- Read references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns

  1. Testing UI for regressions?

- Read references/snapshot-testing.md for snapshot testing setup

  1. Testing data structures or state?

- Read references/dump-snapshot-testing.md for text-based snapshot testing

  1. Migrating from XCTest?

- Read references/migration-xctest.md for migration guide

Triage-First Playbook (Common Errors -> Next Best Move)

  • "XCTAssertEqual is unavailable" / need to modernize tests

- Use references/migration-xctest.md for XCTest to Swift Testing migration

  • Need to test async code

- Use references/async-testing.md for async patterns, confirmation, timeouts

  • Tests are slow or flaky

- Check F.I.R.S.T. principles, use proper mocking per references/test-doubles.md

  • Need deterministic test data

- Use references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns with fixed dates

  • Need to test multiple scenarios efficiently

- Use references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing

  • Need to verify component interactions

- Use references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns

Core Syntax

Basic Test

import Testing

@Test func basicTest() {
    #expect(1 + 1 == 2)
}

Test with Description

@Test("Adding items increases cart count")
func addItem() {
    let cart = Cart()
    cart.add(item)
    #expect(cart.count == 1)
}

Async Test

@Test func asyncOperation() async throws {
    let result = try await service.fetch()
    #expect(result.isValid)
}

Arrange-Act-Assert Pattern

Structure every test with clear phases:

@Test func calculateTotal() {
    // Given
    let cart = ShoppingCart()
    cart.add(Item(price: 10))
    cart.add(Item(price: 20))

    // When
    let total = cart.calculateTotal()

    // Then
    #expect(total == 30)
}

Assertions

#expect - Soft Assertion

Continues test execution after failure:

@Test func multipleExpectations() {
    let user = User(name: "Alice", age: 30)
    #expect(user.name == "Alice")  // If fails, test continues
    #expect(user.age == 30)        // This still runs
}

#require - Hard Assertion

Stops test execution on failure:

@Test func requireExample() throws {
    let user = try #require(fetchUser())  // Stops if nil
    #expect(user.name == "Alice")
}

Error Testing

@Test func throwsError() {
    #expect(throws: ValidationError.self) {
        try validate(invalidInput)
    }
}

@Test func throwsSpecificError() {
    #expect(throws: ValidationError.emptyField) {
        try validate("")
    }
}

F.I.R.S.T. Principles

PrincipleDescriptionApplication
FastTests execute in millisecondsMock expensive operations
IsolatedTests don't depend on each otherFresh instance per test
RepeatableSame result every timeMock dates, network, external deps
Self-ValidatingAuto-report pass/failUse #expect, never rely on print()
TimelyWrite tests alongside codeUse parameterized tests for edge cases

Test Double Quick Reference

Per Martin Fowler's definition:

TypePurposeVerification
DummyFill parameters, never usedN/A
FakeWorking implementation with shortcutsState
StubProvides canned answersState
SpyRecords calls for verificationState
SpyingStubStub + Spy combined (most common)State
MockPre-programmed expectations, self-verifiesBehavior

Important: What Swift community calls "Mock" is usually a SpyingStub.

For detailed patterns, see references/test-doubles.md.

Test Double Placement

Place test doubles close to the interface, not in test targets:

// In PersonalRecordsCore-Interface/Sources/...

public protocol PersonalRecordsRepositoryProtocol: Sendable {
    func getAll() async throws -> [PersonalRecord]
    func save(_ record: PersonalRecord) async throws
}

#if DEBUG
public final class PersonalRecordsRepositorySpyingStub: PersonalRecordsRepositoryProtocol {
    // Spy: Captured calls
    public private(set) var savedRecords: [PersonalRecord] = []

    // Stub: Configurable responses
    public var recordsToReturn: [PersonalRecord] = []
    public var errorToThrow: Error?

    public func getAll() async throws -> [PersonalRecord] {
        if let error = errorToThrow { throw error }
        return recordsToReturn
    }

    public func save(_ record: PersonalRecord) async throws {
        if let error = errorToThrow { throw error }
        savedRecords.append(record)
    }
}
#endif

Fixtures

Place fixtures close to the model:

// In Sources/Models/PersonalRecord.swift

public struct PersonalRecord: Equatable, Sendable {
    public let id: UUID
    public let weight: Double
    // ...
}

#if DEBUG
extension PersonalRecord {
    public static func fixture(
        id: UUID = UUID(),
        weight: Double = 100.0
        // ... defaults for all properties
    ) -> PersonalRecord {
        PersonalRecord(id: id, weight: weight)
    }
}
#endif

For detailed patterns, see references/fixtures.md.

Test Pyramid

        +-------------+
        |   UI Tests  |  5%  - End-to-end flows
        |   (E2E)     |
        +-------------+
        | Integration |  15% - Module interactions
        |    Tests    |
        +-------------+
        |    Unit     |  80% - Individual components
        |    Tests    |
        +-------------+

Reference Files

Load these files as needed for specific topics:

  • test-organization.md - Suites, tags, traits, parallel execution
  • parameterized-tests.md - Testing multiple inputs efficiently
  • async-testing.md - Async patterns, confirmation, timeouts, cancellation
  • migration-xctest.md - Complete XCTest to Swift Testing migration guide
  • test-doubles.md - Complete taxonomy with examples (Dummy, Fake, Stub, Spy, SpyingStub, Mock)
  • fixtures.md - Fixture patterns, placement, and best practices
  • integration-testing.md - Module interaction testing patterns
  • snapshot-testing.md - UI regression testing with SnapshotTesting library
  • dump-snapshot-testing.md - Text-based snapshot testing for data structures

Best Practices Summary

  1. Use Swift Testing for new tests - Modern syntax, better features
  2. Follow Arrange-Act-Assert - Clear test structure
  3. Apply F.I.R.S.T. principles - Fast, Isolated, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely
  4. Place fixtures near models - With #if DEBUG guards
  5. Place test doubles near interfaces - With #if DEBUG guards
  6. Prefer state verification - Simpler, less brittle than behavior verification
  7. Use parameterized tests - For testing multiple inputs efficiently
  8. Follow test pyramid - 80% unit, 15% integration, 5% UI

Verification Checklist (When You Write Tests)

  • Tests follow Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation
  • Fixtures use sensible defaults, not random values
  • Test doubles are minimal (only stub what's needed)
  • Async tests use proper patterns (async/await, confirmation)
  • Tests are fast (mock expensive operations)
  • Tests are isolated (no shared state)
  • Tests are repeatable (no flaky date/time dependencies)

平台分布

Codex

35.01%
按下载量换算342

Claude

30.08%
按下载量换算294

Cursor

16.29%
按下载量换算159

Gemini CLI

9.32%
按下载量换算91

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills