Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

blog-writing-specialist(博客写作专家)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

blog-writing-specialist 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 25,107。

总安装 3,843周安装 157GitHub Stars 42下载 1,231核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:blog-writing-specialist(博客写作专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin
仓库路径:skills/blog-writing-specialist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill blog-writing-specialist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill blog-writing-specialist

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

blog-writing-specialist 用于综合提升技术博客深度与个人风格,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要兼顾 AEO 优化与开发者视角时使用。它融合教程写作、个人语调转换与算法可见性策略,提供决策树引导内容类型选择。

使用时根据输入类型匹配不同写作模块,确保技术准确性与传播力平衡。安装前建议确认是否接入第三方 SEO 工具及内容审核流程。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/blog-writing-specialist

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill blog-wr…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

blog-writing-specialist 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill blog-writing-spec…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

blog-writing-specialist 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

blog-writing-specialist 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

blog-writing-specialist 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

blog-writing-specialist 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,843 次,近一周安装 157 次,下载 1,231 次,GitHub 42 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

blog-writing-specialist 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
blog-writing-specialist

博客写作专家 · 本页

3,84342只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Blog Writing Specialist

Comprehensive blog writing combining technical depth, personal voice transformation, and AEO optimization.

Quick Decision Tree

Input TypeUse Section
Technical tutorial, deep dive, benchmarkTechnical Blog Writing
Brain dump → polished postNick Nisi Voice
Personal voice (Jarad style)Jarad's Voice
Company/product/technology category postLightfast Category System
Not sureStart here, adapt as needed

Part 1: Technical Blog Writing

Write developer-focused technical blog posts.

Post Types

1. Tutorial / How-To

Step-by-step instruction. Reader should build something.

Structure:
1. What we're building (with screenshot/demo)
2. Prerequisites
3. Step 1: Setup
4. Step 2: Core implementation
5. Step 3: ...
6. Complete code (GitHub link)
7. Next steps / extensions
RuleWhy
Show the end result firstReader knows if worth continuing
List prerequisites explicitlyDon't waste wrong audience time
Every code block should be runnableCopy-paste-run is the test
Explain the "why" not just the "how"Tutorials that explain reasoning get shared
Include error handlingReal code has errors
Link to complete code repoReference after tutorial

2. Deep Dive / Explainer

Explains a concept, technology, or architecture decision in depth.

Structure:
1. What is [concept] and why should you care?
2. How it works (simplified mental model)
3. How it works (detailed mechanics)
4. Real-world example
5. Trade-offs and when NOT to use it
6. Further reading

3. Postmortem / Incident Report

Describes what went wrong, why, and what was fixed.

Structure:
1. Summary (what happened, impact, duration)
2. Timeline of events
3. Root cause analysis
4. Fix implemented
5. What we're doing to prevent recurrence
6. Lessons learned

4. Benchmark / Comparison

Data-driven comparison of tools, approaches, or architectures.

Structure:
1. What we compared and why
2. Methodology (so results are reproducible)
3. Results with charts/tables
4. Analysis (what the numbers mean)
5. Recommendation (with caveats)
6. Raw data / reproducibility instructions

5. Architecture / System Design

Explains how a system is built and why decisions were made.

Structure:
1. Problem we needed to solve
2. Constraints and requirements
3. Options considered
4. Architecture chosen (with diagram)
5. Trade-offs we accepted
6. Results and lessons

Writing Rules for Developers

Voice and Tone

DoDon't
Be direct: "Use connection pooling""You might want to consider using..."
Admit trade-offs: "This adds complexity"Pretend your solution is perfect
Use "we" for team decisions"I single-handedly architected..."
Specific numbers: "reduced p99 from 800ms to 90ms""significantly improved performance"
Cite sources and benchmarksMake unsourced claims
Acknowledge alternativesPretend yours is the only way

What Developers Hate

❌ "In today's fast-paced world of technology..." (filler)
❌ "As we all know..." (if we all know, why writing it?)
❌ "Simply do X" (nothing is simple if reading a tutorial)
❌ "It's easy to..." (dismissive of reader's experience)
❌ "Obviously..." (if obvious, don't write it)
❌ Marketing language in technical content
❌ Burying the lede under 3 paragraphs of context

Code Examples

RuleWhy
Every code block must be runnableBroken examples destroy trust
Show complete, working examplesSnippets without context are useless
Include language identifier in fenced blocksSyntax highlighting
Show output/result after codeReader verifies understanding
Use realistic variable namescalculateTotalRevenue not foo
Include error handling in examplesReal code handles errors
Pin dependency versions"Works with React 18.2" not "React"

Explanation Depth

Audience SignalDepth
"Getting started with X"Explain everything, assume no prior knowledge
"Advanced X patterns"Skip basics, go deep on nuances
"X vs Y"Assume familiarity with both, focus on differences
"How we built X"Technical audience, can skip fundamentals

State your assumed audience level explicitly at the start.

Blog Post Structure

The Ideal Structure

# Title (contains primary keyword, states outcome)

[Hero image or diagram]

**TL;DR:** [2-3 sentence summary with key takeaway]

## The Problem / Why This Matters
[Set up why the reader should care — specific, not generic]

## The Solution / How We Did It
[Core content — code, architecture, explanation]

### Step 1: [First thing]
[Explanation + code + output]

### Step 2: [Second thing]
[Explanation + code + output]

## Results
[Numbers, benchmarks, outcomes — be specific]

## Trade-offs and Limitations
[Honest about downsides — builds trust]

## Conclusion
[Key takeaway + what to do next]

## Further Reading
[3-5 relevant links]

Word Count by Type

TypeWord CountWhy
Quick tip500-800One concept, one example
Tutorial1,500-3,000Step-by-step needs detail
Deep dive2,000-4,000Thorough exploration
Architecture post2,000-3,500Diagrams carry some load
Benchmark1,500-2,500Data and charts do heavy lifting

Part 2: Brain Dump → Polished Post (Nick Nisi Voice)

Transform unstructured brain dumps into polished blog posts.

Process

1. Receive the Brain Dump

Accept whatever provided:

  • Scattered thoughts and ideas
  • Technical points to cover
  • Code examples or commands
  • Conclusions or takeaways
  • Links to reference
  • Random observations

Don't require organization. The mess is the input.

2. Read Voice and Tone

Load references/voice-tone.md to understand Nick's writing style.

Key characteristics:

  • Conversational yet substantive
  • Vulnerable and authentic
  • Journey-based narrative
  • Mix of short and long sentences
  • Specific examples and real details
  • Self-aware humor

3. Check for Story Potential

Read references/story-circle.md to understand the narrative framework.

Determine if content fits a story structure:

  • Is there a journey from one understanding to another?
  • Can you identify a problem and resolution?
  • Does it follow: comfort → disruption → return changed?

4. Organize Content

Structure material into sections:

Common structures:

  • Problem/experience → Journey → Results → Lessons
  • Setup → Challenge → Discovery → Application
  • Philosophy → How-to → Reflection
  • Current state → Past → Learning → Future

5. Write in Nick's Voice

Opening:

  • Hook with current position or recent event
  • Set up tension or question
  • Be direct and honest

Body:

  • Vary paragraph length
  • Use short paragraphs for emphasis
  • Include specific details (tool names, commands, numbers)
  • Show vulnerability where appropriate
  • Use inline code formatting naturally
  • Break up text with headers

Technical content:

  • Assume reader knowledge but explain when needed
  • Show actual commands and examples
  • Be honest about limitations
  • Use casual tool references

Ending:

  • Tie back to opening
  • Forward-looking perspective
  • Actionable advice
  • Optimistic or thought-provoking

Part 3: Jarad's Voice

Personal blog writing with distinctive voice.

Core Voice Patterns

Sentence Structure:

  • Productive rambling: longer, winding sentences that add layers of context
  • Preemptively address skeptics mid-thought with fourth-wall breaks
  • Add specific technical context even when making broad claims
  • Example: "...ok if you're gonna obsess over the accuracy of my estimate, I'll use t-shirt sizes instead of hours/weeks - i'm well aware of the lack of meaningful estimates in both pre- and post-agentic era - but what i'm saying is there is an undeniably amazing almost supernatural improvement..."

Concrete Over Abstract:

  • Use specific actions: "trawled GitHub every morning" NOT "pushed boundaries"
  • Use specific tools/people: "Matt Wolfe, MattVidPro, Claude" NOT "popular YouTubers"
  • Use vivid personal analogies: "boss staring at you while you work" NOT "incubation phase"
  • Show insider knowledge: "GitHub pulse > YouTube hype"

Tone Elements:

  • Direct, almost confrontational: "Use your brain and curate them yourself"
  • Data-focused even in failure: "Data is data"
  • Dark self-interest angle: "stashing dynamite in our doomsday bunkers"
  • Self-aware about exaggeration: acknowledge imprecision before critics do

NEVER Use:

  • "This isn't X, it's Y" profound-sounding structures
  • Cliché transitions: "here's the kicker", "here's where it gets interesting"
  • Abstract action verbs without details: "experimented relentlessly", "pushed boundaries"
  • Overly polished blog-speak
  • Clean, explanatory metaphors like "incubation phase"

Header Style:

  • Minimalistic: 2-4 words maximum
  • When read in sequence, headers tell their own story
  • No explanatory subtitles
  • Example progression: "Flat Charts" → "The Lab" → "Spring 2024" → "The Numbers" → "The Window"

Content Strategy

Opening:

  • Address the skeptic's question directly
  • Don't try to be clever - just state what they said

Body:

  • Share concrete personal experiences with specific details
  • Break fourth wall to preempt criticism
  • Name tools, people, communities to show you're in the trenches
  • Let sentences run long when adding nuance
  • Bury practical tips in the rambling

Addressing Critics:

  • Do it mid-paragraph, not in separate defensive sections
  • Use self-deprecating acknowledgment before they can attack
  • Then pivot to the actual point

Closing:

  • Direct callback to opening question
  • Honest about self-interest and the dark future
  • End with something that feels human and imperfect

Examples

Bad: "The shovelware isn't missing. It's incubating." Good: "I would say this is more accurately 'an incubation phase'. Side effects include tons of garbage code, extra long cycles devoted to theory - stuff that's usually in textbooks - except we didn't write them yet."

Bad: "I was hitting these incredible 'a-ha' moments weekly." Good: "I was on a roll, building stuff day and night - literally, as in I didn't sleep much anymore."

Bad: "Experimented relentlessly. Pushed boundaries. Tried to break things." Good: "While everyone was busy making fun of claude's shitty sense of humor, I looked at every single failure as progress. Data is data. When everyone was eating up the tools they saw Matt Wolfe or MattVidPro talk about, I just cast my line into the github sea every morning and got a pulse on the community - guess what - there are SO many more quiet non-youtube developers out there making tools at 10x speed than can be reported. Use your brain and curate them yourself."


Part 4: Category-Aware AEO System (Lightfast)

Create category-aware, AEO-optimized blog posts.

Critical: Accuracy Over Marketing

Before writing anything:

  1. Verify every claim:

- If you cite a number, confirm the source - If you mention a feature, confirm it exists in production - When uncertain, ask for clarification

  1. Never oversell:

- Disclose limitations: "Currently supports X; Y coming in vZ" - Be honest about beta status and rollout timelines

  1. Match category voice:

- Technology: Technical authority, data-driven - Company: Visionary, category-defining - Product: Problem-solver, benefit-oriented

Category Selection

CategoryUse WhenAudience
TechnologyTechnical deep-dives, architecture, researchDevelopers, engineers
CompanyFunding, partnerships, events, hiringExecutives, investors
ProductFeature launches, updates, tutorialsCustomers, prospects

Writing Guidelines

  1. Concise & scannable: Match category word counts
  2. Lead with value: Start with what readers gain
  3. Be transparent: Mention beta status, limitations
  4. Active voice: "You can now..." not "Users are able to..."
  5. No emoji: Professional tone
  6. Include TL;DR: 80-100 words for AI citation
  7. FAQ section: 3-5 questions matching search queries
  8. Code examples: Required for Technology posts

Required Frontmatter

Every draft MUST include:

  • title, slug, publishedAt, category (core)
  • excerpt, tldr (AEO)
  • seo.metaDescription, seo.focusKeyword (SEO)
  • _internal.status, _internal.generated (traceability)

Part 5: Diagram Generation

When to Use Diagrams

ScenarioDiagram Type
Request flowSequence diagram
System architectureBox-and-arrow diagram
Decision logicFlowchart
Data modelER diagram
Performance comparisonBar/line chart
Before/afterSide-by-side

For architecture diagrams and benchmark visualizations:

Use diagramming tools (Mermaid, Excalidraw, draw.io) for architecture diagrams and charting libraries (matplotlib, Chart.js) for benchmark visualizations. These tools provide better control, are self-hosted, and avoid third-party execution risks.


Part 6: Distribution

Where Developers Read

PlatformFormatHow to Post
Your blogFull articlePrimary — own your content
Dev.toCross-post (canonical URL back to yours)Markdown import
HashnodeCross-post (canonical URL)Markdown import
Hacker NewsLink submissionShow HN for projects, tell HN for stories
Reddit (r/programming, r/webdev, etc.)Link or discussionFollow subreddit rules
Twitter/XThread summary + linkSee twitter-thread-creation skill
LinkedInAdapted version + linkSee linkedin-content skill

Common Mistakes

MistakeProblemFix
No TL;DRBusy devs leave before getting the point2-3 sentence summary at the top
Broken code examplesDestroys all credibilityTest every code block before publishing
No version pinningCode breaks in 6 months"Works with Node 20, React 18.2"
"Simply do X"Dismissive, condescendingRemove "simply", "just", "easily"
No diagrams for architectureWalls of text describing systemsOne diagram > 500 words
Marketing toneDevelopers instantly disengageDirect, technical, honest
No trade-offs sectionReads as biased marketingAlways discuss downsides
Giant introduction before contentReaders bounceGet to the point in 2-3 paragraphs
Unpinned dependenciesTutorial breaks for future readersPin versions, note date written
No "Further Reading"Dead end, no context3-5 links to deepen understanding

Bundled Resources

References

  • references/voice-tone.md - Complete Nick Nisi voice and tone guide
  • references/story-circle.md - Story Circle narrative framework

Usage

Load reference files when writing in specific voices:

  • Nick Nisi voice → read references/voice-tone.md + references/story-circle.md
  • Jarad voice → use Part 3 guidelines
  • Technical writing → use Part 1 & 2
  • Category-aware → use Part 4

平台分布

Codex

33.15%
按下载量换算408

Claude

30.67%
按下载量换算378

Cursor

19.14%
按下载量换算236

Gemini CLI

9.47%
按下载量换算117

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills