Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

biz-cac-ltv(商业 cac 电视)

biz-cac-ltv 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

biz-cac-ltv 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 7,230。

总安装 376周安装 16GitHub Stars 125下载 132核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:biz-cac-ltv(商业 cac 电视)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/biz-cac-ltv
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-cac-ltv
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-cac-ltv

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

biz-cac-ltv 聚焦客户获取成本与生命周期价值比,评估营销效率与商业模式可持续性。适用于初创企业融资、市场预算分配或优化用户留存策略等场景。使用时需提供获客支出与客户收入数据,工具计算 LTV:CAC 比率并提供改进方向。安装需通过 npx 添加 GitHub 仓库,建议确认数据来源权限及历史周期长度是否足够。

注意:分类为待分类,强调该比率为核心指标,但需结合 churn rate 等上下文综合判断。

来源仓库内路径:skills/biz-cac-ltv

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-cac-ltv;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

biz-cac-ltv 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-cac-ltv。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

biz-cac-ltv 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

biz-cac-ltv 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

biz-cac-ltv 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

biz-cac-ltv 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 376 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 132 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

biz-cac-ltv 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
biz-cac-ltv

商业 cac 电视 · 本页

376125需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CAC and LTV Analysis

Overview

CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) and LTV (Customer Lifetime Value) are the two fundamental unit economics metrics. Together they answer: "Does each customer generate more revenue than it costs to acquire them?" The LTV:CAC ratio is the single most important indicator of marketing efficiency and business model viability.

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • User evaluating marketing spend efficiency
  • User asks "what's each customer worth?" or "are we spending too much on marketing?"
  • User assessing business model viability or fundraising metrics
  • User needs to allocate budget across acquisition channels

When NOT to use:

  • For product pricing decisions → use Pricing Strategy
  • For customer segmentation → use STP or RFM
  • For comprehensive financial analysis → use financial ratios

Framework

IRON LAW: LTV:CAC > 3 for Healthy Business

LTV:CAC ratio must be at least 3:1 for sustainable businesses.
- < 1:1 = You're LOSING money on every customer
- 1-3:1 = Unsustainable unless you can reduce CAC or increase LTV
- 3-5:1 = Healthy
- > 5:1 = Potentially underinvesting in growth (leaving market share on the table)

This ratio applies to the BLENDED average. Individual channels can be
below 3:1 if the overall blend exceeds it.
IRON LAW: CAC Must Include ALL Acquisition Costs

CAC = Total marketing & sales spend / Number of new customers acquired

"Total spend" includes: ad spend, marketing team salaries, sales team
salaries, tools, content production, events — EVERYTHING spent to acquire
customers in that period. Excluding salaries or tools understates true CAC.

Step 1: Calculate CAC

Basic formula:

CAC = Total acquisition spend in period / New customers acquired in period

By channel:

CAC (Channel X) = Spend on Channel X / Customers from Channel X

Include in total acquisition spend:

  • Advertising (digital + offline)
  • Marketing team compensation
  • Sales team compensation (for B2B)
  • Marketing tools and software
  • Content production costs
  • Events and sponsorships
  • Agency fees

Step 2: Calculate LTV

Simple formula:

LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % × Average Customer Lifespan

Where:

  • ARPU = Average Revenue Per User per period (monthly or annual)
  • Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue
  • Average Customer Lifespan = 1 / Churn Rate

Cohort-based (more accurate): Track actual revenue per customer cohort over time. Sum cumulative revenue per customer, apply gross margin.

Step 3: Calculate Key Ratios

MetricFormulaHealthy Benchmark
LTV:CACLTV / CAC> 3:1
Payback PeriodCAC / (ARPU × Gross Margin)< 12 months
CAC % of LTVCAC / LTV × 100< 33%

Step 4: Segment Analysis

Calculate CAC and LTV by:

  • Channel: Which acquisition channels are most efficient?
  • Customer segment: Which segments have highest LTV:CAC?
  • Cohort: Is LTV improving or degrading over time?

Step 5: Optimization Strategies

To reduce CAC:

  • Shift budget to lower-CAC channels
  • Improve conversion rates (better landing pages, sales process)
  • Increase organic/referral acquisition (content, word-of-mouth)

To increase LTV:

  • Reduce churn (improve product, customer success)
  • Increase ARPU (upsell, cross-sell, price increases)
  • Extend customer lifespan (loyalty programs, switching costs)

Output Format

# CAC-LTV Analysis: {Company/Product}

## Unit Economics Summary

| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Status |
|--------|-------|-----------|--------|
| CAC (blended) | ${X} | — | — |
| LTV | ${X} | — | — |
| LTV:CAC | {X}:1 | > 3:1 | ✓/✗ |
| Payback Period | {X} months | < 12 months | ✓/✗ |

## CAC by Channel

| Channel | Spend | Customers | CAC | % of Total |
|---------|-------|-----------|-----|-----------|
| {channel} | ${X} | {N} | ${X} | {X%} |

## LTV Calculation

- ARPU: ${X}/month
- Gross Margin: {X%}
- Avg Lifespan: {X} months (churn rate: {X%}/month)
- LTV = ${X}

## LTV:CAC by Segment

| Segment | CAC | LTV | Ratio | Action |
|---------|-----|-----|-------|--------|
| {seg A} | ${X} | ${X} | {X}:1 | Invest / Maintain / Cut |

## Optimization Recommendations
1. ...
2. ...

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: CAC-LTV for a Taiwanese B2C subscription box (monthly NT$599)

CAC calculation:

ItemMonthly Spend
Facebook/Instagram adsNT$200,000
Google AdsNT$80,000
KOL partnershipsNT$50,000
Marketing team (2 people)NT$120,000
TotalNT$450,000

New customers in month: 300 CAC = NT$450,000 / 300 = NT$1,500

LTV calculation:

  • ARPU: NT$599/month
  • Gross Margin: 55%
  • Monthly churn: 8% → Avg lifespan: 1/0.08 = 12.5 months
  • LTV = NT$599 × 0.55 × 12.5 = NT$4,118

LTV:CAC = 4,118 / 1,500 = 2.75:1 — Below the 3:1 threshold. Need to either reduce CAC or improve retention.

Incorrect Application

What went wrong:

  • CAC calculated as "ad spend / new customers" only, excluding NT$120K/month marketing team salary → True CAC is NT$1,500, not NT$1,100. Violates Iron Law: include ALL acquisition costs.
  • LTV:CAC of 1.8:1 reported as "good because we're growing" → Growth at LTV:CAC < 3:1 means you're growing into larger losses. Violates Iron Law: ratio must be > 3:1.

Gotchas

  • Attribution is messy: A customer who saw an Instagram ad, Googled your brand, then signed up via a referral link — which channel gets credit? Be consistent in attribution methodology (first-touch, last-touch, or multi-touch).
  • Blended vs marginal CAC: Blended CAC includes all channels. Marginal CAC is the cost of acquiring ONE MORE customer. As you scale, marginal CAC typically rises (best channels saturate first).
  • LTV is always an estimate: Future churn and spending behavior are uncertain. Use conservative assumptions and update with real cohort data as it accumulates.
  • Payback period matters for cash flow: Even with LTV:CAC of 5:1, if payback takes 24 months, you need significant upfront capital. Fast-growing companies can die from long payback periods despite great unit economics.
  • Negative churn is a superpower: If expansion revenue (upsells) exceeds lost revenue (churn), Net Revenue Retention > 100%. This means LTV grows over time — the best possible scenario.

Scripts

ScriptDescriptionUsage
scripts/cac_ltv.pyCompute CAC, LTV, LTV/CAC ratio, and payback periodpython scripts/cac_ltv.py --help

Run python scripts/cac_ltv.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.

References

  • For cohort-based LTV calculation methods, see references/cohort-ltv.md
  • For channel attribution models, see references/attribution-models.md

平台分布

Codex

36.84%
按下载量换算49

Claude

27.16%
按下载量换算36

Cursor

19.7%
按下载量换算26

Gemini CLI

10.3%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills