Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

biz-relationship-pulse(商业关系脉搏)

biz-relationship-pulse 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

biz-relationship-pulse 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 28,486。

总安装 3,214周安装 130GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,009核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:biz-relationship-pulse(商业关系脉搏)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rednix/biz-relationship-pulse
安装命令:
openclaw skills install biz-relationship-pulse
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install biz-relationship-pulse

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

扫描您的电子邮件和 LinkedIn,以识别停滞的商业关系,并通过定制的重新参与线路建议优先联系人。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install biz-relationship-pulse;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

biz-relationship-pulse 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install biz-relationship-pulse。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

biz-relationship-pulse 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

biz-relationship-pulse 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

biz-relationship-pulse 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

biz-relationship-pulse 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,214 次,近一周安装 130 次,下载 1,009 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

biz-relationship-pulse 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
biz-relationship-pulse

商业关系脉搏 · 本页

3,214—调用外部服务MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
biz-relationship-pulse
description
Scans email and LinkedIn for stalled commercial relationships and surfaces re-ignition candidates with scored briefs. Use when a user wants to warm up cold leads, revive partnerships, or identify investor conversations worth restarting.
license
MIT
compatibility
Requires OpenClaw. Works with any channel configuration.
allowed-tools
web_search web_fetch
metadata

Scope — existing relationships only

This skill re-ignites existing stalled conversations — people the user has previously spoken with and who have gone quiet. It is not for:

  • Cold outreach to people the user has never contacted
  • Lead generation or prospect acquisition
  • Mass outreach or automated sales sequences

Every contact surfaced must already exist in the user's communication history. The opening lines restart real conversations — they do not initiate new ones.


The difference from relationship-pulse

relationship-pulse — personal relationships. People you care about. Friendship maintenance. biz-relationship-pulse — commercial relationships. Deals, partnerships, door-openers, former clients. Revenue and opportunity.

Different detection logic. Different output. Different stakes.


File structure

biz-relationship-pulse/
  SKILL.md
  config.md          ← relationship types, sources, scoring weights, context
  pipeline.md        ← scored contact log, stall reasons, last action, status
  context.md         ← what you're working on now — used to match relevance

Token discipline: weekly cron reads only config.md + pipeline.md + context.md.


What counts as a stalled conversation

A conversation is stalled — not ended — when:

Recency signal:

  • Was actively exchanged (3+ messages back and forth) within the last 18 months
  • Then went quiet for 60+ days with no clean resolution
  • Last message was not a hard no or a natural close ("great working with you, take care")

Momentum signal:

  • The thread contained forward-looking language: "let's reconnect", "follow up next quarter", "send me more when you're ready", "timing isn't right but keep me posted"
  • A concrete next step was mentioned but never happened
  • One party went quiet mid-thread without a clear reason

Relationship type signal:

  • Was tagged or inferable as: prospect, partnership discussion, investor conversation, former client, connector/advisor

Recency of last contact:

  • Cold zone: 6-18 months (most re-ignitable — enough time has passed, not so long it's awkward)
  • Warm zone: 2-6 months (still recent enough, something clearly stalled)
  • Archive zone: 18+ months (surface only if context.md shows a specific reason to reconnect now)

Sources and what to extract

Gmail

  • Search sent + received threads with external contacts
  • Flag: threads with 3+ exchanges that went quiet
  • Extract: last message sender, last message content, any forward-looking language, implied next step
  • Note: who went quiet — did they stop replying, or did you?

LinkedIn (if connected via MCP)

  • Connection requests accepted but no follow-up conversation
  • Message threads that stalled
  • Profile views from people in your network — they looked you up recently, timing may be right
  • Recent job changes or company news for contacts in pipeline.md — a trigger to reach out

WhatsApp (if accessible via channel)

  • Business conversations that went quiet
  • Voice note conversations with no follow-up
  • Group chats with relevant contacts

context.md (internal)

  • What are you actively working on, selling, or building right now?
  • Who would be specifically relevant to current projects?
  • Any names or companies you want to prioritise?

Scoring model

Each candidate contact gets scored across five dimensions:

1. Momentum score (0-3)

  • 3: had explicit next step that never happened, or they said "follow up in X weeks"
  • 2: warm exchange that tapered off, no explicit close
  • 1: light exchange, interest was implied but not stated
  • 0: one-sided (only you reached out) or clearly ended naturally

2. Recency score (0-3)

  • 3: stalled 2-6 months ago (warm zone)
  • 2: stalled 6-12 months ago
  • 1: stalled 12-18 months ago
  • 0: stalled 18+ months ago (unless context.md gives specific reason)

3. Relationship value score (0-3)

  • 3: former client or active deal prospect
  • 2: partnership or collaboration discussion
  • 2: investor or serious door-opener
  • 1: connector or loose advisor conversation
  • 0: unclear or low commercial relevance

4. Context relevance score (0-3)

  • 3: directly relevant to what's in context.md right now
  • 2: adjacent — would be useful but not primary
  • 1: general network value
  • 0: no clear current relevance

5. Re-ignition plausibility score (0-3)

  • 3: there's a natural hook — their company is in the news, they changed roles, something relevant happened
  • 2: time has passed cleanly — "it's been a while" is a natural opener
  • 1: harder to re-open without it feeling like a delayed sales follow-up
  • 0: would feel forced or inappropriate to reach out

Total: 0-15. Surface contacts scoring 8+. If fewer than 3 score 8+, lower threshold to 6+ for that week. Hard cap: surface maximum 5 contacts per week. Quality over quantity.


Setup flow

Step 1 — Connect sources

Confirm which sources are available:

  • Gmail: check if connected
  • LinkedIn MCP: check if connected
  • WhatsApp: check if accessible via channel

Note which are unavailable. The skill runs with whatever is connected — it doesn't fail on missing sources.

Step 2 — Build context.md

This is the most important setup step.

Ask the user: "What are you actively working on right now? What would make a re-connection commercially useful — are you fundraising, selling something, looking for partnerships, hiring, or something else?"

Also ask: "Are there any specific people or companies you've been meaning to reach out to but haven't?"

Write context.md:

# Current Context

## What I'm working on
[Description of current projects, sales focus, fundraising status, etc.]

## Relationship types to prioritise this quarter
[e.g. "investors for Series A", "enterprise clients in DACH", "marketing partnerships"]

## Specific people to watch for
[Names or companies — surface these even if score is below threshold]

## Relationship types to deprioritise
[e.g. "early-stage conversations that went nowhere", "irrelevant industries"]

Step 3 — Write config.md

# Biz Relationship Pulse Config

## Sources
gmail: true
linkedin: true
whatsapp: true

## Relationship types to track
prospects: true
partnerships: true
investors: true
former_clients: true
connectors: true

## Scoring thresholds
surface_above: 8
fallback_threshold: 6
max_per_week: 5

## Stall detection
cold_zone_months: 6-18
warm_zone_months: 2-6
archive_months: 18

## Delivery
channel: [CHANNEL]
to: [TARGET]
day: Monday
time: 08:30

Step 4 — Initial pipeline scan

On first run, do a full scan across all sources going back 18 months. Build pipeline.md with all candidates found. This first run will take longer — worth flagging to the user.

Step 5 — Register cron job

Weekly, Monday morning, isolated, lightContext.

{
  "name": "Biz Relationship Pulse",
  "schedule": { "kind": "cron", "expr": "30 8 * * 1", "tz": "<USER_TIMEZONE>" },
  "sessionTarget": "isolated",
  "wakeMode": "now",
  "payload": {
    "kind": "agentTurn",
    "message": "Run biz-relationship-pulse. Read {baseDir}/config.md, {baseDir}/pipeline.md, and {baseDir}/context.md. Scan connected sources (Gmail, LinkedIn, WhatsApp) for stalled commercial conversations. Score each candidate. Surface top 3-5 scoring 8+ (or 6+ if fewer qualify). For each: write a relationship brief and one specific re-opening message. Update pipeline.md. Deliver via configured channel.",
    "lightContext": true
  },
  "delivery": { "mode": "announce", "channel": "<CHANNEL>", "to": "<TARGET>", "bestEffort": true }
}

Runtime flow

1. Read config, pipeline, context

Load scoring preferences, what's been surfaced before, and current commercial priorities.

2. Scan sources

Gmail scan:

  • Search sent mail for external contacts going back 18 months
  • Find threads with 3+ exchanges that went quiet
  • Extract: last message date, last sender, any forward-looking language
  • Note: did you send last (they went quiet) or did they send last (you went quiet)?

LinkedIn scan (if connected):

  • Check message threads for stalled conversations
  • Check for recent profile views from pipeline contacts
  • Check for job changes or company news from pipeline contacts

WhatsApp scan (if accessible):

  • Check business-context conversations
  • Flag any threads with pending follow-ups

3. Score all candidates

Apply the five-dimension scoring model. Cross-reference context.md for relevance boost. Flag any names mentioned specifically in context.md — surface regardless of score.

4. Pick top 3-5

Select highest scoring contacts not surfaced in the last 4 weeks. Avoid surfacing the same person twice in a month.

5. For each contact — generate the brief

Section A: Who they are and what the relationship was

[NAME] — [Title] at [Company] *Relationship type: [prospect / partner / investor / former client / connector]* *Last contact: [X months ago] via [Gmail / LinkedIn / WhatsApp]*

[One sentence: what the conversation was about] [One sentence: where it stalled and why]


Section B: Why now

Score: [X/15] [The specific reason this person is worth re-igniting now — either a trigger event or a clean time-has-passed window]

Examples of good "why now":

  • "They changed roles 3 weeks ago — natural moment to reconnect"
  • "Their company just announced a funding round — relevant to what you're building"
  • "It's been exactly 6 months since they said 'follow up in Q2'"
  • "You're now working on [X from context.md] — directly relevant to what they were looking for"

If there's no specific trigger, say: "No recent trigger — but 8 months is a clean enough gap that re-opening won't feel like a delayed chase."


Section C: What to say

One specific opening line. Not a template. Written for this person, this context.

Rules:

  • References something specific from the conversation history — not generic
  • Does not feel like a sales follow-up
  • Has a reason to reach out that isn't "just checking in"
  • Short enough to send as-is or with minimal editing
  • Honest about the gap — don't pretend no time has passed

Good:

"Nico — it's been a while since we spoke about [X]. I've been thinking about our conversation re [specific thing they mentioned] — we've since [relevant development]. Worth a quick call to catch up?"

Bad:

"Hi [NAME], hope you're well! I wanted to reach out and reconnect. Are you free for a quick call?"

The opening line is the most important output. If it's generic, the skill has failed.


6. Update pipeline.md

# Pipeline

## [NAME] — [Company]
Type: [prospect / partner / investor / former client / connector]
First contact: [date]
Last contact: [date]
Last source: [Gmail / LinkedIn / WhatsApp]
Stall reason: [inferred — they went quiet / you went quiet / timing / no next step]
Score: [X/15]
Times surfaced: [N]
Last surfaced: [date]
Status: [monitoring / surfaced / reached out / re-engaged / archived]
Notes: [anything relevant from the conversation history]

Context updates

The skill improves the more context.md stays current.

When your situation changes — new project, new funding stage, new product — update context.md: /bizpulse context update "We just launched X and are looking for Y"

The next weekly run will re-score all pipeline contacts against the new context.


Management commands

  • /bizpulse now — run immediately
  • /bizpulse score [name] — see the score and reasoning for a specific contact
  • /bizpulse add [name] [context] — manually add someone to track
  • /bizpulse archive [name] — remove from active tracking
  • /bizpulse sent [name] — mark as reached out (pauses for 30 days)
  • /bizpulse reengaged [name] — mark as re-engaged (moves to active pipeline)
  • /bizpulse context update [text] — update current commercial context
  • /bizpulse history [name] — show full history for a contact
  • /bizpulse pipeline — show full scored pipeline

What makes it good

The opening line has to be specific. That's the whole product. Anyone can surface a list of cold contacts. The skill earns its place by writing the first sentence so you don't have to.

The scoring model distinguishes stalled from ended. A clean goodbye is not a stall. A "let's talk in Q2" that never happened is.

The context.md update loop is the compounding mechanism. A skill running against current priorities is 3x more useful than one running against stale ones.

The "who went quiet" signal matters. If you went quiet on them, the re-opening message is different than if they went quiet on you. The skill tracks this and the opening line reflects it.


Privacy rules

SOUL.md applies. Commercial relationships only. Never surface personal email threads in the business output. If a thread is ambiguous (personal friend who is also a business contact), default to not surfacing unless context.md explicitly includes them.

Names in output are fine — these are professional relationships. Do not include email addresses, phone numbers, or other contact details in the delivery. User already has these. The skill provides context and a message, not a contact dump.

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.68%
按下载量换算824

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills